Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice.
Quote | Reply
I have been at this for 5 years now and can't seem to get it all together for a HIM. I am just an avg MOP 47yo with no big ambitions for a KQ but would like to perform better at HIM. I could use some advice on my bike split and would love to hear what some of the ST experts have to say.

I did Lake Placid 70.3 on Sept 10th and my big goal for the day (outside of getting out of the lake alive) was a sub 2 hour run split and I ended up slugging my way to a disappointing 2:05.

I did a FTP test today to find out just were I am at, I tested 245w/168bpm, I am 5'7" 162#, 3.32w/kg.

For Placid bike split I averaged 178w at 155BPM for a 2:57 split time.

I did not use FTP to determine what power to target for the race. I had only a guess at what my FTP even was going in and didn't want to test before hand either. I went off avg power I held on long rides and especially what I could hold on a hard 40 miler which was 200w at very low 140's HR. Last long brick I did 2 weeks out was 62 miles 2900' elv, at 178w avg HR 139 ran 6 miles off the bike at 8:18 pace 161HR (Open HM HR is low 170's). I felt confident at 175-180w and a 8:30 pace for the run, I actually felt 175-180w was pretty conservative?

I swam 46 minutes at Placid and actually felt like I had a good swim. My Avg HR on the bike at Placid was close to 15bpm HIGHER than what I would avg on my long rides averaging the same power averages. My HR was even throughout the ride too,153 through mile 40 155 for the last 16 miles climbing back into Lake Placid.

I am no faster a swimmer today than I was in 2014, literally. I admit I do not put as much effort into it as the other two and swim volume suffered some in training going into Placid but I got at least 2 swims in a week. I am now starting to realize that if I want to race a solid HIM I need to fix my swim and plan to really focus on it this winter.

Is the swim taking this much out of me? I felt fine on the bike and even on the climbs didn't feel like I was lighting any matches.

I am now thinking of heading down to North Carolina on 10-21 to make another go at it. I have a solid 3 weeks ahead to train and I could some advice on where should I focus my time to have a good run split? What should I shoot for on the bike for NC? I am going to want to crush an open flat bike course like NC has, I could use some feedback on what to target for pwr and HR so I can run well off the bike.

Thank You
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [mlyonsdc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I do think you're taking a much bigger hit on the swim that you think. A 46 min HIM swim, unless the conditions were atrocious, is really slow, and the reality is that swimmers in that range often waste a ton of energy just even keeping that slow pace, so you're likely burning a lot more matches than you think in the swim, hence the 'off' bike.

It's hard to gauge your run target without knowing how well you run an open 5k or HM - if you're only a 1:50 open HM runner, than you'd be running fine, but if you're a 1:35 open HM runner that slows to 2:05 in the HM, something's very off.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [lightheir] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
lightheir wrote:
I do think you're taking a much bigger hit on the swim that you think. A 46 min HIM swim, unless the conditions were atrocious, is really slow, and the reality is that swimmers in that range often waste a ton of energy just even keeping that slow pace, so you're likely burning a lot more matches than you think in the swim, hence the 'off' bike.

It's hard to gauge your run target without knowing how well you run an open 5k or HM - if you're only a 1:50 open HM runner, than you'd be running fine, but if you're a 1:35 open HM runner that slows to 2:05 in the HM, something's very off.

it's a little "harsh" but I completely agree with your swim comments. In fact with a swim that slow, any discussion about run or bike times is moot. There's too much lost in the water to discuss how to go fast on the bike or run. To be competitive in the range of achieving a KQ at that age really requires an 30 min. or better swim for 70.3 those who come out of the water that fast are able to feel like the swim was but a warm up for the rest of the day, i.e., they don't feel at ALL thrashed.

The good news is. Working hard on the swim will no doubt yield some real time gains. Lotsa low hanging fruit there.
enjoy the journey

I saw this on a white board in a window box at my daughters middle school...
List of what life owes you:
1. __________
2. __________
3. __________
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [mlyonsdc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
70.3 NC will have an incoming tide in a channel, your swim will be BLAZING, take 10mins off your 70.3 LP time easy, it does have a long run up to T1, bike is flat, you should be able to pull off at least a 2:20ish pending no hard winds with that FTP and previous split. It’s a ridiculously easy course, especially for the weakest of the weak swimmers.
Target 83% FTP on the bike see how you feel at the 14, 28, and 42 mile marks. Make some minor adjustments as you feel, what’s sucks about a flat bike course is no real break from pedaling.
Last edited by: mike s: Sep 23, 17 18:08
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [manofthewoods] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Thanks for the responses, I agree I am a lousy swimmer and it has been extremely frustrating trying to become an even reasonable swimmer. Its not like I haven't tried at all in the last 5 years! I am just coming to realization just how much that lousy swim is taking out of my bike and run and its a lot more than I expected. I am going to make a serious effort at improving my swim this winter as I really like doing triathlons.

In the meantime, if I go to NC, what do you guys suggest I do for the next 4 weeks and how much should I pull out of my bike split to have a decent run or is it even possible? Or should I just put the bike away and just focus on swimming for now?

I have no idea where my open HM is at this point, I don't have any recent run races to even use as a reference. I ran 1:48 HM last fall 15# heavier and worked on improving run fitness all winter up through May when I started swimming and biking again. I can hold an 8:teen pace on 10 mile training runs and I can do 6-7 mile repeats on the track at 7:10-15. I am guessing my open half is close to 1:45, that's another race I hoping to do this fall.

I have no delusions of being a KQ or pointy edge AG grouper. I honestly do not have the time to commit to something like that nor the natural athletic talent. I am however trying to get the most out of the 8-12 hours a week I do have and to perform somewhat well in all three disciplines.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [mlyonsdc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I think what the other two posters said about your swim is accurate.

I think you biked too hard. If I understood correctly, you expected to hold the 40 mile power for 56 miles, after swimming for 46 minutes. That seems like expecting too much to me. My suspicion regarding your heart rate is that it was higher normal because had already swum.

