rubik wrote:
fb wrote:
rubik wrote:
Yeah, got him confused with fb, who seems confused about what a cat 2 actually is.
The US is not my primary racing scene, but I've done about 20 races in the most competitive region of the US (in categories ranging from cat 3 to cat1) so I do think I have a decent grasp of the level of a cat2.
With an FTP of ~4w/kg I would gather enough points in cat3 over a season to qualify for cat 2. Granted, since I've done about a 1000 races in Europe I have more race craft than most.
Otoh 4 w/kg would get you dropped in most cat2 races no matter your skill level.
To be in any way competitive there my guess is you would need at least 4.4 w/kg, a decent sprint and good race craft. Does that sound about right?
The level of a cat 2 was not your initial assertion. Your initial assertion was that
Quote:
People who do actually train, in my experience, end up in cat 2 at least.Thus, I think your initial assertion is wrong and as you allude to in your second paragraph, far more comes into play than ftp.
Yes you are right. I was wrong in saying that everyone has the potential to get to cat2. What I should have said was that 50% has the potential.
My comments here were in regards to Andy Coggans definition of "actually training" - which I took to mean "getting the absolute max out of yourself with many years of brutal training and diet". The very few who do this will aquire both the physical and mental skills to at least *get to* cat2.
But I still believe that the 4.1w/kg of the OP are closer to getting him to cat2 than to be an average cat3. (Given that he aquires decent technical and tactical skills).