Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Kona and Age Group Power
Quote | Reply
The pros put out some amazing power on Saturday, but I'm interested in what us mortals were able to do. I'll start and post mine. Feel free to include a pic of your riding position, I may add one later myself.

http://connect.garmin.com/activity/391109601

Proudly Team BSR
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [amgray13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Good numbers - I didn't race so I have nothing to share, just a curious spectator. How did you run? Your IF is on the high end for an Ironman bike effort and you also hit some high peak wattage.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [amgray13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Time 4:51
225W ave
NP 231W




Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Larbot] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
height weight?

Larbot wrote:
Time 4:51
225W ave
NP 231W




Eric Reid AeroFit | Instagram Portfolio
Aerodynamic Retul Bike Fitting

“You are experiencing the criminal coverup of a foreign backed fascist hostile takeover of a mafia shakedown of an authoritarian religious slow motion coup. Persuade people to vote for Democracy.”
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Toothless] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
that's absolutely fine for an IM... don't forget there's a super steep short hill (Palani) that requires alot of watts no matter how slow you go.

Toothless wrote:
Good numbers - I didn't race so I have nothing to share, just a curious spectator. How did you run? Your IF is on the high end for an Ironman bike effort and you also hit some high peak wattage.

Eric Reid AeroFit | Instagram Portfolio
Aerodynamic Retul Bike Fitting

“You are experiencing the criminal coverup of a foreign backed fascist hostile takeover of a mafia shakedown of an authoritarian religious slow motion coup. Persuade people to vote for Democracy.”
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Toothless] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Run was great for the first 10 miles. Hill on Palani and climbing the Queen K out to the energy lab sucked all my energy. I was aiming for 200-210 (IF .7-.75), but it is Kona and it's hard not to get excited.

Proudly Team BSR
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Larbot] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Wow, nice job on the 1.026 VI

Proudly Team BSR
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [amgray13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I had a fairly abysmal day...legs felt like poop from the second I got on the bike, managed OK for four hours then it all went to shite.

http://connect.garmin.com/activity/390500383

_________________________________
Steve Johnson
DARK HORSE TRIATHLON |
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [amgray13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'll post mine mine when I get home in a week, but it was a 4:45 with 231w average (not sure of normalized, but likely 232-235w). 6'0", 165lbs (on scale before race). Ran a tough 3:32 after the bike. Ecstatic with my 9:38 after a 10:45 last year. I was aiming for 70% of FTP, and felt like I had tons more to give on the bike and really held back for the last 50km.

Bike Position Pics

Ken


"the trick is to keep losing weight until your friends and family ask you if you've been sick. then you know you're within 10 pounds. if they start whispering to each other, wondering if you've got cancer or aids, you're within 5. when they actually do an intervention, you're at race weight." - Slowman
Last edited by: redtdi: Oct 15, 13 21:17
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [amgray13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
4:49 Bike Split
145lbs
202W Avg
210NP
VI 1.04

I completely blew up on the run. First time that has ever happened as I normally run 3:00-3:05 off the bike. A bit of a disappointing day to say the least but life goes on. Some great AG performances on the day as I think conditions were ideal.



_________________________________________________________________
Supported by Compressport Canada | F2C Nutrition | Element | Argon 18 | 4iiii Innovations | Read my Blog
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [amgray13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply


http://www.trainingpeaks.com/...QXKYTJ5JPZ5KZNAMYBVA

4:41
Avg 234
NP 245
VI 1.05
Ran 3:14 (3mins off my PB at Kona)

I think what you run off of a bike split is much more important than the actual bike split itself ;) I will post a full race report in the next 2 days. 67th overall and 6th in AG.

-Brad Williams
Website | Twitter: @BW_Tri |Instagram: @BW_Tri | Strava | Co-Founder & Coach at: KIS Coaching
Partnered with: Zoot Sports | Precision Fuel &Hydration | ISM
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [afbadbrad] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
http://www.trainingpeaks.com/av/EB6JMRUSIJH3XNCQQ23HCRWYHU


First time in Kona. Heat was brutal for me and the run turned south around mile 10. Just about the same power numbers here as Lake Placid for me. No pack riding for me due to my swimming prowess :)

6'1" 178 lbs.
327 watts np for 4:32


Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [amgray13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
4:52, ~192W AP, ~205W NP
5'9", 152 lbs
VI was much higher than typical for me (usually 1.02-04) but I had a slightly slower swim than I expected and made some big surges early on to get through some pretty big groups of riders.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [joshjan] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
joshjan wrote:
http://www.trainingpeaks.com/av/EB6JMRUSIJH3XNCQQ23HCRWYHU


First time in Kona. Heat was brutal for me and the run turned south around mile 10. Just about the same power numbers here as Lake Placid for me. No pack riding for me due to my swimming prowess :)

6'1" 178 lbs.
327 watts np for 4:32


Your workout isn't public but 327W for 4.5 hrs.. holy shit balls, nice work. I'm trying to get to 300W for my FTP and we're about the same size
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [joshjan] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
joshjan wrote:
http://www.trainingpeaks.com/av/EB6JMRUSIJH3XNCQQ23HCRWYHU


First time in Kona. Heat was brutal for me and the run turned south around mile 10. Just about the same power numbers here as Lake Placid for me. No pack riding for me due to my swimming prowess :)

6'1" 178 lbs.
327 watts np for 4:32


Dude. You took down Hines in the pond. You rock.
Seriously sick bike, as the other poster said. Holy Shit Balls.
Sorry about the run.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [amgray13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
4:57:40 on 202 watts avg power. I was 154 on race day at 5'10"

Ill download the data later and throw that on here.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Training/Racing Log - http://www.earthdaykid.com/blog --- Old Training/Racing Log - http://colinlaughery.blogspot.com
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [amgray13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Curious as to what your weight/height is?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Training/Racing Log - http://www.earthdaykid.com/blog --- Old Training/Racing Log - http://colinlaughery.blogspot.com
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [colinlaughery] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Amazing how many sub 5 rides this year!

-Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
Team ZOOT
ZOOT, QR, Garmin, HED Wheels, Zealios, FormSwim, Precision Hydration, Rudy Project
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [colinlaughery] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
6'1", 165 lbs

Just started training with the power meter in March. I plan on focusing on the bike this winter and increasing my FTP.

Proudly Team BSR
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [darkhorsetri] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Darkhorse, was it due to an injury? Or did you just have a bad day?
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [darkhorsetri] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
You need to update your firmware.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [joshjan] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Ho. Lee. Shit. 327np for an Iron is insane. What what your actual AP? Unless you were 50% surge 50% coast, and riding the least efficient way possible, that is a massive number.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [afbadbrad] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
off topic, but which Castelli top is that ? did you throw it on in T1 over your tri suit ? Can't tell if that's a two piece kit. If you can include gear choices and transition times in your race report that would be cool. Thanks.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [amgray13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
http://www.trainingpeaks.com/...2ERDSQFNGGMHR3A3QKX4
Bike split was 4h29 and a bit. It was not too warm and not windy most of the day so perfect for fast times!
Sam
samgyde.com
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [sgy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
sgy wrote:
http://www.trainingpeaks.com/...2ERDSQFNGGMHR3A3QKX4
Bike split was 4h29 and a bit. It was not too warm and not windy most of the day so perfect for fast times!
Sam
samgyde.com

365 TSS and still ran a 3 hr marathon (if I'm remembering right) or is your FTP low in TP?

You killed it btw, nice work
Last edited by: jamgam: Oct 16, 13 6:58
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [jamgam] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jamgam wrote:
sgy wrote:
http://www.trainingpeaks.com/...2ERDSQFNGGMHR3A3QKX4
Bike split was 4h29 and a bit. It was not too warm and not windy most of the day so perfect for fast times!
Sam
samgyde.com


365 TSS and still ran a 3 hr marathon (if I'm remembering right) or is your FTP low in TP?

I think my FTP is set at 300W in TP but guess it is a bit higher in reality :-)
But my run sucked a bit indeed... Next time better I hope...
It is probably all this training with powercranks that makes me so slow. Also, I taped gels on my top tube in a very unaerodynamic way (which was good for a topic on this forum after my Kona race in 2011), and last but not least: my seat is probably way too high ;-)
Sam
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [sgy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
sgy wrote:
I think my FTP is set at 300W in TP but guess it is a bit higher in reality :-)
But my run sucked a bit indeed... Next time better I hope...
It is probably all this training with powercranks that makes me so slow. Also, I taped gels on my top tube in a very unaerodynamic way (which was good for a topic on this forum after my Kona race in 2011), and last but not least: my seat is probably way too high ;-)
Sam

Well to this MOP schmo it's impressive. Nice work all around
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [nhoya] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Did you see he weighs 178lbs? Still though that is 4.08 w/kg for his NP where as I rode at 3.4w/kg, but a 3:14 marathon to a 3:48 marathon............

-Brad Williams
Website | Twitter: @BW_Tri |Instagram: @BW_Tri | Strava | Co-Founder & Coach at: KIS Coaching
Partnered with: Zoot Sports | Precision Fuel &Hydration | ISM
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [rmg] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The new T1 stealth. Threw it on in T1 over my Kiwami Konami. What gear choices do you want to know?