My wild assed suggestion would be to reduce the power goal to 170.

My question for you is, how reasonable was the goal of a 2:05 run? With the hindsight of a "good" swim and a bike, maybe that was a bit of a stretch. Also, only having one goal puts you in a binary position. Hit it and feel great; miss it and feel miserable. It might make more sense to set 3 goals for your run. One that you fairly confident you can hit. A second that a little bit of a stretch - like if you're having a really good day. And a third that a real stretch.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [mike s] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mike s wrote:
70.3 NC will have an incoming tide in a channel, your swim will be BLAZING, take 10mins off your 70.3 LP time easy, it does have a long run up to T1, bike is flat, you should be able to pull off at least a 2:20ish pending no hard winds with that FTP and previous split. It’s a ridiculously easy course, especially for the weakest of the weak swimmers.
Target 83% FTP on the bike see how you feel at the 14, 28, and 42 mile marks. Make some minor adjustments as you feel, what’s sucks about a flat bike course is no real break from pedaling.

A 36 min swim, 2:20ish bike split and a 2:05 run would be a REALLY good day for me lol!!

I think I am going to NC!!!

The only reason I did my FTP test was for Trainerroad. I am planning to follow the last 4 weeks of the HIM Specialty training plan for NC. They do long interval rides with constant pedaling at specific target % FTP which I thought would be good training for that course. I have done several 2 hour, 40ish mile rides at a steady state with a 200w avg which is close to that 83%, I haven't run off those rides though. Im going to add suggested as an outdoor ride at with a run.
Thanks
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [FatandSlow] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
FatandSlow wrote:
I think what the other two posters said about your swim is accurate.

I think you biked too hard. If I understood correctly, you expected to hold the 40 mile power for 56 miles, after swimming for 46 minutes. That seems like expecting too much to me. My suspicion regarding your heart rate is that it was higher normal because had already swum.

My wild assed suggestion would be to reduce the power goal to 170.

My question for you is, how reasonable was the goal of a 2:05 run? With the hindsight of a "good" swim and a bike, maybe that was a bit of a stretch. Also, only having one goal puts you in a binary position. Hit it and feel great; miss it and feel miserable. It might make more sense to set 3 goals for your run. One that you fairly confident you can hit. A second that a little bit of a stretch - like if you're having a really good day. And a third that a real stretch.

40 mile avg pwr is 200w at 140-145 BPM HR at least 4 of these rides in training

I avg 178w 155 BPM for ride at LP

2:05 was PR for my HIM run split lol! I did just that, reasonable day I was confident I could hit, 8:55 avg pace, good day 8:40 great day 8:30 none of these paces are difficult for me to run for 13 miles in training.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [mlyonsdc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mlyonsdc wrote:
I have been at this for 5 years now and can't seem to get it all together for a HIM. I am just an avg MOP 47yo with no big ambitions for a KQ but would like to perform better at HIM. I could use some advice on my bike split and would love to hear what some of the ST experts have to say.

I did Lake Placid 70.3 on Sept 10th and my big goal for the day (outside of getting out of the lake alive) was a sub 2 hour run split and I ended up slugging my way to a disappointing 2:05.

I did a FTP test today to find out just were I am at, I tested 245w/168bpm, I am 5'7" 162#, 3.32w/kg.

For Placid bike split I averaged 178w at 155BPM for a 2:57 split time.

I did not use FTP to determine what power to target for the race. I had only a guess at what my FTP even was going in and didn't want to test before hand either. I went off avg power I held on long rides and especially what I could hold on a hard 40 miler which was 200w at very low 140's HR. Last long brick I did 2 weeks out was 62 miles 2900' elv, at 178w avg HR 139 ran 6 miles off the bike at 8:18 pace 161HR (Open HM HR is low 170's). I felt confident at 175-180w and a 8:30 pace for the run, I actually felt 175-180w was pretty conservative?

I swam 46 minutes at Placid and actually felt like I had a good swim. My Avg HR on the bike at Placid was close to 15bpm HIGHER than what I would avg on my long rides averaging the same power averages. My HR was even throughout the ride too,153 through mile 40 155 for the last 16 miles climbing back into Lake Placid.

I am no faster a swimmer today than I was in 2014, literally. I admit I do not put as much effort into it as the other two and swim volume suffered some in training going into Placid but I got at least 2 swims in a week. I am now starting to realize that if I want to race a solid HIM I need to fix my swim and plan to really focus on it this winter.

Is the swim taking this much out of me? I felt fine on the bike and even on the climbs didn't feel like I was lighting any matches.

I am now thinking of heading down to North Carolina on 10-21 to make another go at it. I have a solid 3 weeks ahead to train and I could some advice on where should I focus my time to have a good run split? What should I shoot for on the bike for NC? I am going to want to crush an open flat bike course like NC has, I could use some feedback on what to target for pwr and HR so I can run well off the bike.

Thank You
Quick question(s) for you:
Do you ever bike hard immediately after swimming? How much kicking do you do during your weekly swim workouts?

The higher HR is about adrenaline and probably being rested going into the race. I see higher HRs all the time from my athletes when they are racing.

Mike Ricci
2017 USAT World Team Coach
USAT National Coach of the Year
Coaching Triathletes since 1992.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [mlyonsdc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
a swim that slow means you are inefficient. inefficient means you are using more energy thatn necessary. that energy, if not wasted on the swim could be used for bike and run.
id try and get at least ten minutes off the swim you will still be MOP but the physiologic cost will be lower.

im not a fast swimmer. so i know of what I speak.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [mlyonsdc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Thanks for clarifying. Sounds like your run goal was reasonable.

With the bike, you did 89% of your 40 mile average. For 56 miles. Perhaps consider 85% or a little less for average. Also, if you don't already, keep the climbing efforts under your 40 mile effort.

