Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

IM Boulder reviews?
Quote | Reply
Oddly quiet today. Normally after a race we have a thread still ongoing from the day before regarding the play by play, another thread by those elsewhere asking for feedback on the event to decide whether or not they want to do the race and another one or two about it positively or negatively... and sometimes some fast typers getting their race report out.

Steve (darkhorse on here) and I drove the bike course and hopped around the run course. Some things we noticed from the perspective of an RD/spectator. Any thoughts from those that raced as to how the event unfolded for you? Hope your day went well!

1) lack of top end
- at one point we got out of the car (~mile 40) and were sitting around watching one athlete go by maybe every 20 seconds or so. I asked to see when these folks had crawled out of the water.... first one or two we spot are between 62 and 74 minute swimmers. This after maybe only 100 athletes tops had gone by our position.

2) spread out bike course at the front end (i.e. very clean racing)
- this is related to point 1. We were on the course from mile 25 to 100. In that time frame we saw _just_ three instances of drafting. One lady with a mirror (we caught her being suspicious 2-3 times... waiting to hear about legality of mirror and if we have any photo evidence on go pro), two mexicans (seriously, you race side by side in the same jersey and you think we are dumb?), and a northern colorado tri club fella. The latter two drafters backed off quite sheepishly when we rolled by slowly with the camera square on them. Back to the original point... this course was SPREAD out. There were times it would be a minute or two between athletes and this was maybe 200 athletes deep into the field. Was so very surprising but very encouraging from a fair racing perspective.

3) absence of refs at the front end
- while we saw little reason to have any refs at the front end we were shocked to not have seen a single zebra all day long. Any thoughts as to why this is?

4) safety of the course out east
- I am RD for a few events out here. At one point we got off course to jump ahead. When we came back into the course we weren't sure we were on the course or not. <--- that should _never_ happen. We entered the course (yes it was an open course) from an unmanned and unmarked intersection. We found about 9-12 others like this. Yes they were seemingly benign intersections but please have a cone with a sign saying what's going on. Or a NHS high school kid or 2 manning the intersection. My concern here is what happens when someone comes along on the cross road and wants to get to the other side when the mass of the field is there?

5) 79th street hill
- 14-ish% grade at mile 100. Highly entertaining. Some folks being good little angels with watts and getting up it as easily as they could... others providing sheer entertainment value by charging up it as if the fastest up it would win a million dollars.

6) Larimer/Weld/Boulder County sheriffs deparments
- super awesome job on traffic flow and athlete control (aside from one very skittish deputy in Larimer). Can anyone comment on traffic hold ups later in the day? Particularly 287 and Hwy 52?

7) run course
- it was busy but not as busy as foreseen. Still saw several instances of faster athletes having to do the sideways run to get thru the throngs of people and speed up and slow down to get around crowds. Occasionally you'd get big ROTC like groups jogging in a pack together taking up the path. 4.5 feet per direction is too skinny for a two lap 2000+ person run course IMO. A one loop course? http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=6395067 (yeah yeah, it's .65m short and goes thru CU and OSMP property... just an idea).

8) run course affecting vehicular traffic
- ZERO. The whole run was done "below grade" by use of the creek path system. If you were on a road a block away from the event you had no idea the event was going on. This was astonishing. In other words the town swallowed up the event and hid the extra pounds well!

9) bike course
- flat, not challenging (weather alone _could_ make it challenging - in last 10 days we've had high temps range from 100 to 58 & rain). Taking it so far east that on a hazy day you wouldn't be able to tell the difference between Boulder and Iowa is a bit of a slap in the face to calling this IM Boulder. When we were hanging out up in Loveland it was gorgeous. Green vegetation, foothills, some views of the high peaks, horse farms.... then the course turned east and it was dry, brown, dusty and there were oil and gas wells every where you looked. We can do better.

10) swim
- rolling swim start continues to work well. It's tough for those racing and knowing where you are, but for full events i think it's good (no way for sprint, oly or half)

11) swim course
- no part of the swim going directly at the sun = WINNING

36 kona qualifiers 2006-'23 - 3 Kona Podiums - 4 OA IM AG wins - 5 IM AG wins - 18 70.3 AG wins
I ka nana no a 'ike -- by observing, one learns | Kulia i ka nu'u -- strive for excellence
Garmin Glycogen Use App | Garmin Fat Use App
Last edited by: MarkyV: Aug 4, 14 15:21
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I plugged this course into Bestbikesplit and it was 2 minutes slower for me that what it spit out for IMFL! Must have been that one climb at mile 100. Honestly, not very befitting for a rocky mountain state. I'm not saying they need to go through a major mountain pass, but I don't know Boulder very well. Maybe it's mostly flat there. I drove through once and I I remember was a really long boring congested road with no shoulder with lots of cyclist and impatient cars... and a canyon road heading out of town towards Estes Park. In between was just typical American suburbia with a giant strip mall for 5 miles in between. But that was 7 years ago so my memory is a little foggy.

Seems like all the fast age groupers are tied up with other commitments. IMWI participant lost looks a little thin too. Lots of fast age groupers in Boulder might be wanting ot do 70.3 worlds, nationals or Kona, and Boulder is just bad timing this year. Plus I'm not sure I'd want to do a first year event after some of the chaos at IMLT last year.


TrainingBible Coaching
http://www.trainingbible.com
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I had a good day, a good long day. The only real negative for me is the long T2 and running over hot sidewalk, rubber mat bridge cover and the high school track to get your bike bag. I left my shoes on the bike, put on a pair of socks for the bike in to the catchers, and still got a blister on one foot, which hurt my run. So that could be better thought out. Or leave the bike shoes on your feet and clomp in. Other than that, I thought most everything went really well. I was pretty stressed and worried about morning parking and the shuttles, and that part was just easy. I was impressed at how efficient and fast and easy it was.
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [motoguy128] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
With all do respect, I'm not sure what was chaotic about IMLT last year. We can't control the weather. The T1 tent was too small but other than that it was a great race. My opinion is that a lot of people from San Francisco/Silicon Valley came into the race under-trained which contributed to the 25% DNF. I'd be curious to hear from someone who finished Boulder how it compares to IMLT 2013 assuming he/she finished IMLT.
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I am kinda shocked at the lack of IM Boulder info as well. It seems after the initial buzz of them announcing the IM Boulder it got lost in the sea of other IMs.

I will preface this by stating this was my first IM distance race.

1) I was shocked during the run to see some of the Pros moving the way they were. Some were moving like they were professionals. Some were actually human. I guess that was something I should have expected or anticipated by having a 2 loop run. It was good to see some of the pros feeling the same way I was.

2) I was nowhere near the front end so i cannot comment on those riders. But as always there was some drafting going on. However, I saw the race officials 4-5 separate times and they handed out penalties when they saw violations. I did see one group of riders with a guy wearing a mirror on his helmet. I am not going to state whether the group was actively working together within the rules or not, but I did notice the mirror and thought it odd.

3) No idea

4) For the most part the roads were well manned. There was some stretch on WCR 13 that seemed to not have any markings at the intersection. The traffic on that part was minimal, and like you stated a cone or sign on the stop sign could have helped. All that said, I didn't feel unsafe due to cross traffic. I can only imagine the hell that some of the volunteers/ traffic control personnel were getting while the bulk of the riders were passing through.