-Brad Williams
Website | Twitter: @BW_Tri |Instagram: @BW_Tri | Strava | Co-Founder & Coach at: KIS Coaching
Partnered with: Zoot Sports | Precision Fuel &Hydration | ISM
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [afbadbrad] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
afbadbrad wrote:
Did you see he weighs 178lbs? Still though that is 4.08 w/kg for his NP where as I rode at 3.4w/kg, but a 3:14 marathon to a 3:48 marathon............

Yes, but did you also see he rode the same power at Lake Placid where he ran a 2:57 marathon? The 3:48 marathon is the first ever blowup on the run I am aware of for Beck.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kny] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Good point, didn't see that. Now that you mention it I remember that thread.

-Brad Williams
Website | Twitter: @BW_Tri |Instagram: @BW_Tri | Strava | Co-Founder & Coach at: KIS Coaching
Partnered with: Zoot Sports | Precision Fuel &Hydration | ISM
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [sgy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
sgy wrote:
jamgam wrote:
sgy wrote:
http://www.trainingpeaks.com/...2ERDSQFNGGMHR3A3QKX4
Bike split was 4h29 and a bit. It was not too warm and not windy most of the day so perfect for fast times!
Sam
samgyde.com


365 TSS and still ran a 3 hr marathon (if I'm remembering right) or is your FTP low in TP?


I think my FTP is set at 300W in TP but guess it is a bit higher in reality :-)
But my run sucked a bit indeed... Next time better I hope...
It is probably all this training with powercranks that makes me so slow. Also, I taped gels on my top tube in a very unaerodynamic way (which was good for a topic on this forum after my Kona race in 2011), and last but not least: my seat is probably way too high ;-)
Sam

Not sure if I believe you. I mean you averaged 278w for 4:30, so I can totally see you have a FTP of 300w.

Another holy shit balls you mofo's can roll is deserved. Great race.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [afbadbrad] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
That makes sense, just couldn't tell how many pieces your kit was. Doubted you made full change in T1/T2. I def am going to check that jersey out. No issues with chafing or keeping cool with it over your Kiwami ? Thinking of doing something similar in Florida over my Kaiman XC.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [amgray13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Wgt: 168lbs
Time: 5:09:59
Avg W: 228W
NP: 238W
Max Avg (20min): 255W

http://connect.garmin.com/activity/390971691

The above (along with smart nutrition and heat management) set me up great for the run I was hoping for:

Time: 2:56:xx
http://connect.garmin.com/activity/390971724
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Natrl DIZZ] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
good grief, no wonder I'm MOP. I hold 230w on sprint races and it hurts. If I'm 200w for HIM I struggle mightily on the run, and for IM I'm below 200 or I'm walking. You guys are ridiculously strong.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Natrl DIZZ] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
wow, that run seems very well-paced considering the location of the climbs. Curious, how do you train your long runs? All at the same pace, speedwork, hills?

Proudly Team BSR
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Bryancd] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Bryancd wrote:
Amazing how many sub 5 rides this year!


OK, from the back of the field, I can provide some other data: 70 min swim, 5:21 bike, 4:11 run (torn hamstring 6 weeks ago, so I had to really take the run easy, it really was not over biking...bike felt easy). 5:30 combined transitions, so missed the 45-49 combined transition championship by a few seconds (was second in that category...bummer!!!)

5'6", 143 lbs (not sure how I gained almost 7 lbs since IM Tremblant....must be all the biz travel and restaurant food).

http://connect.garmin.com/activity/390070351

AP = 191
NP = 201

Looks like my moving time was 23 seconds faster than total time, which seems to be the stop to get my 500 cals of infinit at special needs. The IF and TSS on Garmin connect are off as I did not update my FTP to reflect it having gone up since earlier in the season, but one could say I still biked high, but with a hamstring tear, I was not going to be moving very fast on the run anyway.

My position is pretty upright due to a fairly bad neck injury from a crash that prevents me from going any lower (I end up with headaches). My plan was to overbike a bit heading out to Hawi because I checked the forecast and saw a big South West wind in the forecast later in the morning, so I figured that the quicker I got to Hawi, the less riding I would do in the stiffer wind coming back. I was averaging 197W at Hawi and soft pedaled back down to Kawaihai and loaded up on nutrition, by which point it was down to 191W. From Kawaihai back to Kona, I basically rode at that average.



With my neck issues, this is the only way I can reduce my frontal....but time for a stubbly helmet. Almost drop $250 for a Specialized Evade, but I got cheap at the last moment and went with my old Chrono. I figure that $250 was worth another Half IM entry fee I could give to WTC rather than giving money to Kona bike works...Oh well!
Last edited by: devashish_paul: Oct 16, 13 8:52
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [joshjan] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
If that power number is legit, allow us to aero-plan for you, so that you can become world champion.

joshjan wrote:
http://www.trainingpeaks.com/av/EB6JMRUSIJH3XNCQQ23HCRWYHU


First time in Kona. Heat was brutal for me and the run turned south around mile 10. Just about the same power numbers here as Lake Placid for me. No pack riding for me due to my swimming prowess :)

6'1" 178 lbs.
327 watts np for 4:32




Kat Hunter reports on the San Dimas Stage Race from inside the GC winning team
Aeroweenie.com -Compendium of Aero Data and Knowledge
Freelance sports & outdoors writer Kathryn Hunter
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [amgray13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
My long runs are a mostly a mix of steady effort and tempo. Not alot of speed work. I come from a running background so I spend a significantly greater amount of time on the bike than I do running now.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [jmaley] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jmaley wrote:
4:49 Bike Split
145lbs
202W Avg
210NP
VI 1.04

I completely blew up on the run. First time that has ever happened as I normally run 3:00-3:05 off the bike. A bit of a disappointing day to say the least but life goes on. Some great AG performances on the day as I think conditions were ideal.


Was tha the fastest bike split out of the RCAF ? How tall are you ?....I'm going a hell of a lot slower (32 minutes) on 11 less watts (Quarq) and as I said, my neck issues do prevent some of that. Wheels and rubber can be upgraded too.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
5:17
6'1" 150
192/183 N/avg watts

1:20 swim
5:17 bike
3:25 run

FTP 250


Coach at KonaCoach Multisport
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I believe I was the only one here from the RCAF though I could be wrong. I am 5 ft 8in. My power numbers were very similar to Texas.

_________________________________________________________________
Supported by Compressport Canada | F2C Nutrition | Element | Argon 18 | 4iiii Innovations | Read my Blog
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [jmaley] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jmaley wrote:
I believe I was the only one here from the RCAF though I could be wrong. I am 5 ft 8in. My power numbers were very similar to Texas.

Hey, I still count for RCAF, although I have been a civilian for 17 years...once an airman, you are that for life!

Nice work. Next year I hope to get a bit more optimized as my neck condition improves. I actually finally had a half decent swim (for me).
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yes, you still most definately count. I should have captioned my response with active service.

_________________________________________________________________
Supported by Compressport Canada | F2C Nutrition | Element | Argon 18 | 4iiii Innovations | Read my Blog
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [darkhorsetri] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
You're being too hard on yourself. ;)
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [sgy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
sgy wrote:
http://www.trainingpeaks.com/...2ERDSQFNGGMHR3A3QKX4
Bike split was 4h29 and a bit. It was not too warm and not windy most of the day so perfect for fast times!
Sam
samgyde.com

Sam, you were over 20 min faster on the bike at Kona than at IMMT. Did you put out similar power at Tremblant? Were the conditions just that perfect at Kona for really fast bike times?

Blog: http://262toboylstonstreet.blogspot.com/
https://twitter.com/NateThomasTri
Coaching: https://bybtricoaching.com/ - accepting athletes for 2023
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [amgray13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
263w ave
273w np

6'3"
Probably around 180 lbs (I never look at the scale race morning, as I always seemingly gain 8 lbs race week. I was 172 lbs in the med tent after though)


4:52 bike
3:09 run (stopped dead in my tracks, can't even walk, hamstring cramps coming down palani at mile 25, or else it might have been 3:05-3:06)


Please critique / tear apart the position

http://www.finisherpix.com/...-2013/pbib/1970.html
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [afbadbrad] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Hmm, not available until spring 2014. Guess the jersey chose you.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [rmg] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yeah I got hooked up with one out there through a friend. Maybe post a WTB add in the classifieds and you can get lucky and maybe someone will sell you one. They gave out a few of them out there. I will see you down at FL! I just kept it wet the whole time through every aid station and that made it cool.

-Brad Williams
Website | Twitter: @BW_Tri |Instagram: @BW_Tri | Strava | Co-Founder & Coach at: KIS Coaching
Partnered with: Zoot Sports | Precision Fuel &Hydration | ISM
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [natethomas] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
natethomas wrote:
sgy wrote:
http://www.trainingpeaks.com/...2ERDSQFNGGMHR3A3QKX4
Bike split was 4h29 and a bit. It was not too warm and not windy most of the day so perfect for fast times!
Sam
samgyde.com


Sam, you were over 20 min faster on the bike at Kona than at IMMT. Did you put out similar power at Tremblant? Were the conditions just that perfect at Kona for really fast bike times?