Hope you have a great day in NC.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [lightheir] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
lightheir wrote:
I do think you're taking a much bigger hit on the swim that you think. A 46 min HIM swim, unless the conditions were atrocious, is really slow, and the reality is that swimmers in that range often waste a ton of energy just even keeping that slow pace, so you're likely burning a lot more matches than you think in the swim, hence the 'off' bike.

It's hard to gauge your run target without knowing how well you run an open 5k or HM - if you're only a 1:50 open HM runner, than you'd be running fine, but if you're a 1:35 open HM runner that slows to 2:05 in the HM, something's very off.

I have to agree with this as well. Even as harsh as it sounds.

That doesn't mean there's not hope. It just means that you should work with a swim coach and you can probably learn a lot, and get out of the water fresher, which will result in a faster bike split, with less effort, and a faster run split.

Of course, that's if this hobby is worth that much to you.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [mlyonsdc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Do you race with a powermeter?
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [mlyonsdc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mlyonsdc wrote:

Is the swim taking this much out of me?

Possibly yes. This is something that has only become apparent to me this season. I've often wondered why I seemed to bike quicker than guys who smashed me in training, spoke to one after a recent 70.3 and he said he struggled on the bike because he felt hammered by the swim, someone else said he struggled on the run because of the swim! I'm like WTF! People are still feeling the pain from the swim on the run!? I'd normally come in 27, 28mins feeling relatively fresh and by km 5 on the bike, my HR is down. I just assumed weaker swimmers had the same experiences, but just went slower. Obviously this isn't the case and I guess the swim is more important than a lot of people think. i.e someone swimming 33mins is 6mins slower than me, but perhaps that could be as much as 10 or 15mins if they are fatigued for the bike.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [zedzded] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
zedzded wrote:
mlyonsdc wrote:


Is the swim taking this much out of me?


Possibly yes. This is something that has only become apparent to me this season. I've often wondered why I seemed to bike quicker than guys who smashed me in training, spoke to one after a recent 70.3 and he said he struggled on the bike because he felt hammered by the swim, someone else said he struggled on the run because of the swim! I'm like WTF! People are still feeling the pain from the swim on the run!? I'd normally come in 27, 28mins feeling relatively fresh and by km 5 on the bike, my HR is down. I just assumed weaker swimmers had the same experiences, but just went slower. Obviously this isn't the case and I guess the swim is more important than a lot of people think. i.e someone swimming 33mins is 6mins slower than me, but perhaps that could be as much as 10 or 15mins if they are fatigued for the bike.

yes, x1,000. No BDB, but I can "add" 1 min to my HIM swim and come out in mid 27. It feels like a warm up, I haven't a care in the world through T1 and hit the bike ready to rock. I'm an adult onset swimmer, so, it CAN be done. First step is to learn to love swimming.

I saw this on a white board in a window box at my daughters middle school...
List of what life owes you:
1. __________
2. __________
3. __________
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [manofthewoods] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Interesting, if you look at my bike splits for Busso 70.3. I did a 2.25 and was ranked 164/1500 for the bike, my position for the 4 x 22.5km splits were:

1st 22.5km - 111th
2nd - 174th
3rd - 186th
4th - 159th

Kind of suggests there's a lot of people hitting the bike not feeling that fresh.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [Mike Ricci] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Mike Ricci wrote:
Quick question(s) for you:
Do you ever bike hard immediately after swimming? How much kicking do you do during your weekly swim workouts?

The higher HR is about adrenaline and probably being rested going into the race. I see higher HRs all the time from my athletes when they are racing.

I do some kick set drills but not a lot. I don't kick much swimming and barely at all in a wetsuit.

Do you have your athletes account for the higher HR in races for pacing? I am used to having a higher HR in racing than training, the difference has been less since I first started. TBH the worst is probably at the swim start it usually takes a good 250-400 yds for me to settle down at the beginning.

BTW I don't feel wiped out after the swim in T1, and for the most part I feel fine on the bike. While my HR is higher in a race I still stay in that high Z2 low Z3 range.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [mlyonsdc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mlyonsdc wrote:
Mike Ricci wrote:
Quick question(s) for you:
Do you ever bike hard immediately after swimming? How much kicking do you do during your weekly swim workouts?

The higher HR is about adrenaline and probably being rested going into the race. I see higher HRs all the time from my athletes when they are racing.


I do some kick set drills but not a lot. I don't kick much swimming and barely at all in a wetsuit.

Do you have your athletes account for the higher HR in races for pacing? I am used to having a higher HR in racing than training, the difference has been less since I first started. TBH the worst is probably at the swim start it usually takes a good 250-400 yds for me to settle down at the beginning.

BTW I don't feel wiped out after the swim in T1, and for the most part I feel fine on the bike. While my HR is higher in a race I still stay in that high Z2 low Z3 range.

Do you do hard bikes after hard swims? ;-)

Mike Ricci
2017 USAT World Team Coach
USAT National Coach of the Year
Coaching Triathletes since 1992.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [davejustdave] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
davejustdave wrote:
lightheir wrote:
I do think you're taking a much bigger hit on the swim that you think. A 46 min HIM swim, unless the conditions were atrocious, is really slow, and the reality is that swimmers in that range often waste a ton of energy just even keeping that slow pace, so you're likely burning a lot more matches than you think in the swim, hence the 'off' bike.

It's hard to gauge your run target without knowing how well you run an open 5k or HM - if you're only a 1:50 open HM runner, than you'd be running fine, but if you're a 1:35 open HM runner that slows to 2:05 in the HM, something's very off.


I have to agree with this as well. Even as harsh as it sounds.

That doesn't mean there's not hope. It just means that you should work with a swim coach and you can probably learn a lot, and get out of the water fresher, which will result in a faster bike split, with less effort, and a faster run split.

Of course, that's if this hobby is worth that much to you.

I am all good with the comments and appreciate the feedback which is why I posted all of this.