5) 79th St Hill was disappointing. Not from a hell standpoint... cause it was there and the crowds were motivating. But I expected a tent set up with some guys drinking margaritas wearing sombreros and partying. It totally ruined my run not seeing it.

6) Law enforcement was great. They definitely had their hands full having to block off the major sections of roads and dealing with some long lines of frustrated drivers. From my point they did what they needed to in order to allow the racers to maintain their momentum. Kudos for a tough job. (having to block off an interstate intersection, State highways, main county roads... not an easy deal)

7) Run course was adequate unless you came upon the packs of people walking 2-3 abreast and it created some traffic. The shade was nice. The part that bothered me more about the run course was some of the outside influences on the course. It is great to run down by the creek, it is a nice area. That is why all the kids like to hang out on their tubes down there. Most were courteous and would wait for an opening in traffic to walk with their tubes or walk on the side of the path. Some didn't care there was a race going on. Also, I dont know if it is common place, but I didn't see any race officials on the run course. I saw many people throwing trash wherever they wanted. The volunteers did a great job of trying to pick up the trash outside of the trash zones, but there were some blatant disregard for the trash zones.

8) There was 1 or 2 road crossing but it didn't seem to disrupt traffic. (1 was in a neighborhood).

9) Bike course was good from my perspective. I think it did a decent job of showing the front range, not just Boulder. There is so much more to the state than what can be seen in Boulder. Hopefully when people were riding or driving the bike course they stopped in a town that didn't have so much of the Boulder flavor (you know what I am talking about).

I think that it was a challenge for many. The variance of the terrain and environment could really adjust the attitude of the athlete. There was the nice cool mountain breeze in Boulder and Loveland. Once you made the turn south onto the fresh asphalt of WCR 17 the wind changed to the hot dry wind that the plains are known for and you could feel it evaporating the water out of the BTA bottle. I also like that it was one giant loop without many out/backs. While the course may not have had the elevation challenge that some were looking for, I believe the course may have humbled some people.

10/11) Swim went well. Aside from them announcing that the waves would be run by 10 minute intervals and then having different signs at the start. (Briefed 1:00-1:10, 1:10-1:20, etc. Signs 1:00-1:15, 1:15-1:30, etc.). Again not that big of deal, but not a hard thing to know in advance. It was even being briefed the 10 minute intervals on race morning at the reservoir when they had the signs. ????
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Great observations of the race. From my perspective as a racer you are spot on.

2) Totally agree at the front end. I had to work my way up on the bike, since I swam a 1:20, but broke into the top 200 by about mile 50-60. The first 60 miles there was lots of bunching within the middle of the pack. But up front everyone raced clean.
3) I didn't see one ref the last half of the bike course.
5) I was passed by a few people on 79th who were charging up the hill. They were so short that pushing to get up the hill didn't make a difference. I recovered fully on the following descents.
6) Totally agree, fantastic police and very friendly. Although there were a few intersections which I approached where they were still letting cars through. I had to feather the brakes a bit for fear they wouldn't hold traffic.
7) Definitely not busy. Don't know how it was later in the race, but between 1 pm and 5 pm, there were only a few points where the path was blocked by people running two or three abreast. Great volunteers and support also! Lots of fun, but hard run course.
9) I only have the Cabo bike course to compare, so Boulder was cake compared to that. With the conditions we had yesterday, it was a very fast bike course.
10) Loved the rolling start! Really gave room for the 3000+ athletes. I didn't experience any contact at all.
11) Totally winning!

I'll add that I am very amazed with the organization of this race. Being a first year race there was a lot of apprehension about the shuttle situation, parking, etc. But everything turned out really well. Big kudos to the race director and organizers, and I can't wait to see what they have in store next year!

__________

"Thankfully, persistence is a great substitute for talent" - Steve Martin
http://www.trifundracing.com
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
7) I liked the run course. The triple out an back IMHO made it feel shorter then a one loop or even double loop course. It also gave spectators great places to setup and watch the runners pass them multiple times and added to the energy of the day.

I only ran into an issue with it being to narrow once or twice and that was from people grouping up three wide and being inconsiderate.
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
IMLT 2013 and IM Boulder 2014 is an interesting comparison... in a lot of ways they are similar and a lot they're opposite. I ended up with similar times for both races, and here is the direct comparison. The swim at Boulder was beautiful and uneventful. The swim at LT was brutally cold, offered poor visibility, and the infamous changing tent. The bike at Boulder was challenging but fast. I biked similar wattages and was 50 minutes faster at Boulder. The run at LT was cool, pleasant, and relatively fast. The run at Boulder was a freeking death march. Looking at the weather reports doesn't even come close to telling the whole story. Carnage from mile 0 with people caked with salt, yacking all over the place, and being carted off the course with med staff. I've done 12 and it was by far the hardest marathon. I talked to someone that has done 40 including winning his age group at Kona several times and he also said it was the hardest marathon he'd ever done. Tahoe will always be a very hard race but Boulder could be smokin' fast with mild weather.
Last edited by: iheartfestina: Aug 4, 14 16:38
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Really cool race, I'd do it. Love Boulder!
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [iheartfestina] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Not sure if anyone else had this on their Garmin, but mine said the swim was 2.6mi???

Team Zoot-Texas, and Pickle Juice
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
MarkyV wrote:
Oddly quiet today. Normally after a race we have a thread still ongoing from the day before regarding the play by play, another thread by those elsewhere asking for feedback on the event to decide whether or not they want to do the race and another one or two about it positively or negatively... and sometimes some fast typers getting their race report out.

Steve (darkhorse on here) and I drove the bike course and hopped around the run course. Some things we noticed from the perspective of an RD/spectator. Any thoughts from those that raced as to how the event unfolded for you? Hope your day went well!

1) lack of top end
- at one point we got out of the car (~mile 40) and were sitting around watching one athlete go by maybe every 20 seconds or so. I asked to see when these folks had crawled out of the water.... first one or two we spot are between 62 and 74 minute swimmers. This after maybe only 100 athletes tops had gone by our position.

2) spread out bike course at the front end (i.e. very clean racing)
- this is related to point 1. We were on the course from mile 25 to 100. In that time frame we saw _just_ three instances of drafting. One lady with a mirror (we caught her being suspicious 2-3 times... waiting to hear about legality of mirror and if we have any photo evidence on go pro), two mexicans (seriously, you race side by side in the same jersey and you think we are dumb?), and a northern colorado tri club fella. The latter two drafters backed off quite sheepishly when we rolled by slowly with the camera square on them. Back to the original point... this course was SPREAD out. There were times it would be a minute or two between athletes and this was maybe 200 athletes deep into the field. Was so very surprising but very encouraging from a fair racing perspective.

3) absence of refs at the front end
- while we saw little reason to have any refs at the front end we were shocked to not have seen a single zebra all day long. Any thoughts as to why this is?

4) safety of the course out east
- I am RD for a few events out here. At one point we got off course to jump ahead. When we came back into the course we weren't sure we were on the course or not. <--- that should _never_ happen. We entered the course (yes it was an open course) from an unmanned and unmarked intersection. We found about 9-12 others like this. Yes they were seemingly benign intersections but please have a cone with a sign saying what's going on. Or a NHS high school kid or 2 manning the intersection. My concern here is what happens when someone comes along on the cross road and wants to get to the other side when the mass of the field is there?

