Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Gravel Bike. Who has what?
Quote | Reply
Looking at getting a Gravel Bike for a bit of off-road fun.
Not a lot of choices in my local area and was just wondering if anyone can recommend some brands I can research. Want a 1x
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
If you care about brand pedigree and bragging rights skip this post. I went to a local LBS and they showed me a Fuji Jari ... its features and capabilities were quite impressive. Tire clearance, mounting options and versatility. Not to mention always on sale somewhere.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I’m super happy with my Santa Cruz Stigmana; not the most obvious choice but hit the right notes for me.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I had a 2011 Trek X01 CX bike that is converted to gravel over the year and it worked fine for 98% of the rides I go on. As I started entering longer and more adventurous tires I realized I was going to need wider tires (the Trek could run 38 rear, 40 up front). I have some epic rides planned for next year and just picked up a new 2019 Salsa Warbird and am in love. The big thing for me was the ability to run either 700c or 650b wheels, which allows me to go up to a 2.1” mountain bike tire. If you’re just getting started keep an eye out on something used until you learn what type of terrain you enjoy... gravel is an all encompassing word.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Jonboy wrote:
Looking at getting a Gravel Bike for a bit of off-road fun.
Not a lot of choices in my local area and was just wondering if anyone can recommend some brands I can research. Want a 1x

I have a Raleigh Clubman. I built some 650b wheels for it and run Clement 42mm tires (same outer diameter as 700c x 28, so I can still run the fenders it came with) and it's awesome. It's not 1x but nothing really stopping me from putting a 1x crank on it if I wanted to do that.

There are a LOT of choices out there these days, from using a CX frame to a rigid MTB frame with drop bars.

Less is more.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Jonboy wrote:
Looking at getting a Gravel Bike for a bit of off-road fun.
Not a lot of choices in my local area and was just wondering if anyone can recommend some brands I can research. Want a 1x

You might check this thread.... 9 pages of gravel bike porn and discussion
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Big brand- Trek Checkpoint
Other popular bikes- Santa Cruz Stigmata, Ibis Hakka MX, Niner.
Scott makes a nice gravel bike too-

Obscure but nice- Norco.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
 
You could do a lot worse than a Felt Breed: https://feltbicycles.com/...-30-gravel-road-bike
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Salsa Warbird, carbon frame with Force drive train. Great bike!
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Chan] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I also picked up a Fuji Jari. I was looking at the Ibis and the Norco but decided that I wanted something a little bit more beater so as to ride around the city and commute without worrying and wanted to save some money so as to get my next mountain bike sooner and radder.

It’s got good spec, great versatility, very good tire clearance and options for adding 650B and all sorts of panniers and fenders. And, the price is right. I’m not gonna be getting any elite cyclocross podiums but it’s perfectly capable. W a small portion of the money I saved I added a stages left-only power meter and now this is my main non-mtb bike
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [devolikewhoa83] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Raleigh Stuntman. I love it. No longer available, sadly.
Last edited by: hiro11: Nov 3, 18 14:30
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Jonboy wrote:
Looking at getting a Gravel Bike ...Want a 1x

While a lot of people do 1X, it probably isn't the best for gravel if there is any sustained climbing. 1X is nice for CX where weight and simplicity matter a lot more.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I have a Cannondale CAADX that I'm about to put an adventure crank on (most likely 48/32) to replace the 46/36 it came with, but I ardently did not want a 1X because I like closer gear ratios. I looked really hard at upgrading and at the Specialized Diverge, but at the end of the day there's nothing right now spec'd such that I am willing to shell out for it. If I'm going to have to tinker, I may as well upgrade the perfectly good bike I already have - as much as not doing n+1 pains me.

My husband has a Trek Checkpoint that he absolutely adores. It was a replacement for a Ridley X-Trail that he really, really wanted but just never fit him quite right. Those are both are great bikes.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I just got a Niner from Competitive Cyclist. It was $2200 with Ultegra components, Zipp service course fixed parts, and some nice Easton hoops. I’ve only ridden it to the track so far for run intervals since I’m tapering for Ironman Arizona and not ready to focus on cross/gravel, but it’s fun riding thru ditches and stuff taking shortcuts I couldn’t take with my tri bike! đź„

Oh, I went 2x but they’re really good to work with if you want to switch components out.



Cheers,

thechromedome
http://www.favoritefinishlines.blogspot.com
http://www.cupcakecartel.org
My 20% off code for 2018 FS Series races: tricred18
"there are no drafters in heaven" - C Bonner
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'm in the process of converting to disc... so my Gravel bike is my main road bike right now.

Parlee Z-Zero XD.. 8070/9170 Integra/DA mix, Enve 4.5ARs
Last edited by: spntrxi: Nov 3, 18 15:10
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
S-works crux. I think it was a Dirty Kanza edition or something like that. No complaints. I wouldn't want to switch it to 1x.

Dimond Bikes Superfan
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I love my Salsa Warbird.

clm
Nashville, TN
https://twitter.com/ironclm | http://ironclm.typepad.com
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I have a motobecane cross bike. I want a Otso Warkin. Maybe in a few years I'll upgrade.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Jonboy wrote:
Looking at getting a Gravel Bike for a bit of off-road fun.
Not a lot of choices in my local area and was just wondering if anyone can recommend some brands I can research. Want a 1x

what i've found is that the same ambivalence to geometric care that plagued tri bikes until, this decade now plagues gravel bikes. this is in 2 areas: bottom bracket drop; and more importantly fit. stack and reach type stuff. nobody really knows why they're making their bikes the way they're making them. or if they do they aren't expressing it.

the first thing you need to do, in my opinion, is decide what gravel means to you. as a bike style. a riding style. does it mean mostly road, in terms of position? it does for me. but it might not for you. once you decide that, then you should look carefully at the geometries of these bikes. i can point to bikes that i absolutely love in terms of value, spec, features, but i just could never ride them.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
This is not the most popular brand out there but I absolutely LOVE my Foundry Overland. I've used it all over Bend, OR for everything from singletrack MTB trails to fire roads and even as a standby road machine. One of my favorite bikes I've owned!
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I agree with this-
Part of this is forks- Enve and Parlee only make 47mm rake forks in cross/gravel models with the most clearance.
For me, the 55mm rake Seven Matador fork was a game changer. Handles so nice with a 71 degree head angle- And I was able to design all of the toe clip overlap out of the bike-

Other two things that bug me are:
1.) Components/groups. SRAM is firmly in the 1x camp, Shimano 2x.
There are problems with both of these approaches-
SRAM doesn't make clutch derailleurs for their road type derailleurs- So no Red or ETAP for wide range cassettes.
SRAM ETAP front derailleur runs into large tires (in some cases).
Shimano doesn't make the cassette sizes that they need- They need an 11-36 for gravel.
Shimano RX derailleur can be challenged when it is run with a large cassette (like an 11-40)- This is stupid, you want to be able to use low gears!
Lastly, the fact that you can't mix DI2 road and mtb front and rear derailleurs for a 2x setup. If you could do this, you could just use an XT or XTR rear derailleur for z 2x gravel setup. This is only a software hack, doesn't even take new parts.
2.) Frame parts to allow for short chain stays, big tires and 2x all at the same time.
Framebuilders needs tubes and/or yokes to allow for this to happen. Already happening, but a lot of bikes have really long stays to accomplish both-
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [bootsie_cat] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
bootsie_cat wrote:
I agree with this-
Part of this is forks- Enve and Parlee only make 47mm rake forks in cross/gravel models with the most clearance.
For me, the 55mm rake Seven Matador fork was a game changer. Handles so nice with a 71 degree head angle- And I was able to design all of the toe clip overlap out of the bike-