I've had swim coaching. I watch videos read books, every post on here etc. I recently found some inspiration with Tower 26 and Gerry Rodigeus videos. I plan to follow his advice this winter and I just bought a snorkel and ankle bands with a bouy hoping he straightens my ass out lol!

I was at one point swimming better than I am now back in 2015 when I did my only full IM in Maryland. The swim was shortened to 3000m due to wind. I swam 1:02 there its the fastest swim I ever had and to this day do not know HOW I managed it. I was thinking the draft had something to do with it and for Placid I actually planned for this, I self seeded at the back of the 35-45 min group and got on the cable line and stayed in a group of people the entire swim.

I don't HATE swimming but its not like biking or running. I want to go fast in those run harder mash pedals and go fast even if its for a short distance not so much in the pool. I have put a lot of effort into running and losing weight over the last year and have made significant improvements in both. If I can't make significant improvement in swim this winter I am going all bike next year. Biking comes REALLY easy to me for some reason, the other two not so much!
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [mike s] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mike s wrote:
Do you race with a powermeter?

Sworks Quarq
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [mlyonsdc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Not sure i agree on the speed of NC.
Its point to point so you could get 40 miles if headwind like last year.

Last year, I raced a little over 200w at 167lbs and came in with a 2:40 something.

I think with no wind and my cda, I was a low 2:20 at 205w (per bbs). When I look at bbs, with "generic" weather in NC, and lake placid as race day, my races come out 18 minutes apart... So a 2:40 placid turns into a 2:22 nc (with no wind).
Id guess 2:57 becomes 2:40 - 2:45 not 2:20.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [Mike Ricci] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Mike Ricci wrote:
Do you do hard bikes after hard swims? ;-)

Aahh, that is a workout I specifically wanted to do before Placid. It is tough to duplicate in training since you don't have a transition to run to with your bike racked.

Sept 3, did 2300 yd OWS at 57 minutes, got on the bike rode one hour at 183w average and Avg HR was 138 BPM.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [dcohen24] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
dcohen24 wrote:
Not sure i agree on the speed of NC.
Its point to point so you could get 40 miles if headwind like last year.

Last year, I raced a little over 200w at 167lbs and came in with a 2:40 something.

I think with no wind and my cda, I was a low 2:20 at 205w (per bbs). When I look at bbs, with "generic" weather in NC, and lake placid as race day, my races come out 18 minutes apart... So a 2:40 placid turns into a 2:22 nc (with no wind).
Id guess 2:57 becomes 2:40 - 2:45 not 2:20.


2:40 is what I was thinking on the bike for NC with the possibility of a 1:55 run. BBS had me at 2:48 for Placid at 188w. Here's my bike set up from Placid LMK what you guys think, I may even shave my legs for NC lol!


Last edited by: mlyonsdc: Sep 24, 17 10:08
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [mlyonsdc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mlyonsdc wrote:
Mike Ricci wrote:
Do you do hard bikes after hard swims? ;-)


Aahh, that is a workout I specifically wanted to do before Placid. It is tough to duplicate in training since you don't have a transition to run to with your bike racked.

Sept 3, did 2300 yd OWS at 57 minutes, got on the bike rode one hour at 183w average and Avg HR was 138 BPM.

I've seen this issue pop up before and since you aren't used to going from swim to bike, you may be losing power - it's worth a shot to try a few race pace swims pre-Saturday long ride or whenever you do your long rides. I would do something like 2k straight swim at race pace, and then 2 hours race pace, then run 10-15k off the bike. That would be a good simulation for you.

Mike Ricci
2017 USAT World Team Coach
USAT National Coach of the Year
Coaching Triathletes since 1992.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [mlyonsdc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Few issues going on.

1. Swim like everyone says. Don't worry, I can't get my swim time below 38-40 either but:
2. Your bike speed relative to your power seems off. Your position is decent. I am 170-175 lbs and FTP of 255. At about 180 NP, I would expect to go 2:40 ish depending on course. I did 165NP at 70.3FL(hillier that you would think-1800ft elev) for 2:41 and 190NP at 70.3 Steelhead for 2:33. Make sure you have good tires and latex tubes work on your position.
3. Really look into your nutrition and make sure you are consuming enough calories AND enough water. I take about 800 cal on the bike and prob 6-7 bottles of water.

Good luck
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [Mike Ricci] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Mike Ricci wrote:
mlyonsdc wrote:
Mike Ricci wrote:
Do you do hard bikes after hard swims? ;-)


Aahh, that is a workout I specifically wanted to do before Placid. It is tough to duplicate in training since you don't have a transition to run to with your bike racked.

Sept 3, did 2300 yd OWS at 57 minutes, got on the bike rode one hour at 183w average and Avg HR was 138 BPM.


I've seen this issue pop up before and since you aren't used to going from swim to bike, you may be losing power - it's worth a shot to try a few race pace swims pre-Saturday long ride or whenever you do your long rides. I would do something like 2k straight swim at race pace, and then 2 hours race pace, then run 10-15k off the bike. That would be a good simulation for you.

I will try to put that on the schedule for NC, maybe this weekend as the lakes are still warm from the nice weather we've had here in Ohio.

BTW best race Ive had so far was IMMD which is my only full IM. I followed one of your training plans, thanks again for the advice.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [KingMidas] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
KingMidas wrote:
Few issues going on.

1. Swim like everyone says. Don't worry, I can't get my swim time below 38-40 either but:
2. Your bike speed relative to your power seems off. Your position is decent. I am 170-175 lbs and FTP of 255. At about 180 NP, I would expect to go 2:40 ish depending on course. I did 165NP at 70.3FL(hillier that you would think-1800ft elev) for 2:41 and 190NP at 70.3 Steelhead for 2:33. Make sure you have good tires and latex tubes work on your position.
3. Really look into your nutrition and make sure you are consuming enough calories AND enough water. I take about 800 cal on the bike and prob 6-7 bottles of water.

Good luck

My goal has been to get transitions and swim done in 45-50 minutes. I filmed my swim yesterday, it isn't pretty but I think I see a few things I may be able to key in on for NC.

