JSA wrote:
Absolutely unreal. What a messed up process.
In the US, to have a "qualifying disability" under the Americans with Disabilities Act, you must be "able to perform the essential functions of the job with or without accommodation." So, for example, to be protected as an individual diagnosed as an addict, you have to be drug/alcohol free. So, if you show up to work drunk or high, and claim to be protected as an addict, you lose, because showing up to work under the influence does not make on able to perform the essential functions of the job.
In this case, her theft and doctoring of records would disqualify her.
If you were an opioid addict and showed up high, you could function with accommodation in the form of narcan.
Note: im not advocating this, just looking for ways to argue it out of boredom.
who's smarter than you're? i'm!