Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Prev Next
Re: A Question Only [pattersonpaul] [ In reply to ]
 
Awesome.
 
Re: A Question Only [Kenney] [ In reply to ]
 
Nice to see a better story amongst all this carnage:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/...t/0/cycling/19930514

...maybe we should have a thread for all those guys who refused to dope and had to quit the sport. Cue quips about how short a thread it would be, but I'll bet there were quite a few we've just never heard about, to say nothing of those who didn't even bother to try to go pro because they knew what was involved to win.
 
Re: A Question Only [Kay Serrar] [ In reply to ]
 
Kay Serrar wrote:
Nice to see a better story amongst all this carnage:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/...t/0/cycling/19930514

...maybe we should have a thread for all those guys who refused to dope and had to quit the sport. Cue quips about how short a thread it would be, but I'll bet there were quite a few we've just never heard about, to say nothing of those who didn't even bother to try to go pro because they knew what was involved to win.


I was offered testosterone at a gym to get bigger for rugby. Had by team rugby jersey on and didn't know the guy (pusher). Said no and didn't go back to that gym.
I could name some other non-American sports and certain countries which had or still have problems with drugs in sports.
The thing is the drugs are quite often not illegal for medical treatment when coming back from injury when a person has handed in their pro license.

Also a lot of people know which doctors or other sources will provide them with PEDs. I am 100% against drugs used illegally, but it would take pretty extreme circumstances before I would consider dobbing someone in. And yes I have seen a guy injecting, well him and also the guys on the street in a few different cities.
Here is a scenario I heard recently. Guy gets busted for class A drugs, guys above him send some threats to those around him and he has only one way out so it appears, sad. Moral of the story is don't get involved in drugs.


G.

http://www.TriathlonShots.com
Full event coverage of triathlon/ironman in photos.


Last edited by: triathlonshots: Oct 12, 12 19:56
 
Re: A Question Only [Kay Serrar] [ In reply to ]
 
Kay Serrar wrote:
Nice to see a better story amongst all this carnage:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/...t/0/cycling/19930514

...maybe we should have a thread for all those guys who refused to dope and had to quit the sport. Cue quips about how short a thread it would be, but I'll bet there were quite a few we've just never heard about, to say nothing of those who didn't even bother to try to go pro because they knew what was involved to win.

Mercier has been reported on before, but it is good to see. He wrote an op ed a few weeks ago calling for UCI resignations.

John



Top notch coaching: Francois and Accelerate3 | Follow on Twitter: LifetimeAthlete |
 
Re: A Question Only [Bman925] [ In reply to ]
 
Bman925 wrote:
pick6 wrote:
Bman925 wrote:
The main difference here is that WTC is not a governing body. It is a company that elected to use the USADA to assist in doping controls. People have shown that USADA has not done a very good job of this for WTC. Following a review of the information provided by USADA and a serious conversation with their attorneys, my belief is this:

WTC will fire the USADA in their role as doping authority inasmuch as they have admitted as part of the Armstrong case they cannot provide an analytical positive. WTC will do its best to put together a legitimate anti-doping procedure using independent experts and reliable laboratories.

Brian


There's a simple answer to this: It won't happen. Why? Because WTC is a WADA signatory, which you missed in all this. They're not going to pull out of that. They cant fire USADA, as USADA falls under WADA. USADA also didn't admit they can't provide an analytical positive; Most of the samples during armstrongs time were administered by UCI; which armstrong wouldnt give USADA access to. If they did, and with the new EPO tests, it's almost a lock that he'd test positive if the samples from the tours were available for retesting by USADA.

Lance is done racing except his own series and the occasional unsanctioned race.


Just a couple of things:

Just because you are a WADA signatory now doesn't mean you have to be one forever. I haven't missed this. WTC like any company can do whatever they want. If that means blowing off WADA as well as USADA in favor of a different testing regimen there is no reason this should be a problem. Let's face it, WADA's record in catching cheats is lousy or they would have "cleaned up" cycling long ago.

As far as there being an analytical positive in the report that any lawyer worth his salt couldn't tear to shreds, please point it out to me. There was a post earlier where an attorney said that most of what was presented in the report was so poor that he "wished he was still a trial attorney".

I believe that Lance Armstrong doped. I also believe he will never admit it. All I'm saying is that after a substantial penalty and under a certain set of circumstances he could race again. I, personally, wouldn't mind seeing it.

Brian

WTC isnt going to drop WADA signatory status. the 2009 blood passport results are a failed test, the fact that the UCI never showed it to their passport committee doesnt make it any less of a positive test. 4 of the passport committee members have publicly in the last week come out and said if it had been presented to them it would have been a passport violation.