Other two things that bug me are:
1.) Components/groups. SRAM is firmly in the 1x camp, Shimano 2x.
There are problems with both of these approaches-
SRAM doesn't make clutch derailleurs for their road type derailleurs- So no Red or ETAP for wide range cassettes.
SRAM ETAP front derailleur runs into large tires (in some cases).
Shimano doesn't make the cassette sizes that they need- They need an 11-36 for gravel.
Shimano RX derailleur can be challenged when it is run with a large cassette (like an 11-40)- This is stupid, you want to be able to use low gears!
Lastly, the fact that you can't mix DI2 road and mtb front and rear derailleurs for a 2x setup. If you could do this, you could just use an XT or XTR rear derailleur for z 2x gravel setup. This is only a software hack, doesn't even take new parts.
2.) Frame parts to allow for short chain stays, big tires and 2x all at the same time.
Framebuilders needs tubes and/or yokes to allow for this to happen. Already happening, but a lot of bikes have really long stays to accomplish both-

clearance is a big deal. i run eTap and my bike is built with a 425mm chainstay. luckily. or, fortuitiously - because i chose the geometry ;-)

you mentioned groupkits. i think the single biggest issue now is gearing. gravel bikes need to be geared low. but they are built with a road motif. if you want to stay with a road stance width, a road crank, 110bcd isnt small enough. 34t isn't small enough.

in january a bunch of stuff is launching, i think, that should speak to forks, steering geometry, shoe overlap, gearing, etc., for gravel.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply


There are some options for sub-compact currently, such as FSA Adventure 46/30 which I have above with Stages PM on my Kona. I made lots of use of the 30-32 gearing yesterday riding, rather than walking, really steep loose stuff.

Other options from IRD, Sugino, Easton, maybe Rotor too? I suspect Shimano and SRAM will eventually have to offer something...do you know anything else here?
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [brando] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Praxisworks has subcompact options, too.

Now, if anyone knows of anything that will work on my Cannondale BB30 natively, I'd be interested to hear about it.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
This is your first gravel/cross bike?

Guessing yes- So get something used like an older Cannondale caad cx-9/super X if you must need disc and spend your money on a nice set of tubeless/wide wheels with nice tires so you can actually ride and don't have to worry about flats.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [bootsie_cat] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
bootsie_cat wrote:
SRAM doesn't make clutch derailleurs for their road type derailleurs- So no Red...for wide range cassettes.

Aaah, "not so fast, my friend"...the SRAM 10sp MTB derailleurs have clutches AND are "exact actuation" (AKA, 1:1 pull ratio) and so they work perfectly fine with both 10sp and 11sp Red shifters. (It's the 11sp SRAM MTB derailleurs that went away from 1:1)

I'm using a GX10 rear derailleur on my Fuji Jari with 10sp Red shifters, Force front derailleur, 53-39 Quarq Cinqo crankset, Sunrace 11-42 cassette.

My buddy's Stinner Refugio is set up with the same GX10 rear derailleur, 11sp Red shifters, Yaw front derailleur, 52-34 110bcd crankset, Shimano 11-40 cassette. As he likes to say, he has "alls the gears" ;-)

Both setups work awesome...although the extra wide spread on the Stinner's chain rings requires quite "exact" positioning for best performance.

It's still possible to mix and match somewhat these days...

You're welcome ;-)

http://bikeblather.blogspot.com/
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Slowman wrote:


you mentioned groupkits. i think the single biggest issue now is gearing. gravel bikes need to be geared low. but they are built with a road motif. if you want to stay with a road stance width, a road crank, 110bcd isnt small enough. 34t isn't small enough.


Agreed, but they also need to be geared high (since they are ridden on pavement too)...I personally think that's often given short shrift for these bikes...and most of that is driven by the compromises undertaken to run 1X.

I've actually heard a few high level gravel riders say lately that they're "done with 1X" and want to go back to 2X for their all-road bikes. As I described in the post above, it's really not all that difficult to get "alls the gears" :-)

And really, the degree to which they should be geared low is dependent on the local terrain. For you or me, we have steep roads and trails to take them on...so yeah, I want MTB-low gearing. However, in the "flatlands", maybe not so much.

http://bikeblather.blogspot.com/
Last edited by: Tom A.: Nov 4, 18 9:42
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Tom A.] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Tom A. wrote:
Slowman wrote:


you mentioned groupkits. i think the single biggest issue now is gearing. gravel bikes need to be geared low. but they are built with a road motif. if you want to stay with a road stance width, a road crank, 110bcd isnt small enough. 34t isn't small enough.


Agreed, but they also need to be geared high (since they are ridden on pavement too)...I personally think that's often given short shrift for these bikes...and most of that is driven by the compromises undertaken to run 1X.

I've actually heard a few high level gravel riders say lately that they're "done with 1X" and want to go back to 2X for their all-road bikes. As I described in the post above, it's really not all that difficult to get "alls the gears" :-)

And really, the degree to which they should be geared low is dependent on the local terrain. For you or me, we have steep roads and trails to take them on...so yeah, I want MTB-low gearing. However, in the "flatlands", maybe not so much.

YOU need them geared high ;-)

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I run 2x... everyday is 52/34 with 11/32 . I'll use 11/34 cassette on for the gravel climby rides.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [spntrxi] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
spntrxi wrote:
I run 2x... everyday is 52/34 with 11/32 . I'll use 11/34 cassette on for the gravel climby rides.

i'm running 50x34 and 11-32. 34x32 is not small enough for me. SRAM says no can to bigger than 32t on wifli. i don't need new gearing bad enough to need it before jan, and i think jan is going to be a big intro month.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Salsa Warbird is a good choice. I have the Salsa Cutthroat but that is more of a drop bar mountain bike than anything else.


Jim

**Note above poster works for a retailer selling bikes and related gear*
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [UK2ME] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
UK2ME wrote:
Now, if anyone knows of anything that will work on my Cannondale BB30 natively, I'd be interested to hear about it.

Hi UK2ME,

Watch for a 30-46 SpideRing that will retrofit onto all Si cranks. Not positive about retail availability yet, but it's been in road testing for the last year or so.

Cheers,
Damon

Damon Rinard
Engineering Manager,
CSG Road Engineering Department
Cannondale & GT Bicycles
(ex-Cervelo, ex-Trek, ex-Velomax, ex-Kestrel)
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Specialized Crux Carbon and running 40mm Maxxis Ramblers. Ultegra Di2. Compact cranks with an 11/30t cassette. No complaints at all. Older frame that doesn’t have thru axel.

I would like to get an newer frame with thru axel and a new wheelset that is wider internal......maybe a Hunt wheelset.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Tom A.] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Cool that you guys have been able to make parts like that work- But my point is that manufacturers are slow to respond to this trend. And they have been responding with parts and groups that are only "half there".
Consumers will buy purpose built gravel components that work- Shimano could make Ultegra and Dura-Ace level gravel components with low gears, lighter cassettes, clutch derailleurs, etc.
Same for SRAM- People would buy clutch/gravel ETAP with low gears.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [bootsie_cat] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
bootsie_cat wrote:
Cool that you guys have been able to make parts like that work- But my point is that manufacturers are slow to respond to this trend. And they have been responding with parts and groups that are only "half there".
Consumers will buy purpose built gravel components that work- Shimano could make Ultegra and Dura-Ace level gravel components with low gears, lighter cassettes, clutch derailleurs, etc.
Same for SRAM- People would buy clutch/gravel ETAP with low gears.

