gregtryin wrote:
You conveniently left out that crucial aspect called context. Here is the full quote. Carlson last week railed against the economics of immigration—bringing up the highly publicized migrant caravan—before slamming American leaders' immigration views.
"Our leaders demand that you shut up and accept this," he said on his show. "We have a moral obligation to admit the world's poor, they tell us, even if it makes our own country poorer, and dirtier, and more divided. Immigration is a form of atonement. Previous leaders of our country committed sins; we must pay for those sins by welcoming an endless chain of migrant caravans. That's the argument they make."
The point he was making was that the views of ‘American leaders’ (the Democratic ones, I suppose) was that the country should throw open our arms and welcome any and all immigrants regardless of their past history or what their motives are. Note that the topic was the numerous migrant caravans made up primarily of unskilled people, human traffickers, and crooks that were moving toward the southern border at the time with full intentions of taking advantage of Obama’s idiotic immigration policies. His point was that we have to have some sort of control over immigration. That’s not white supremacy.
White supremacy views people of color as crooks, human traffickers and unskilled worthless humans. That is the definition of white supremacy.
When you argue that immigrants make our country poorer, and dirtier, and more divided because immigrants are made up “primarily of unskilled people, human traffickers, and crooks,” you believe the white supremacy narrative. You’re going in circles.