Youre entire premise is false. UCI maintained results management over the majority of cycling races in the world with top level pros in it. They didnt want the riders caught, so they made sure to keep the results the way they wanted them. They benefited from the appearance of clean racing, not clean racing.
 
Re: A Question Only [JollyRogers] [ In reply to ]
 
Note the disclaimer at the bottom of the page for additional entertainment...

Re: PC ad
 
Re: A Question Only [Kay Serrar] [ In reply to ]
 
Thanks
 
Re: A Question Only [jmh] [ In reply to ]
 
jmh wrote:
Got it. Subtle. From TH's book:

Quote:
My secret weapon wasn’t a private jet or even Ufe. It was a short, wiry Italian man named Luigi Cecchini. I called him Cecco. Cecco was a trainer who lived in Lucca, near Bjarne. Bjarne had introduced me to him shortly after I’d signed, saying he could help me reach the next level. Cecco’s client list was top shelf: Ullrich, Pantani, Bugno, Bartoli, Petacchi, Cipollini, Cancellara, Casagrande. In fact, Cecco had helped revive Bjarne Riis’s back career back in the early 1990s; he was the reason Riis had bought a house near Lucca.

Coyle, Daniel; Hamilton, Tyler (2012-09-05). The Secret Race: Inside the Hidden World of the Tour de France: Doping, Cover-ups, and Winning at All Costs

I'm NOT saying any of these guys (of course, other than those who already have been convicted or admitted to it) doped, but TH might be.


To be fair on Cecchini, from the next paragraph in The Secret Race:

Quote:
He (Cecco) also had a revolutionary and refreshing attitude about doping ... he encouraged me (TH) to dope as little as possible. He never gave me (TH) any Edgar (EPO); ... because Cecco believed that most riders dope far, far too much.

 
Re: A Question Only [triathlonshots] [ In reply to ]
 
I could name some other non-American sports and certain countries which had or still have problems with drugs in sports.


Yeah but could you name a single sport or country free of drugs in sports?
 
Re: A Question Only [gregf83] [ In reply to ]
 
gregf83 wrote:
departed wrote:
gregf83 wrote:
departed wrote:
Nearly everyone from the EPO era has confessed by now (Bjarne, Jan, the discovery team, . . . .).
What makes you think that? I suspect there are many others who doped but didn't get caught and weren't forced to testify.


Agreed. But those who haven't confessed differ from Armstrong in that (a) they are smaller fish and have moved on quietly to lives outside cycling, and/or (b) have been quiet about the past and have not been proclaiming that they were clean in the EPO era. Thus, I see LA as largely standing alone proclaiming that he rode clean during the EPO era.
With all due respect, that is complete nonsense. By not saying anything or helping to disclose what went on they are equally culpable and implicitly claiming they were clean. So what if they were 'smaller fish', which is just a euphemism for poorer riders. Why should they get a free pass?

Quote:
Cycling fans like me may have doubts about all the winners of the TDF since LA, but none of them have gotten up on the soapbox like Lance making a big deal about being clean.
What about Contador? You think he has fessed up to everything he's taken? He's a doper too but I very much enjoyed watching the Vuelta this year and would be disappointed if he were eliminated from cycling.


Quote:
Cycling still as many problems, but there was never going to be any real healing until the biggest boil on its neck got lanced.
Without rigorous testing accompanied by the blood passport program, nothing will change independent of what happens to LA. It's more difficult, but not impossible, to dope now and that is due only to the framework in place for testing. Strengthen the framework to the point where gains from doping are small to insignificant and that will be good enough or me. I don't need perfection.

Here's a postal rider, named by other riders but not convicted of anything; coming clean before australia went after him. Didnt talk to USADA, Didnt make a deal, came clean once the story came out. the other shoe is falling http://www.sbs.com.au/...n-from-cycling-posts This is going to impact team after team as more of the folks named in the exhibits come clean. So many of these guys still work in the sport.
 
Post deleted by bazilbrush [ In reply to ]
Re: Daniel Coyle tweet [FJB] [ In reply to ]
 
FJB wrote:
I would imagine that UCI/team HQ's/sponsors are all scrambling a bit right now.


I agree. I did read Nike is standing by Lance but that is often a knee-jerk reaction and the amount of press and public reaction will be the deciding factor of course. I sense based on comments from other riders (Fabian and David Miller to name two) that this is gaining steam and not going away soon.


I think that ship as long sailed in Nike (or other major sponsors) dropping LA.

Unless something heinous comes out about LA doing something that is against the law very recently other than, to paraphrase Don Corleone, " a harmless vice" as it is now in a sport that does not take place on US soil and a sport very few people pay attention to, care about or understand.

