Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Prev Next
Re: pretty... [original PV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I guess my theory is that the ethic we should send our kids is to be the best you can in all facets of life.

I think the point that you're missing is that that's not the message that society is sending women.

Quote Reply
Re: pretty... [squid] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I completely agree that the message society isn't sending is to excel in all facets.



When someone pulls laws out of their @$$, all we end up with are laws that smell like sh!t. -Skippy
Quote Reply
Re: pretty... [original PV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I am not sure I am going to be able to find the right words for such a complicated issue but since we are having a conversation and since it is something I feel strongly about I am going to give it a go....I am hoping it doesn't come across as a rant, that is not what I intend. To speak in terms of gross generalities or societal norms makes it vague so I will speak to what I know.

It is one thing to have my appearance/presentation used by others as one facet of an overall impression/appraisal of me. In this sense I have no problem with someone not getting their `best' impression of me if I haven't taken the time to comb my hair and throw on clothes that don't have holes in them. It is quite another to be dismissed outright, to be judged or to be denied opportunities based on whether, because in that first moment, I didn't look like Cindy Crawford. No matter how hard I try I will never look like Cindy Crawford. I bought her weight training video back in the 80's with a degree of wishful thinking:) Alas, I am still me. Even now in 2010 I am still told that that is what I should aspire to, that it will buy the right guy, the nice house, the nice car, great clothes, joy and happiness.

As a smart woman, who has never typically been the best looker in the room, I have learned a few things. There a few men out there who will take the time to get to know me, don't pre-judge. There are others who will quickly dismiss me and move on to my more beautiful/pretty friends. In other words, and in the words of the video- I have been deemed to be "unfuckable". Then there are those who will talk to my chest. My brain is located in my head, not my breasts. While you may argue that most smart men wouldn't behave that way, trust me lots do. Some of these are the same men who will take my girlfriends out for dinner, appreciate their beauty, enjoy having a beautiful woman on their arm and then feel entitled to `something' for having provided the dinner. There are many women who gradually come to believe that their beauty, because of this, is the only thing that will get them somewhere- but eventually what they come to know is that it rings hollow when it doesn't matter whether you did an Ironman, got your degree while raising the kids etc....

So the issue of raising our daughters is complicated. You want them to understand that it does matter that they take care of themselves in ways that allow them to feel beautiful inside and out and that gives them the right kind of opportunities but you also want them to understand how to tell the difference between a boss or a boyfriend who doesn't appreciate them beyond how they look. As the mother of a son, I want him to grow up to appreciate and value inner beauty as much as outer beauty- not to write someone off who doesn't happen to look like his equivalent of Cindy Crawford. Talk about a complicated job!

Not sure this helps....

Alison
Quote Reply
Re: pretty... [Alison] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
There is absolutely nothing in your post that I disagree with. I commend you on crafting not a rant, but a well thought out opinion. Sounds like you are one heckuva mom!



When someone pulls laws out of their @$$, all we end up with are laws that smell like sh!t. -Skippy
Quote Reply
Re: pretty... [Alison] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Very well written. It captures a lot of my experiences as well. Thanks.

AP

------------------------
"How bad could it be?" - SimpleS
Quote Reply
Re: pretty... [Alison] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
In Reply To:
I am not sure I am going to be able to find the right words for such a complicated issue but since we are having a conversation and since it is something I feel strongly about I am going to give it a go....I am hoping it doesn't come across as a rant, that is not what I intend. To speak in terms of gross generalities or societal norms makes it vague so I will speak to what I know.

It is one thing to have my appearance/presentation used by others as one facet of an overall impression/appraisal of me. In this sense I have no problem with someone not getting their `best' impression of me if I haven't taken the time to comb my hair and throw on clothes that don't have holes in them. It is quite another to be dismissed outright, to be judged or to be denied opportunities based on whether, because in that first moment, I didn't look like Cindy Crawford. No matter how hard I try I will never look like Cindy Crawford. I bought her weight training video back in the 80's with a degree of wishful thinking:) Alas, I am still me. Even now in 2010 I am still told that that is what I should aspire to, that it will buy the right guy, the nice house, the nice car, great clothes, joy and happiness.