I was quoting average pwr and not NP. I have to look but I think my NP was higher than usual since it was a hillier race. My stupid Garmin 735 watch doesn't pick up my pwr meter in multi-sport mode. My Garmin Edge 800 did but I can not get it to connect to Express to download the file so I haven't been able to look at the entire file. Still working on that. Garmin customer service is fantastic but there products are crap IMO.

I glued up new pair Vittoria Speed G+ tubulars for the race. I am open to suggestions on fit, I am very comfortable in that position and can ride full and half distance races without ever getting off the bars. I did just take 10mm out of the pads and my thigh is getting up in my chest. I have to see how it feels on a longer ride. I was thinking of trying a 155mm crank over the winter, I have 170mm now.

I am surprised nutrition didn't come up earlier. I did have a difficult time getting liquids in since it was cold that day at 37*. On the bike I had 3 bottles of Infinite concentrated into 2 bottles which I drank 80% of, plus one gel. I took in about 750 calories and 185g of carbs. I also had trouble getting gels out due to wearing gloves and I dropped my bag of chews as a result so I was worried it wasn't enough. On the run I made a few early aid stations stops to eat some chews and a banana. I did pee at the first aid station on the run which I am usually a camel in a race. Overall I didn't feel nutrition was an issue?
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [mlyonsdc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
You need to be pacing by NP not average. NP is the time weighted average. Meaning on a hilly course your NP will be higher if your pacing off of average, this can be bad if the gap is large. Ideally you want your average = NP
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [mlyonsdc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mlyonsdc wrote:
Mike Ricci wrote:
mlyonsdc wrote:
Mike Ricci wrote:
Do you do hard bikes after hard swims? ;-)


Aahh, that is a workout I specifically wanted to do before Placid. It is tough to duplicate in training since you don't have a transition to run to with your bike racked.

Sept 3, did 2300 yd OWS at 57 minutes, got on the bike rode one hour at 183w average and Avg HR was 138 BPM.


I've seen this issue pop up before and since you aren't used to going from swim to bike, you may be losing power - it's worth a shot to try a few race pace swims pre-Saturday long ride or whenever you do your long rides. I would do something like 2k straight swim at race pace, and then 2 hours race pace, then run 10-15k off the bike. That would be a good simulation for you.


I will try to put that on the schedule for NC, maybe this weekend as the lakes are still warm from the nice weather we've had here in Ohio.

BTW best race Ive had so far was IMMD which is my only full IM. I followed one of your training plans, thanks again for the advice.

Happy to help. And thanks for purchasing our plans too! We are constantly reviewing and improving them each off-season. I'm sorry IMMD was such a tough weather day last year.

Mike Ricci
2017 USAT World Team Coach
USAT National Coach of the Year
Coaching Triathletes since 1992.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [shoff14] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
shoff14 wrote:
You need to be pacing by NP not average. NP is the time weighted average. Meaning on a hilly course your NP will be higher if your pacing off of average, this can be bad if the gap is large. Ideally you want your average = NP

Unfortunately I cant get that info off the Edge 800. I am typically pretty close between NP and avg in a race. I am pretty sure my NP for Placid was in the 190-200w range with the climbing. In training my 170-180w avg pwr rides are 200-210 NP but some of these are with others so drafting etc come into play. Last long ride in training 2800' elevation 62 miles avg 178w NP 207 which is pretty similar to Placid ride and I rode out front for 90% of the ride.

Why is NP pwr better than avg for pacing Avg is actual power output? I use NP more to compare overall efforts on training rides more than anything?
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [Mike Ricci] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
IMMD 2015 Still tough conditions, swim shortened due to wind 62* water temp and cold windy bike ride. I was there just to finish and realized pretty late in the run that I still felt pretty good, knocked down last three miles sprinted to finishline and jumped across lol! Unfortunately I didn't make it suck bad enough so I have to go back and do it again. Want to execute a good HIM first maybe Full at Cozumel 2018.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [mlyonsdc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mlyonsdc wrote:
shoff14 wrote:
You need to be pacing by NP not average. NP is the time weighted average. Meaning on a hilly course your NP will be higher if your pacing off of average, this can be bad if the gap is large. Ideally you want your average = NP

Unfortunately I cant get that info off the Edge 800. I am typically pretty close between NP and avg in a race. I am pretty sure my NP for Placid was in the 190-200w range with the climbing. In training my 170-180w avg pwr rides are 200-210 NP but some of these are with others so drafting etc come into play. Last long ride in training 2800' elevation 62 miles avg 178w NP 207 which is pretty similar to Placid ride and I rode out front for 90% of the ride.

Why is NP pwr better than avg for pacing Avg is actual power output? I use NP more to compare overall efforts on training rides more than anything?

Looks to me like you overbikee. Always go by NP. Just google it and there are plenty of articles on it.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [mlyonsdc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mlyonsdc wrote:
shoff14 wrote:
You need to be pacing by NP not average. NP is the time weighted average. Meaning on a hilly course your NP will be higher if your pacing off of average, this can be bad if the gap is large. Ideally you want your average = NP


Unfortunately I cant get that info off the Edge 800. I am typically pretty close between NP and avg in a race. I am pretty sure my NP for Placid was in the 190-200w range with the climbing. In training my 170-180w avg pwr rides are 200-210 NP but some of these are with others so drafting etc come into play. Last long ride in training 2800' elevation 62 miles avg 178w NP 207 which is pretty similar to Placid ride and I rode out front for 90% of the ride.

Why is NP pwr better than avg for pacing Avg is actual power output? I use NP more to compare overall efforts on training rides more than anything?

Well yes you could compute NP already back in 2011. http://www.bikeradar.com/...topic.php?t=12807891 I've been using it on a 500 which got the same update i.e. V 2.40 for the past 6 years.