Yeah, but "gravel" isn't about waiting for mainstream manufacturers to make the stuff you want to ride. In fact, it's been pretty much the opposite.

Personally, I think people put WAY to much import on drivetrain components being all "matchy-matchy", when many times it isn't necessary...or, even desirable (if it limits your gearing choices, e.g.)...but, maybe that's just me :-)

http://bikeblather.blogspot.com/
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Tom A.] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Not gravel bike specific and replying to general thread.

I'm debating a CX bike vs mtb.

2 things- I like the mtb because I can use it when I'm coaching athletes on the run. I like MTB better for just getting around easier on different surfaces..BUT i don't think i'm going to be doing anymore MTB stuff because I more enjoy the crushed gravel pathway/bridal trails much more than "single" track....I crash every single time on the MTB just from aggressiveness/stupid/slips, etc.


I guess the answer is CX with the wider tires than normal road width but not the normal wide MTB width.

Thoughts?

Brooks Doughtie, M.S.
Exercise Physiology
-USAT Level II
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Tom A.] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I don't feel like my parts have to "match"- just work well.
I would run a Shimano DI2 mtb derailleur if it would work with DI2 and road front derailleur.

I used to use a SRAM 11-36 11 speed cassette with an Ultegra long cage derailleur. It worked well enough.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Just picked up a used 2016 Giant TCX. It's Ultegra Di2 1x with a 40t Wolf chainring, running CX-1 wheels and WTB Resolute tubeless. I've always preferred Shimano over SRAM, so that was a big reason for me to look used. It'll be my one bike for gravel, cx, and road so I'll be setting it up 52x36 up front as well as a road-specific wheelset by the time spring and road racing comes around. For now, I'm just trying to get lost riding the forest service roads around Central Oregon while planning my version of an Overland triathlon. I've had it on roads, singletrack and some super-climby FS roads, in sand-like dirt, rough, rocky surface and everything in between. It's been great!
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
If you want 1x (I did too) then don't go with my choice.

I have a Canyon Grail CF SL 7.0
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Diabolo] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
So you don’t like the grail?
Why not? The bars?
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I ride a Focus Mares CX with Force 1 because well.. I compete in cyclocross races and gravel.

I'm currently drooling over my buddies new Ibis Hakka MX. What a nice machine. I'd probably go Di2 2x if I didn't race cyclocross.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Jonboy wrote:
So you don’t like the grail?
Why not? The bars?

I love my Grail, didn't buy it for the bars (but don't mind them). It's just not available as a 1x option. I wanted 1x but in the end went with the Grail with 2x because other factors played in favour of that choice.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Tom A.] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Gravel bikes need to be geared however they need to be geared.

Bottoming out your gearing is a gigantic performance killer. And when it happens, it tends to be during climbs, which is a place where you don't want to be paying gigantic performance killers. Gravel exacerbates the issue, since limited rear wheel traction makes it more difficult to produce extra bailout torque by standing.

Yesterday, the middle of my gravel ride featured a pretty steep fire road to the top of a foothill: 1.4 miles of loose rutted stuff at around a 12% average gradient.
I was in my 22" bottom gear for most of the climb, and although I averaged a bit under 5mph, there were spots where that gear was getting uncomfortable.
Another guy on the ride is about my climbing equal on road rides, but he was on his CX bike with a 34" bottom gear. He was the last person to the top, taking more than 40% longer than me. His bike was more than ten pounds lighter than mine too, but he just couldn't pedal the thing effectively on that hill.
And while that's an extreme case, I see stuff like it all the time.

If the choice has to be made, I'd generally recommend erring toward having sufficient low gears than high gears: roadies on average seem to have far more issues with the former, and an inflated sense of what they need from the latter.

But gravel bikes are also capable of being competent road bikes, which can merit road gearing. What exactly that means is very circumstantial... although roadies sometimes insist on higher top gears than they have much use for, some mountain-esque drivetrains can be lacking in the opposite direction. Spacing can also be an annoyance, if a gravel ride turns into a road ride.

The PNW is somewhat demanding in this regard. The gravel is mostly mountainous forest road, but gravel rides can involve plenty of connecting flat and hilly paved road. So having everything that a road bike would need, plus some extra bailout gears, is an attractive idea. But where to get those extra gears from? A triple? Going 1x with an 18-speed cassette? Stealthily hanging onto the saddle rails of the rider in front of you?
Last edited by: HTupolev: Nov 5, 18 2:06
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [HTupolev] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I just wrapped up a year-long experiment of riding to see if one bike could do it all. That included about 15 road, mixed surface and pure gravel races from basically a P12 75-mile / 10k of hard climbing/technical descending to DK to Fondos to 150-mile ride with 16.5k of climbing to Maunakea (which had the toughest gravel climbing by far). I covered a little over 12k miles on this rig.

Bike is an UPPER 1x with DA brifters and XRT RD, road and gravel wheelsets that I swapped tires for the terrain. I started with a 42 front, and 11-40 for road and 10-42 for gravel. This is backwards and limited by hub compatibility (moral of story: don’t buy King hubs if you want max flexibility). The 42 wasn’t enough for road race style events so I went up to 44 right away. More recently I’ve been using an 11-42 on road but find I don’t go to bailout gear very often (and I live in an area with some steep, pitchy climbs).

The ideal *current* setup for me is 44 x 11-40 for mixed surface, and 11 or 10-42 for gravel. On the road I very occasionally run out of gears on both ends but not often enough it’s an issue. The jumps are less noticeable than anticipated and as a former TTer, is something I’m sensitive to. With that in mind, the *ideal setup* for me is 44 x 10-40 12 spd for everyday and to a 42 for tough graveling. IMO there would be few concessions. The 10t road cassette is really the missing piece at moment but there will be a few good options in â€19 to resolve that.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Carl Spackler] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
For most of us "mere mortals" though (i.e. folks without a P1/2 W/kg ratio), I highly recommend having gear ratios below 1:1 for gravel with decent climbs ;-)

http://bikeblather.blogspot.com/
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I've been loving my Ibis Hakka MX. I use it as my cyclocross and gravel bike. I have a 700C wheelset for cross and a 650b wheelset with 2.1" tires for fun. I even put slicks on it an rode century on the road 2 months ago.

This weekend the cross course was dry and loose. I switched to my 650b wheelset and it was so much fun. Where everyone with skinnier cyclocross tires were sliding out in the loose stuff I was just rolling through with plenty of traction.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I love my Diamondback Haanjo Trail.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
My road bike takes ~30mm tires, and I typically ride 27-28mm tubeless (down to ~60psi). Gearing is 52/36 (and I can pop on a 34 easily enough) with a 11x28, 30, or 32 cassette. This handles 60% of the gravel/dirt that I ride.

For rockier rides or when I don't want to be as careful picking lines, I ride my cyclocross bike (Trek Boone), which has a relatively low BB for a cx bike (65mm), takes up to 40mm tires, and has geometry that enables me to get both a good road fit or a good cx fit (or something in between) without resorting to odd sized stems or anything. The only changes I make when running this bike as a dedicated gravel bike is I switch the chainrings from 44/36 to 48/34, I'll run a 11x32 cassette instead of 11x28, and a different saddle, slid about 1cm further back.