As a smart woman, who has never typically been the best looker in the room, I have learned a few things. There a few men out there who will take the time to get to know me, don't pre-judge. There are others who will quickly dismiss me and move on to my more beautiful/pretty friends. In other words, and in the words of the video- I have been deemed to be "unfuckable". Then there are those who will talk to my chest. My brain is located in my head, not my breasts. While you may argue that most smart men wouldn't behave that way, trust me lots do. Some of these are the same men who will take my girlfriends out for dinner, appreciate their beauty, enjoy having a beautiful woman on their arm and then feel entitled to `something' for having provided the dinner. There are many women who gradually come to believe that their beauty, because of this, is the only thing that will get them somewhere- but eventually what they come to know is that it rings hollow when it doesn't matter whether you did an Ironman, got your degree while raising the kids etc....

So the issue of raising our daughters is complicated. You want them to understand that it does matter that they take care of themselves in ways that allow them to feel beautiful inside and out and that gives them the right kind of opportunities but you also want them to understand how to tell the difference between a boss or a boyfriend who doesn't appreciate them beyond how they look. As the mother of a son, I want him to grow up to appreciate and value inner beauty as much as outer beauty- not to write someone off who doesn't happen to look like his equivalent of Cindy Crawford. Talk about a complicated job!

Not sure this helps....

Alison


It's times like this I really wish ST had a "like" button. SUPER-LIKE.
Well written.

--L
Quote Reply
Re: pretty... [Khai] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
In Reply To:
What strikes me a particularly interesting is how you arrived at that reading of her work. I got a completely different message - namely, that being defined as and by the term "pretty" is an extremely small and fairly negative way of viewing oneself.

The author is none of the things you mentioned - just look at her. She's well put together, and obviously takes pride in her appearance. But her appearance is not her defining characteristic. She's passionate, eloquent, fiercely opinionated, and intelligent. She's angry. She's funny. She's brave. And yes, pretty, too. But what about her struck you the most? I'd be surprised if you honestly claimed that it was her looks.

THAT, to me, was her point. Not that there's anything intrinsically wrong with "being pretty". But that only being pretty is a far cry from what any modern woman ought to strive for. Based on her looks I'd wager that her daughter will be pretty too. But I'm also quite certain that she'll be far more than just pretty...

***********************************************************************************

Kai, thanks for posting the video and stimulating the great dialogue. This issue matters.

I believe you are right about the woman in the video. She has figured out by her early thirties what takes most of the rest of us until our 40's and 50's to figure out. That is, that there is more to us than how we look. I wouldn't want to go back to my teens, twenties or thirties to have to deal with all that body image stuff again- will I be pretty? At 48 I don't care so much anymore and it feels great- but don't mistake that for a license to let myself go, rather it is permission to take care of me in ways that I enjoy. In fact because of that, I would say that most of us older gals are a way better catch in our latter years than we ever were when we were at our `prettiest' :)

Gotta love the slowtwitch forums!

Alison
Quote Reply
Re: pretty... [Alison] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
In fact because of that, I would say that most of us older gals are a way better catch in our latter years than we ever were when we were at our `prettiest' :)

Yep, I couldn't agree more.

Quote Reply
Re: pretty... [Alison] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
What she said!

Thank you for so eloquently stating this.
Quote Reply
Re: pretty... [FeltLikeTriing] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The enemy has invaded !
I'm a 53 year old guy who reads the Women's forum for 2 reasons: I get really tired of the harsh responses in the other forum and topics get discussed here that most men are afraid of ( I'm guessing ).
Wow, that youtube video ! I'd never seen women's eyes being made larger , etc. Kind of brilliant how the ad is over a car lot at the end ( commodities ).
A few responses:
My daughter , now 27 and healthy, was in rehab for eating disorders several times. She was bulimic ( a strange way of saying she made herself throw up after eating ).
I really think the body image problem is widespread in male triathletes too. There is a current post about a guy who lost a lot of weight and freezes in wetsuit swims. Who would've guessed ! Part of it is this entire ' if you don't qualify for Kona, you're nothing ' sub context.

There is this great sci-fi short story about a guy who owns a dog. One day the dog starts talking . It turns out all dogs can talk but they don't want us to know about it. The rest of the dogs hear about the traitor dog and kill him. I hope none of the guys from the regular forum read this and start writing those cruel responses. It seems we've lost the ' we can disagree without being disagreeable ' idea in that forum.

I don't want to sound like I'm pandering but I answered a post about the new Triathlete mag with the nearly naked woman on the front ; my wife was thrilled with that !
She also wants to know why there isn't a 'Mr November' contest on the Triathlete website.