Genetics load the gun, lifestyle pulls the trigger.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [mlyonsdc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'm also a very slow swimmer. The reason is simple, I don't do very much swim training, and I'm okay with that. I'm a slow runner too but I'm alright on the bike which gets most focus in training. Before anyone tells me I should train my weaknesses, not my strengths - I enjoy cycling more. I do most of what I enjoy most. Also this season I had some specific cycling only events I was focusing on and my running got side-lined more than I planned.

My last HIM I did a 0:44 swim, 2:33 cycle and 2:00 run.
I took it VERY easy on the swim. I did try pushing fairly hard on the swim in one HIM while poorly trained for it and I've decided it's a mistake. It almost certainly costs you more than you gain. I'm pretty sure I could have done 40-41 mins rather than 44mins in my last race with a bit more effort (I was really taking it quite easy) but it would have made a big difference in effort expended and I'm certain I would have lost more on the bike than I could have gained in the water. My advice: if you're slow in the water, accept it and pace accordingly. You can't save time by trying harder in the race. You're trained and have the technique or you're not and don't.

I don't agree with the earlier comment that your cycle and run are moot if the swim is bad. It depends what you're trying to achieve. Sure, if you're trying to be competitive in your AG you can't afford to a ignore a discipline and if your swim is that slow there's no recovering from it. However, I'm just trying to maximise my performance in execution of the race, despite constraints that come from my choices in training. It sounds like you are probably trying to do the same. So if you know you have a slow swim, then the first priority should be ensuring that doesn't cripple the rest of your race.

I like to think I'm saving some potential big improvements for next season. Honestly, how hard can 00:38, 02:30, 1:50 be if get around to putting in a bit of work on the swim and run? ;p
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [Ai_1] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Your goal of 38/2:30/1:50 should be eminently doable with more of a focus on your weaknesses as opposed to your strength, just as you say. Still, nothing wrong with enjoying cycling and just accepting a slower swim/run if that's the most enjoyable way of doing HIM.

The swimming is a tough nut to crack though. The 'naturals' at swimming automatically assume that anyone who's swimming a 40 minute HIM just needs to swim like 2x/week at moderate pace, <3000yds to drop that down to sub 36, but in reality if you're 40+ right now, it'll take a ton of work to get that swim speed down. That 'low hanging fruit' the tell you about is def not so - it's pretty hard as a slow AOS swimmer to cut off significant time from your swim.

Not to say you shouldn't give up on it, and especially because I and others have found that swim gains from slow swims are usually the most durable of gains since as your muscles and technique improve, they tend to stick, so after a few years of 1-2 minute gains, you realistically will be seeing those 6+ minute aggregate gains. But don't expect to chop off so much in a single year if you haven't been able to in the past.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [KingMidas] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I have had a bad summer training wise and had let my swimming really slip. I recently did an OLY where I faked it through the swim trying as hard as I could. I usually do OLY swims around 27ish and I swam a 31. My bike after that really sucked - I had never felt like any part of the swim affected the bike until that race. My power was down about 15 watts.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [lightheir] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
lightheir wrote:
The swimming is a tough nut to crack though. The 'naturals' at swimming automatically assume that anyone who's swimming a 40 minute HIM just needs to swim like 2x/week at moderate pace, <3000yds to drop that down to sub 36, but in reality if you're 40+ right now, it'll take a ton of work to get that swim speed down. That 'low hanging fruit' the tell you about is def not so - it's pretty hard as a slow AOS swimmer to cut off significant time from your swim.

I’m coming to that realization actually. I’m a 40/2:30/1:45 guy. I swim 4 times a week for 10-15k per week depending how close I am to a full. I really tried hard at improving my swim but after a lot of hard (and boring) training, my swims were either the same to 1 min improvement. Really not the ROI i was looking for. So I’ve decided I am ok for now with 40 min and I’m trying to get my bike to 2:20 and run to 1:30
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [lightheir] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
lightheir wrote:
Your goal of 38/2:30/1:50 should be eminently doable with more of a focus on your weaknesses as opposed to your strength, just as you say. Still, nothing wrong with enjoying cycling and just accepting a slower swim/run if that's the most enjoyable way of doing HIM.

The swimming is a tough nut to crack though. The 'naturals' at swimming automatically assume that anyone who's swimming a 40 minute HIM just needs to swim like 2x/week at moderate pace, <3000yds to drop that down to sub 36, but in reality if you're 40+ right now, it'll take a ton of work to get that swim speed down. That 'low hanging fruit' the tell you about is def not so - it's pretty hard as a slow AOS swimmer to cut off significant time from your swim.

Not to say you shouldn't give up on it, and especially because I and others have found that swim gains from slow swims are usually the most durable of gains since as your muscles and technique improve, they tend to stick, so after a few years of 1-2 minute gains, you realistically will be seeing those 6+ minute aggregate gains. But don't expect to chop off so much in a single year if you haven't been able to in the past.
That's more or less what I thought. However, I think I can hope to take a little more than 1-2mins off my swim. To give you some context - I just checked GarminConnect out of curiosity and it appears I literally did 8 swims within 5 months before my HIM. The maximum distance I swam was 1900m and the total distance covered in that period was a measley 10,900m. I suspect some of you have done that much in a single session and plenty of you do that much each week. So I really have no business expecting a decent performance in the water. But given where I'm starting from, and how easy I took the swim in my last HIM, I reckon fitness alone will get me close to 40mins. And if I can also improve my technique, maybe I can hope for something in the region of 38mins? I'm not banking on it but we'll see if I ever put the effort in!

I do have definite plans to improve my run. I've never been a fast runner and my best of two open half marathon is 1:50 but that was the day after a 180km cycle in the middle of an IM training block last year, plus I've lost about 3kg since then. So, I reckon with some proper run training this winter (and perhaps losing a couple more kg) I can be optimistic about beating 1:45 in an open run by next spring. Then I just need to see how much of that I can hang onto in a triathlon. Historically I've held up fairly well on triathlon runs compared to my open run times. Don't know if that will hold true when properly trained!
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [KingMidas] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
KingMidas wrote:
lightheir wrote:

The swimming is a tough nut to crack though. The 'naturals' at swimming automatically assume that anyone who's swimming a 40 minute HIM just needs to swim like 2x/week at moderate pace, <3000yds to drop that down to sub 36, but in reality if you're 40+ right now, it'll take a ton of work to get that swim speed down. That 'low hanging fruit' the tell you about is def not so - it's pretty hard as a slow AOS swimmer to cut off significant time from your swim.