5) 79th street hill
- 14-ish% grade at mile 100. Highly entertaining. Some folks being good little angels with watts and getting up it as easily as they could... others providing sheer entertainment value by charging up it as if the fastest up it would win a million dollars.

6) Larimer/Weld/Boulder County sheriffs deparments
- super awesome job on traffic flow and athlete control (aside from one very skittish deputy in Larimer). Can anyone comment on traffic hold ups later in the day? Particularly 287 and Hwy 52?

7) run course
- it was busy but not as busy as foreseen. Still saw several instances of faster athletes having to do the sideways run to get thru the throngs of people and speed up and slow down to get around crowds. Occasionally you'd get big ROTC like groups jogging in a pack together taking up the path. 4.5 feet per direction is too skinny for a two lap 2000+ person run course IMO. A one loop course? http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=6395067 (yeah yeah, it's .65m short and goes thru CU and OSMP property... just an idea).

8) run course affecting vehicular traffic
- ZERO. The whole run was done "below grade" by use of the creek path system. If you were on a road a block away from the event you had no idea the event was going on. This was astonishing. In other words the town swallowed up the event and hid the extra pounds well!

9) bike course
- flat, not challenging (weather alone _could_ make it challenging - in last 10 days we've had high temps range from 100 to 58 & rain). Taking it so far east that on a hazy day you wouldn't be able to tell the difference between Boulder and Iowa is a bit of a slap in the face to calling this IM Boulder. When we were hanging out up in Loveland it was gorgeous. Green vegetation, foothills, some views of the high peaks, horse farms.... then the course turned east and it was dry, brown, dusty and there were oil and gas wells every where you looked. We can do better.

10) swim
- rolling swim start continues to work well. It's tough for those racing and knowing where you are, but for full events i think it's good (no way for sprint, oly or half)

11) swim course
- no part of the swim going directly at the sun = WINNING

Fantastic review. I was wondering why earlier in your post you observed so little congestion drafting and later in your post you mentioned the rolling start. Glad to see the rolling start work again. As for your point about the bike course, it really is too bad that you had the "Iowa in Colorado" bike course option rather than the "Colorado version of Stelvio-Gavia-Mortirolo" (from what I understand, you guys can one up those too). At Whistler they delivered spectacularly on the best that the local roads can offer....on the other hand, the local roads there can't really offer an Iowa or Florida simulation other than the 50k of flats that they managed to give us.
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Just home from racing in Boulder. 19th Ironman for what thats worth (I don't learn maybe)

All things at the high school wasn't the easiest of situations, I stayed downtown but without hotels right there, driving and parking was always involved.

Felt sorry for the registration tent workers, that place was flooded bad and smelled like a pasture.

The bike drop off at the Res wasn't that big of a deal, long walk in, some got charged for passengers, we parked outside the gate and hoofed it.

I was worried with the busing out race morning. All sent super smooth and no stress.

Rolling swim start was awesome. First experience with it. In first coral and just waded in, swam by myself, only contact was when our little trio passed a women pro and she grabbed my leg (we swam the easiest 55 ever)

Bike course was nice and on point to some of the descriptions. mild grades, the out and back early on was a hill. I was expecting way more from the 3 sisters climbs. I think I built it up in my head and it really was nothing (live in the mountains though). Bike course is really exposed so with a windy day could change things dramatically. Traffic control was real good, surfaces all good. Got a flat at 95 so don't know what that was about.

Run on cement was bit unforgiving. The width of the path didn't really come into play for me at least. liked the course layout with the three out and backs, easy to mentally break it down.

Having the morning clothes/dry bag back at the high school was not the best. The truck with those bags should have been right at the finish. If it was cooler, or if you're hurting, it would suck.

They gave us a $25 voucher instead of a pasta party. It was nice because with family there, we wouldn't have gone to the pasty party. Ate at Zeal on Pearl, real good (iffy wine so Im told)

I don't like those satiny polyester Zorrel shirts (its my cross to bear, I like a comfy cotton tshirt)

Thats enough out of me, time to catch up on work
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [Taugen] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Taugen wrote:
Not sure if anyone else had this on their Garmin, but mine said the swim was 2.6mi???

Yup, mine too was exactly 2.6 miles. I swam far to the right of the buoys, but still had a good line.

__________

"Thankfully, persistence is a great substitute for talent" - Steve Martin
http://www.trifundracing.com
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [AdamHill] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
AdamHill wrote:
Taugen wrote:
Not sure if anyone else had this on their Garmin, but mine said the swim was 2.6mi???

Yup, mine too was exactly 2.6 miles. I swam far to the right of the buoys, but still had a good line.

Hell, I swam dead on the buoys, in fact I hit a few head on. And still my Garmin went off at the halfway point before the buoy color change, and then again at the 2.4 mark far before we hit land. Another guy on the run asked me if I thought it was long as well. Just my observation, but I think the was long.

Team Zoot-Texas, and Pickle Juice
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I think you rode by me right when you saw the Mexican dudes. I was laughing and thinking the same thing. That was really the only drafting or blocking I saw. I didn't care for the St. Vrain out and back. I'm not a fast swimmer, and that was early enough where the was some major disparity in speed descending. It was a bit unnerving at times. Lots of "on you lefts" being shouted.

I loved the rolling swim start. Cleanest swim I've had by far. My garmin also had 2.6 and I swam pretty straight, but my garmin always tends to show a bit longer.

I didn't get much of the run flavor. Tore my calf literally two steps out of T2. Did my best to fight through it but DNF'ed after 7 miles. The run was really hot too for me and the last hour of the bike was deceptively hard. Loved racing in my home state. Great crowds.
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [Taugen] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Are you using a 910?

I have a 310 and had some luck with it tracking my swim under the sleeve of my wetsuit. Not on this swim. It showed way long. Like 3+ miles. The bike and run were both almost spot on though.
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [motoguy128] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
motoguy128 wrote:
Honestly, not very befitting for a rocky mountain state. I'm not saying they need to go through a major mountain pass, but I don't know Boulder very well. Maybe it's mostly flat there. I drove through once and I I remember was a really long boring congested road with no shoulder with lots of cyclist and impatient cars... and a canyon road heading out of town towards Estes Park. In between was just typical American suburbia with a giant strip mall for 5 miles in between.


Yes, totally flat here. Think Kansas...

http://www.strava.com/activities/11063891






Last edited by: v0coder: Aug 4, 14 19:42
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'd attribute the fair racing on the bike (that we saw, obviously there was more congestion further back) to the simple fact there were so very few athletes that swam under 70minutes in the race.

I rode those climbs when in Italy, ain't nuthin here that can compare with those. We've got them on gross altitude but they win in %grade and switchback categories, not to mention the views!!! Plus, 50 people would sign up for it. :-p

The whistler bike course can pretty much only be what it is. that's the only option. boulder? TONS of options. What i think is a short coming is that the original course had no climbing in it. Granted after the floods the course would have needed to been altered to something that resembles what was used this year. I bet if this course had any topography to it it would go the way of St. George, the dinosaur and, in the future, likely, Lake Tahoe.