I also confess that I get a lot of enjoyment from being 6 feet tall and 190 lbs ( from exercise ) at my age.I don't think I should weigh 170 lbs and live on 1200 calories, though. I believe there is a middle ground in all this. Speaking only for myself, if my self esteem is based on what other people think of me, I'll never be happy. However, I can't even guess the effects of growing up with an impossible standard bombarding you every day. I think it's shocking how widespread 'cosmetic surgery ' is . Does anyone remember that sad Triathlete mag with that no body fat woman and breast implants in a bikini ?

While I'm at it, I get a kick out of the 'too sexy' halloween costumes articles every year. Apparently, women are supposed to be luring but not sexual. It just seems hypocritical. I think a terror of women's sexuality lurks just beneath the surface of our culture at all times.
Curious to hear any responses.
Fight the Power, of course.
Quote Reply
Re: pretty... [Nola Joe] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Having just been in Vegas it is shocking how much plastic surgery there is. Just wait til all those Barbie/Ariel wanna be's turn 65 and still have the nasty DD rack!!! Yuck!

Body image affects all genders, you bet. I would bet that the vast majority of people in "western" society would, if asked to draw/outline/describe their body size accurately, be off by at least 10%, maybe even more. Imagine the exercise of being given a digital image of yourself that's been all warped up, and you are asked to put it correct, with correct proportions. No one would be close to right. And a lot of women would be way off, either way too skinny or way to fat, of course not even close to accurate.

Learning to read through the media representations, see beyond the image presented for its true content and meaning - not the visual stimulus of a pretty skinny tall woman for example. A good example of how invasive advertising is: try muting the tv when ads come on. You really can notice the difference in your response to the visual content.

Thanks for posting.

AP

------------------------
"How bad could it be?" - SimpleS
Quote Reply
Re: pretty... [AndyPants] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
A good example of how invasive advertising is

Amen to that. It's a form of brainwashing. Usually I'll hit the mute when an ad comes on

Quote Reply
Re: pretty... [Nola Joe] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Again, I don't see a nearly naked woman here:



For all you other womens, I agree that sending the image of the way too thin woman isn't safe nor is it realistic for all the daughters out there. Granted my experience with eating disorders is very minimal, even after reading about them quite a bit I still have a hard time understanding them; but, I do understand the gravity of the situation and the problems they can cause. What I do see becoming a trend though is the 'accept your body' mentality, without the preclusion though of 'as long as its healthy'.

Its imperative to keep your body healthy, which gets seemingly overlooked in the Environment of Acceptance, but it seems like to me beyond that, both male and female should make every effort to set their own standards of self validation. How to draw that line though, I admit, I have no idea.

Miss Pants (Hey, how are ya? Haven't talked at ya in a while),
I'll agree that image issues impact both sexes. Granted its exactly opposite for many men as it is for women but that's neither here nor there. I'll speak from personal experience when I say that I have always seen myself as smaller than I am. I lifted quite heavily throughout college and no matter where I was in terms of muscle mass, I never saw it as big enough or where I wanted to be, or even where I was. I guess for me though even at my heaviest muscle mass, it was never unhealthy, and for that I am really lucky. Which to me seems to be the recurring theme, healthy.



When someone pulls laws out of their @$$, all we end up with are laws that smell like sh!t. -Skippy
Quote Reply
Re: pretty... [Nola Joe] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
First off, thanks for your post. I too like to think we are a little kinder and gentler :)

By the way this isn't the wetsuit guys issue, if we are talking about the same post, he lost his weight from cancer.

In terms of males, body image and eating disorders, I believe that you are right that the issues are now across the board. It is a shame that men didn't learn from our mistakes and stop the media images, largely through print mags. The proliferation of magazines, like Men's Health, set the wheels in motion for the standard to be set for men as well. This shows as an increase in the use of steroids in young males, the incidence of males presenting for treatment, also at alarmingly younger ages. However, I would add it is hard to determine whether in fact this is entirely new as men/boys don't come forward in the same way that women do for treatment. This is likely for a couple of reasons-they don't talk and it probably isn't on parents' radar in the same way it would be for females. Also, the treatment systems are, for the most part, very female oriented. Boys/ men can feel pretty awkward in a room full of girls/women and it can often discourage many from sticking with treatment.

On that note, if you are a Glee fan, you may have recently watched an episode (the Rocky Horror one- yeah). In it they showed the main character Fin, as feeling awkward about walking around in his tidy whities due to discomfort around his body image. He was comparing himself to the buff guy (Sam) with the six pack who talked about working out for hours in order to have said six pack to get dates etc...Sam expressed concern about having to wear too small a suit- but argued on grounds of ...ummm...`package' discomfort. For me there were a few interesting things to note about this- one, the guys complained! Women won't typically. They would lose the weight or perform anyway and feel ashamed. Second, they actually showed a guy comparing himself to another and coming up short- a very hot, cool guy (as would be determined by those much younger than I of course) it must be noted. Did anyone else see that?

