chaparral wrote:
It really is crazy, trump knew to throw in the whole, "and Mexico will pay for it." Because everyone would look at the cost and see it is a terrible idea, it is just a waste of money to address the issue, but if someone else is paying for it, why not? But now we are paying for it, so did everyone forget why he threw in that Mexico would pay for it? We all agreed it was a waste of money for America, now suddenly it is not?
Also, become an Official Wall Member, because you want it on the record how dumb you are.
If this webpage is real, it looks false and misleading, by impliedly suggesting that contributions would be allocated to fund the wall. That’s not how appropriations work. Note too the $2700 highest contribution which I believe is the limit on individual POLITICAL donations. This is fundraising masquerading as wall financing, at least that’s the appearance. This seems to be of dubious legality to me.
Separately, I can’t understand how a narrative has developed that Trump is trying to keep his campaign promise. American taxpayers never were supposed to fund the wall. “Mexico will pay for it.”
Anyone attempting to distort that clear promise, repeated by Trump ad nauseum, is just a shill for Trump.
To the OP, there’s no reason to disseminate the ravings of a few extreme, outlier commentators. They bring to mind the adage does a tree make sound when it falls in the forest. It does, but only the nuts buried by the squirrels nearby are there to hear it.