lrcanuck wrote:
.
I don't post here very often but all I ever keep reading about is your race results. So I decided to take a look.
What I see is someone that is a good runner but is a pretty weak biker. I have no idea if the powercranks are helping your run or not but they clearly are not helping your bike. Maybe it is time to ditch them and do some traditional cycling? Even if you happened to lose a bit in the run I think that would be more that made up in your bike. Probably time to refocus your training!
I probably shouldn't give you this advice because you're just going to post more and more about your results but at least we won't be hearing about these powercranks.[/quote]
Yep, my bike sucks and always has.
The day I get older folks beating me is the day I will ask what do I need to change. And I have been in the top 20 the last 3 year in the AG with USAT rankings, 12th last year, so yep, I am a real poor athlete.
.[/quote]
I never said you are a poor athlete. For someone that is clearly interested in results you think you would be doing everything you can to improve on them but clearly you're not.
You may also want to go back and look at your results form Edmonton. I didn't see you winning your age group and if you look at one age group up you were beaten by a couple people older than you.
I guess today is that day![/quote]
Yep, my bike was poor at Edmonton. (You did not comment that I had the fastest runs though)
Couple of mistakes at Edmonton. I had the only round tube old crappy bike. But worse, for me, is I rode 175mm cranks, which I know now, for me is terrible.
I was only 2 minutes off the Podium in the Olympic race, with the fastest run. I will take that. :)
.
Dave Campbell | Facebook | @DaveECampbell | h2ofun@h2ofun.net
Boom Nutrition code 19F4Y3 $5 off 24 pack box | Bionic Runner | PowerCranks | Velotron | Spruzzamist
Lions don't lose sleep worrying about the sheep