Its just so strange to me how a grown up can talk out of both sides of his mouth so often.
Lavender Room
Login required to started new threads
Login required to post replies
Re: So looks like the NYT isnt "fake news" and anonymous sources are to be believed [patentattorney]
[ In reply to ]
Oh look, todays 40th Trump thread where the OP can't even be bothered to make a point.
yawn
Re: So looks like the NYT isnt "fake news" and anonymous sources are to be believed [A-A-Ron]
[ In reply to ]
I think he's talking about Rosenstein's proposal a year ago to secretly record Trump and get him ousted under 25th Amendment.
________
It doesn't really matter what Phil is saying, the music of his voice is the appropriate soundtrack for a bicycle race. HTupolev
________
It doesn't really matter what Phil is saying, the music of his voice is the appropriate soundtrack for a bicycle race. HTupolev
Re: So looks like the NYT isnt "fake news" and anonymous sources are to be believed [patentattorney]
[ In reply to ]
patentattorney wrote:
Its just so strange to me how a grown up can talk out of both sides of his mouth so often.Hahaha!
"So there an anonymous accusation made in the NYT- Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein suggested last year that he should make covert audio recordings of President Trump in order to build a case for removing him from office, according to a New York Times report."
And somehow Trump is in the wrong here?
Re: So looks like the NYT isnt "fake news" and anonymous sources are to be believed [getcereal]
[ In reply to ]
getcereal wrote:
And somehow Trump is in the wrong here?I think the point trying to be made is Trump called Woodward's claim about some people discussing invoking the 25th "fabricated stories," but this NYT story corroborates Woodward.
Also Rosenstein's denial is a non-denial.
Re: So looks like the NYT isnt "fake news" and anonymous sources are to be believed [trail]
[ In reply to ]
trail wrote:
getcereal wrote:
And somehow Trump is in the wrong here?I think the point trying to be made is Trump called Woodward's claim about some people discussing invoking the 25th "fabricated stories," but this NYT story corroborates Woodward.
Also Rosenstein's denial is a non-denial.
More to the point Trump says anonymous sources can’t be believed and the failing NYT is fake news.
Um, sometimes I guess.
How does Danny Hart sit down with balls that big?
Re: So looks like the NYT isnt "fake news" and anonymous sources are to be believed [getcereal]
[ In reply to ]
And somehow Trump is in the wrong here?
Re: So looks like the NYT isnt "fake news" and anonymous sources are to be believed [Sanuk]
[ In reply to ]
Sanuk wrote:
And somehow Trump is in the wrong here? I still don't get it. Everyone know the NYT is left leaning bullshit. Did Trump say something?
Re: So looks like the NYT isnt "fake news" and anonymous sources are to be believed [trail]
[ In reply to ]
Quote:
Also Rosenstein's denial is a non-denial.Huh?
“The New York Times’s story is inaccurate and factually incorrect,” he said in a statement. “I will not further comment on a story based on anonymous sources who are obviously biased against the department and are advancing their own personal agenda. But let me be clear about this: Based on my personal dealings with the president, there is no basis to invoke the 25th Amendment.”
Slowguy
(insert pithy phrase here...)
Re: So looks like the NYT isnt "fake news" and anonymous sources are to be believed [getcereal]
[ In reply to ]
getcereal wrote:
Sanuk wrote:
And somehow Trump is in the wrong here? I still don't get it. Everyone know the NYT is left leaning bullshit. Did Trump say something?[/quote]
And everybody knows Don is a chronic liar. Maybe you should try reading Woodward's book. I just finished it about half an hour ago.
Re: So looks like the NYT isnt "fake news" and anonymous sources are to be believed [slowguy]
[ In reply to ]
slowguy wrote:
Quote:
Also Rosenstein's denial is a non-denial.Huh?
“The New York Times’s story is inaccurate and factually incorrect,” he said in a statement. “I will not further comment on a story based on anonymous sources who are obviously biased against the department and are advancing their own personal agenda. But let me be clear about this: Based on my personal dealings with the president, there is no basis to invoke the 25th Amendment.”
Nowhere does he deny the primary claims. It reads like lawyer-speak. "Based on my personal dealings." That leaves wiggle room
That woman, etc.