Ok, so it's up to the athletes to determine what they should and shouldn't be allowed to take. Got it. And caffeine is ok, but "obscure Eastern European drug not on the US FDA's approved list" is not. And where's the line in between those two? Do you draw the line? Does each athlete draw their own line? Bottom line (pun intended), the only line to be drawn is what is or isn't on WADA's banned list.

And by the way, the three factors you quoted are what WADA uses to determine what should be banned, not what they suggest athletes use as their own subjective determination of what they can and can't take. Only you are trying to impose that responsibility on athletes.

. [1] The full SO category description is “Any pharmacological substance which is not addressed by any of the subsequent sections of the List and with no current approval by any governmental regulatory health authority for human therapeutic use (e.g. drugs under pre-clinical or clinical development or discontinued, designer drugs, substances approved only for veterinary use) is prohibited at all times.