From Gwen thread
juanillo wrote:
The olympic quota is not awarding the best athletes as it should . . .
It is astonishing that some countries, with 5 or 6 athletes in the top 30, . . .
It is even so stupid that guys and girls who . . . are in the top 30.. [are not picked].
this problem happens with France, Germany, UK, USA [you missed the ESP men, 5 in top #32]
So, clearly, I would say WT to decide of they want to prioritize individuals vs team relay and athletes vs federations. In athletics, if you fulfill the IAAF criteria you are in and no discussion. Also, with these countries with so much talent, give them an extra spot...this is not swimming and athletics that are practised more or less over the world.
Olympics is a world wide sports competition. Do you wish to exclude many athletes from nations across the world by just going on rankings? Because that would be the effect. A subsidiary effect would be to generate team tactics (and domestique-type activity) in the individual by the nations who might have 4 or even 5 thus included. We've already seen that with the set maximum of 3 per nation.
Enjoy Paris 2024: it'll be the last time we see a proper 100+ minute triathlon at the Olympic Games, echoing Brooks' mantra.
"WT to decide of they want to prioritize individuals vs team relay and athletes vs federations": they have
decided and strike the current balance. For LA28 they'll "decide": sprint distance (with MTR half that). Much better for tv, and after all, what criterion is more important.
"In athletics, if you fulfill the IAAF criteria you are in" - think you are comprehensively mistaken: there are nation limits for every event (same for swimming). (NB IAAF is not a 'thing' now btw.)
https://www.triathlon.org/...qualification/female