Lavender Room
Login required to started new threads
Login required to post replies
Re: Trump MI lawsuit witness [CallMeMaybe]
[ In reply to ]
Re: Trump MI lawsuit witness [CallMeMaybe]
[ In reply to ]
CallMeMaybe wrote:
jharris wrote:
Actually, it was: Let the record show, “showing ID should be the basic requirement”.
But, hey... hear what you want to hear. Regardless, let the shit show continue.
(Let the record stand I have followed zero on the recount process except for this thread and a few clips shown that I just watched)
Jharris, there’s a time and place for everything. Voter ID requirements are established by the state legislature, not election workers or judges or attendees at a fake hearing.
So, if a person has a problem with voter ID laws, they should take it up with the state legislature.
Correct. It is a state issue....
WIsconsin is an ID state. So, I don’t need to call anyone....
I do think ID is a good idea and all states should do it. My opinion.
Re: Trump MI lawsuit witness [jharris]
[ In reply to ]
jharris wrote:
CallMeMaybe wrote:
jharris wrote:
Actually, it was: Let the record show, “showing ID should be the basic requirement”.
But, hey... hear what you want to hear. Regardless, let the shit show continue.
(Let the record stand I have followed zero on the recount process except for this thread and a few clips shown that I just watched)
Jharris, there’s a time and place for everything. Voter ID requirements are established by the state legislature, not election workers or judges or attendees at a fake hearing.
So, if a person has a problem with voter ID laws, they should take it up with the state legislature.
Correct. It is a state issue....
WIsconsin is an ID state. So, I don’t need to call anyone....
I do think ID is a good idea and all states should do it. My opinion.
But nobody cares about that opinion when the subject is “evidence of fraud” in the election. You and the chick at the “hearing” are bringing up irrelevant information about voter ID laws that has no bearing on fraud.
Frequently, a motion to strike is filed with a motion to dismiss in order to strike out all the irrelevant crap a plaintiff includes in the lawsuit. It would be marvelous if we could magically strike out the irrelevant nonsense spouted by Trump and his allies.
Re: Trump MI lawsuit witness [kiki]
[ In reply to ]
Re: Trump MI lawsuit witness [g_lev]
[ In reply to ]
g_lev wrote:
kiki wrote:
can we get back to talking about Rudy's audible? Best laugh in days.It was real
We've gone from fake news to fart news. This administration delivers.
Re: Trump MI lawsuit witness [chaparral]
[ In reply to ]
I know everyone has their own tastes, but is that a flattering picture?
Re: Trump MI lawsuit witness [chaparral]
[ In reply to ]
"31" ...... ummmm, riiiiiiight
RayGovett
Hughson CA
Be Prepared-- Strike Swiftly -- Who Dares Wins- Without warning-"it will be hard. I can do it"
Re: Trump MI lawsuit witness [g_lev]
[ In reply to ]
Snopes has also confirmed.
week on week, he brings comedy gold. Wonder if he's getting berated behind the scenes by the Chief.
week on week, he brings comedy gold. Wonder if he's getting berated behind the scenes by the Chief.
Re: Trump MI lawsuit witness [raygovett]
[ In reply to ]
my sense is she is there to pivot if an opportunity doesn't play out.
Somewhere she claims she's joined up with an "ethical hacking" group. IT training, aspirations as a 'face', and a big jones for Trump -- she made her play and has hit the front page.
lots of hustle. If she gets the right agent it's next stop Celebrity Big Brother . . .
Somewhere she claims she's joined up with an "ethical hacking" group. IT training, aspirations as a 'face', and a big jones for Trump -- she made her play and has hit the front page.
lots of hustle. If she gets the right agent it's next stop Celebrity Big Brother . . .
Re: Trump MI lawsuit witness [kiki]
[ In reply to ]
kiki wrote:
my sense is she is there to pivot if an opportunity doesn't play out. Somewhere she claims she's joined up with an "ethical hacking" group. IT training, aspirations as a 'face', and a big jones for Trump -- she made her play and has hit the front page.
lots of hustle. If she gets the right agent it's next stop Celebrity Big Brother . . .
Real Housewives of Detroit
Calling Andy Cohen!!!
"What's your claim?" - Ben Gravy
"Your best work is the work you're excited about" - Rick Rubin
Re: Trump MI lawsuit witness [kiki]
[ In reply to ]
kiki wrote:
lots of hustle. If she gets the right agent it's next stop Celebrity Big Brother . . .
Fox News Anchor?
Re: Trump MI lawsuit witness [CallMeMaybe]
[ In reply to ]
anybody else think it's ironic that her last name is Carone...Karen with a C.
Re: Trump MI lawsuit witness [ThisIsIt]
[ In reply to ]
ThisIsIt wrote:
I know everyone has their own tastes, but is that a flattering picture?Not a flattering look at all, and does not appear to be a professional photo either. TBH - her look does nothing for me anyway.
Re: Trump MI lawsuit witness [rick_pcfl]
[ In reply to ]
That is awesome.