The public at large is completely neutral to a large WGAS/WGAF about all of this stuff with LA. The Hulk Hogan sex tape got more press this past week than LA did with these doping charges that occurred years ago in Europe.
Last edited by: SayHey Kid: Oct 13, 12 6:33
 
Re: A Question Only [pick6] [ In reply to ]
 
pick6 wrote:
Here's a postal rider, named by other riders but not convicted of anything; coming clean before australia went after him. Didnt talk to USADA, Didnt make a deal, came clean once the story came out. the other shoe is falling http://www.sbs.com.au/...n-from-cycling-posts This is going to impact team after team as more of the folks named in the exhibits come clean. So many of these guys still work in the sport.

He was named in the report. Waited until it came out and was about to be trashed in the media. If he was not named he would not have confessed. He is no hero. Also he was fired from a team in 2011 for sending a rider to a dirty doctor for a "Vo2" test.

I want someone not named and not part of an American team to come out and confess.
 
Re: A Question Only [pick6] [ In reply to ]
 
Gets rid of the "They were offered a deal and they are lying to protect their interests" argument. No deals with White. Doesn't excuse his doping though.



Heath Dotson
HD Coaching:Website |Twitter: 140 Characters or Less|Facebook:Follow us on Facebook
 
Re: A Question Only [Hanaki] [ In reply to ]
 
Hanaki wrote:
pick6 wrote:
Here's a postal rider, named by other riders but not convicted of anything; coming clean before australia went after him. Didnt talk to USADA, Didnt make a deal, came clean once the story came out. the other shoe is falling http://www.sbs.com.au/...n-from-cycling-posts This is going to impact team after team as more of the folks named in the exhibits come clean. So many of these guys still work in the sport.


He was named in the report. Waited until it came out and was about to be trashed in the media. If he was not named he would not have confessed. He is no hero. Also he was fired from a team in 2011 for sending a rider to a dirty doctor for a "Vo2" test.

I want someone not named and not part of an American team to come out and confess.

I will be happy if I see everybody in the postal team confess...

The entire event (IM) is like "death by 1000 cuts" and the best race is minimizing all those cuts and losing less blood than the other guy. - Dev
 
Re: A Question Only [Ex-cyclist] [ In reply to ]
 
Ex-cyclist wrote:
Gets rid of the "They were offered a deal and they are lying to protect their interests" argument. No deals with White. Doesn't excuse his doping though.

We are not sure what if any deal he was offered in Austrailia. Also he didn't come out and say he doped. He probably still wants to be involved in cycling and felt this was the best way to do that.

"I am sad to say that I was part of a team where doping formed part of the team's strategy, and I too was involved in that strategy."

A real confession would say what he took and when he took it. It would also name names of people that gave him the drugs and who else he knew took them.

It was known in 2010 the allegations against him but he chose not to confirm those.
 
Re: A Question Only [Hanaki] [ In reply to ]
 
Every single confession, aside from Tyler's, is lame. They're all wrapped around the why, etc. I can understand the need to present the rationale
for doping (I guess we all know what it is anyway), but in the end, have the guts to say: but it was my choice, and no one had a gun to my head. I chose
to do it.
 
Re: A Question Only [Mike C] [ In reply to ]
 
Mike C wrote:
Now I just think the whole thing sucks.

Eight words that sum up everything quite nicely.

Yep,it's just too bad that some people have to make this personal and insult anyone who does not share their opinions 100%.
 
Re: A Question Only [Hanaki] [ In reply to ]
 
Hanaki wrote:
Ex-cyclist wrote:
Gets rid of the "They were offered a deal and they are lying to protect their interests" argument. No deals with White. Doesn't excuse his doping though.


We are not sure what if any deal he was offered in Austrailia. Also he didn't come out and say he doped. He probably still wants to be involved in cycling and felt this was the best way to do that.

"I am sad to say that I was part of a team where doping formed part of the team's strategy, and I too was involved in that strategy."

A real confession would say what he took and when he took it. It would also name names of people that gave him the drugs and who else he knew took them.

It was known in 2010 the allegations against him but he chose not to confirm those.

Yes we are, as of the time of coming forward, cycling australia hadn't contacted him yet.
 
Re: Daniel Coyle tweet [SayHey Kid] [ In reply to ]
 
SayHey Kid wrote:
FJB wrote:
I would imagine that UCI/team HQ's/sponsors are all scrambling a bit right now.


I agree. I did read Nike is standing by Lance but that is often a knee-jerk reaction and the amount of press and public reaction will be the deciding factor of course. I sense based on comments from other riders (Fabian and David Miller to name two) that this is gaining steam and not going away soon.


I think that ship as long sailed in Nike (or other major sponsors) dropping LA.

Unless something heinous comes out about LA doing something that is against the law very recently other than, to paraphrase Don Corleone, " a harmless vice" as it is now in a sport that does not take place on US soil and a sport very few people pay attention to, care about or understand.

