Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Crank length
Quote | Reply
I'm just nshy of 5'11 and have an 88cm inseam.

Currently riding 175 cranks. Any reason to switch over to 172.5 aside from the reported ease of achieving higher cadence or the reported extra strain when climbing?



Thanks
Quote Reply
Re: Crank length [Bearis] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Nope. You very likely wouldn't notice a difference at all. Save your $


<If you're gonna be dumb, you gotta be tough>
Get Fitter!
Proud member of the Smartasscrew, MONSTER CLUB
Get your FIX today?
Quote Reply
Re: Crank length [Bearis] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
rather than say you won't notice a difference, I'd say you seem to be the right size for 175. i'm 5'9" with an 83cm inseam and the 175 felt great climbing at low cadence but were hard for me to spin over 95rpm. go borrow a bike with the shorter crank length for a try or buy a cheap used pair if you're undecided

Irony can be humorous, but it does not have to be.

"I've always said that an Ironman is a reflection of your character" - Kevin Moats
Quote Reply
Re: Crank length [Bearis] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
IMO, the best way to est. how different the 172.5 cranks would be compared to 175's would be to plug in your drivetrain specs into sheldon's gain ration calculator.

http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gain.html



-----------------------
Proud member of Team Tooth Pick (TTP): like a leaf in the wind.
Quote Reply
Re: Crank length [Bearis] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
With an 88cm inseam I think there is more reason to switch to 177.5 or 180 cranks than 172.5 for a steady state effort.
Quote Reply