I’m coming to that realization actually. I’m a 40/2:30/1:45 guy. I swim 4 times a week for 10-15k per week depending how close I am to a full. I really tried hard at improving my swim but after a lot of hard (and boring) training, my swims were either the same to 1 min improvement. Really not the ROI i was looking for. So I’ve decided I am ok for now with 40 min and I’m trying to get my bike to 2:20 and run to 1:30

What was the quality of the swim workouts you were putting in? Were you coasting through those 10-15k per week or were you worked after every swim? I made some improvements to my swim this year and it was due to swimming hard every session. Not only did my swim times improve, but I definitely felt fresh for the bike as was mentioned previously in this thread. I also feel like there was quite a bit of fitness carry-over from swimming to biking to running. Doing 3 hard swims/week payed dividends to my overall fitness that I hadn't expected.

"One does not discover new lands without consenting to lose sight of the shore for a very long time."
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [splatt] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
splatt wrote:
KingMidas wrote:
lightheir wrote:

The swimming is a tough nut to crack though. The 'naturals' at swimming automatically assume that anyone who's swimming a 40 minute HIM just needs to swim like 2x/week at moderate pace, <3000yds to drop that down to sub 36, but in reality if you're 40+ right now, it'll take a ton of work to get that swim speed down. That 'low hanging fruit' the tell you about is def not so - it's pretty hard as a slow AOS swimmer to cut off significant time from your swim.


I’m coming to that realization actually. I’m a 40/2:30/1:45 guy. I swim 4 times a week for 10-15k per week depending how close I am to a full. I really tried hard at improving my swim but after a lot of hard (and boring) training, my swims were either the same to 1 min improvement. Really not the ROI i was looking for. So I’ve decided I am ok for now with 40 min and I’m trying to get my bike to 2:20 and run to 1:30

What was the quality of the swim workouts you were putting in? Were you coasting through those 10-15k per week or were you worked after every swim? I made some improvements to my swim this year and it was due to swimming hard every session. Not only did my swim times improve, but I definitely felt fresh for the bike as was mentioned previously in this thread. I also feel like there was quite a bit of fitness carry-over from swimming to biking to running. Doing 3 hard swims/week payed dividends to my overall fitness that I hadn't expected.

I don’t have easy swims. Usually about 700 wu, and then 2000 of intervals from 50’s to 200’s, PB’s, kicks and stuff. I’ve seen a few seconds/100 of improvements in the pool but it doesn’t translate to open water. I would have to do a major block of swimming to improve a lot I think but it’s very inefficient. It’s 30 min of driving each way, plus sometimes wait for a lane, shower back, and a 75 min workout takes 2.5 hours.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [sciguy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
sciguy wrote:
mlyonsdc wrote:
shoff14 wrote:
You need to be pacing by NP not average. NP is the time weighted average. Meaning on a hilly course your NP will be higher if your pacing off of average, this can be bad if the gap is large. Ideally you want your average = NP


Unfortunately I cant get that info off the Edge 800. I am typically pretty close between NP and avg in a race. I am pretty sure my NP for Placid was in the 190-200w range with the climbing. In training my 170-180w avg pwr rides are 200-210 NP but some of these are with others so drafting etc come into play. Last long ride in training 2800' elevation 62 miles avg 178w NP 207 which is pretty similar to Placid ride and I rode out front for 90% of the ride.

Why is NP pwr better than avg for pacing Avg is actual power output? I use NP more to compare overall efforts on training rides more than anything?


Well yes you could compute NP already back in 2011. http://www.bikeradar.com/...topic.php?t=12807891 I've been using it on a 500 which got the same update i.e. V 2.40 for the past 6 years.

I have software 2.70 loaded on my Edge 800. Can you tell me how I can get that info off the Edge without downloading the file? I can not seem to find it in there anywhere and I can not download the file for some reason when I connect it with a USB cable. It will charge but not connect to Express. I would love to get that file off there to review.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [KingMidas] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I takes you about 2.5 hours to do a swim workout and you are doing that 4 times a week.? And you are swimming 40 min for a half at best? Your problem isn't fitness it is technique. That is a huge time investment. If at all possible run to the the nearest masters club and get some stroke help. If for no other reason so you can get some of your life back.

They constantly try to escape from the darkness outside and within
Dreaming of systems so perfect that no one will need to be good T.S. Eliot

Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [mlyonsdc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mlyonsdc wrote:
sciguy wrote:
mlyonsdc wrote:
shoff14 wrote:
You need to be pacing by NP not average. NP is the time weighted average. Meaning on a hilly course your NP will be higher if your pacing off of average, this can be bad if the gap is large. Ideally you want your average = NP


Unfortunately I cant get that info off the Edge 800. I am typically pretty close between NP and avg in a race. I am pretty sure my NP for Placid was in the 190-200w range with the climbing. In training my 170-180w avg pwr rides are 200-210 NP but some of these are with others so drafting etc come into play. Last long ride in training 2800' elevation 62 miles avg 178w NP 207 which is pretty similar to Placid ride and I rode out front for 90% of the ride.

Why is NP pwr better than avg for pacing Avg is actual power output? I use NP more to compare overall efforts on training rides more than anything?


Well yes you could compute NP already back in 2011. http://www.bikeradar.com/...topic.php?t=12807891 I've been using it on a 500 which got the same update i.e. V 2.40 for the past 6 years.