A lot of the current gravel offerings look nice, but I race both road and cx (so I need those bikes), and I have not seen a gravel bike that would be so much better than these two that I'd want to get it. As Slowman said, companies are still figuring out what they're doing with gravel bikes, so you really have to know the kind of riding *you* intend to do, then fit a bike to that. If you're not sure, a used cx bike might be a better way to get into it and figure out what you want going forward. It will likely be cheaper and more versatile.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Tom A.] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Agree that 1:1 is an ideal rule of thumb. Adjust up or down depending on terrain and/or type of rider, esp on gravel. For many coming from a road or tri background, riding steep, loose stuff takes some time to figure out, and more gears will be better.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Tom A.] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Tom A. wrote:
bootsie_cat wrote:

SRAM doesn't make clutch derailleurs for their road type derailleurs- So no Red...for wide range cassettes.


Aaah, "not so fast, my friend"...the SRAM 10sp MTB derailleurs have clutches AND are "exact actuation" (AKA, 1:1 pull ratio) and so they work perfectly fine with both 10sp and 11sp Red shifters. (It's the 11sp SRAM MTB derailleurs that went away from 1:1)

I'm using a GX10 rear derailleur on my Fuji Jari with 10sp Red shifters, Force front derailleur, 53-39 Quarq Cinqo crankset, Sunrace 11-42 cassette.

My buddy's Stinner Refugio is set up with the same GX10 rear derailleur, 11sp Red shifters, Yaw front derailleur, 52-34 110bcd crankset, Shimano 11-40 cassette. As he likes to say, he has "alls the gears" ;-)

Both setups work awesome...although the extra wide spread on the Stinner's chain rings requires quite "exact" positioning for best performance.

It's still possible to mix and match somewhat these days...

You're welcome ;-)

Thank you for talking some sense into this thread. It sounds like a lot of posts so far are just regurgitated from other threads and reflect very little experience.

One thing I would like to throw into the conversation is to look at gear inches, not gearing. A 38-40 mm tire is going to give a wheel diameter almost 5% bigger than a 25 mm. A 50 chainring on a 25 mm tire becomes a 48 chainring on a 40 mm tire. If Ted King maxed out at 119 gear inches and goes all the way down to 28 gear inches, I doubt many of us need to get much over 100 gear inches on a gravel bike.

Genuine question from somebody that respects your contributions: How much are you and your buddy hitting the 53/52 ring and dropping to the 11 or 13 cog (much above 70 rpm)? The gear range on that Stinner is incredible and definitely at the max of possibility with those components. If the 52 x 11 or 52 x 13 aren't being used though, it's essentially a 13 speed drivetrain. Maybe 14 if he's consistently riding 25 mph at a lower cadence. I'm 100% for making a bike your own and getting "alls the gears" but that setup seems a little complicated for the rest of us.

I know I'm making a big assumption that the 11 and 13 isn't getting used, but if it's not, the 52/34 x 11-40 setup equals a 365% range due to a couple gears being too tall to use. What's the range of an 11-40 cassette on its own? 364%.

If you're going to ride with the same 'gaps' in gearing, I would think that 1x could be fairly appropriate for others in a similar situation. Less weight, easier maintenance, The enginerdiness of you and your buddy make me *think* you have thought this through and know all that, so this is more for other readers.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [B_Doughtie] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
B_Doughtie wrote:
Not gravel bike specific and replying to general thread.

I'm debating a CX bike vs mtb.

2 things- I like the mtb because I can use it when I'm coaching athletes on the run. I like MTB better for just getting around easier on different surfaces..BUT i don't think i'm going to be doing anymore MTB stuff because I more enjoy the crushed gravel pathway/bridal trails much more than "single" track....I crash every single time on the MTB just from aggressiveness/stupid/slips, etc.


I guess the answer is CX with the wider tires than normal road width but not the normal wide MTB width.

Thoughts?

I have an aluminum CX bike with 40s. Despite the "bigger" tyres, it really is no where near as capable as an MTB. I thought I might be able to run at least some technical single track, but sharp edge rocks, rock gardens, or root fields all just beat the crap out of me.

My MTB just floats through it all. That said, my MTB feels like a pig on smooth single track or gravel.

In the end I have one of each, but would have loved to discover that the CX could do it all.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
 

Here is my Exploro FM with eTap.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [rob_bell] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Sick bike.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [The Guardian] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yeah unfortunately I dn't think you'll ever find the CX that can do it all. As you get good with it you'll be able to ride more terrain, and faster, on your cx bike, but you'll always hit a limit gnar-wise, and you'll hit that limit far sooner than you would on your ATB.

But, I wouldn't worry. If you get more into ATB, you'll find the same thing with mountain bikes: for each bike, there will be a "gnar limit" to what you are willing to attempt. You can try to maximize versatility (i.e., take the most balanced allocation between pedaling, geometry, travel and tire size) but there still will be a best tool for every job.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [dangle] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I like to compare things using Sheldon Brown's "gain ratio" calculator to compare things...and I hear what you're saying on wheel/tire outer diameter effects.

As far as how often that 11 or 13 cog is used...well, I consider it similar to how I approach the low gears. You might not use them all that often, but when you'd like to have it, it sure is nice that they're on board. Remember, these are bikes that are intended to be used over a wide range of uses, so there's nothing wrong with setting them up to accommodate that range, even if any particular ride doesn't entail it all.

Not having to worry if the gearing on my bike is appropriate for the task is a "simpler" approach overall than any 1X setup IMHO ;-)

http://bikeblather.blogspot.com/
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Tom A.] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Canti version of a Crockett. 32mm cyclocross tires and a spare wheelset with 28mm gators for road use. Has a narrow wide 1x conversion (40T front ring) with a med-cage RD. The cyclocross wheelset has an 12-32 SRAM RD and the road set with the gators has an 11-28 Shimano. Somehow have it spaced out and tuned up that I can swap those without a RD adjustment.

I actually have put more miles on it since I bought it than my road race bike. Including on the road.

Great bike for a jack of all trades kind of deal. It is noticeably slower on-road with gators and a more upright geometry. However, not enough to keep you from taking it on the hammer ride. I dropped the group on it a few times.

As for gravel, I find it's plenty. I think the fastest gravel bike all depends on what it looks like in your area. If it is sharp flint, something bigger tire clearance and not a CX tire. If like here, you could probably run some 28mm or 30mm gatorskins and be fastest.

I specifically chose the canti Crockett so I could share rim brake wheels with the road race bike and just swap cassettes/spacers out. So, between them I could in theory have 3 wheelsets per bike: 50mm, 38mm, box section cross rims.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Carl Spackler] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Under the right rider, it looks like you can win a mtn bike race with an OPEN. I know it's not the most technical course, but hey, still damn impressive! Kabush is a legend.

He used 27.5 x 2.1 Maxxis Apsens
46/34 rings with an 11x32 cassette

https://www.record-eagle.com/...5b-37d285678384.html

_______________________________________________
Last edited by: Bonesbrigade: Nov 5, 18 12:12
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Bonesbrigade] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
A legend indeed. Dude is a badass.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
My previous gearing on a 172.5 road crank has been 46/34 with 11-32 in the back (for gravel riding) and on "42"mm tires (Conti SpeedRide, measures just at 40mm on WTB I-19 rims). My current build will have 170mm MTB cranks with 42/26 chainrings and 11-26 in back, rolling 50mm tires. I'll have capacity to go to 32 in back if needed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Some are born to move the world to live their fantasies...

https://triomultisport.com/
http://www.mjolnircycles.com/
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I have had a Felt VR3 ( sold because a little too big) that was really nice to ride on the road and gravel. I now have an Open UP that I love. Pricey but it fits me well. My first ride was 52 miles - mostly gravel - and felt great the entire way. Handled well in loose dirt and some smooth hard pack.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [dangle] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
dangle wrote:
Genuine question from somebody that respects your contributions: How much are you and your buddy hitting the 53/52 ring and dropping to the 11 or 13 cog (much above 70 rpm)?