36 kona qualifiers 2006-'23 - 3 Kona Podiums - 4 OA IM AG wins - 5 IM AG wins - 18 70.3 AG wins
I ka nana no a 'ike -- by observing, one learns | Kulia i ka nu'u -- strive for excellence
Garmin Glycogen Use App | Garmin Fat Use App
Last edited by: MarkyV: Aug 4, 14 19:53
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [iheartfestina] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Just be glad the run wasn't out a the res like the 70.3. There's no shade on that loop.
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
5) you see these guys at the top of the bitches?
http://twitter.com/...068192817152/photo/1
Where were all the fans on the bike course? Heard it was pretty scarce. Bike course at IM Moo is always ridiculous with fans everywhere.
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [GFOQ] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
We were right at the steepest part (probably a 50m section at 12-15%ish) it's the first one right after you turn off of Hwy 52. Didn't see that, um, unicorn man.

This bike course is near impossible for the family entourages to go spectate on. Just goes very far north and west of the swim/run venues. I drew up a course today that did two loops starting at 75th and Hwy 66. That corner could get some love if course is adopted.

36 kona qualifiers 2006-'23 - 3 Kona Podiums - 4 OA IM AG wins - 5 IM AG wins - 18 70.3 AG wins
I ka nana no a 'ike -- by observing, one learns | Kulia i ka nu'u -- strive for excellence
Garmin Glycogen Use App | Garmin Fat Use App
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
has this race sold out for 2015?
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [v0coder] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
IM website says a bit over 4000 ft of elevation. So, are you all saying that 4000 is totally flat to you or is the 4000 not accurate?
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [winchester] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
As of now, 7 AM MDT, registration is still open.

--------------------------
The secret of a long life is you try not to shorten it.
-Nobody
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [iheartfestina] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
iheartfestina wrote:
IMLT 2013 and IM Boulder 2014 is an interesting comparison... in a lot of ways they are similar and a lot they're opposite. I ended up with similar times for both races, and here is the direct comparison. The swim at Boulder was beautiful and uneventful. The swim at LT was brutally cold, offered poor visibility, and the infamous changing tent. The bike at Boulder was challenging but fast. I biked similar wattages and was 50 minutes faster at Boulder. The run at LT was cool, pleasant, and relatively fast. The run at Boulder was a freeking death march. Looking at the weather reports doesn't even come close to telling the whole story. Carnage from mile 0 with people caked with salt, yacking all over the place, and being carted off the course with med staff. I've done 12 and it was by far the hardest marathon. I talked to someone that has done 40 including winning his age group at Kona several times and he also said it was the hardest marathon he'd ever done. Tahoe will always be a very hard race but Boulder could be smokin' fast with mild weather.

So did the moderate temps but low humidity sneak up on people combined with the very direct sun? That's what it sounds like. Funny, when it's hot and humid you have a clear hydration plan, when it's not hot but sunny, things get a bit weird.


TrainingBible Coaching
http://www.trainingbible.com
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [grindmonkey] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
My observations after doing the swim and bike - (pre planned dnf as I'm doing Hawaii in 9 weeks):

- Boulder is a perfect place (for supporters) to hold an Ironman - great restaurants, T2 and finish are centrally located, interesting shopping, riding and hiking for those from out of town. Not as clear on the hotel situation (I'm local) but I'm sure VRBO has some good options.
- Iron Village was muddy but we've had an unusually rainy month, unlikely that will happen again.
- Bike drop off could use some tweaks, but not too bad.
- Shuttle bus worked perfectly. Well planned and executed.

- Rolling start for the swim was brilliant! Spread everyone out early, and didn't have to get in line at 3 AM like Louisville. I think this helped keep the bike from being too crowded.
- Swim was long. I went without a wet suit but still seemed up to 400 yds long. Also, probably should not have been wetsuit legal as it felt like a perfect pool without one.

- Bike - I've ridden the full course twice in training and often train on parts of it. I like the course, and I kept thinking fast does not equal easy. The east side of I25 has been brutal every time I've done it.
Still haven't perfected heat management, and had some troubles breathing (allergies? ozone?) which I don't normally have. The good thing was that riding my month-old Speed Concept was like riding Silk.
The problem with moving the course to the hills around here (which I agree are better riding) would be the steep descents. Kind of a recipe for disaster at an Ironman.

- Run: Don't know as I dropped out, but looked like it was working with the volume of people. Most of whom seemed pretty shattered - just like every other Ironman I've done (Penticton, Coeur D'alene, St. George, Louisville).
I know there are a lot of complaints about the bike path but the year I lived in Boulder I saw a ton of world class atheletes training on it year round.

Liked it so much I'm signed up for next year.
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The temperature for the race was a little below normal for August. The temp got to 86 on Sunday and it could have easily been 96 this time of year. And looking at the chart, there was virtually no wind on the bike and no thunderstorms. Good first year for Boulder but I wouldn't count on similar conditions in the future.
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [Pharmguy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Pharmguy wrote:
IM website says a bit over 4000 ft of elevation. So, are you all saying that 4000 is totally flat to you or is the 4000 not accurate?

I got 3379 of elevation gain on my garmin 800. Despite the course riding the foothills for the first 30 miles the course had nearly identical elevation gain in first and second halves (1711, 1677 first and second halves respectively). Not bragging, but I rode 4:43 and my power was a laughable 210 (220 NP).

I have ridden on the flat sections of the course in nearly every condition and in much worse scenarios. The lack of shade and dry climate fry you. The "flats" are always unrelenting in their mini-rollers and long false-flats as you return to the foothills. Despite my knowledge, I even failed to properly hydrate. The dry heat and very hot sun were aspects that locals all discussed as being the difficulty in this race as soon as it opened for registration. You just don't work that hard in an ironman for the altitude to have a perceptual effect on your race. I know times will always be slower at altitude, but nothing hurts more than those threshold and sustained super-threshold type efforts (mile run road-race- Pearl St Mile).

The concrete on the run was also always going to be a factor. I could not have been happier with my old-man/pillow-bottom shoes. Another mental fail on my part was not knowing about that hill along Foothills Pkwy. My course recon had us following the creek path all the way to the ponds. More heat and shade-less running that I was not expecting. I have run that stupid over-pass hundreds of times and have despised nearly every time I ran it.

My wife, who I think quotes this from a friend in LA, says, "it's called Ironman, not Pussyman." That being said, we will always push our limits to the course and we will make it tough for ourselves- would we really want it any other way?

-

later,
billy
Endurance Athlete and Coach
Naval Academy Triathlon Coach (USNA '00 and USMC)
billythekidtriathlete.com
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [Billy the Kid] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I did not race but have done the 70.3 and was at the event all day yelling at everyone!

from what I saw and have herd one of the bigger issues was the black track and bear feet I was told that the medical team read 103 degrees from that track. I know a few people got blisters from it, I also thought that the path would be way crowded but from what I saw it was not terrible not great as you mentioned but not terrible I however did not see it around aid stations?

I also agree it was awesome that the run really had no impact on streets etc that was very cool and should eliminate some of the crying.

One thing we noticed as spectators was it seemed like pearl street and the area around was not prepared for how big this even was and how many people it would bring. A few of the restaurants we went into were running out of things late Sunday and seemed understaffed and frustrated with the crowds. A lot of them were running out of things like bottles of water, this is to be expected for a first year event though.
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [Billy the Kid] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Were you rocking a Navy Tri kit? There was a dude waaaaay up front wearing the Navy colors, didn't catch his number though.