I did both Tremblant and Kona, and rode Kona 1 Watt harder than Tremblant and was ~9 minutes faster with identical set up. As a smaller rider, the climbing in Tremblant (around 2000 more feet more) hurts me less and the wind coming back from Hawi hurts me more. So I can see for a bigger riders, how the delta between the two courses might be a lot more, with Kona (this year), being a lot faster. Also I seemed to have gained around 6-8 lbs of fat between Tremblant and Kona. Maybe the delta would be even more if I was lighter. I sure as heck did not gain any FTP (might have just been the fact that my training volume was 35-50% lower than the lead up to Tremblant).

Dev
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [The Phoenix] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I know you are using his words but I would not consider 23miles/hr in Kona even close to being a " bad" day.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [afbadbrad] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
son of a bitch. you're doing IMFL?

----
@adamwfurlong
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [jackmott] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
If that power number is legit, allow us to aero-plan for you, so that you can become world champion.

Or at least crush the bike record...

Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I also did Tremblant (4:53) and Kona (4:45) with identical setups (save for a Rudy Project helmet vs LG Super Legerra), and was 8 minutes faster. Power was the same on both courses and I was the same weight.

Last year on 4 watts less power I was a 5:06 at Kona.

Ken


"the trick is to keep losing weight until your friends and family ask you if you've been sick. then you know you're within 10 pounds. if they start whispering to each other, wondering if you've got cancer or aids, you're within 5. when they actually do an intervention, you're at race weight." - Slowman
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Natrl DIZZ] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
picture of your setup?

for reference, I rode 4:54 on 211 crank-based watts at 180lbs.

Natrl DIZZ wrote:
Wgt: 168lbs
Time: 5:09:59
Avg W: 228W
NP: 238W
Max Avg (20min): 255W

http://connect.garmin.com/activity/390971691

The above (along with smart nutrition and heat management) set me up great for the run I was hoping for:

Time: 2:56:xx
http://connect.garmin.com/activity/390971724

Eric Reid AeroFit | Instagram Portfolio
Aerodynamic Retul Bike Fitting

“You are experiencing the criminal coverup of a foreign backed fascist hostile takeover of a mafia shakedown of an authoritarian religious slow motion coup. Persuade people to vote for Democracy.”
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [redtdi] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote:
Last year on 4 watts less power I was a 5:06 at Kona.

I picked the *wrong* year to skip kona.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [ericM40-44] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [sentania] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
holy crap.

sentania wrote:
lots of free speed avail


http://www.finisherpix.com/...514585/pbib/815.html

Eric Reid AeroFit | Instagram Portfolio
Aerodynamic Retul Bike Fitting

“You are experiencing the criminal coverup of a foreign backed fascist hostile takeover of a mafia shakedown of an authoritarian religious slow motion coup. Persuade people to vote for Democracy.”
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [sentania] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
sentania wrote:
Quote:
Last year on 4 watts less power I was a 5:06 at Kona.

I picked the *wrong* year to skip kona.

You and me both! ;) But relative placing stats the same, so unless your just PR hunting, Kona is a race for place, not pace.

-Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
Team ZOOT
ZOOT, QR, Garmin, HED Wheels, Zealios, FormSwim, Precision Hydration, Rudy Project
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Bryancd] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I would have moved up at least 5 places over last year with a PR....

Next year :)
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [jmaley] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
How on earth do you manage a 4:49 bike split on only 210 NP. What power meter do you use?

That's an awesome bike time! Congrats!!
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [amgray13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
4:54
211 AP
229 NP

58:50 swim
3:23 run
197th OV



Eric Reid AeroFit | Instagram Portfolio
Aerodynamic Retul Bike Fitting

“You are experiencing the criminal coverup of a foreign backed fascist hostile takeover of a mafia shakedown of an authoritarian religious slow motion coup. Persuade people to vote for Democracy.”
Last edited by: ericM40-44: Oct 17, 13 10:21
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [sentania] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
sentania wrote:
I would have moved up at least 5 places over last year with a PR....

Next year :)

Great, I could have been 21st, whoopee. ;) 2015 for me, I got a baby to help raise!

-Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
Team ZOOT
ZOOT, QR, Garmin, HED Wheels, Zealios, FormSwim, Precision Hydration, Rudy Project
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Bryancd] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Bryancd wrote:
sentania wrote:
I would have moved up at least 5 places over last year with a PR....

Next year :)


Great, I could have been 21st, whoopee. ;) 2015 for me, I got a baby to help raise!

Poor guy thinks it'll be easier when the kid is 3. At least you had a good run for a few years!
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [acumenjay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
acumenjay wrote:
Bryancd wrote:
sentania wrote:
I would have moved up at least 5 places over last year with a PR....

Next year :)


Great, I could have been 21st, whoopee. ;) 2015 for me, I got a baby to help raise!

Poor guy thinks it'll be easier when the kid is 3. At least you had a good run for a few years!

Denial is a river in Egypt and I live on it's banks. He'll be 2 1/2, at least the wife is on board. :)

-Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
Team ZOOT
ZOOT, QR, Garmin, HED Wheels, Zealios, FormSwim, Precision Hydration, Rudy Project
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [acumenjay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ok, try this link:
http://connect.garmin.com/activity/391394757

7 watts different than Lake Placid but 51 minutes different on the run! Heat was not my friend Saturday. I totally agree that you race for place here and not time. I had nothing to lose by going for it on the bike but if you are a better fish it seemed like you could get into a pack of guys and save a ton of energy and throw down a great run. Oh well, live and learn.

Josh
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [joshjan] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Seriously, go find a pic of Kienle, study it, replicate it, then take the bike course record next year =)

Just walk the marathon, go all in!

joshjan wrote:
ok, try this link:
http://connect.garmin.com/activity/391394757

7 watts different than Lake Placid but 51 minutes different on the run! Heat was not my friend Saturday. I totally agree that you race for place here and not time. I had nothing to lose by going for it on the bike but if you are a better fish it seemed like you could get into a pack of guys and save a ton of energy and throw down a great run. Oh well, live and learn.

Josh



Kat Hunter reports on the San Dimas Stage Race from inside the GC winning team
Aeroweenie.com -Compendium of Aero Data and Knowledge
Freelance sports & outdoors writer Kathryn Hunter
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [sgy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Great race Sam. Were you rocking those Qrings again on Saturday?

Thanks,

Hugh

Genetics load the gun, lifestyle pulls the trigger.
Last edited by: sciguy: Oct 16, 13 13:20
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [joshjan] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Those are some pretty amazing numbers if they're accurate/ power meter is calibrated properly. The trainingpeaks analysis of McKenzie and Faris showed they rode around 280 Watts for their ride.

You should look into optimizing your fit and bike setup - I have to imagine you're leaving some free speed out there.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [The Phoenix] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The Phoenix wrote:
Darkhorse, was it due to an injury? Or did you just have a bad day?

It was a bad day, of which I have had very few throughout the years. My legs were burning from the very start of the ride. Sucks, but I'm over it.

Scott: the unit is brand new to me and I didn't want to dick with it right before the race. I know it needs an update. :)

_________________________________
Steve Johnson
DARK HORSE TRIATHLON |
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [TriBeer] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
TriBeer wrote:
You're being too hard on yourself. ;)

I think the time and the watts look ok from just looking at the numbers. I rode about what I wanted for four hours, but it was a struggle. I was just hoping my legs would come around during the second half of the ride...and kept telling myself the fitness was there...it just decided not to show up on race day! As it was, the legs were hurting pretty much the whole ride. I was able to pull something together for about 15 miles on the run, but it just wasn't meant to be on this day.

_________________________________
Steve Johnson
DARK HORSE TRIATHLON |
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [joshjan] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
that would be really impressive IF you had ridden the entire course...but since you only rode 111.99 miles...much less so ;)
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [natethomas] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
natethomas wrote:
sgy wrote:
http://www.trainingpeaks.com/...2ERDSQFNGGMHR3A3QKX4
Bike split was 4h29 and a bit. It was not too warm and not windy most of the day so perfect for fast times!
Sam
samgyde.com


Sam, you were over 20 min faster on the bike at Kona than at IMMT. Did you put out similar power at Tremblant? Were the conditions just that perfect at Kona for really fast bike times?

In Mt-Tremblant I missed T2 and biked 3 extra miles which included slowly navigating back so you have to deduct 8 minutes to have my 'real' Mt-Tremblant time. My IMMT bike average was 275W.
Sam
samgyde.com
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [sentania] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
sentania wrote:
Quote:
Last year on 4 watts less power I was a 5:06 at Kona.


I picked the *wrong* year to skip kona.

This. Whyyyyyy!?

VALÄ’RE | YouTube
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [sciguy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
sciguy wrote:
Great race Sam. Where you rocking those Qrings again on Saturday?

Thanks,

Hugh

Tnx!
Training on powercranks - racing on Rotor QXL rings!
Sam
samgyde.com
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [sgy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Think I might have to try them power crank contraptions. Still have the ones and BB adapter that were on the Blue, Send with shirt :0)
Btw also rev3 ATlantic City looks to be fun

__________________________________________________
Official Polar Ambassador
http://www.google.com/...P7RiWyEVwpunlsc2JtQQ
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [afbadbrad] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
totally unrelated and i don't want to hijack but can i ask what those tri shorts are? Pretty sure they are kiwami as per your signature but just wanted to know. That is just about what i am looking to buy for next season. Thanks!