52-11 on that bike isn't wildly different from what typical road bikes top out at. So if someone who uses those gears on their road bike is spiritedly road riding on their gravel bike, they may find similar use for the same gears.

Many people on road bikes don't have much real use for gears as high as 50-11 or 53-11. And many people never use their gravel bikes in a manner that demands high top gears.
But if you sometimes need them, it's better to have them and not need them than the other way around. I go on plenty of rides - on all of my bikes - where I don't use the extremes of my gearing range, but I don't consider this much of an issue. On the flip side, if I'm constantly on the extremes of my gear range, this usually indicates a big issue.

//=========================================

Since this thread is asking what we've got, I might as well throw in the silly drivetrain on my gravel bike. 48-38-24 cranks with 11-13-15-18-21-24-28 cassette. When paired with the 53 -559 tires that the bike usually wears, it provides a 509% range from about 22" up to 113". The two larger rings also 1.5-step the cassette, so when I want them, the ratios from 47" up through 96" are decently tight.



So it's worth about 16 unique useful ratios, it provides mostly satisfactory road gears, and it gives me decently low bailouts for the mountainous gravel climbs. Pretty capable for a 3x7. Shifting between the 38T and 24t chainrings is a dramatic gap, though.
Last edited by: HTupolev: Nov 5, 18 15:57
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [HTupolev] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
HTupolev wrote:
dangle wrote:
Genuine question from somebody that respects your contributions: How much are you and your buddy hitting the 53/52 ring and dropping to the 11 or 13 cog (much above 70 rpm)?

52-11 on that bike isn't wildly different from what typical road bikes top out at. So if someone who uses those gears on their road bike is spiritedly road riding on their gravel bike, they may find similar use for the same gears.

I think that misses my first point. Due to the larger tire circumference, the chainring is effectively 4-5% larger. A 52 with a 38 or 40 mm tire is about equal to a 54 or 55 ring with a 25 mm tire.

If somebody is riding gravel tires at the lower pressures they are supposed to be, the rolling resistance gets pretty high at fast speeds. A simplified comparison would be to take some numbers from Jarno Bierman and apply them. A 25 mm 4000sII with a butyl tube at 80 psi has a CRR of .00411 and he measured the Bon Jon Pass with a similar butyl tube (the only gravel tire he has published, so our only comparison) at 30 psi at .00842. More than double the CRR. Since watts to roll basically equals CRR x load x speed, having twice the CRR is going to make the watts needed to pedal go up twice as fast (compared to that GP4000) as speed does. Keeping the load constant and pedaling those BJP's up to 27 mph, you need just over 42 watts per tire. That 27 mph would be achieved with the 53 x 13 (109 gear inches in BJP tires) mentioned above at roughly 82 rpm. The 'load' number borrowed from Jan Bierno is waaaay lower than my rear tire would ever see, so I'm afraid to run the numbers for myself. So as the speed increased from 18 to 27 mph, the 4000SII needed 7 more watts, while the BJP needed 14 more.

Even if you could pedal in the 52/53 x 11/12/13/14 with a true gravel tire.......it seems wasteful. Maybe it's just the TT'er in me, but it seems like that energy could be better spent elsewhere if you're not having to react to pack dynamics.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [dangle] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
A couple things:
- What's the rollout on the larger tires when run at lower pressures?
- Don't forget to take into account the crank lengths in your gain ratio comparisons
- What if one runs 650B wheels with the wider tires?

And lastly:
- I think you're over-thinking it ;-)

http://bikeblather.blogspot.com/
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Bonesbrigade] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Bonesbrigade wrote:
Under the right rider, it looks like you can win a mtn bike race with an OPEN. I know it's not the most technical course, but hey, still damn impressive! Kabush is a legend.

He used 27.5 x 2.1 Maxxis Apsens
46/34 rings with an 11x32 cassette

https://www.record-eagle.com/...5b-37d285678384.html

After test riding the 3T Exploro a few years back at interbike when they were first introduced, my friend's first comment after we got back from the singletrack trails in Bootleg Canyon was "I'd Cross-Country race that thing!" :-)

http://bikeblather.blogspot.com/
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
What I have now: Trek Checkpoint SL with Di2 2x -- but I don't like it. The Isospeed decoupler ruins it for me. I hate the bobbing. (And I very much dislike the BB90 bottom bracket.) Otherwise, it's a good bike with excellent geometry.

In the past:

- original Titanium Salsa Warbird (not much tire clearance, otherwise great!)
- Niner RLT9 aluminum (excellent bike, but it would beat you up for distances of over 150 miles on rough gravel)
- Lynskey custom, same geometry as their current gravel bikes (excellent bike in every way, I only sold it because my knee surgeon told me I couldn't race gravel anymore . . . mistake!) The Lynskey had Di2 1x with an XTR rear derailleur. It worked GREAT, except that, in one race, there were four of us in the break. The last five miles started with a steep descent and the other three (using 2x) left me in the dust. (I'm sure that, on equal equipment, I was faster than them.) I didn't have enough gearing with 42x11 to keep up.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Tom A.] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Tom A. wrote:
A couple things:
- What's the rollout on the larger tires when run at lower pressures?
- Don't forget to take into account the crank lengths in your gain ratio comparisons
- What if one runs 650B wheels with the wider tires?

Rollout differences? I don't know. Is that something you have looked at? This sort of reminds me of the stuff you and FLO were talking about a year or so ago. Tire height would change a little, casing tension, etc. My gut reaction would be "not much" but that would be a total guess.

I was using gear inches to take the crank length out of the equation. If one is trying to compare apples to apples (road bike to gravel bike gearing) then leaving the crank length as a constant makes sense to me. It's a totally different can of worms you are well versed in, but it seems that going even shorter would be more of an argument towards not overgearing for gravel.

I feel like the Venn diagram with 2x compatible frames and 650B compatible frames would have very little overlap. Obviously a smaller overall tire diameter means you can gear up a little more. A quick Sheldon Brown reference says that a 50 mm tire in 650B has a wider diameter than a 700 x 44. I wouldn't have guessed that. The only frame I have had that could have fit 650B was sold for something racier. I only tires I see on 650B around these parts is in the 2.1" / ~50 mm range. Are you seeing much different?

Tom A. wrote:
And lastly:
- I think you're over-thinking it ;-)

I'm absolutely overthinking it....to show how many are underthinking it.


Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Tom A.] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Tom A. wrote:
Bonesbrigade wrote:
Under the right rider, it looks like you can win a mtn bike race with an OPEN. I know it's not the most technical course, but hey, still damn impressive! Kabush is a legend.

He used 27.5 x 2.1 Maxxis Apsens
46/34 rings with an 11x32 cassette

https://www.record-eagle.com/...5b-37d285678384.html


After test riding the 3T Exploro a few years back at interbike when they were first introduced, my friend's first comment after we got back from the singletrack trails in Bootleg Canyon was "I'd Cross-Country race that thing!" :-)


Tomac probably would have liked to race it too!

When I designed the geo on my English, it actually came out almost exactly to the Exlploro geometry without even knowing it. I just spec'd more BB drop in comparison. So...they must know what they're doing!

Edit: my only regret is not flipping the downtube like you did!