Alison
Quote Reply
Re: pretty... [original PV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
thanks for your post.
Speaking only for myself, when I look at that woman, here's what I see.
Her arms and legs are about as thin as they can be. Now, that may be because she's an endurance athlete; Pam Reed , one of my heroes ( John Bonness is great too ) is lean too. I can't imagine any tri shorts that would be functional if they were cut like the ones she's wearing. Why is this woman on the cover of Triathlete ? Is it because her shorts are only an inch above her vulva ? She may be very comfortable showing that much of her body; why aren't men exposed on the cover like that ? Maybe a lot of male readers would be offended if a man wearing the same shorts was on the cover. Women are presented as bodies to be looked at in a sexual way. Men aren't. To me , there is an inherent vulnerability in having your genitalia barely covered.
I have a friend who teaches gender representation in western culture. If you want to see men presented as women are , look at gay porn or ads aimed at gay males. Men in that media are presented for their sexual attraction value.
I do agree with you about the acceptance issue. Accepting myself if I weighed an unhealthy 225 lbs is a bad idea. I think the glorious achievement of athletes is believing they are capable of amazing acts. Triathletes know they can swim 2 miles. I did my first 2 70.3 races very slowly and I want to be faster.
However, like you were saying about lifting, being very muscular but never feeling it was enough brings to mind the saying 'Perfect is the enemy of good'.
I'm hyper reactive to these issues 'cause my daughter nearly died from trying to meet an impossible standard. We had to commit her to a locked psych ward . She would eat and had to be watched to make sure she didn't make herself throw up . She didn't feel she had value unless she looked a certain way. To me , seeing ' perfect ' women in the media a hundred times a day is a big part of that.
Let me ask you, why doesn't the Triathlete website have contests for Mr December with 5 men in tiny speedos to choose from ? I'm not trying to put you on the spot; I just wanted to point out the difference in the way the genders are presented.
Quote Reply
Re: pretty... [Nola Joe] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
First off Joe (?), I am sorry that your daughter and your family has suffered. Indeed as a parent it can be completely scary and disempowering to watch someone you love suffer from an eating disorder. On the face of it, for those who have not lived it, it can seem so extraordinarily simple- eat. And in the face of the life or death battles that others face, such as those that the folks describe in the fibroid posts, the e.d. battles can seem superficial. What we absolutely know though is that an eating disorder takes hold of both its victim and the victims' family and friends. It changes families and it changes parents. The bottom line is that eating disorders are complicated. It would be easy to target only the mass media and images such as those that are shown on the cover but the truth is they are more than just that. It is about politics, oppression, about value, voice and power, about relationships and emotion management, sexuality, families, impulsivity, genetics, mood related issues and the list goes on....

A part of me would love to harness all of the energy that Jordan was able to rally in his `Call to action' plea. But imagine all the places we would have to hit? It would take legions of slowtwitches to address the auto, magazine, weightloss, makeup, alcohol, clothing...you name it we'd have to hit it.

In the meantime, it is great that there are men who want better for the women in their lives....

Ok now this is a rant....

alison
Quote Reply
Re: pretty... [Nola Joe] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'll begin by saying I too am sorry for what your family has had to go through and I wish your daughter and family the smoothest of paths ahead.

I don't disagree at all when it comes to women being portrayed as very thin as an unhealthy and nearly impossible standard. I hope none of my posts have portrayed that, if they have, I apologize as that is not the case. Like I said earlier, while I have a very limited understanding of eating disorders, I know enough to understand the impact they can have, much like you and Alison have both said on individuals as well as families, friends, etc. Anything we as a society can do to help combat that, I am all for.

I think when it comes to this cover you and I must just be seeing it differently. I see an athlete with low cut shorts on, yes, but nothing that is drastically outside the ordinary. I've seen lots of women at the gym, running, biking, and even doing tri's in the brief type shorts. Don't forget volleyball shorts! (Now those are short!) That's neither here nor there though. The reason she is on the cover vice Macca in a speedo is the readership of the magazine is majority male. I think we both know that. Its a sport specific magazine from which the readership hopes to gain information, which is distinct from a magazine like Mens Health or Mens Fitness which I'll mention below. Women being sexualized vice men, I definitely understand your point there as well. You really don't see on a regular basis womens magazines with men on them. You see lots of mens magazines with women on them, but you also see a lot of mens magazines with men on them. I think its these that men get their image issues from. When the magazine is about general health and fitness, (however wrong the information therein may be) we (men) want to see what we can look like if we work hard. Now granted we can't all look like the mens fitness models with uber low body fat and great six pack abs, Lord knows I'd love to though.