JD

Carry on
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [snoop] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
It is actually a Kiwami Konami one piece suit with the Castelli Stealth T1 top over it. I only biked in the Castelli top. Swam in the Konami with an Amphibian over it, and then ran in just the Konami.

-Brad Williams
Website | Twitter: @BW_Tri |Instagram: @BW_Tri | Strava | Co-Founder & Coach at: KIS Coaching
Partnered with: Zoot Sports | Precision Fuel &Hydration | ISM
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [amgray13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
You should be interested in TSS as well. If you have your threshold power numbers right you should be biking somewhere around 280 - 300 TSS for the ride, for a chance on the run as well.

He who understands the WHY, will understand the HOW.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [31CapeHorn] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
31CapeHorn wrote:
good grief, no wonder I'm MOP. I hold 230w on sprint races and it hurts. If I'm 200w for HIM I struggle mightily on the run, and for IM I'm below 200 or I'm walking. You guys are ridiculously strong.

Was thinking the same thing! These are hardly "mere mortals" numbers.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Natrl DIZZ] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Natrl DIZZ wrote:
My long runs are a mostly a mix of steady effort and tempo. Not alot of speed work. I come from a running background so I spend a significantly greater amount of time on the bike than I do running now.

interesting that you do that, i too have a running background though not as good as your own, i cycled with you at kona (i am not a stalker but know you by sight after zofingen) , coming in just behind you in 5-09, though i only ran a 3-15

what is your bike to run ratio in miles terms out of interest - i know that tells me nothing about intensity but i need to improve my bike, i just dont bike enough but also lack time so wondering whether i just cut down on the run

many thanks

steve
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [amgray13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
209 W ave
6'2" 164lb
5:10:16

Http://darkhorsemultisport.blogspot.com :Riding the Awesome Train with Darkhorse Coaching
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [drluke12] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I was using a Quarq ELSA. People questioned my power output at IM Texas this year where I did a 4:48 on 207W Avg and 211 NP...that time also included a pit stop to change a flat (power was stopped during that period).

_________________________________________________________________
Supported by Compressport Canada | F2C Nutrition | Element | Argon 18 | 4iiii Innovations | Read my Blog
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [jmaley] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
when I see your setup I see most of the low hanging fruit taken up, great choices.

I was 4:54 at 180lbs at 211 AP, which I also consider to be pretty good from a watts/speed perspective. It can be done.



jmaley wrote:
I was using a Quarq ELSA. People questioned my power output at IM Texas this year where I did a 4:48 on 207W Avg and 211 NP...that time also included a pit stop to change a flat (power was stopped during that period).

Eric Reid AeroFit | Instagram Portfolio
Aerodynamic Retul Bike Fitting

“You are experiencing the criminal coverup of a foreign backed fascist hostile takeover of a mafia shakedown of an authoritarian religious slow motion coup. Persuade people to vote for Democracy.”
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [amgray13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
165 lbs
6'0"
236 NP
0.75 IF (usually .77 - .79)
4:55

Glute seized up as i got on bike. Came right after 25 min.
Had a terrible run despite holding back on the bike. 3:29 and I was aiming for 3:00-3:10. Can't figure it out, it didn't feel particularly hot to me plus I was well acclimated. Maybe it was a remnant of the glute issue. But I've noticed a lot of guys who expected to run around 3 hours, joining me in 3:30ish

____________________________________

Are you ready to do an Ultraman? | How I calculate Ironman race fueling | Strength Training for Athletes |
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [robgray] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
so we are saying 200w = 5hrs this year.......Drafting much ?
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [trek52] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
trek52 wrote:
so we are saying 200w = 5hrs this year.......Drafting much ?

Nope.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [trek52] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
trek52 wrote:
so we are saying 200w = 5hrs this year.......Drafting much ?

Yep, from what I saw, the drafting was ridiculous.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [sgy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
sgy wrote:
jamgam wrote:
sgy wrote:
http://www.trainingpeaks.com/...2ERDSQFNGGMHR3A3QKX4
Bike split was 4h29 and a bit. It was not too warm and not windy most of the day so perfect for fast times!
Sam
samgyde.com


365 TSS and still ran a 3 hr marathon (if I'm remembering right) or is your FTP low in TP?

I think my FTP is set at 300W in TP but guess it is a bit higher in reality :-)
But my run sucked a bit indeed... Next time better I hope...
It is probably all this training with powercranks that makes me so slow. Also, I taped gels on my top tube in a very unaerodynamic way (which was good for a topic on this forum after my Kona race in 2011), and last but not least: my seat is probably way too high ;-)
Sam

I followed your race very closely online Sam as a close friend of mine was close behind in your AG.
Great execution yet again,well done !

Terry

"You are never too old to set another goal or to dream a new dream" - Les Brown
"Discipline is the bridge between goals and accomplishment" - Jim Rohn
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [sgy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
So many fast Belgians. Male winner, fastest bike splits in women's and AG men, AG winners in M 35-39 and M50-54.

Must be something in the water there!
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [amgray13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Thanks for posting. I had 229/235W for 4:50, and I'm pretty amazed by some of these numbers. Anyways, I am bored flying back from Kona so I took a closer look. What I find most interesting is the cluster of guys riding the same time (~4:50) with huge distribution in power (190-270). Any ideas why that is? ;)



Too few points to get a good read, but for this sample time and power are highly correlated (r = -0.75).
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [avagoyamug] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
avagoyamug wrote:
So many fast Belgians. Male winner, fastest bike splits in women's and AG men, AG winners in M 35-39 and M50-54.

Must be something in the water there!

Actually, it is in our beer ;-) But on the other hand, beer is made of water so you might be right...
Sam
samgyde.com
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [jmaley] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jmaley wrote:
I was using a Quarq ELSA. People questioned my power output at IM Texas this year where I did a 4:48 on 207W Avg and 211 NP...that time also included a pit stop to change a flat (power was stopped during that period).

I was floored by your numbers then and I am floored by your numbers now. Maybe you're just really really aero. In any event, great effort out there, again.

Have you ever thrown your bike on a CompuTrainer or other power trainer and gut checked the Quarq?
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [sgy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Thanks for clarifying.

Puts my mind at ease.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yup. I ride on a CT a lot of the time and the numbers are normally in very good agreement. Also for what it is worth I used a Quarq Rotor PM for Texas and a brand new Quarq ELSA for Kona. So two different PMs have given me virtually the same power output for two different races.

_________________________________________________________________
Supported by Compressport Canada | F2C Nutrition | Element | Argon 18 | 4iiii Innovations | Read my Blog
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [trek52] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
trek52 wrote:
so we are saying 200w = 5hrs this year.......Drafting much ?

Where do you get 200w from? I said I did 236

____________________________________

Are you ready to do an Ultraman? | How I calculate Ironman race fueling | Strength Training for Athletes |
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
Thanks for posting. I had 229/235W for 4:50, and I'm pretty amazed by some of these numbers. Anyways, I am bored flying back from Kona so I took a closer look. What I find most interesting is the cluster of guys riding the same time (~4:50) with huge distribution in power (190-270). Any ideas why that is? ;)



Too few points to get a good read, but for this sample time and power are highly correlated (r = -0.75).

Weight of the rider has to be the biggest difference. I weigh 130 lbs, my FTP is 205 (now I have never KQ, but trying to make the point), so at .75 I am at 152 watts which gets me to about a 5:20-5:30 split. Theoretically, at 180 watts I can get in around 5 hours....in my dreams. I now realize I am not qualified to post on this thread.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
Thanks for posting. I had 229/235W for 4:50, and I'm pretty amazed by some of these numbers. Anyways, I am bored flying back from Kona so I took a closer look. What I find most interesting is the cluster of guys riding the same time (~4:50) with huge distribution in power (190-270). Any ideas why that is? ;)



Too few points to get a good read, but for this sample time and power are highly correlated (r = -0.75).


Nice to see you out there. Just for everyone's benefit, can you post how tall you are, kilos and also watts per kilo (well we'll get that once you post kilos). I did exactly 3W per kilo for 5:21, but as I mentioned, there is some low hanging fruit to work on my position when my neck gets better (if). There are other aspects of my set up that I give away some speed on for ease of travel and maintenance (or cheapness....ex: using 7 year old race wheels)
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
A picture is worth a thousand words. Thanks for the chart. I think most have provided their weight; if you have the time and desire, could you post watts/kilo by time? We should see a pretty straight line with high and low outliers indicating various things we armchair st'ers can debate.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kny] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
While W/kg is a good benchmark, as was pointed out by Tom A. in a different thread - kona is still heavily weighted towards W/cDa
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [amgray13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The watch is in a bag with Tri Bike Transport, so I can't post the file. Avg watts were 211, for a 5:19 split. PR for IM distance but I overcooked the bike and suffered to a 3:58 run. 10 watts or so less and the run might have been a lot better. Hindsight is lways 20/20 right? Overall 10:34, which I'll take for my first Kona. Weight was 161, height 5'8". I gained a few during taper.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [amgray13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Another data point. I was 4:55 with 199w avg, 213 NP. I weighed 163lbs raceday. I'm fairly certain this was due to the good conditions. I have files from two training rides in Phoenix where I achieved similar speed for the wattages. That is why I targeted riding around 200-215 watts for the majority of the ride, lifting to around 230-270 for Hawi and the shorter climbs. I'd also have to contribute some of my efficiency to a visit to the Faster windtunnel in Scottsdale. They dialed in my fit and gave me more speed for my watts, no doubt. When we were hitting the headwinds and I was in my optimized aero position I was flying by others from miles 80-100.



Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kny] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Unfortunately most did not post their weight. About half the sample, which is already light. Not sure it's instructive unless we get more points to plot, but my sense is that the w/kg array would not be a better determinant of time than watts. For instance, it's all over the place

-Josh Beck pushed more watts per kg than any pro, and probably more watts than anyone with Starky possible exception
-Sami Inkinen put out significantly fewer watts and much lower w/kg than Josh for a similar split
-Both were TT'ing solo

-Five plots from my head are Brad W., me, Joel Maley, Curbeau from QT2, darkhorse splitting like 4:41, 4:50, 4:50, 4:53, 4:52 on watts around 230, 230, 205, 230, 230 with weight of 175?, 145, 145, 145, 165?. In other words, the bigger guys rode faster or the same on the same power as a couple much smaller guys who I guess are about as aero as a barn door. Brad typically needs a lot more power but did not at Kona and Joel hardly needs to pedal to go 24+...somebody call the wambulance, I guess. Next race, maybe a w/kg course since I am an aero-as-a-barndoor diminuitive type
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [joshjan] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
joshjan wrote:
First time in Kona. Heat was brutal for me and the run turned south around mile 10. Just about the same power numbers here as Lake Placid for me. No pack riding for me due to my swimming prowess :)

6'1" 178 lbs.
327 watts np for 4:32


Thanks for sharing, and you outbiked Potts by like 7 minutes at Placid? Keep up those 5 hour Friday rides at 300+ watts, sir you are one powerhouse of a cyclist
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I was 180, 4:54, 211AP, 229 NP.

Eric Reid AeroFit | Instagram Portfolio
Aerodynamic Retul Bike Fitting

“You are experiencing the criminal coverup of a foreign backed fascist hostile takeover of a mafia shakedown of an authoritarian religious slow motion coup. Persuade people to vote for Democracy.”
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Russ Brandt] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
don't forget that riding an all black bike is worth 5 watts. If you had peeled off your wheel decals it would have been worth another 5 watts ;)

edit: I miss my P4

Russ Brandt wrote:
Another data point. I was 4:55 with 199w avg, 213 NP. I weighed 163lbs raceday. I'm fairly certain this was due to the good conditions. I have files from two training rides in Phoenix where I achieved similar speed for the wattages. That is why I targeted riding around 200-215 watts for the majority of the ride, lifting to around 230-270 for Hawi and the shorter climbs. I'd also have to contribute some of my efficiency to a visit to the Faster windtunnel in Scottsdale. They dialed in my fit and gave me more speed for my watts, no doubt. When we were hitting the headwinds and I was in my optimized aero position I was flying by others from miles 80-100.



Eric Reid AeroFit | Instagram Portfolio
Aerodynamic Retul Bike Fitting

“You are experiencing the criminal coverup of a foreign backed fascist hostile takeover of a mafia shakedown of an authoritarian religious slow motion coup. Persuade people to vote for Democracy.”
Last edited by: ericM40-44: Oct 17, 13 9:22
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [ericM40-44] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
First off, no fair cloaking yourself in a PI Octane so the "Army" target couldn't be spotted.
Second, turning your P5 back to a P4 with the water bottle should invalidate your warranty.
Third, IMAZ doesn't stand a chance with your fitness. A good day could yield a sub 9 hr race for you. Serious.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Russ Brandt] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
also, why didn't you buy my Ventus bars from me?

Russ Brandt wrote:
First off, no fair cloaking yourself in a PI Octane so the "Army" target couldn't be spotted.
Second, turning your P5 back to a P4 with the water bottle should invalidate your warranty.
Third, IMAZ doesn't stand a chance with your fitness. A good day could yield a sub 9 hr race for you. Serious.

Eric Reid AeroFit | Instagram Portfolio
Aerodynamic Retul Bike Fitting

“You are experiencing the criminal coverup of a foreign backed fascist hostile takeover of a mafia shakedown of an authoritarian religious slow motion coup. Persuade people to vote for Democracy.”
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [ericM40-44] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Ha! I didn't buy your Ventus because my current Ventus bars would be pissed.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
What a thread...starts with a request for data and then degrades into accusations of those same providers of data. Another perfect example of both the great and terrible of ST!

As previously indicated, I rode 4:52 on ~192/205W AP/NP after a 1:14 swim this year. Passed about 800 people on the bike and saw quite a bit of drafting but more in the people who appeared to be riding ~5:15+ pace. Only guy I noticed go by me and stay away was Josh Beck. Also rode 5:04 last year on ~195/200W after a 1:16 swim. Probably a bit more aero this year, but the conditions this year were FAST! I think the analysis needs some more work. Or I drafted the whole way...both years...

Stay aero my friends...
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [amgray13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Having not sorted through the pages....

This thread is missing swim times.


Brandon Marsh - Website | @BrandonMarshTX | RokaSports | 1stEndurance | ATC Bikeshop |
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [DrPain] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
You misheard. The total impact of the variables influencing the relationship between watts and time--those variables, to name a few, are weight, position, equipment, measurement method (at crank vs. at hub), power meter error, positioning vis a vis other riders and skill of (perhaps quite legal) positioning/passing, swim time, AND yes, illegal drafting--is HUGE, and means 80-90 watts for the same speed on a watts course. Don't jump to the defensive because you are at the low end of that range. Some guys are simply better at translating input to output than others, and some are surely are cheating to do it. I can tell you there is a lot of both at Vegas and Kona. And the most egregious offenders rarely post data to indict themselves. So stay aero, stay honest, and if you don't trust the data, trust God I guess, at least until we get statistically significant sample
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [ericM40-44] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
No doubt a very fast year on the bike.

5:10 at 185NP, 155lbs
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [-BrandonMarshTX] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'll edit mine.

I swam 58:50 and had the usual people passing me in the first 10 miles, but then the drafting continued all the way to Hawi and THEN the draft PACKS started on the way down. I was bummed. If I could have gone with the early guys I'd have avoided that BS. I'm not a powerful guy but I'm pretty aero so can put time into individuals in a line but not into a draft pack.

-BrandonMarshTX wrote:
Having not sorted through the pages....

This thread is missing swim times.

Eric Reid AeroFit | Instagram Portfolio
Aerodynamic Retul Bike Fitting

“You are experiencing the criminal coverup of a foreign backed fascist hostile takeover of a mafia shakedown of an authoritarian religious slow motion coup. Persuade people to vote for Democracy.”
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yeah, Kiley it was a little less power than I expected to put out. But you witnessed the same thing I did, the packs ate us up. We both played the game well. Sitting 7 meters off the back of 20 guys still gets you a really good "draft". It is legal, you just have to be smart about it and not get caught up in all of the others blatantly cheating. Same thing happened coming back down Hawi, this time I was on the front pushing 260 and got ate up by a group of 30, went straight to the back and sat there for 15 miles until the refs showed up and gave 10 guys penalties. At mile 10 of those 15, Ken Glah got spit out the back of the group and we sat back there and complained to ourselves about how horrible it was. It is something that is out of our control, you can't get worked up about it while on the bike, that is what creates people to do stupid things bike way to hard and then blow up on the run. At the penalty tent after those guys that got penalties, the group of 30 got blown up due to the head wind and then I rode back through a good majority of that group and watched then one by one fall of the back.

Interested to see that W/kg plot. Put me in at 3.25 for AP and 3.4 for NP.

And for Brandon, I swam 1:01, so in the first 40 miles had a lot of people to slingshot "draft" off of.

-Brad Williams
Website | Twitter: @BW_Tri |Instagram: @BW_Tri | Strava | Co-Founder & Coach at: KIS Coaching
Partnered with: Zoot Sports | Precision Fuel &Hydration | ISM
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Natrl DIZZ] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Impressive as always Mr. Burke. Nice job!

-----------------
Dale Stephanos (Formerly PappaD)

Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [afbadbrad] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Totally agree...best you can do is keep your nose clean when there's blow in the room and wait for the cops to show up. And I personally witnessed much less shameless wheel sucking in Kona than in Vegas. Kona was more of a 5 meter, key bump in the bathroom kind of thing, while Vegas was kilos on the living room table.

Regarding your ride, think you worked it pretty well, and think your racing instinct is much better than mine and your ability to work within the law to maximize your watts and your speed shows. And, you seem to thrive more on a watts course,, which makes a ton of sense. All good things. Glad to hear about the mass drug bust. I was kicking myself for not following the whole team up Hawi, but I was over on watts and dropped...I can tell you it wasn't any fun taking the lion's share of the wind for the next string of guys back to Kawaihae, then fighting solo for much of the trip back to town. In any case, good fun and good racing. This championship thing is a totally different ballgame. So is this Ironman thing.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [sesel] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Why'd I skip?
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Bryancd] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I've got a 3 year old and this year was WAY easier than last year.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [sentania] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
my 3yo and 8mo made me a more efficient trainer. Got more out of less very early in the morning.

sentania wrote:
I've got a 3 year old and this year was WAY easier than last year.