_______________________________________________
Last edited by: Bonesbrigade: Nov 6, 18 9:50
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Jonboy wrote:
Looking at getting a Gravel Bike for a bit of off-road fun.
Not a lot of choices in my local area and was just wondering if anyone can recommend some brands I can research. Want a 1x

I probably have the least impressive bike on this thread but for now it works for most of what I ride.

2001 LeMond Poprad CX Bike (steel frame)
Tiagra Drivetrain
Triple crank 52-42-30. 12-25 cassette
Panaracer Hardpack 700x38 front
Vittoria Randonee Cross 35 rear
Standard Trek/Bontrager components

I’ve ridden it on single track, dirt/gravel roads, and with a light road wheel set, the Triple Bypass in CO.

I rarely if ever use the 52 unless it’s bombing down some mountain pass with the road wheels on. The low gearing gets up some steep stuff.

It’s pretty heavy but takes a beating.

It’s a little limited to tire width especially in the back. Probably fine with 40 in the front but the 38 was getting some chain stay rub in the back.

Formerly DrD
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [dangle] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
dangle wrote:
I think that misses my first point. Due to the larger tire circumference, the chainring is effectively 4-5% larger.

4% is a fairly small jump, about half the size of a gear step in the straight block of a road cassette. And people on gravel bikes are sometimes running smaller rim diameters anyhow:

Quote:
A quick Sheldon Brown reference says that a 50 mm tire in 650B has a wider diameter than a 700 x 44.

That's not right. The width increase will change inflated wheel diameter by something in the ballpark of a centimeter, but 650b wheels are nearly four centimeters smaller than 700c.

My 53mm 26ers are smaller than the 700x25s on my Trek.

Quote:
If somebody is riding gravel tires at the lower pressures they are supposed to be, the rolling resistance gets pretty high at fast speeds.

Depends on the tire.

Actually, one of things I like about my 53s being so wide is that they can be squishy without being terribly underinflated. Narrow tires need to be run at comparatively high drop to get the same amount of squishiness, and this also increases the exposure of the sidewall to the riding surface, which encourages people to get tires with lots of protection. The result is, frequently, a heck of a lot slower on smooth sections than my supple fat tires.
I was on a gravel ride last summer with a guy who was about my equal on road rides, but he was on toughened 35s. I was cruising along paved sections with nigh-indistinguishable performance from my road riding, and he was having a hard time even staying in my draft.

Quote:
A simplified comparison would be to take some numbers from Jarno Bierman and apply them. A 25 mm 4000sII with a butyl tube at 80 psi has a CRR of .00411 and he measured the Bon Jon Pass with a similar butyl tube (the only gravel tire he has published, so our only comparison) at 30 psi at .00842.

Fat road tires can actually roll just fine, but BJP roller data is an anomaly. TomA also saw very high numbers for the BJP on his drum, including compared to Compass's wider Snoqualmie Pass. I wouldn't necessarily assume anything about gravel tires in general based on that test.

It is true that most gravel tires are slower than most road tires... they're often more protection, knobs can slow them down on paved sections, and there are aerodynamic disadvantages. But there's a huge amount of variety in what people ride.

But I also think you're looking at this wrong:
Quote:
Even if you could pedal in the 52/53 x 11/12/13/14 with a true gravel tire.......it seems wasteful.

It's not that a gravel tire is better for the jobs where you need a 53-11 than a high-performance road setup is. It's that some people might come across those situations occasionally while riding their gravel bikes.
Last edited by: HTupolev: Nov 6, 18 10:18
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [rob_bell] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
rob_bell wrote:


Here is my Exploro FM with eTap.

I just cheesed my shorts.

_________________________________
The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Bonesbrigade] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Bonesbrigade wrote:
Under the right rider, it looks like you can win a mtn bike race with an OPEN. I know it's not the most technical course, but hey, still damn impressive! Kabush is a legend.

He used 27.5 x 2.1 Maxxis Apsens
46/34 rings with an 11x32 cassette

https://www.record-eagle.com/...5b-37d285678384.html

Did you race this weekend? It's my 15th year and I've seen crossbike attempts numerous times. Never worked out too well. The majority of the course is good for cross bikes, but there are some sketchy parts. I talked with Gary Fisher at the expo about the crossbike attempt and he was a skeptic as well. I had a sub 2-hour ride and I absolutely bombed some downhills. I can't even imagine the ass beating he took on some of those downhills and at the speed they ride.

This win will change the race. I wonder if Steve will alter the course to prevent it from become a quasi gravel road race.

_________________________________
The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [HTupolev] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
HTupolev wrote:
dangle wrote:
A quick Sheldon Brown reference says that a 50 mm tire in 650B has a wider diameter than a 700 x 44.

That's not right. The width increase will change inflated wheel diameter by something in the ballpark of a centimeter, but 650b wheels are nearly four centimeters smaller than 700c.


That's what I would have thought as well. I'm not in a position I can measure that though. I specifically referenced the Sheldon Brown site because I don't have my own numbers. I would be interested if somebody could measure the rollout.
Last edited by: dangle: Nov 6, 18 10:40
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
2019 Trek Domane SLR7 Disc - bike gravel event on Saturday, fun gravel ride on Sunday.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [dangle] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
dangle wrote:
HTupolev wrote:
dangle wrote:
A quick Sheldon Brown reference says that a 50 mm tire in 650B has a wider diameter than a 700 x 44.

That's not right. The width increase will change inflated wheel diameter by something in the ballpark of a centimeter, but 650b wheels are nearly four centimeters smaller than 700c.


That's what I would have thought as well. I'm not in a position I can measure that though. I specifically referenced the Sheldon Brown site because I don't have my own numbers. I would be interested if somebody could measure the rollout.

Here's a data point:
-In my roller testing, I've started testing them at the theoretical "Berto 15% drop" pressure (i.e. dependent on measured width and tire load) in order to have a more "apples to apples" comparison between tires of largely varying widths. I test all tires in the same chainring/cog combination, and hold 90 rpm during the test session. So, any differences in rollout will show up as a speed difference (I measure speed on the roller itself).

When I tested a 700x23C (27mm measured width) Continental GP4000S at 92psi, the measured roller speed is 39.9kph
When I tested a 700x40C (40.5mm measured width) Vittoria Terreno Dry at 48psi, the measured roller speed is 40.7 kph

So...that's looking like only a 2% change in the actual rollout. Comparing a 700x23C to a 700x38C gain ration difference in the Sheldon Brown calculator shows more like a 4.3% difference.

So yeah...it looks like the actual rollout doesn't change as much as "theoretical" if lower pressures are utilized with the wider tires. Especially so since in heavy off-road conditions I tend to go even lower than the Berto pressure.

http://bikeblather.blogspot.com/
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Economist] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Economist wrote:
Bonesbrigade wrote:
Under the right rider, it looks like you can win a mtn bike race with an OPEN. I know it's not the most technical course, but hey, still damn impressive! Kabush is a legend.

He used 27.5 x 2.1 Maxxis Apsens
46/34 rings with an 11x32 cassette

https://www.record-eagle.com/...5b-37d285678384.html


Did you race this weekend? It's my 15th year and I've seen crossbike attempts numerous times. Never worked out too well. The majority of the course is good for cross bikes, but there are some sketchy parts. I talked with Gary Fisher at the expo about the crossbike attempt and he was a skeptic as well. I had a sub 2-hour ride and I absolutely bombed some downhills. I can't even imagine the ass beating he took on some of those downhills and at the speed they ride.

This win will change the race. I wonder if Steve will alter the course to prevent it from become a quasi gravel road race.

