40-Tude wrote:
I didn't see the exchange so I don't know what Kerry was saying in the hearing. Massie is a hardcore STEM guy from MIT. So if Kerry was arguing scientifically, but with some fundamental misunderstandings or misconceptions in his argument, I could see a science guy calling him out, or his credentials.
Or is Massie an Ass and just playing party line politics? And the abbreviation is Poli Sci, not Poly. And of course it's not a science like other disciplines based on the scientific method of data driven controlled experimentation.
Yes.
Here's the transcript:
Massie: Secretary Kerry, I want to read part of your statement back to you. “Instead of convening a kangaroo court, the president might want to talk with the educated adults he once trusted to fill his top national security positions.” It sounds like you’re questioning the credentials of the president’s advisers currently, but I don’t think we should question your credentials today. Isn’t it true you have a science degree from Yale?
Kerry: A bachelor of arts degree.
Massie: Is it a political science degree?
Kerry: Yes, political science.
Massie: So how do you get a bachelor of arts in a science [degree]?
Kerry: Well, it’s liberal arts education and degree, it’s a bachelor.
Massie: OK, so it’s not really science. So I think it’s somewhat appropriate that someone with a pseudoscience degree is here pushing pseudoscience in front of our committee today.
Kerry: Are you serious? This is really, seriously happening here?
Massie: You know what? It is serious, you’re calling the president’s Cabinet a kangaroo court, is that serious?
Kerry: I’m not calling his Cabinet a kangaroo court, I’m calling this committee he’s putting together a kangaroo committee.
Massie: Are you saying he doesn’t have educated adults there now?
Kerry: I don’t know who he it yet, because it’s secret.