--------------------------
The secret of a long life is you try not to shorten it.
-Nobody
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [mck414] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I was talking to the captain of the 2nd bike aid station and he said the only problem they saw was some of the locals were losing their minds a bit. They had to move their entire aid station a half mile down the road that morning due to some mix up and then several locals stopped by just screaming at him that they were breaking the law, etc. demanding to see who was in charge and calling the authorities. I guess somehow this whole "Ironman thing" snuck up on them.

I saw the guy in the Navy kit finish and he looked really good. Nice job out there.
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
As for your point about the bike course, it really is too bad that you had the "Iowa in Colorado" bike course option rather than the "Colorado version of Stelvio-Gavia-Mortirolo" (from what I understand, you guys can one up those too). At Whistler they delivered spectacularly on the best that the local roads can offer...

Dev,

Indeed - Left Hand Canyon would have been great for IM Bloulder ( even if they could after the floods), but I guess you have not heard the grumbling about the IMC(Whistler)bike course being, "too hard"!



Steve Fleck @stevefleck | Blog
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [Fleck] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I did the course when the first announced it with the original carter lake climb and it was amazing I had never done that ride before and up by the lake was awesome too bad that had to go. Although the climb was not too crazy im sure people would have blown up on it.
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [winchester] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
It took over a week last year.

36 kona qualifiers 2006-'23 - 3 Kona Podiums - 4 OA IM AG wins - 5 IM AG wins - 18 70.3 AG wins
I ka nana no a 'ike -- by observing, one learns | Kulia i ka nu'u -- strive for excellence
Garmin Glycogen Use App | Garmin Fat Use App
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [Pharmguy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The gains are so gradual that such a number does not really paint a true picture of the course. There really aren't any hills on the course as much as there are constant false flats.

36 kona qualifiers 2006-'23 - 3 Kona Podiums - 4 OA IM AG wins - 5 IM AG wins - 18 70.3 AG wins
I ka nana no a 'ike -- by observing, one learns | Kulia i ka nu'u -- strive for excellence
Garmin Glycogen Use App | Garmin Fat Use App
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [Billy the Kid] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Billy the Kid wrote:
My wife, who I think quotes this from a friend in LA, says, "it's called Ironman, not Pussyman."
-

Quoting because Lara is awesome.

36 kona qualifiers 2006-'23 - 3 Kona Podiums - 4 OA IM AG wins - 5 IM AG wins - 18 70.3 AG wins
I ka nana no a 'ike -- by observing, one learns | Kulia i ka nu'u -- strive for excellence
Garmin Glycogen Use App | Garmin Fat Use App
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [mck414] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
yeah, that was him.

36 kona qualifiers 2006-'23 - 3 Kona Podiums - 4 OA IM AG wins - 5 IM AG wins - 18 70.3 AG wins
I ka nana no a 'ike -- by observing, one learns | Kulia i ka nu'u -- strive for excellence
Garmin Glycogen Use App | Garmin Fat Use App
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [Fleck] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
To first address what someone commented on earlier, I don't believe the descents in the canyons are too steep. You might be able to say that about Lee Hill or Flagstaff or Mags or Sugar Loaf but not South St Vrain or James/Lefthand. That's also why i think they are fair game for a future course. 4-6% grades the whole way up (some very short kickers not much higher tho) is something that a sea leveler should be able to handle.

Jamestown needs support right now, sending the course up there and donating money to the town (hell, bus people up there to cheer ala Verona) would be great. Likewise with Lyons.

As to whether that was possible this year or even into next.... roads are still not built. 40%(?) of the gross mileage up to Jamestown is dirt and gravel.

36 kona qualifiers 2006-'23 - 3 Kona Podiums - 4 OA IM AG wins - 5 IM AG wins - 18 70.3 AG wins
I ka nana no a 'ike -- by observing, one learns | Kulia i ka nu'u -- strive for excellence
Garmin Glycogen Use App | Garmin Fat Use App
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
MarkyV wrote:
.... I don't believe the descents in the canyons are too steep. You might be able to say that about Lee Hill or Flagstaff or Mags or Sugar Loaf but not South St Vrain or James/Lefthand.... .

I don't know how you'd manage traffic to get off 36 and then back on without shutting down 36, and I don't think Boulder County would go for that - not saying there isn't a way, I just don't know it. Still disagree on the descents, they're fine with a dozen folks out for a ride, put 3000 people with less than stellar handling skills on super bikes with aero wheels they don't normally ride, then tell them its a race, and I think you end up with a ton of injuries. Penticton, Coeur d'alene and St. George all have/had long sweeping descents so the climbs worked. We can argue that people should have better handling skills, but you race with the people you get.

Still, second half of the course is pretty dull. What about an out and back to mile 56?
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [kfc_bob] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
It's an idea... work on the details (such as 36 shutdown) later.

We descend LHC in the Peak as well as Old Stage, which is far more treacherous (yes, one way).

Edit to add: doing this very early in the day is one way of convincing Pelle we can pull it off. I.e. get off the roads before people wake up.

36 kona qualifiers 2006-'23 - 3 Kona Podiums - 4 OA IM AG wins - 5 IM AG wins - 18 70.3 AG wins
I ka nana no a 'ike -- by observing, one learns | Kulia i ka nu'u -- strive for excellence
Garmin Glycogen Use App | Garmin Fat Use App
Last edited by: MarkyV: Aug 5, 14 11:57
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
MarkyV wrote:
3) absence of refs at the front end
- while we saw little reason to have any refs at the front end we were shocked to not have seen a single zebra all day long. Any thoughts as to why this is?

Refs don't wear Zebra stripes?

Similar to one of the reasons for the rolling swim start: Refs were stationed in areas to affect athlete density early in the race in an effort to prevent groups from forming later in the race?

----

Jimmy
http://www.Riccitello.com
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [JimmyRiccitello] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
USATs do and your's don't?

36 kona qualifiers 2006-'23 - 3 Kona Podiums - 4 OA IM AG wins - 5 IM AG wins - 18 70.3 AG wins
I ka nana no a 'ike -- by observing, one learns | Kulia i ka nu'u -- strive for excellence
Garmin Glycogen Use App | Garmin Fat Use App
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
There is no zebra shirt requirement at USAT. The standard USAT referee outfit is a red polo and khakis.

A USAT certified Head Referee working a USAT rules event is required to "wear distinctive clothing or other means of identification," and will often use the zebra shirt as a means to distinguish him/herself from the other referees.

----

Jimmy
http://www.Riccitello.com
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [JimmyRiccitello] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Got it.

I'm all for stealth refs!