Eric Reid AeroFit | Instagram Portfolio
Aerodynamic Retul Bike Fitting

“You are experiencing the criminal coverup of a foreign backed fascist hostile takeover of a mafia shakedown of an authoritarian religious slow motion coup. Persuade people to vote for Democracy.”
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [sentania] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
sentania wrote:
I've got a 3 year old and this year was WAY easier than last year.

Forwarding this to my wife... ;)

-Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
Team ZOOT
ZOOT, QR, Garmin, HED Wheels, Zealios, FormSwim, Precision Hydration, Rudy Project
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [TonyStark] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Thanks muchly. Just trying to do my part for the old(er) doodes.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [afbadbrad] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
It doesn't really matter to me what the numbers are. I know mine, and they are higher than most of the people who are posting, and I didn't go 'that' much faster. I had the 'benefit' of riding in a 12 meter spaced pack for 40ish miles. So, my early ride was pretty high and I paid the piper on the way back.

I'm just pointing out that simply posting time and average power and maybe a picture really only tells a small part of the story.

I also got an email asking about my numbers because someone saw some 'age group numbers' that were crazy low for the splits posted given rider weights and equipment, etc. So, the swim time for you guys matters. Someone is going to look at some of these posted numbers and think...I can ride 4:50 on 200 watts which may or may not be true. Heck I know a pro who rode low 4:20s or so at a race on under 200 watts with a relatively bad position and probably not the fastest wheels or tires. That's called drafting.


Brandon Marsh - Website | @BrandonMarshTX | RokaSports | 1stEndurance | ATC Bikeshop |
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kny] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kny wrote:
A picture is worth a thousand words. Thanks for the chart. I think most have provided their weight; if you have the time and desire, could you post watts/kilo by time? We should see a pretty straight line with high and low outliers indicating various things we armchair st'ers can debate.

As hypothesized, there is a stronger correlation between time and watts than between time and watts relative to mass (w/kg), though not significantly stronger. Sample about 20 polluted by bias of self selection, so this probably means less than nothing.


Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [-BrandonMarshTX] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Of course isolating two variables when many others are of influence only tells part of the story. What is your specific point regarding the swim? The slingshot method is surely a way to buy speed on a watts discount. So are the flavors of legal positioning, and of course blatant wheel sucking is a godsend too. We can wax on about which of these is the biggest reason why power is a surprisingly poor indicator for time, but if you rode Vegas and you rode Kona as an age grouper, presuming you have a power meter and a brain, you probably don't need all the arrays of these "other" variables to form an opinion on the matter.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [amgray13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'm late to the party but here's some more data. If anyone wants any other specifics let me know.

4:54
AP 206W
NP 216W
IF-.72
6'2" and 160#[/img]

Ben McMurray
Northern Michigan Small Farm Venture ---> http://facebook.com/hillvalleymi [/size]


Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [jackmott] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jackmott wrote:
watts/height would be interesting

Poor man's proxy for watts/cda?
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [earthling] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
was waiting till I got my pics before posting again. It's nice to see similar numbers shake out to about the same time.

Recap
height-6'1"
weight-165lbs

swim-58:32
bike-5:11:57
AP-202
NP-216
VI-1.07
TSS-295
IF-0.76
run: 3:50:16

Any advice on my aero position is much appreciated. I have about 2 more spacers to go for the stem to be slammed.



Proudly Team BSR
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kny] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kny wrote:
jackmott wrote:
watts/height would be interesting


Poor man's proxy for watts/cda?

Well, I believe that is what Computrainer does in their model...you plug in your height and weight, you pedal at a certain amount of watts and the CT just calculates your ground speed based on some assumption of drag given your height...and when it is non zero grade it factors in your weight. Not sure if they also use the weight to calculate what your aero profile might be :-). i have generally found that the CT model to be way off, but I guess it really does not matter as long as you just compare CT rides with CT rides....sorry for the thread hijack.

Dev
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Kiley-

Want to know something interesting, one of the three amigos that rode 2:16 at Vegas in our AG, rode 4:39 at Kona. Interesting data point, he out split me and the other "top" bikers, minus the other 2 2:16'ers, by 6 minutes in Vegas. Kona he had the 3rd fastest split in our AG, and its not like I got blown out of the water.

Brandon-

Completely understand that your race is totally different. The slingshot method is a lot easier for us to do and especially when I came out of the water like 300th, it left plenty of people on the course to pass. I doubt I would have rode 4:41 if I had to race with you guys, obviously I would have no pack to ride with, other than maybe the pro girls that all would pass me on the swim ;) Are you going to be at Austin? Hopefully see you down there and we can talk down there, want to pick your brain about some stuff.

-Brad Williams
Website | Twitter: @BW_Tri |Instagram: @BW_Tri | Strava | Co-Founder & Coach at: KIS Coaching
Partnered with: Zoot Sports | Precision Fuel &Hydration | ISM
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [ericM40-44] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Looks like someone was paying attention to what clothing has tested as fast. Was the black color of the PI suit an issue in terms of being hot? Did you wear it for the run? If you took it off for the run was it a quick change?

Thanks in advance...
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [tttiltheend] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I wasn't hot in the PI suit, any more than I'd be at a Kona race. I liked it actually... kept it wet at each aid station.

Getting it off was fine, getting the running kit on was not. My usual T2 at Kona is 2:30 and I split almost 5min this time, however a full minute of that was pissing in the trough and some other time wasted on non tri-suit stuff. So some seconds wasted that could have been better if I rehearsed more I suppose.

I'll probably never race in a tank tri top again... no sunburn anywhere except my forearms this year.

tttiltheend wrote:
Looks like someone was paying attention to what clothing has tested as fast. Was the black color of the PI suit an issue in terms of being hot? Did you wear it for the run? If you took it off for the run was it a quick change?

Thanks in advance...

Eric Reid AeroFit | Instagram Portfolio
Aerodynamic Retul Bike Fitting

“You are experiencing the criminal coverup of a foreign backed fascist hostile takeover of a mafia shakedown of an authoritarian religious slow motion coup. Persuade people to vote for Democracy.”
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [ericM40-44] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Good info, I was a bit put off by the black color but sounds like it's no big deal.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [tttiltheend] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I see P5, P5, P4, new P3, old P3, old P3, P2, Transition?, Argon, Swift (Gyde), devashish paul's? What other bikes are people riding?
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yup, I must have entirely misheard...haha ;)
In any case, I'm not looking to argue. I agree with your list of multiple confounding factors that make it hard to make any significant conclusions. Terrible pacing on the bike (and the run) is another one that I'm repeatedly shocked by at Kona.
Well, I hope you find what you're looking for in this analysis.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [ninesixfour] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ninesixfour wrote:
I see P5, P5, P4, new P3, old P3, old P3, P2, Transition?, Argon, Swift (Gyde), devashish paul's? What other bikes are people riding?


Mine is an old model Slice. I basically got it this year so that I can have my saddle slammed all the way back in a road position, but the reach is so short that I can get to my aerobars without stretching out my back. The reason I want to ride in that John Cobb Slam position is to put more weight on my butt/back wheel, as I have neck injuries that result in headaches if I put too much weight on my upper body with the saddle forward.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [amgray13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
open for anyone, but for you guys listing wattage at Kona, what kind of average power are you pushing on your long training rides in comparison to your ironman bike average?

higher, lower, same?

just curious.

thanks,
jack
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [cyclingdoc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
cyclingdoc wrote:
open for anyone, but for you guys listing wattage at Kona, what kind of average power are you pushing on your long training rides in comparison to your ironman bike average?

higher, lower, same?

just curious.

thanks,
jack

for very long rides (over race distance/time eg 6+ hours) it's 20-40 watts lower than race day
my race rehearsal rides were 10-15 watts higher (not intentionally, I just underperformed by 10-15 watts on race day)

____________________________________

Are you ready to do an Ultraman? | How I calculate Ironman race fueling | Strength Training for Athletes |
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [robgray] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
This thread is so interesting...just because I wasn't prepared for the way Kona turned out. Totally my fault but if I had to do it all over again I would change a lot! I simply burnt up on the bike. What's interesting is that I averaged 7 watts less at LP and ran a 2:57 vs. my walk/run 3:48 at kona. The heat is the same for everyone but man was it brutal on this pasty white guy.
I am fortunate enough to be able to knock out 100 mile rides just about every Friday during the season and usually average 10-20 watts less on those rides. Of course it's sunny PA and not Hawaii :)
I ride a Valdora tri bike and rode 808's, a 55tooth chainring, 11-25 cassette, and no aero helmet on raceday. No pics from race but this was from a ride beforehand:




Kudos to you guys that are dialed in for that race.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [joshjan] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
joshjan wrote:
This thread is so interesting...just because I wasn't prepared for the way Kona turned out. Totally my fault but if I had to do it all over again I would change a lot! I simply burnt up on the bike. What's interesting is that I averaged 7 watts less at LP and ran a 2:57 vs. my walk/run 3:48 at kona. The heat is the same for everyone but man was it brutal on this pasty white guy.
I am fortunate enough to be able to knock out 100 mile rides just about every Friday during the season and usually average 10-20 watts less on those rides. Of course it's sunny PA and not Hawaii :)
I ride a Valdora tri bike and rode 808's, a 55tooth chainring, 11-25 cassette, and no aero helmet on raceday. No pics from race but this was from a ride beforehand:




Kudos to you guys that are dialed in for that race.

