So we've done quite a bit of work on this with a couple of pro teams and the reality is that it's really all still on a continuum of benefits and tradeoffs... as much as we always want this stuff to be cut and dried, it just never is!!
Here's what we found last year, sorry, can't yet tell you what we are doing THIS year! (but the directionality is similar)
1. Sealant just works better at lower pressures.. that sealant blowing through a hole just has a way better shot at coagulating and hardening when the pressure differential is 24psi-ambient than it does when the differential is 100psi-ambient, so testing it over and over again, you will just NEVER get similar results on road as MTN
2. All sealants seem to exist on a continuum running between fast sealing/fast drying to slow sealing/lasts a long time. This is a major reason that we never entered this market, the science is pretty sound and everybody really just has to stake their claim somewhere on the continuum as being 'better sealing' or 'doesn't dry out' etc.. We've replicated this in our testing over and over. Last year Orange Seal joined forces with Bora after testing showed that it was the best as sealing flats in classics style racing and we used it in both tubulars and latex tubed clinchers off and on all year, but the reality is that it requires care and attention and it dries out faster than would be ideal. Similarly, we tried others which didn't dry out, but they also didn't really work to seal hardly any flats.. so there's the tradeoff.
3. Orange Seal and CafeLatex worked best with latex tubes at sealing flats in our testing, Orange seal fixed more flats, CafeLatex lasted longer.. As a pro with somebody else doing the work I'd pick OrangeSeal, if I was maintaining it, I'd pick Cafe Latex
4. Some sealants just don't work at all at road pressures.. Not naming names, but Stan's would be a third place finisher on this list and if I didn't name your name, you just didn't work, or if you are a new or tiny brand maybe we just didn't try you, but we tried lots of sealants with lots of name brands and different marketing and they are all somewhere on this continuum and most of them didn't work so well.
5. Work the numbers. In a pro team, the wheels are set up with various tires for different events and that setup sort of defines the probability of flatting. If we are pulling out the 28's for a Flanders or Strade Bianchi then sealant makes a lot of sense.. these tires are used for just a few months per year and the flat risk is high while the pressures are low. If we have the rider on 23's, then the surfaces are good, the flat risk is low and the pressures are high.. you can see the interplay here that when the flat risk is low, the pressures also tend to be higher which significantly reduces the effectiveness of the sealant anyway.. so for those events not as worth it.
6. When running tubeless it is almost always a benefit and rarely a detriment. For TT's EF has been running Vittoria Corsa Speed TLR tubeless setups, where the sealant not only helps seal the system on install but also reduces pressure loss over time, AND it might possibly also help seal a flat.. This is a much more favorable scenario to running sealant in latex where sealant often times is adding little benefit at the cost of a lot of headache around install and maintenance.
Best of luck!
Josh
http://www.SILCA.cc Check out my podcast, inside stories from more than 20 years of product and tech innovation from inside the Pro Peloton and Pro Triathlon worlds!
http://www.marginalgainspodcast.cc