36 kona qualifiers 2006-'23 - 3 Kona Podiums - 4 OA IM AG wins - 5 IM AG wins - 18 70.3 AG wins
I ka nana no a 'ike -- by observing, one learns | Kulia i ka nu'u -- strive for excellence
Garmin Glycogen Use App | Garmin Fat Use App
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'm a Boulder resident, 2nd full distance tri and first IMC 140.6. I thought the race was great and I signed up for next year. A few thoughts and possible changes that would make it even better from my perspective:

1) looks like rolling starts are here to stay, I haven't heard too many negative things about them and many positives. I am comfortable swimming in a pack and I would like to do a mass start some day, but if rolling starts keep a few people from panicking in the water, it's worth it.
2) It would be great if special needs drop off was at the same time and place as bike check in. I thought it was strange and a little inconvenient to be on race morning.
3) I live about 2 miles away from the race site as the crow flies and 5 miles if I take roads. I had to get up about 1.5 hours earlier than I should if there just would have been an option for the athletes to get dropped off somewhere near the swim start. This is my biggest gripe.
4) I felt ok after the race, so walking from the finish, to the high school to get my bike then walk back to my car was not that big a deal. A little too much walking after a race for those really struggling.
5) Very little to no drafting from my perspective (1:04 swim, 5:38 bike)
6) As a MOP cyclist the removal of Carter Lake favored me but on the same day, if the Carter Lake portion remained, it would have added 7 minutes or more (best guess) onto my time as the descent on the north side of Carter is a little too sudden to help make up for lost time on the climb. The roads should be sorted by next year and Carter Lake portion will be a welcome change.
7) The shade on the run course was extremely helpfull, the support from the volunteers on the run course was outstanding. I never got overheated as ice was always available.
8) local officials did an amazing job with the traffic.

These are small gripes. I had a blast and I can't wait until next year.
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [humanator] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I heard a rumor that the course will change next year, cutting out much of the eastern portion of the course and instead going up to Fort Collins and going around Horsetooth Reservoir which is probably more challenging than Carter Lake. That is unsubstantiated, but it wouldn't surprise me because they always intended on having a high grade climb but Carter Lake refused the permit.
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [patsullivan6630] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Did you hear this from someone authoritative on the subject or a stranger standing around the course?


patsullivan6630 wrote:
I heard a rumor that the course will change next year, cutting out much of the eastern portion of the course and instead going up to Fort Collins and going around Horsetooth Reservoir which is probably more challenging than Carter Lake. That is unsubstantiated, but it wouldn't surprise me because they always intended on having a high grade climb but Carter Lake refused the permit.
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [lurch] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I heard that from someone I trust but I have not yet determined how she found out so I will call it unverified. I have spoken to the race director on a few occasions (this is where I learned about the permitting issues surrounding Carter lake), not to the point where I can just call him up, but I have some friends that can. If I find out more, I will share.
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [grindmonkey] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
"10/11) Swim went well. Aside from them announcing that the waves would be run by 10 minute intervals and then having different signs at the start. (Briefed 1:00-1:10, 1:10-1:20, etc. Signs 1:00-1:15, 1:15-1:30, etc.). Again not that big of deal, but not a hard thing to know in advance. It was even being briefed the 10 minute intervals on race morning at the reservoir when they had the signs. ????"

I take full responsibility for this mistake. I did not look at the signs before the race and could not see them them from where I was announcing in the transition. I assumed that they were 10 min. intervals. I will not make this mistake again! Z

Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [tomziebart] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
They got permitted to do the carter lake road race (even though it was in Feb) and I think they are planning it next year also. So I don't imagine it would be out of the question for a big bucks operation like ironman to get permission.
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Just heading back home now. Some comments from this peanut gallery:

- Overall, I think the race is a winner (this was IM no. 49, so there is some perspective) - I would say about 75% to 80% of the race is good, but there are changes required.

- Nice to have a one loop swim course. Would like to have a practice swim that doesn't cost $20 (or at least put it in the entry fee, so I don't feel like there's constantly a hand reaching in my pocket. Swim entry/exit good, good to not have any leg directly into the sun.

- Bike course was more challenging than I gave it credit for; a couple of slightly more epic climbs thrown in would work well. Saw several motos the first 30 miles, none afterwards, though everything was spreadout by then (did a 1:03 swim/5:03 bike).

- The T2 bike hand off needs serious help (you had to see it to believe it) . At the very least, there should be bike catchers near the dismount line. Running in bare feet for a quarter mile on hot concrete and running track needs to go away.

- Railroad crossings need serious help. If I hadn't slowed down a bunch, I most likely would have flatted.

- Run course was good. I expected it to be more crowded, given the width of the path, but only had to dance around a few people on the second lap.

- Having dry clothes bags closer to finish line would be a plus. Add colder/wetter weather and this turns into a medical tent nightmare.

Again, overall a positive experience, and would do it again.

Team Kiwami
Instagram
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
"Flat lander" review. I went to CSU and LOVED biking in Colorado, so was thrilled to do my 4th IM in Boulder. Now 40 and living in Philly, I was mentally prepared for a hard day due to altitude. That said, I was a bit sad there wasn't more climbing on the course. If this course gets shifted up to Horsetooth Resevoir and they take the bit east of I-25 out, I'll have to come do it again. I thought this was a very well run event, period. Don't even need to qualify that with the "first year" bit. And the videos on FB showing both transition areas and the flow of participants during the race was the best information I've seen on any of the events. Things that would have helped me out: morning clothes bag and massage at the finish line. Had I been feeling like a faster runner Sunday, the packs of people on the trail would have slowed me up. As it was I could manage them pretty well. However, if all "3000" people actually show up for this race, I predict some running collisions. Oh, and if someone could talk the host hotel out of jacking up their rates for IM week, that'd be swell. But I know I also have the option of staying somewhere else. The volunteers rocked. PS, I can't thank the RD enough for having so much ice on the course. I literally put it everywhere every time I passed it. One more request - ice cold watermelon. Yum!

To breathe, to feel, to know I'm alive.
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [v0coder] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The lake is frozen in February. Lots of boats in August. That's why permit was not issued.

36 kona qualifiers 2006-'23 - 3 Kona Podiums - 4 OA IM AG wins - 5 IM AG wins - 18 70.3 AG wins
I ka nana no a 'ike -- by observing, one learns | Kulia i ka nu'u -- strive for excellence
Garmin Glycogen Use App | Garmin Fat Use App
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
My notes;

- 75 degrees is just stupid warm for allowing wetsuits. Would do lava pants if it was that warm again.
- Setup at the rez was really bad for spectators to watch/see the swim.
- Swim was most certainly long.
- $20 to pre-swim a 750m course is crazy.
- Local restaurant only partially honored the food voucher. Said something about WTC only paying them $10 back for the $25 voucher. Lame.
- The swim warm up was not very practical from a logistics standpoint.
- Buses on race morning worked really well.
- Split location transitions are a major hassle. Especially since parking in and around the high school was a major pain in the ass.
- Rolling swim start was awesome. Very sane and low pressure swim and this led to a very spread out start of the bike. This might have also been partly because of the weird pace signs used. There was a sub hour sign with a bunch of people in front of it, a bunch of people behind it, then a big gap, then another sign that read 1-1:15 with a bunch of people behind it. So not sure, what the no man's land was supposed to be but that seemed to work out.
- Rolling swim start, long swim, lack of wind, early false flats, and the bike course in general led to a very fair bike leg. Saw very little drafting. Saw refs only early mostly, but they were not needed when I didn't see them.
- The out and back off of 36 was dumb, but maybe a necessary evil to break up the bike ride. Plenty of heros trying to win the bike on the descent in close proximity.
- The bike course was great except for everything on the east side of I25. That section was long, hot, and boring.
- The entire field seemed to really slow down as the heat cranked up late in the bike.
- The back half of the bike could have used more aid stations. I like a one loop course, but would trade that in any day for more aid stations. Spectators might get a chance to check things out on the bike then too. By the time they got back on the bus and in to town they were like f'it we are going to lunch.
- The hills on the way back in to town were way over hyped. The climb on the out and back on 36 seemed steeper.
- Traffic control on the bike course was really good for a first year race.
- The T2 transition was poorly setup with the really long run with your bike and a portion on a black track surface. Nothing like running a quarter mile with your bike and a boiling hot rubber transition surface.
- The run course was chaotic with locals wandering all over the place. People riding bikes, schlepping inner tubes, staggering, and smoking reefer on the path.
- I much prefer roads than bike paths. If you can't really take over an area it probably isn't a good idea to have 2500 people running there.
- Ironman in the first week of August in Boulder... yeah I'll pass on that next time. If the race was on the preceding Wednesday or the following Monday completely different days.
- Most people blew out of transition too fast with the gradual downhill, only to explode in a couple of miles.
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Would they be worse than the IMLT descents? If not, no one got killed, even when I blew a front tire going down one of the 8% from the Ritz. Scared the ... out of me though.