The public at large is completely neutral to a large WGAS/WGAF about all of this stuff with LA. The Hulk Hogan sex tape got more press this past week than LA did with these doping charges that occurred years ago in Europe.

I honestly don't know the answer to this so may be well of course but surely some of these allegation provide very strong evidence that LA committed perjury in at least some of the many court battle he has been involved in. If that is the case don't the feds have a duty to follow up and prosecute? As I say I don't know the answer to this so genuinely interested in thoughts.

Also this is huge news in Europe and even in the Middle East where I live and even on Chinese tv there was a major news item on it.....this isn't about to go away anytime soon, IMHO this is only really starting and LA and a lot of others guys I believe will be truly sweating now as they are looking at jail time.....the Italians have already begun a criminal investigation against Ferrari. In one sense I hope it does go all the way to criminal courts as that is possibly the one thing that will once and for all put an end to widespread doping practices
 
Re: A Question Only [pick6] [ In reply to ]
 
pick6 wrote:
Hanaki wrote:
Ex-cyclist wrote:
Gets rid of the "They were offered a deal and they are lying to protect their interests" argument. No deals with White. Doesn't excuse his doping though.


We are not sure what if any deal he was offered in Austrailia. Also he didn't come out and say he doped. He probably still wants to be involved in cycling and felt this was the best way to do that.

"I am sad to say that I was part of a team where doping formed part of the team's strategy, and I too was involved in that strategy."

A real confession would say what he took and when he took it. It would also name names of people that gave him the drugs and who else he knew took them.

It was known in 2010 the allegations against him but he chose not to confirm those.


Yes we are, as of the time of coming forward, cycling australia hadn't contacted him yet.

Cycling Australia was first made aware of Landis's allegations in May 2010.
Cycling Australia then referred the matter to the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority, which said in February last year it was aware of the claims made by Landis.

So in all that time they never contacted him at all??

He is also "co-ordinator of Cycling Australia's men's road racing program, which takes in the Olympics and the world championships."

So no one contacted him when the main USADA report came out. That would be very strange indeed.
 
Re: A Question Only [FJB] [ In reply to ]
 
FJB wrote:
I could name some other non-American sports and certain countries which had or still have problems with drugs in sports.


Yeah but could you name a single sport or country free of drugs in sports?

Not unless you get some fringe sport like darts or similar. However, even those I wouldn't bet on it. In "A Good Walk Spoiled", the first book where a writer spent a year on the PGA tour, there were a couple golfers that said they experimented with beta blockers to keep their heart rate down during tournaments.

Maybe T-ball?

John



Top notch coaching: Francois and Accelerate3 | Follow on Twitter: LifetimeAthlete |
 
Re: Daniel Coyle tweet [SayHey Kid] [ In reply to ]
 
SayHey Kid wrote:
Unless something heinous comes out about LA doing something that is against the law very recently other than, to paraphrase Don Corleone, " a harmless vice" as it is now in a sport that does not take place on US soil and a sport very few people pay attention to, care about or understand.

The public at large is completely neutral to a large WGAS/WGAF about all of this stuff with LA. The Hulk Hogan sex tape got more press this past week than LA did with these doping charges that occurred years ago in Europe.

Would the fact he's being sued by the Sunday Times (*) (Rupert Murdoch, oh the irony) for basically extorting money from them for allegedly "slandering" him in 2004 count? That, and things like it, in my opinion, is why Armstrong is such a f*cking creep. That goes way beyond "a harmless vice". If you have harmless vices, shut the fuck up about them.

(*) To lazy to find an English language link. Can give you a Dutch one you can feed through translate if you insist.

Citizen of the world, former drunkard. Resident Traumatic Brain Injury advocate.
 
Re: A Question Only [Francois] [ In reply to ]
 
Francois wrote:
Every single confession, aside from Tyler's, is lame. They're all wrapped around the why, etc. I can understand the need to present the rationale
for doping (I guess we all know what it is anyway), but in the end, have the guts to say: but it was my choice, and no one had a gun to my head. I chose
to do it.

Landis is the most honest. Everyone else is using a variation of "I'm so sorry. I should not have done it. I feel guilty.". Landis is honest enough to say he would do it again and the whole experience was a great ride. The only thing he is sorry about is lying when he was caught.
 
Re: A Question Only [Francois] [ In reply to ]
 
Francois wrote:
Every single confession, aside from Tyler's, is lame. They're all wrapped around the why, etc. I can understand the need to present the rationale
for doping (I guess we all know what it is anyway), but in the end, have the guts to say: but it was my choice, and no one had a gun to my head. I chose
to do it.

I can get fully behind that. My BS meter is still being tickled after reading the others' statements and confessions.
 

Prev Next