JacobB1111 wrote:
I totally agree. It's unprovable who is faster, and that is the exact point I am making.
Why are ST's obsessed with "Well, Allen/Scott/Whoever could have been faster with XYZ piece of gear."
Maybe, maybe not. In swimming, we don't say "Well, Mark Spitz could have gone head to head with Phelps if he had modern training, modern suits, shaved his mustache, worn goggles, had a better pool. But if Phelps had to swim only twice like Spitz instead of prelims/semi's/finals he would have been even faster because he would have swum like 8 fewer races."
Seriously. Stop. It's dumb.
"The person on top of the mountain didn't fall there." - unkown
also rule 5