We all seem to agree on many of these points though. Here is my question in return: How do we convey the message that 'too thin isn't in' but 'accepting your body for what it is, even if you are heavy' isn't in either? Or do you not think that message should be sent?



When someone pulls laws out of their @$$, all we end up with are laws that smell like sh!t. -Skippy
Quote Reply
Re: pretty... [Nola Joe] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I was reading Vanity Fair yesterday (guilty pleasure) and wondering who is responsible for the ads. It is surely not ALL MEN making the JCrew modeling ads and pictures; and all the other brands --- women must be involves in choosing the models and taking the pictures and making the clothes.

So aren't we doing this to ourselves? Yeah... girl power.

On a different note,
I really like the "Pretty" poem but to be honest, it appealed to me more in her performance (I've done performance poetry) and its structure as a poem than the message. Yes, the "pretty [insert adjective]" is brilliant and I liked that, but the structure of the poem is fantastic. She talks about herself, her mother, and then her daughter; linking three generations. The "those two pretty syllables" line is brilliant; one of those things that not a lot of people are going to catch but quite nicely done anyway. I'm over all the "girl power, the media has all these impossible standards, poor women" stuff. Just tired of hearing about it. Yeah, it's true, it is an issue that's beating a dead horse, let me explicate the poem please.

maybe she's born with it, maybe it's chlorine
If you're injured and need some sympathy, PM me and I'm very happy to write back.
disclaimer: PhD not MD
Quote Reply
Re: pretty... [tigerchik] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I agree completely the toughest sell for things to change is women themselves! So many girls/women assume that guys like a thinner woman and yet if you actually ask them, most typically say they prefer a partner with some curves/shape. Correct me if I am wrong though??? Most can't hear that though. One of the greatest things that I have watched for this issue is the brit show `How to look good naked'. He takes women of all sizes and shapes and helps them to dress and feel better about themselves, just as they are- and they do!

In terms of the messages, to me the best is `health at any size'. If you say that those folks who are on the heavier side need to do things differently then again you are simply continuing the same message. For example, if you have two daughters one thinner the other larger, you are going to feed them differently? send them out to exercise differently? How would that feel to be on the receiving end? No for me the issue is no matter your gene pool, you need to be taking good care of your health period.
Quote Reply
Re: pretty... [Alison] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
In Reply To:
I agree completely the toughest sell for things to change is women themselves! So many girls/women assume that guys like a thinner woman and yet if you actually ask them, most typically say they prefer a partner with some curves/shape. Correct me if I am wrong though??? Most can't hear that though. One of the greatest things that I have watched for this issue is the brit show `How to look good naked'. He takes women of all sizes and shapes and helps them to dress and feel better about themselves, just as they are- and they do!

In terms of the messages, to me the best is `health at any size'. If you say that those folks who are on the heavier side need to do things differently then again you are simply continuing the same message. For example, if you have two daughters one thinner the other larger, you are going to feed them differently? send them out to exercise differently? How would that feel to be on the receiving end? No for me the issue is no matter your gene pool, you need to be taking good care of your health period.

Not to nit-pick or argue, but just to understand better: Why shouldn't you get them to eat differently or exercise differently? Coronary Heart Disease (majority of cases obesity related) is not only the leading cause of death but moreso than the next 7 causes combined. Ignoring the elephant in the middle of the room has never made it go away (at least in my experience). The fact is the folks on the heavier side DO need to do things differently. Hence the costs of health care sky-rocketing. Do you make them study the same if one is an A student and the other a D? I can only say that I would not.

Tigerchik, I agree, in construction and performance the poem is quite good. Its the content that I don't like.



When someone pulls laws out of their @$$, all we end up with are laws that smell like sh!t. -Skippy
Quote Reply
Re: pretty... [Alison] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
In Reply To:
So many girls/women assume that guys like a thinner woman and yet if you actually ask them, most typically say they prefer a partner with some curves/shape.

The only long relationship I've had was with a guy with two brothers. One of those brothers preferred overweight women. Boyfriend and I had a conversation about how guys feel about women's bodies; I was shocked - completely shocked - to learn that not all men prefer skinny girls. Apparently the media has done a good job influencing me.

