natethomas wrote:
Definitely not anything near pro, but humbled.
I guess what I'm hoping to accomplish by getting in a lot of bike miles is coming off the bike at IMLP feeling pretty fresh and ready to have a good run. In my last two IM's I've gone from a good spot for a KQ to not so great on the run. I could write a lot about what happened (details are in my blog), but I feel I've under-performed in my two previous IM's and want to nail this one.
I also really enjoy biking, and the majority is on the trainer and pretty quick to do - compared to getting to the pool, change, swim, change, then get home. Maybe I'm in the minority in that I enjoy the training and wouldn't mind doing even more - if there were 26 hours in the day I'd be all for it to fit more training in.
Nate (you're probably sick of me chiming in, but I can't help it...)
There is some data on 'critical volume'. Although I think there is a line of diminishing returns, being able to handle to wear and tear of the IM distance is important. You are a veteran on intermediate distance races and have years of volume in you, but still Kropelnick believes that you should do: 9/3 x the distance (of the race) for the S; 8/3 x the distance for the B and 7/3 x the distance for the run. Those are peak weeks. It proves durability more than anything else. And very few of us mortals can get that kind of volume in so compromises need to me made.
http://kropelnicki.com/critical-volume-again/ Your B and R volume, like most non-pro IM triathletes are a tad light, but not much. Pretty hard to hold 300 miles/week on the bike and 60 miles/week on the run for several weeks. I'm a little worried for you regarding the run volume you've held and how it may affect you late in the IM race.
You can get in higher quality with less time (a la EN) with improved efficiency by adding in some intensity. Same TSS doing a 4 hr bike with long periods of HIM pace than a Z2 6 hr ride. Time on your feet for the run is important for those who don't have cumulative miles in their feet, IMO. It's pretty hard to maintain 40/50+ miles/week running when putting in all the other training-oh and trying to keep the family unit together.
I always laugh and still use their 'SAU' theme. My spousal approval units are spent in the few months closer to race day when you need to up the volume-especially that last training block prior to taper.
There are lots of different thoughts on training methods and strategies and a coach might well be the best thing for you. The nutrition/BR thing needs to be figured out and timing the taper and deciding how to best peak and which workouts you like and respond best to. The IM run is all about not slowing down and holding that best pace right until the end. Racing with power helps to avoid 'overbiking' but doesn't suggest why your run has not been optimal.
You are only 6 weeks away from IMLP so I'm not sure much change can be made at this point.
What will you peak at for bike and run volume (for at least 2 weeks) this year?
Why do you think you did not perform well on the last few IM runs?
edited to add congrats on the nice progression in your USAT ranking from 88>97 over the past few years. Wow. Very solid improvement.