I had the exact same experience.

Had a great swim for me 1:02 and legs felt great race day.
I actually felt like I held back quite a bit on the bike but I totally overheated.
It was game over for me as soon as I started running, nothing I could do at that point.
I shuffled a 3:53, which was quite frustrating.

I arrived 10 days early, and thought that some light training race week would be enough to acclimatize but I guess not.
I also chose to use the A/C in my condo this time around.
Lots of things I'd change if I did it again.

My long ride watts are also 20-40W lower than race day normally.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Larbot] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Larbot wrote:
My long ride watts are also 20-40W lower than race day normally.

there's your trouble

Eric Reid AeroFit | Instagram Portfolio
Aerodynamic Retul Bike Fitting

“You are experiencing the criminal coverup of a foreign backed fascist hostile takeover of a mafia shakedown of an authoritarian religious slow motion coup. Persuade people to vote for Democracy.”
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [ericM40-44] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ericM40-44 wrote:
Larbot wrote:

My long ride watts are also 20-40W lower than race day normally.


there's your trouble

No kidding. Was about to post the same.

Why does anyone think that they can ride less watts for long rides in training and then show up on race day, output not just more but 20-40 more and then run well off that? In the kona heat.

"One Line Robert"
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [wsrobert] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
wsrobert wrote:
ericM40-44 wrote:
Larbot wrote:

My long ride watts are also 20-40W lower than race day normally.


there's your trouble

No kidding. Was about to post the same.

Why does anyone think that they can ride less watts for long rides in training and then show up on race day, output not just more but 20-40 more and then run well off that? In the kona heat.

The reason why is because my long rides are 6-7hrs untapered.
I rode higher watts at tremblant with no problems running afterward.

I know people like to chalk bad runs to overbiking, but that's not what happened in my case. I held my watts fine in Kona without much trouble.

Believe what you want, but like the others I have enough race experience to know what my limits are.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Larbot] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yeah, 3:48 off the bike at Kona

Larbot wrote:
Believe what you want, but like the others I have enough race experience to know what my limits are.

Eric Reid AeroFit | Instagram Portfolio
Aerodynamic Retul Bike Fitting

“You are experiencing the criminal coverup of a foreign backed fascist hostile takeover of a mafia shakedown of an authoritarian religious slow motion coup. Persuade people to vote for Democracy.”
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Larbot] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
A few thoughts on the heat acclimatization that might be helpful for some of you guys:

  1. Trainer rides back home with minimum fan. Get used to jacking up the core temp. Rapp said you need more than 10 hours of that. Some may need slightly more, some slightly less.
  2. Kona week, I saw tons of people out riding and running in the morning. That's exactly the wrong time of day. Run in the afternoon and don't go and ride on the Queen K where there is airflow.
  3. Go ride south of the pit past Keahou shopping center where there is a wide road and long steady climbs where you are going slow enough to overheat with minimal air flow. Do repeats of these climbs in aerobars and you'll get used to your core temp being jacked up. What I am surprised about is that literally no one is riding there. Everyone is out on the Queen K
  4. Get sun exposure as much as possible without burning early on race week. Most of us don't get enough sun back home to deal with a 9 hour run day in Kona. Then hide from the sun the last 48 hours. Make sure you have days out in the sun mid day. Again, I see lots of people in Kona out training at 6 am, but that dies off in the afternoon. I'd recommend afternoon workouts as much as possible. The guys riding with sleeved clothing have the right idea on the sun exposure part
  5. One more reason for afternoon workouts. If you are coming from east coast, 4 pm in Kona is 10 pm back home. If you are from Europe, 4 pm in Kona is 4 am back home. You need to be ready to perform on race day "prime time" which is from 2 pm to 5 pm for you sub 10 guys. You can't expect to be on during that time of day if race day is your first work out where you are performing in the "wind down sleep time" back home.



I'm not as fast as most of you guys, but I've helps a lot of guys racing in the heat in different time zones. It's a bit of a fine craft if you are not totally used to it. Although my time was slow compared to you guys, my performance in Kona at 10:49 was in line with 10:46 at LP and 10:51 in Tremblant. Like most I had a problem at each race (LP flat, Tremblant locked up neck in the swim, Kona, torn hamstring....so they all kind of added the same amount of penalty to each day, resulting in somewhat consistent finishes).
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [cyclingdoc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I consistently average about 5-7% higher on my race rehearsal long rides versus race day.
Last edited by: DrPain: Oct 18, 13 20:31
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [ericM40-44] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ericM40-44 wrote:
Yeah, 3:48 off the bike at Kona

Larbot wrote:
Believe what you want, but like the others I have enough race experience to know what my limits are.
BOOM!
Tapering doesn't give magic fairy dust where you can push 20-40 more watts. It's ok, you went too hard. (Not Eric)
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [tucktri] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
tucktri wrote:
ericM40-44 wrote:
Yeah, 3:48 off the bike at Kona

Larbot wrote:
Believe what you want, but like the others I have enough race experience to know what my limits are.
BOOM!
Tapering doesn't give magic fairy dust where you can push 20-40 more watts. It's ok, you went too hard. (Not Eric)

Come on guys, do all threads have to degrade to such pettiness?
I responded to give my insights into my race and mistakes.
I have no problem admitting to going too hard on the bike and suffering afterwards. I know what that feels like and what sort of power that takes for me.

If you read above I'm not the only one who does their long rides below race watts. I also do them below race effort.

A month earlier I had raced centurion at 290W for 4.5hrs, so again I know what my limits are. I raced kona at 167lbs and know I'm not a fastrunner by Kona standards, but in my experience there was more going on with me on race day.

If you think I'm in denial, that's cool I'm not trying to impress anyone with my average bike time and below average running.
Again if you want to turn your brains off and believe that all bad runs are due to overbiking that's up to you.
I happen to think otherwise.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Larbot] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Over heating is essentially over biking. Whhat are your other thoughts on slow running cases? Interested.

Eric Reid AeroFit | Instagram Portfolio
Aerodynamic Retul Bike Fitting

“You are experiencing the criminal coverup of a foreign backed fascist hostile takeover of a mafia shakedown of an authoritarian religious slow motion coup. Persuade people to vote for Democracy.”
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [joshjan] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Josh,
Two things.
1 - Very nice swim. 4 minutes faster at Kona than Lake Placid. That's quite an improvement and has been lost in your bike overperform, run underperform.
2 - You rode 4:40 and ran 3:04 at Louisville in 2010. That was a brutal day; near 100 degrees and humid, very Kona-like. To an outsider it seems you thrive in the heat and tough conditions. Did you have a powermeter at Louisville 3 years ago?

And, that's a sweet pic of you motopacing, but a dangerous one to post on slowtwitch, where the hounds will decide you are clearly well-versed at drafting. But, starting the ride in 1500th place and riding 4:32 means any drafting must have occurred on your rear wheel only. Did you pick up any parasites on the journey? Typically you blow by too fast to attract any passengers, but at Kona your 25mph must have looked appealing to other's 23-24mph.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [ericM40-44] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ericM40-44 wrote:
Over heating is essentially over biking. Whhat are your other thoughts on slow running cases? Interested.

So in your opinion Rapp overbiked as well?
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [OldFart] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Or overswimming.

Or both.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [rmg] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [afurlong] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
afurlong wrote:
son of a bitch. you're doing IMFL?

Yes, Austin 70.3 and then IMFL..........See you there :)

-Brad Williams
Website | Twitter: @BW_Tri |Instagram: @BW_Tri | Strava | Co-Founder & Coach at: KIS Coaching
Partnered with: Zoot Sports | Precision Fuel &Hydration | ISM
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [ericM40-44] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ericM40-44 wrote:
Over heating is essentially over biking..


Interesting, how did you come up with that?

I seem to think that over biking is riding beyond your aerobic and/or muscle endurance abilities. You have now educated me on the fact that thermoregulation is also due bike fitness.

In my opinion I paced my bike appropriately based on the fact that I:
-Raced at similar or lower watts than my Kona Qualifier with similar fitness (as did almost all other posters here)
-Raced at <70% FTP
-Raced at constant watts and RPE

I've also done many hot weather races (including Kona on a hotter day), but never before had this same sensation of "overheating". In retrospect I do however think that I paid less attention this time to preparing for the heat. In that respect I found Dev's response quite helpful.

If someone's qualified for Kona I seem to think they probably have enough insight into their own training/racing to figure out how to properly pace. I tend to give them the benefit of the doubt on this.
However, it seems many here like proclaim "Bullshit dude, you totally overbiked!"

Point taken, I suppose the fact that you put together a solid run on Saturday makes you an authority on the subject.

All slow runs and all overheating are due to over biking.
Got it, thanks.
Last edited by: Larbot: Oct 19, 13 8:20
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Larbot] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
dude, if the over heating happens while on the bike, you're over biking. where do you think that heat comes from? it's a race, not a math problem. if you feel yourself getting hot, slow down. 10 watts might mean the difference between a good and bad run.

let's say you're putting out 250 watts into the pedals... that means you're probably putting out at least 750 watts and maybe as much as 1000 watts of heat into your body.