I don't believe in "health at any size." At the exceptionally low and exceptionally high ends of the spectrum, it's not true. If a woman is morbidly obese (you said any size!), she will likely suffer from osteoporosis. (Not kidding - amenhorrea is a condition of the severely underweight and the severely overweight.) ... not to mention probably some other cocurrent (concurrent?) conditions.

For most of the population, it is fine to say "health at any size." You can be slightly overweight and healthy. You can be slightly underweight and healthy, too. But "health at any size" is misleading because while healthy habits at any size may be possible, true health at any size is not.

maybe she's born with it, maybe it's chlorine
If you're injured and need some sympathy, PM me and I'm very happy to write back.
disclaimer: PhD not MD
Quote Reply
Re: pretty... [original PV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Maffetone had a really good section on overall health in one of his Endurance books... where he defined overall health as the balance in fitness, diet, and life. You can be extremely fit and able to run a sub 18 5k, but you may not be healthy. You may work 60hrs a week and are likely not healthy. You may eat well but do no physical activity so are likely not healthy. You get the idea.

It can be OK to warp the triangle/balance equation for a while - to achieve a goal for example (think: trying to get to a race weight) - but have no illusion that to do so for an extended period of time yields truth health.

(yo yo Mr PV, things are good, just recovering from Silverman 1/2 - getting ready for IMNZ - booyeah!)

AP

------------------------
"How bad could it be?" - SimpleS
Quote Reply
Re: pretty... [original PV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
In Reply To:
Not to nit-pick or argue, but just to understand better: Why shouldn't you get them to eat differently or exercise differently? Coronary Heart Disease (majority of cases obesity related) is not only the leading cause of death but moreso than the next 7 causes combined. Ignoring the elephant in the middle of the room has never made it go away (at least in my experience). The fact is the folks on the heavier side DO need to do things differently. Hence the costs of health care sky-rocketing. Do you make them study the same if one is an A student and the other a D? I can only say that I would not.

The studying analogy doesn't hold up. Different thing. Yes, one who gets Ds should have some different homework rules.

The girls of different wts is a different issue because you can't give the thin girl dessert and the fat one not. That would hurt the fat one's self esteem. Rather, you treat them both the same and stop buying ice cream, only make dessert when the overweight one is away at a friend's house , etc. Change the family eating habits to fit the goals and health of both, not single one out. Same as adapting for a daughter who is vegetarian and another who isn't ... it needs to be a family thing that some meals are meat free (or lower cal or whatever).

*note: if you are offended by the use of the word "Fat," read "overweight." I'm not afraid of the word "fat" because some people are. Furthermore it takes longer to type "overweight"

maybe she's born with it, maybe it's chlorine
If you're injured and need some sympathy, PM me and I'm very happy to write back.
disclaimer: PhD not MD
Quote Reply
Re: pretty... [tigerchik] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Ahh the sloth involved in typing ;) Generally speaking it takes something very drastic to offend me, and the word fat is far from it. I don't see why the studying analogy doesn't hold up though. By your rules wouldn't the D student's self esteem be hurt by having to study more?

Perhaps my theory of problem solving is just much more direct. The D student studies more, the fat one gets no ice cream. Perhaps I hold a callous viewpoint, and my guess is the answer lies somewhere between ours, but I think the more we worry about and cater to feelings and emotions the less the root problem gets addressed. Like treating the symptoms but not the cause.



When someone pulls laws out of their @$$, all we end up with are laws that smell like sh!t. -Skippy
Quote Reply
Re: pretty... [tigerchik] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
In Reply To:
Change the family eating habits to fit the goals and health of both, not single one out. Same as adapting for a daughter who is vegetarian and another who isn't ... it needs to be a family thing that some meals are meat free (or lower cal or whatever).

I disagree with the extension of this concept to vegetarianism. Vegetarianism is a choice, and one's adherence to that particular choice has no bearing on physical or mental health and well being. Why force the entire family to accommodate the choice of one individual's preference? What if the other daughter is a baconatarian? Do both kids have to swim? Or study a foreign language? Or...?

Some things should be supported by the family; things that are (generally) universally regarded as "good" - studying, some level of physical activity, healthy eating, etc. But there are many ways to achieve those goals. If my daughter went veg I wouldn't have a problem with it. But if it meant that I had to, I'd be pissed. :p


<If you're gonna be dumb, you gotta be tough>
Get Fitter!
Proud member of the Smartasscrew, MONSTER CLUB
Get your FIX today?
Quote Reply

Prev Next