.

Dave Campbell | Facebook | @DaveECampbell | h2ofun@h2ofun.net

Boom Nutrition code 19F4Y3 $5 off 24 pack box | Bionic Runner | PowerCranks | Velotron | Spruzzamist

Lions don't lose sleep worrying about the sheep
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [owtbac86] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
owtbac86 wrote:
Just heading back home now. Some comments from this peanut gallery:

- Overall, I think the race is a winner (this was IM no. 49, so there is some perspective) - I would say about 75% to 80% of the race is good, but there are changes required.

- Nice to have a one loop swim course. Would like to have a practice swim that doesn't cost $20 (or at least put it in the entry fee, so I don't feel like there's constantly a hand reaching in my pocket. Swim entry/exit good, good to not have any leg directly into the sun.

- Bike course was more challenging than I gave it credit for; a couple of slightly more epic climbs thrown in would work well. Saw several motos the first 30 miles, none afterwards, though everything was spreadout by then (did a 1:03 swim/5:03 bike).

- The T2 bike hand off needs serious help (you had to see it to believe it) . At the very least, there should be bike catchers near the dismount line. Running in bare feet for a quarter mile on hot concrete and running track needs to go away.

- Railroad crossings need serious help. If I hadn't slowed down a bunch, I most likely would have flatted.

- Run course was good. I expected it to be more crowded, given the width of the path, but only had to dance around a few people on the second lap.

- Having dry clothes bags closer to finish line would be a plus. Add colder/wetter weather and this turns into a medical tent nightmare.

Again, overall a positive experience, and would do it again.

Thanks for your points on the race, but we want to know where IM number 50 will be. Are you stuffing Tahoe in before Kona, or are you saving it for Kona?
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
devashish_paul wrote:

Thanks for your points on the race, but we want to know where IM number 50 will be. Are you stuffing Tahoe in before Kona, or are you saving it for Kona?

Dev, the IMLT slot is for you this year. :o)

.

Dave Campbell | Facebook | @DaveECampbell | h2ofun@h2ofun.net

Boom Nutrition code 19F4Y3 $5 off 24 pack box | Bionic Runner | PowerCranks | Velotron | Spruzzamist

Lions don't lose sleep worrying about the sheep
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [h2ofun] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
After doing Whistler, Tahoe crossed my mind....but Steffan there or not changes nothing. Usually there are 10 guys in between Steffan and I in line for that KQ slot. Perhaps at a race like Tahoe that number changes to 6-8 but still there are too many fast guys in between. Doing Tahoe would be about the challenge. I am in SFO area in that general time frame for work, so it would be a matter of coordinating logistics and getting the body lined up which might be hard since I am supposed to do Tremblant 140.6 in 11 days.
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [mndiver] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Thanks. I lost my cookies on first loop (bad nutrition execution/decisions- lessons learned hard) so I looked relatively great on second loop. Fun day for all in Boulder.

-

later,
billy
Endurance Athlete and Coach
Naval Academy Triathlon Coach (USNA '00 and USMC)
billythekidtriathlete.com
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
devashish_paul wrote:
After doing Whistler, Tahoe crossed my mind....but Steffan there or not changes nothing. Usually there are 10 guys in between Steffan and I in line for that KQ slot. Perhaps at a race like Tahoe that number changes to 6-8 but still there are too many fast guys in between. Doing Tahoe would be about the challenge. I am in SFO area in that general time frame for work, so it would be a matter of coordinating logistics and getting the body lined up which might be hard since I am supposed to do Tremblant 140.6 in 11 days.

Yep, it would be for the challenge. And since Martis is done, it is easier than last year. I still plan to drive up Friday to register then come home. Will drive back up Sat and spend the night, race the 70.3, and drive him Sunday night.
Nice and cheap lodging this way, and I do not have to worry about the altitude.

.

Dave Campbell | Facebook | @DaveECampbell | h2ofun@h2ofun.net

Boom Nutrition code 19F4Y3 $5 off 24 pack box | Bionic Runner | PowerCranks | Velotron | Spruzzamist

Lions don't lose sleep worrying about the sheep
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
devashish_paul wrote:
owtbac86 wrote:
Just heading back home now. Some comments from this peanut gallery:

- Overall, I think the race is a winner (this was IM no. 49, so there is some perspective) - I would say about 75% to 80% of the race is good, but there are changes required.

- Nice to have a one loop swim course. Would like to have a practice swim that doesn't cost $20 (or at least put it in the entry fee, so I don't feel like there's constantly a hand reaching in my pocket. Swim entry/exit good, good to not have any leg directly into the sun.

- Bike course was more challenging than I gave it credit for; a couple of slightly more epic climbs thrown in would work well. Saw several motos the first 30 miles, none afterwards, though everything was spreadout by then (did a 1:03 swim/5:03 bike).

- The T2 bike hand off needs serious help (you had to see it to believe it) . At the very least, there should be bike catchers near the dismount line. Running in bare feet for a quarter mile on hot concrete and running track needs to go away.

- Railroad crossings need serious help. If I hadn't slowed down a bunch, I most likely would have flatted.

- Run course was good. I expected it to be more crowded, given the width of the path, but only had to dance around a few people on the second lap.

- Having dry clothes bags closer to finish line would be a plus. Add colder/wetter weather and this turns into a medical tent nightmare.

Again, overall a positive experience, and would do it again.

Thanks for your points on the race, but we want to know where IM number 50 will be. Are you stuffing Tahoe in before Kona, or are you saving it for Kona?

Hey Dev-

Would like to make Kona number 50, though you've got me thinking now. :)

I would like to race LT again before the 140.6 disappears.

Team Kiwami
Instagram
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Was one of you wearing a TRS shirt on the 79th street hill cheering for bikers?
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [JAH294] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I _think_ steve was?

36 kona qualifiers 2006-'23 - 3 Kona Podiums - 4 OA IM AG wins - 5 IM AG wins - 18 70.3 AG wins
I ka nana no a 'ike -- by observing, one learns | Kulia i ka nu'u -- strive for excellence
Garmin Glycogen Use App | Garmin Fat Use App
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Ah, just curious. I was the girl that was spinning oh so slowly up the hill and as you guys were cheering I pointed at one of you and said, "I love you guys." You replied back, "We love you too!" You guys were great. :)
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [JAH294] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
our greatness may have been multiplied by margaritas too :)

36 kona qualifiers 2006-'23 - 3 Kona Podiums - 4 OA IM AG wins - 5 IM AG wins - 18 70.3 AG wins
I ka nana no a 'ike -- by observing, one learns | Kulia i ka nu'u -- strive for excellence
Garmin Glycogen Use App | Garmin Fat Use App
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Wasn't me.

