wasusnowme wrote:
JSA wrote:
wasusnowme wrote:
JSA wrote:
wasusnowme wrote:
JSA wrote:
wasusnowme wrote:
Sanuk wrote:
How very republican of you to pass judgment on someone's personal choices that are none of your business.
There are lots of things people make personal choices about that don't have a direct impact on my life. If a couple makes a "personal choice" to abort a child, and the child can't speak for themselves, is it okay to speak out on that child's behalf or is it only the business of the couple?
Your business ends at the end of you nose. If it has no impact on your life, it doesn't concern you. If you have sperm in the game, then it does.
Using your logic, if I walk upon a woman being raped or a child being sexual abused, I should just keep walking because it isn't any of my business.
That's quite a leap, even for you. The last time I checked, abortion was not a criminal act. Those who believe it is are radical conservative terrorists.
I'm not comparing abortion to anything. I did not mention abortion, did not refer to abortion, and was not addressing abortion.
Look at what you wrote. Look at it. Using your logic, if I walk upon a woman being raped or a child being sexually abused, I should just keep walking because it isn't any of my business.
If that is not what you meant, then learn to write intelligently and work on your ability to express yourself through the written word.
So, do you care to revise your original answer to Sanuk or continue to look like a unintelligible boob?
I love how you people wander off topic and then take the [supposed] logical high ground when someone responds within the context of the original posting. Responding appropriately to stumbling upon a criminal act is one of the responsibilities we assume when we decide to be a member of a society that has gone to the trouble of determining what is, and what is not, a criminal act.
So now you sit as judge and jury to decide what is and is not a criminal act???
Wow. I really hope these posts merely evince your inability to formulate a coherent thought into written word and are not a reflection of your insanely warped mind.
Are you drunk, or just stoned? What, exactly, do you not comprehend in my statement?
It has nothing to do with my comprehension. It is what your words actually say. The fact that you lack the mental capacity to comprehend what your own written words actually say and the asinine position they express, comes of no surprise.
Your express position is that another couple's abortion has no direct impact on Sanuk, so he should mind his business. Well, the same can be said of a sexual assault upon which Sanuk comes upon. So, using your logic, he should not intervene in any manner. If you wish to clarify your position, you should do so. But, the words say what they say and that cannot be debated. Therefore, you either lack the ability to express yourself through written word or you truly are a despicable person who feels a person should not intervene in any matter than does not directly impact the person.
If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers
Emery's Third Coast Triathlon | Tri Wisconsin Triathlon Team | Push Endurance | GLWR