tranzformer wrote:
E=H2O wrote:
Dealers and smugglers always get longer sentences than users. You squeeze a user to get the goods on the dealer by offering them a lighter sentence. Nothing new here.Reading through some of the documents seems like many of these riders got their own EPO even before LA was in the picture. Not sure if you are equating LA as being a dealer vs. Hincapie, CVV, DZ, LL being just users?
pick6 wrote:
statute of limitations would be my question here.Didn't stop USADA from going back into 1990s to strip LA.
the anti-doping rule states that if you try to cover up your tracks, then there's no statute of limitations