I probably was not clear enough. I was not necessarily criticizing your testing. I wanted to know the specifics so that I could actually understand it. I had questions:
1. what tire was used?
2. was the same tire used on both wheels?
3. what do you have as support for your contention that 20 degrees yaw is the most important yaw angle for riders to consider?
It's not a matter of me criticizing your aero testing. You're right in that most St'ers couldn't run the average testing session, me included. However, realistically not giving the specifics of your test doesn't help your credibility at all. Tire type and size should have been on your website when you posted the data to begin with.
As for independent data that carries weight. I feel that Velonews did a good job with their aero testing and also allow a certan amount of subjectivity as you suggest as valuable. Tour also has merits with some caveats. Both very valuable for a discerning customer.
Also, your attitude towards ST comes off as quite condescending.
1. what tire was used?
2. was the same tire used on both wheels?
3. what do you have as support for your contention that 20 degrees yaw is the most important yaw angle for riders to consider?
It's not a matter of me criticizing your aero testing. You're right in that most St'ers couldn't run the average testing session, me included. However, realistically not giving the specifics of your test doesn't help your credibility at all. Tire type and size should have been on your website when you posted the data to begin with.
As for independent data that carries weight. I feel that Velonews did a good job with their aero testing and also allow a certan amount of subjectivity as you suggest as valuable. Tour also has merits with some caveats. Both very valuable for a discerning customer.
Also, your attitude towards ST comes off as quite condescending.