I've noticed that ST is a common place for people to post questions asking for reviews of coaches, products, etc. I've done it myself before.
I used to ask these 'review' type questions on the forum, when I was looking for honest, unbiased, uninfluenced opinions on the item or service in question. Good or bad, fair or not, I'd take it (and with a big grain of salt.)
Sometimes, the dealer/vendor/coach of the item being reviewed chimes in on the post. (In the posts I've seen from them it always has been in a nice, thoughtful, and 'we're here to help' type of way, and hasn't been antagonstic at all. I do appreciate their willingness to be helpful and available.)
Thing is, I've realized since I've had several of those vendors reply on my threads, that I'm not asking the questions anymore. I'm simply not interested in hearing at all from the vendor or coach in question, precisely because I want to hear unfiltered , unbiased opinions from real users on how it has worked out for them. The moment that coach/vendor shows up, there is a bias - people will be more hesitant to post negatively. At least a few threads I've seen have ended abruptly after a coach showed up and said, "I'll be happy to answer your questions - just email us and we'll help you out.' Not that that's a bad answer, but it clearly shut off the willingness of other people who had critiques of the program, as sometimes there were more than several legitimate critiques posted immediately prior.
In academic science, when we discuss research or even products, we place a valuable premium on being able to have group discussions without having the original author present where we can be as harsh as we want about the data and the science without worrying about hurting someone's feelings or withholding judgment because we don't want to be perceived as rude. We're basically trying to take the personal aspect of the author out of the issue completely. (On the converse, we also have separate sessions where we're happy to invite the person to the discussion, but we know it will be a different type of discussion.)
At least for me, it's come to the point where I won't even ask a review question about coaching whatsoever on ST because of the high probability that the coach will chime in, and I also heavily discount threads regarding reviews of various services when I see the vendor/coach chime in. Just curious what others felt about this practice. (Yes, I have my flamesuit on.)
I used to ask these 'review' type questions on the forum, when I was looking for honest, unbiased, uninfluenced opinions on the item or service in question. Good or bad, fair or not, I'd take it (and with a big grain of salt.)
Sometimes, the dealer/vendor/coach of the item being reviewed chimes in on the post. (In the posts I've seen from them it always has been in a nice, thoughtful, and 'we're here to help' type of way, and hasn't been antagonstic at all. I do appreciate their willingness to be helpful and available.)
Thing is, I've realized since I've had several of those vendors reply on my threads, that I'm not asking the questions anymore. I'm simply not interested in hearing at all from the vendor or coach in question, precisely because I want to hear unfiltered , unbiased opinions from real users on how it has worked out for them. The moment that coach/vendor shows up, there is a bias - people will be more hesitant to post negatively. At least a few threads I've seen have ended abruptly after a coach showed up and said, "I'll be happy to answer your questions - just email us and we'll help you out.' Not that that's a bad answer, but it clearly shut off the willingness of other people who had critiques of the program, as sometimes there were more than several legitimate critiques posted immediately prior.
In academic science, when we discuss research or even products, we place a valuable premium on being able to have group discussions without having the original author present where we can be as harsh as we want about the data and the science without worrying about hurting someone's feelings or withholding judgment because we don't want to be perceived as rude. We're basically trying to take the personal aspect of the author out of the issue completely. (On the converse, we also have separate sessions where we're happy to invite the person to the discussion, but we know it will be a different type of discussion.)
At least for me, it's come to the point where I won't even ask a review question about coaching whatsoever on ST because of the high probability that the coach will chime in, and I also heavily discount threads regarding reviews of various services when I see the vendor/coach chime in. Just curious what others felt about this practice. (Yes, I have my flamesuit on.)