But it wasn't a "crossbike"...as the article states, it is a "drop-bar mountain bike" :-)

http://bikeblather.blogspot.com/
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Economist] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Economist wrote:
Bonesbrigade wrote:
Under the right rider, it looks like you can win a mtn bike race with an OPEN. I know it's not the most technical course, but hey, still damn impressive! Kabush is a legend.

He used 27.5 x 2.1 Maxxis Apsens
46/34 rings with an 11x32 cassette

https://www.record-eagle.com/...5b-37d285678384.html


Did you race this weekend? It's my 15th year and I've seen crossbike attempts numerous times. Never worked out too well. The majority of the course is good for cross bikes, but there are some sketchy parts. I talked with Gary Fisher at the expo about the crossbike attempt and he was a skeptic as well. I had a sub 2-hour ride and I absolutely bombed some downhills. I can't even imagine the ass beating he took on some of those downhills and at the speed they ride.

This win will change the race. I wonder if Steve will alter the course to prevent it from become a quasi gravel road race.

No, I didn't race it - I just happened to read that Kabush won a "mtn bike race" on his OPEN.

I've done a couple of gravel races where the line is certainly blurry in terms of what bike works best. It sounds like this race could be one of those type events, but the person on the dropbar mtn bike has to be really skilled to pull it off.

_______________________________________________
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [B_Doughtie] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
B_Doughtie wrote:
2 things- I like the mtb because I can use it when I'm coaching athletes on the run. I like MTB better for just getting around easier on different surfaces..BUT i don't think i'm going to be doing anymore MTB stuff because I more enjoy the crushed gravel pathway/bridal trails much more than "single" track....I crash every single time on the MTB just from aggressiveness/stupid/slips, etc.

That is almost exactly what my husband uses his gravel bike for: riding lightweight gravel, shoulder season on the roads (we're in Maine, where the road conditions get cruddy early and don't get swept until late), and chasing me around when I run. He's running 38mm Challenge Gravel Grinder file treads and finds that he'd like a bit more traction on occasion - but not often enough to actually warrant changing the tires.

(We also can't be trusted to mtb without hurting ourselves, even on mtbs. It's not a good scene!)
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Slowman wrote:
spntrxi wrote:
I run 2x... everyday is 52/34 with 11/32 . I'll use 11/34 cassette on for the gravel climby rides.


i'm running 50x34 and 11-32. 34x32 is not small enough for me. SRAM says no can to bigger than 32t on wifli. i don't need new gearing bad enough to need it before jan, and i think jan is going to be a big intro month.

SRAM claims that 32t is the max, but I've used a 11-36t on my wifli eTap without problems. You may need to adjust the b-limit screw a bit, and depending on your current chain length, you may need a chain that is one link longer (or else you'll run into problems if you are cross-chaining from big ring to your 36)

I have a 50-34 on the front, and wanted a 36t rear for Crusher in the Tushars. I'm glad I had it! I had absolutely no shifting problem at all.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [HTupolev] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
HTupolev wrote:
Depends on the tire.

Actually, one of things I like about my 53s being so wide is that they can be squishy without being terribly underinflated. Narrow tires need to be run at comparatively high drop to get the same amount of squishiness, and this also increases the exposure of the sidewall to the riding surface, which encourages people to get tires with lots of protection. The result is, frequently, a heck of a lot slower on smooth sections than my supple fat tires.

It just occurred to me that I lied. Although my gravel bike wore 53mm tires all summer (Rat Trap Pass EL), as of the last few days they do not.
This last Saturday's gravel ride was rainy, so I opted to swap the RTPs for something less slick. The only problem is, I don't have any non-slick tires for this bike that aren't laughably bad. I've got knobs on my hardtail, but I couldn't move them over, since the wheel size is different. I picked these up a couple years ago, when I first put the bike together, $5 for the pair:



And so, Friday evening, I decided that I'd remind myself of why I felt like I'd overpaid at $2.50/tire.

They're nominally 50mm, but the main body of the tire only measures ~45mm on my 23mm-internal rims (they're ~47mm at the side lugs). The sidewalls feel as beefy as the tread on the other tires. And despite being narrower, these things weigh about twice as much as the RTPs. I also swapped my Vittoria MTB latex tubes out for standard butyl tubes, because why not.

I haven't done any serious testing with these tires, but when I was looking at typical performance from the last time I used them, it seems like they average nearly a 2mph deficit versus the RTPs when cruising along flat paved road in mostly like-for-like situations.

That wouldn't have been very bothersome for casual graveling, except that I rode to and from the ride, which added about 32 miles of solo pavement. The occasional 10-second gusts of light tailwind that normally make you feel like a superhero, merely made me feel like I was riding a road bike. And aside from a slight tread pattern noise, these tires rolled painfully quiet: I've grown accustomed to a lively road hum roar on this bike, and it was dead, crushed under the tyranny of durable sidewall protection.

And it's not like the Double Fighters provide impressive mud grip anyway.

I should do something about my tire situation, lol.
Last edited by: HTupolev: Nov 6, 18 17:49
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [HTupolev] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Just built this up to use primarily for riding gravel & Cat 4 roads in Vermont as well as a group weekday right in Northern Westchester NY gravel rides all winter.
Lauf True Grit Frame
Enve C23 wheelset
SRAM force 1x w 11x40 w 40 up front
Stages PM
Easton carbon flared bards, seat post & Alum Stem
WTB saddle
Arundal Cages
Maxxis Ravager Tires/38

Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [devolikewhoa83] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote:
I’m not gonna be getting any elite cyclocross podiums

Now that it's the end of cross season, how did it perform?

I am thinking about getting the Jari for a commuter/touring/cyclocross rig
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Sold all my bikes except my tri/tt bike (still have my MTB but it doesn't move and is worth nothing now). I train only on my gravel bike for IM and love it. I can go almost anywhere (anyway, I wasn't a big fan of these very challenging MTB trails).
It's very comfy (tire pressure), pretty fast on roads too even with low pressure. And very cheap to build.


Last edited by: tripot: Jan 13, 19 8:47
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Orbea Terra M31-D
Love it.

#######
My Blog
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [AquaBikePatti65] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
How does this bike hold up for cyclocross?
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I would not run a 1x for a gravel bike. Gravel roads have steeper hills than paved roads, and you're often doing longer rides. Thus, easy gears are a must, because if you stand up to climb you often spin out and lose traction. I have two what could be called gravel bikes.

1. 2016 BMC GF 02 disc, with regular road compact gearing, di2 hydraulic, has clearance for 35's but not all 38's. Endurance is more road oriented and I don't ride gravel often on it. Use it for gravel races. The current iteration of the gran fondo is a road bike, unfortunately. Not sure why they axed the versatility of the old GF disc.
2. Fyxation quiver disc. Steel and definitely a true gravel bike with 40mm tire clearance, tons of rack mounts all over it. I run it 2x with the inner two rings of a triple (40/30) because I use it for bikepacking. I also have an 11-36 cassette on it.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [stevendex] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply


2018 Cannondale CAADX SE

Picked up the SE as it has better gearing as a gravel bike versus the standard CAADX which is catered more toward cyclocross.
Last edited by: J.Owen: Jan 14, 19 14:15
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [tripot] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Is that the San Marcos Ass Saver under your saddle? Whatever it is, do you like it?
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [AKCrafty] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
https://fr.aliexpress.com/...rri/32958230224.html
Not perfect but it does the job.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Vigilante] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I unfortunately did not get to race any cyclocross this season, but I cannot see why it wouldn't do well.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Finally got a gravel bike! Absolutely love the Di2 shifting on the Grail. I like the hoverbars a lot (especially the looks), though they aren't quite as effective at tampering large bumps/impacts as they are with general vibration reduction. The drops are super stiff for sprint workouts in winter. Geometry is perfect too as it's closer to a road setup than off-road. Plan to ride lots of steep dirt mountain roads with it when the snow melts.