I have software 2.70 loaded on my Edge 800. Can you tell me how I can get that info off the Edge without downloading the file? I can not seem to find it in there anywhere and I can not download the file for some reason when I connect it with a USB cable. It will charge but not connect to Express. I would love to get that file off there to review.

If you haven't already, try downloading via Golden Cheetah. I've had good luck with that. Software V 2.70 ought to allow you to have a normalized power field shown. You will need to go in and set it up as a data field but it only takes o few minutes to do so. Not that that will help you now but down the line it's nice to have.

YMMV,

Hugh

Genetics load the gun, lifestyle pulls the trigger.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [mlyonsdc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mlyonsdc wrote:


I've had swim coaching. I watch videos read books, every post on here etc. I recently found some inspiration with Tower 26 and Gerry Rodigeus videos. I plan to follow his advice this winter and I just bought a snorkel and ankle bands with a bouy hoping he straightens my ass out lol!


Sign up the Tower 26 online coaching program. It's GOLD! Right now it's the start of their new "Recovery & Technical Phase" for the 2018 season. Perfect time to join! (I just joined two weeks ago, and I can feel I'm better already. LOL)

https://coaching.tower26.com
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [tie3] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Thanks I was looking at that as I just got the email about it.

I actually joined a masters group, its a little bit of a drive but I'm sticking to it and have been getting 3 good swims in a week. Nice thing is they have coached swim workout 6 days a week 3 am and 2 pm!

Not getting any faster but the swimming is not as tiring and I am doing longer workouts now with more yards.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [mlyonsdc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I swam with a master group last season twice a week, didn't find it as helpful because it's not really triathlon specific. Gerry's Tower 26 is customized for triathletes!

Right now I'm swimming with my local tri group twice a week (90 minutes each session) and then following Tower 26 program on other days. I think I'm going to finally break my swim plateau this upcoming season.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [KingMidas] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
A couple of other thoughts--you said you didn't feel like you burned any matches. What was your VI?

owner: world's tightest psoas (TM)
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [mlyonsdc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I haven't read the replies to this thread but do you do any shorter races? How about next year train for and do about 5 sprint races and maybe an oly or 2 and finish off the year with a half. Bueno!
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [rumpole] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
rumpole wrote:
A couple of other thoughts--you said you didn't feel like you burned any matches. What was your VI?

Why are u replying to me?
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [KingMidas] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Interesting thread.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [tie3] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
My masters group is pretty stacked with tri-athletes and is mostly tri specific. We even had a guest coach in last week who specializes in open water swim skills.

I am looking at the Tower 26 info now, I did buy a snorkel and ankle bands and have been using them.

Hope you make a break through. My life long friend got into tri's this year starting swimming in January, literally could not get across the pool. He is now swimming 1:16-1:20 100's. I can't even beat him with fins on lol. It's just easy for some I guess.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [mdtrihard] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mdtrihard wrote:
I haven't read the replies to this thread but do you do any shorter races? How about next year train for and do about 5 sprint races and maybe an oly or 2 and finish off the year with a half. Bueno!

I like to race but our season is short in Ohio. If I spent that many weekends racing I would lose my family lol. I usually do a few shorter local races.

BTW I ditched IMNC as I got way to busy with work to even consider it. I did sign up for IMFL 70.3 April 8th as my next race. If anything it will keep me training consistently all winter long. I should be in the best shape Ive been in for early April and not having to play catch up all summer long. Last winter I just ran with zero swim and close to zero bike.
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [mlyonsdc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mlyonsdc wrote:
mdtrihard wrote:
I haven't read the replies to this thread but do you do any shorter races? How about next year train for and do about 5 sprint races and maybe an oly or 2 and finish off the year with a half. Bueno!

I like to race but our season is short in Ohio. If I spent that many weekends racing I would lose my family lol. I usually do a few shorter local races.

BTW I ditched IMNC as I got way to busy with work to even consider it. I did sign up for IMFL 70.3 April 8th as my next race. If anything it will keep me training consistently all winter long. I should be in the best shape Ive been in for early April and not having to play catch up all summer long. Last winter I just ran with zero swim and close to zero bike.

Ok, I don't think you heard what I was saying.....
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [mlyonsdc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote:
3. Really look into your nutrition and make sure you are consuming enough calories AND enough water.

I had this same thought. What are you eating/drinking? 5-6 hrs of athletic work is a massive strain on the body, and nutrition at this distance can be tricky (even if you train it).

Also agree with the others that the swim is taking alot out of you. As a result of your swim, even a "reasonable" bike power is too much. It's a fine balance, though. G'luck -J

----------------------------------------------------------------
Life is tough. But it's tougher when you're stupid. -John Wayne
Quote Reply
Re: Did I cook the bike or is my swim just that bad? I could use some advice. [karlaj] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
karlaj wrote:
Quote:

3. Really look into your nutrition and make sure you are consuming enough calories AND enough water.


I had this same thought. What are you eating/drinking? 5-6 hrs of athletic work is a massive strain on the body, and nutrition at this distance can be tricky (even if you train it).

Also agree with the others that the swim is taking alot out of you. As a result of your swim, even a "reasonable" bike power is too much. It's a fine balance, though. G'luck -J

That was something I looked into and it may have played a role. It was cold out and when its cold I have a hard time getting enough fluids in me. I use Infinite which I had three bottles concentrated into two plus the water bladder in my Shiv. I also had two gels while on the bike and I finished all except about 20% of the last bottle and only drank a little of the water in the bladder. I was a little short of carbs/calories on the bike probably about 850, but I started eating early on the run with a banana and chews.

I still had to pee at the beginning of the run too and I am usually a camel when racing. I have been dehydrated in a race before and know what that is like and I didn't feel like I didnt have enough fluids. I drank plenty on the run too as it was sunny and warming up as the day progressed and I switch to coke around mile 7 and was using Base salt every mile on the run.

Florida will be more of a nutritional challenge in the heat plus I am a heavy sweater to begin with. I hope to also have a little less insulation by then too!
Thanks
Quote Reply