Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Re: Measures of training stress in cyclists - Study [Trev The Rev]
Here's my own mini "case study". So how would the HR vs Power guys each explain this file from my last 70.3 bike leg and run leg? How do I explain what physiologically was happening. MY HR was 10-15bpm higher than I normally see in training at the same pace and lower levels and it took 30 minutes to settle down. Before you just say HRM error... when I've seen an error before, it's usually reading a lot higher than this. If it is error, then how am I supposed to use HR for any type of useful data.

Bike:
http://www.trainingpeaks.com/...FQ5DJQNWT34LQPIJPJEQ
Oh... and it's a Stages PM... so of course my power data is complete crap.

Race simulation Ride (full race kit) 2 weeks earlier
http://www.trainingpeaks.com/...TMPHSYTAN5OMYUHQAY6M

Run:
http://www.trainingpeaks.com/...WYGNPIMBXLF76DN3XTWE

Open 1/2 Mary 3 weeks earlier:
http://www.trainingpeaks.com/...3JFV5AGPILPPWCEJJ3L4

Now a Brick run 1 week later, 2 weeks before the 70.3
http://www.trainingpeaks.com/...YEO6XKWAQOSYK2I7LCAQ


Now do you see why I generally believe that using HR for pacing or overall measurement of training stress to be total crap? From the examples above, pace (with elevation) running and power for the bike are far more useful.


TrainingBible Coaching
http://www.trainingbible.com
Last edited by: motoguy128: Jul 11, 14 7:38

Edit Log:

  • Post edited by motoguy128 (Dawson Saddle) on Jul 11, 14 7:38