_________________________________
Steve Johnson
DARK HORSE TRIATHLON |
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [darkhorsetri] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
you had a hat?

36 kona qualifiers 2006-'23 - 3 Kona Podiums - 4 OA IM AG wins - 5 IM AG wins - 18 70.3 AG wins
I ka nana no a 'ike -- by observing, one learns | Kulia i ka nu'u -- strive for excellence
Garmin Glycogen Use App | Garmin Fat Use App
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Dark Horse t-shirt, red Red Sox hat. Dude, we were together for what, 6 hours?

_________________________________
Steve Johnson
DARK HORSE TRIATHLON |
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [darkhorsetri] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
margaritas? <:-D

36 kona qualifiers 2006-'23 - 3 Kona Podiums - 4 OA IM AG wins - 5 IM AG wins - 18 70.3 AG wins
I ka nana no a 'ike -- by observing, one learns | Kulia i ka nu'u -- strive for excellence
Garmin Glycogen Use App | Garmin Fat Use App
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Lightweight. You had one.

_________________________________
Steve Johnson
DARK HORSE TRIATHLON |
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [darkhorsetri] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
check your vision

36 kona qualifiers 2006-'23 - 3 Kona Podiums - 4 OA IM AG wins - 5 IM AG wins - 18 70.3 AG wins
I ka nana no a 'ike -- by observing, one learns | Kulia i ka nu'u -- strive for excellence
Garmin Glycogen Use App | Garmin Fat Use App
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Whoever was drinking New belgium Ranger about halfway up was on the wrong side of the road for beer hand ups like in cyclocross. Next year maybe.
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [MarkyV] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
One other point I would like to mention about the race but wasnt brought up was the sunscreen. I dont know if anyone else uses that stuff regularly or what, but this was my first time using it.



The bullfrog gel sunscreen did a good job keeping me from getting sunburn. It also did a wonderful job getting my race numbers off. For some reason they thought it would be great to use a rub-on alcohol based sunscreen. For what its worth, I use alcohol to remove permanent marker from walls and counters when my kids get a hold of them, so I wasn't surprised when my numbers came right off with this sunscreen. I dont know if it matters in the long run, just seems weird that they put emphasis on number markings that morning, and then as soon as you take your wetsuit off and put this sunscreen on the numbers come right off. Just an observation.
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [grindmonkey] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Thats what I always use and it is funny how easy and fast it takes off the numbers. Love that stuff tried to go a race without it and got fried.
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [dogmile] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
dogmile wrote:
My notes;

- 75 degrees is just stupid warm for allowing wetsuits. Would do lava pants if it was that warm again.
- Setup at the rez was really bad for spectators to watch/see the swim.
- Swim was most certainly long.
- $20 to pre-swim a 750m course is crazy.
- Local restaurant only partially honored the food voucher. Said something about WTC only paying them $10 back for the $25 voucher. Lame.
- The swim warm up was not very practical from a logistics standpoint.
- Buses on race morning worked really well.
- Split location transitions are a major hassle. Especially since parking in and around the high school was a major pain in the ass.
- Rolling swim start was awesome. Very sane and low pressure swim and this led to a very spread out start of the bike. This might have also been partly because of the weird pace signs used. There was a sub hour sign with a bunch of people in front of it, a bunch of people behind it, then a big gap, then another sign that read 1-1:15 with a bunch of people behind it. So not sure, what the no man's land was supposed to be but that seemed to work out.
- Rolling swim start, long swim, lack of wind, early false flats, and the bike course in general led to a very fair bike leg. Saw very little drafting. Saw refs only early mostly, but they were not needed when I didn't see them.
- The out and back off of 36 was dumb, but maybe a necessary evil to break up the bike ride. Plenty of heros trying to win the bike on the descent in close proximity.
- The bike course was great except for everything on the east side of I25. That section was long, hot, and boring.
- The entire field seemed to really slow down as the heat cranked up late in the bike.
- The back half of the bike could have used more aid stations. I like a one loop course, but would trade that in any day for more aid stations. Spectators might get a chance to check things out on the bike then too. By the time they got back on the bus and in to town they were like f'it we are going to lunch.
- The hills on the way back in to town were way over hyped. The climb on the out and back on 36 seemed steeper.
- Traffic control on the bike course was really good for a first year race.
- The T2 transition was poorly setup with the really long run with your bike and a portion on a black track surface. Nothing like running a quarter mile with your bike and a boiling hot rubber transition surface.
- The run course was chaotic with locals wandering all over the place. People riding bikes, schlepping inner tubes, staggering, and smoking reefer on the path.
- I much prefer roads than bike paths. If you can't really take over an area it probably isn't a good idea to have 2500 people running there.
- Ironman in the first week of August in Boulder... yeah I'll pass on that next time. If the race was on the preceding Wednesday or the following Monday completely different days.
- Most people blew out of transition too fast with the gradual downhill, only to explode in a couple of miles.


Good recap - you got most of the points... you forgot the $6 fee for dropping off your bike. Anyone that was not an athlete had to pay the entry fee to get into the Boulder Rez. EVERYONE was pissed!!!!! This was completely unacceptable. The race director/wtc should have stepped up and just paid a fee to let everyone in that day that was 'with' an athlete. My friend's 70yo parents were super upset about that and they are the nicest people from Omaha.

Honestly, in it's entirety. This race had the WORST overall logistics of any race I've ever done. A few of the items happen at a race and would have made them acceptable, but this race - they just kept adding up. Any one or even a couple of them would have been acceptable but the shear number of really bad decisions really made this a very poorly run race from the basic logistics standpoint in my opinion. Something as simple as having the morning clothes drop off at the opposite end of the very large transition area from the start was just stupid. My friends feet were already sore/almost raw before she started the swim from walking across the parking lot twice. Oh, and if you wanted to warm up...then you had to do this walk an additional two times.

The positive points - i don't think are directly related to race management and the reason they were good.

- Volunteers - they were awesome - more so then any other race. The teenage kids there were out there were fully involved and totally into it and were troopers in the heat.
- Traffic control - again - Awesome... Law enforcement was on the ball everywhere. and with such a challenging course (crossing Diagonal for example).
- The swim start - the rolling start (my first one) was awesome. So relaxed and everyone in my immediate area was very cool. As we were walking toward the water, I could have probably stuck my arms out and not hit anyone. So nice...

I actually think maybe Boulder is not a place for an Ironman. Good intentions - but the town is too big and logistics too complicated for a good experience for the athletes. I.e. did we 'really' need to finish in the heart of downtown for any reason than to appease a few business/chamber of commerce agreements. (and then have to go back a few blocks to get your bags, and then a few blocks to get the car..etc). A smaller town would have been happy just to have the race in the area and might not have imposed so many restrictions....
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [dogmile] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
dogmile wrote:
- The run course was chaotic with locals wandering all over the place. People riding bikes, schlepping inner tubes, staggering, and smoking reefer on the path.

Sounds like a high time was had by all. :)
Quote Reply
Re: IM Boulder reviews? [Pharmguy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
4000 ft of elevation gain isn't "flat", but considering that's covered over 112 miles, it isn't much climbing.
Quote Reply