The new versions of the Grail will have a 1X, but if I had wanted a 1X I wouldn't have waited a half a year for this. Would have just got a Fuji Jari with Force. That would have been perfect for most of the riding I plan to do (and better for possible bike packing), but would get me dropped when bombing a mountain descent so I had to have a 2X.

-Bryan Journey
Travel Blog | Training Blog | Facebook Page
Last edited by: JourneyToGoPro: Feb 22, 19 11:31
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
My ParleeXD is every evolving as I do more offload. My area is full of steep ramps 15% plus.. so I've actually gone away from mid compact gearing to sub-compact. I now use absoluteblack 48/32 and my 11-34t. The redshift stem paired with a Canyon S14 seat post give me a little more give for comfort. I just got my more serious 650b wheelset which is Enve G27 with WTB Byways and I'm actually considering even lower gearing..either an XTR9000 11-40t or XG-1199 10-42 cassette
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I have one of these, love it : https://www.donnellycycling.com/...ections/gravel-bikes

http://www.pbmcoaching.com
USA Triathlon Level 3 Elite Coach
USA Cycling Level 1 Elite Coach

Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Jonboy wrote:
Looking at getting a Gravel Bike for a bit of off-road fun.
Not a lot of choices in my local area and was just wondering if anyone can recommend some brands I can research. Want a 1x

Specialized Diverge but contemplating a switch to Rodeo Labs Trail Donkey. Who wouldn't want a bike with that name?!

Colorado Triathlon Company, CO2UT 2021, Crooked Gravel 2022, Steamboat Gravel 2022
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I am starting my Grava Maple Sally build this weekend- beautiful frame, the rest is to come-


Force 1CX 1x
Easton EC70 AX Bar
Easton EC70 Stem and Post
Industry Nine Wheels


Very excited to get her on the dirt roads!
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Reviving this thread to ask a question about fit...do people get a separate fit for a gravel bike if you already have coordinates from road and CX bikes? Or is there some sort of general rule of thumb re: raise the bars xx amount, etc to make fit less aggressive. Trying to figure out if I can base frame size on existing #s or if I need a brand new fit
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [velox canis] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
+1cm stack, -1cm reach is a common starting point. Though I slowly matched my gravel fit to road setup and ride them pretty much identical.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Carl Spackler] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Carl Spackler wrote:
+1cm stack, -1cm reach is a common starting point. Though I slowly matched my gravel fit to road setup and ride them pretty much identical.

bingo. that's exactly what i came up with. however, i don't find that my cockpit feels less stretched. there's something about the ergonomics of SRAM hydraulic road levers that make the cockpit feel longer if i just do nothing but take off standard levers and put on hydraulic levers. hence at least 1 reason why i like the frame a tad shorter. even with that 1cm shorter frame, i may even still choose a stem 1cm shorter yet than on my road bike.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Slowman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Thanks for the info. Dan, do you really find that sustainable over long gravel rides? Something that takes gradual acclimatization? I regularly log 60-80 miles/ride on my roadie which is fairly long and low, but can't imagine doing the same over gravel. To date my longest ride is approx 40 miles of groad on my CX rig (maxed at 32s) which is nearly identical to roadie and having a hard time imagining a ride of 2x the distance or more and not having back/neck pain for days. My gut says I want to shorten and raise things for all-day comfort. Best to use your rough guideline and find a frame that allows room for change in all directions so I don't limit future position tweaks?
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [velox canis] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Best to use your rough guideline and find a frame that allows room for change in all directions so I don't limit future position tweaks?
That's how I'd go. I was right on the fence between frame sizes and went with larger with shorter stem. Resulted in front end that's a tad quick/twitchy offroad and rear that's sluggish to turn on technical descents. With a do-over I'd start a frame size down and longer stem.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [velox canis] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
velox canis wrote:
Thanks for the info. Dan, do you really find that sustainable over long gravel rides? Something that takes gradual acclimatization? I regularly log 60-80 miles/ride on my roadie which is fairly long and low, but can't imagine doing the same over gravel. To date my longest ride is approx 40 miles of groad on my CX rig (maxed at 32s) which is nearly identical to roadie and having a hard time imagining a ride of 2x the distance or more and not having back/neck pain for days. My gut says I want to shorten and raise things for all-day comfort. Best to use your rough guideline and find a frame that allows room for change in all directions so I don't limit future position tweaks?

there's a big caveat to this. yes, the back of neck is a problem. this is the thing that gets sore. but... my drops position is much higher than it is on my road bike. i'm riding a flared gravel bar that has an exceedingly narrow drop. so, i'm never really bent over much. the really severe beating i take is when i'm in a more typical drops position, and i'm descending, and i'm hitting a lot of bumps, and i'm looking forward.

on my bike now is a 3T superghiaia handlebar. this is a weird bar, because it's made in a 40cm and a 44cm it's a very different bar one size to the other. i like the 40cm because i don't mind a somewhat narrower hoods position, but the flare position is so wide, i wouldn't want it any wide. and it has to be that wide if you're only going to give that bar 110mm of drop, which is what it has. remember, shallow drop road bars are 125mm or 130mm deep, and standard bars have about a 140mm and 150mm of drop.

i like zipp CX service course tape. and, i double wrap the tape below the levers, on the drops. this makes it all much easier, comfort wise.

Dan Empfield
aka Slowman
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
If you are a 54cm frame, I have a 2012 (I think), Specialized Crux Disc brake bike. Little use. Gonna sell it ASAP if you are interested. Full SRAM Red group.
Last edited by: jharris: Feb 24, 20 17:03
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [Jonboy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Was on a Trek Crockett w/ SRAM Force 1x - 40T up front, 11-46 in the back.

I built up a Cervelo Aspero w/ SRAM Force AXS recently. 42T up front, 10-50 in the back. I like the simplicity of a 1x and the bike rides much better than the Crockett.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [drp] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Old bike
CAAD9, was build in SRAM red with Easton EA90 component. (for sale, in SRAM force at the moment).
https://imgur.com/LB5BSdI


New ride
Litespeed CX, 1x 44T 11-28. Mavic Ksyrium pro wheels.
https://imgur.com/uFedD1l


I can’t wait to ride it outside. So far the 1x is not great for indoor training on my rollers setup. I changed to a 50T front but still lacks some speed and the chain is too short. I might eventually convert it to 2X.
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [drp] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I have a Cervelo Aspero 1x, set up with Shimano GRX Di2 and Wolf Tooth 40t oval ring and Quarq crankset, and 11-42t cassette. It has been never short of revelation for me - I've never felt I need any bigger (spins out at about 28 mph at 100 rpm) or smaller gearing, and the power numbers are almost 5% better with the oval ring than round (I had a Wolf Tooth 42t round ring before switching).

The shape of the new GRX Di2 shifters are spot-on for my hands, much more comfortable and in control. I also put the new ENVE Gravel bar, and really enjoy the wide flare at the drops when descending.

All in all, I couldn't imaging a better bike for gravel, maybe just a tad lighter (it weights at about 18.5 lbs with ENVE G23 wheels and Schwalbe G-One 35c tires).
Quote Reply
Re: Gravel Bike. Who has what? [dalava] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I have a Garneau Steeple. Great bike, but has cantilever brakes. Would look better with disc brakes, have to look into it.
Quote Reply