Me? I biked at a higher wattage at Kona than my qualifier, when I felt hot, I slowed down. I ran average... heat was definitely the limiter on the day.

Larbot wrote:
ericM40-44 wrote:
Over heating is essentially over biking..


Interesting, how did you come up with that?

I seem to think that over biking is riding beyond your aerobic and/or muscle endurance abilities. You have now educated me on the fact that thermoregulation is also due bike fitness.

In my opinion I paced my bike appropriately based on the fact that I: -Raced a similar or lower watts than my Kona Qualifier with similar fitness (as did almost all other posters here)
-Raced at <70% FTP
-Raced at constant watts and RPE

I've also done many hot weather races (including Kona on a hotter day), but never before had this same sensation of "overheating". In retrospect I do however think that I paid less attention this time to preparing for the heat. In that respect I found Dev's response quite helpful.

If someone's qualified for Kona I seem to think they probably have enough insight into their own training/racing to figure out how to poperly pace. I tend to give them the benefit of the doubt on this.
However, it seems many here like proclaim "Bullshit dude, you totally overbiked!"

Point taken, I suppose the fact that you put together a solid run on Saturday makes you an authority on the subject.

All slow runs and all overheating are due to over biking.
Got it, thanks.

Eric Reid AeroFit | Instagram Portfolio
Aerodynamic Retul Bike Fitting

“You are experiencing the criminal coverup of a foreign backed fascist hostile takeover of a mafia shakedown of an authoritarian religious slow motion coup. Persuade people to vote for Democracy.”
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [ericM40-44] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ericM40-44 wrote:
dude, if the over heating happens while on the bike, you're over biking. where do you think that heat comes from? it's a race, not a math problem. if you feel yourself getting hot, slow down. 10 watts might mean the difference between a good and bad run.

let's say you're putting out 250 watts into the pedals... that means you're probably putting out at least 750 watts and maybe as much as 1000 watts of heat into your body.

Me? I biked at a higher wattage at Kona than my qualifier, when I felt hot, I slowed down. I ran average... heat was definitely the limiter on the day.

I very well understand how the body produces heat thanks.
I'm actually a physician, not a retard.

Do you honestly think I didn't slow down when I got hot?
Yes, heat was a limiter agreed.
If I could have biked higher watts comfortably I would have as well, because my legs felt good. As in Tremblant, I paced by feel and not watts.

The difference was I couldn't tolerate the heat at all once I started running. Others didn't seem to have the same problem.

I've made my point, you've made yours.
Lets move on.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Larbot] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Larbot wrote:
ericM40-44 wrote:
Over heating is essentially over biking..


Interesting, how did you come up with that?

I seem to think that over biking is riding beyond your aerobic and/or muscle endurance abilities. You have now educated me on the fact that thermoregulation is also due bike fitness.

In my opinion I paced my bike appropriately based on the fact that I:
-Raced at similar or lower watts than my Kona Qualifier with similar fitness (as did almost all other posters here)
-Raced at <70% FTP
-Raced at constant watts and RPE

I've also done many hot weather races (including Kona on a hotter day), but never before had this same sensation of "overheating". In retrospect I do however think that I paid less attention this time to preparing for the heat. In that respect I found Dev's response quite helpful.

If someone's qualified for Kona I seem to think they probably have enough insight into their own training/racing to figure out how to properly pace. I tend to give them the benefit of the doubt on this.
However, it seems many here like proclaim "Bullshit dude, you totally overbiked!"

Point taken, I suppose the fact that you put together a solid run on Saturday makes you an authority on the subject.

All slow runs and all overheating are due to over biking.
Got it, thanks.

Reply to Larbot and Eric combined. Like Larbot, I did Tremblant and Kona. Tremblant I biked 190W, Kona 191W (average...Tremblant has more coasting, so really Tremblant was a harder ride....need to check my NP). Both my runs were bad at Tremblant it was my second IM In 3 weeks (4:03), in Kona torn hamstring (4:11). LP was around 3:51, which is what I SHOULD be running for all my Ironmans if I am healthy, uninjured and execute my nutrition plan.

In St. Croix, I rode my bike ride there at 195W....that is barely IM pace...normally half IM I ride at 215-218W. In St. Croix when I got out of the water, normally you feel cool as the water evaporates...instead, I felt zero evaporation (Korea/Japan/Hong Kong July humidity). I knew right there that I needed to take down my bike intensity by 10% and chose to essentially soft pedal most of the bike. I'm a small guy and dissipate heat well and even then I could feel it, especially the low velocity parts of the bike like the Beast where you're basically encased in a humidity "bubble". I ran 1:48 in St. Croix but I magically moved up from around 9th off the bike to 3rd because almost everyone was walking. Guys were walking every aid station and I was just jogging. Eric, you know what that Asian humidity is like and this was the same. I have been on runs in Taipei, when I go to the track and jog for 400m, and I have to walk from my heart rate exploding, but then as soon as I walk, my core overheats due to lack of air flow "cooling effect". It is a catch 22 when it gets that humid.

I have not been to Kona enough, but my Quarq said it was up at 35-37C...not super hot (like not 40+), but it "seemed" to be more humid than normal. Personally I chose to overbike a bit (for me), knowing that my run would be bad due to injury. But taking off 5-10W may have been the prudent thing on this day....looking at the implosions at the front of the field: Crowie, Docherty, Jacobs, Ralaert, Boeckel, Rapp etc etc etc....brutal carnage, and in general, at the front of the pro field they have to overbike a bit., but overbiking a bit in humidity is deceptive because we have some airflow and it does not "feel that bad", but it really is.

So Larbot, I THINK that we feel like we know what to do, but both for you and I, maybe we underestimated how humid it was. It is really hard to tell on the bike. It is clear that many pros underestimated the humidity+heat combo, and I don't think we age groupers were that much different (except, I was waaay in the back of the field). Many of my friends racing the same speed as me in LP + Tremblant (women and older men who KQ'd with high 10.xx times) went 1.5-2 hours slower in Kona.I think the slower you are the more dramatic the decline versus the faster guys.

Food for thought.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
devashish_paul wrote:
I have not been to Kona enough, but my Quarq said it was up at 35-37C...not super hot (like not 40+), but it "seemed" to be more humid than normal. Personally I chose to overbike a bit (for me), knowing that my run would be bad due to injury. But taking off 5-10W may have been the prudent thing on this day....looking at the implosions at the front of the field: Crowie, Docherty, Jacobs, Ralaert, Boeckel, Rapp etc etc etc....brutal carnage, and in general, at the front of the pro field they have to overbike a bit., but overbiking a bit in humidity is deceptive because we have some airflow and it does not "feel that bad", but it really is.

So Larbot, I THINK that we feel like we know what to do, but both for you and I, maybe we underestimated how humid it was. It is really hard to tell on the bike. It is clear that many pros underestimated the humidity+heat combo, and I don't think we age groupers were that much different (except, I was waaay in the back of the field). Many of my friends racing the same speed as me in LP + Tremblant (women and older men who KQ'd with high 10.xx times) went 1.5-2 hours slower in Kona.I think the slower you are the more dramatic the decline versus the faster guys.

Food for thought.

I believe the dew point was quite high (>70) which I've heard is a bigger factor than both absolute temp and humidity. I didn't feel hot at all during the whole race, but maybe that was a factor too

____________________________________

Are you ready to do an Ultraman? | How I calculate Ironman race fueling | Strength Training for Athletes |
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
Unfortunately most did not post their weight. About half the sample, which is already light. Not sure it's instructive unless we get more points to plot, but my sense is that the w/kg array would not be a better determinant of time than watts. For instance, it's all over the place

-Josh Beck pushed more watts per kg than any pro, and probably more watts than anyone with Starky possible exception
-Sami Inkinen put out significantly fewer watts and much lower w/kg than Josh for a similar split
-Both were TT'ing solo

-Five plots from my head are Brad W., me, Joel Maley, Curbeau from QT2, darkhorse splitting like 4:41, 4:50, 4:50, 4:53, 4:52 on watts around 230, 230, 205, 230, 230 with weight of 175?, 145, 145, 145, 165?. In other words, the bigger guys rode faster or the same on the same power as a couple much smaller guys who I guess are about as aero as a barn door. Brad typically needs a lot more power but did not at Kona and Joel hardly needs to pedal to go 24+...somebody call the wambulance, I guess. Next race, maybe a w/kg course since I am an aero-as-a-barndoor diminuitive type

This is why I like St. Croix and IM France. LP and Tremblant also 'reward' the less aero with decent watts per kilo. I would imagine that Tahoe falls into the same grouping.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [robgray] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
robgray wrote:
165 lbs
6'0"
236 NP
0.75 IF (usually .77 - .79)
4:55

Glute seized up as i got on bike. Came right after 25 min.
Had a terrible run despite holding back on the bike. 3:29 and I was aiming for 3:00-3:10. Can't figure it out, it didn't feel particularly hot to me plus I was well acclimated. Maybe it was a remnant of the glute issue. But I've noticed a lot of guys who expected to run around 3 hours, joining me in 3:30ish

Updated with a pic. Would like to go lower in front but currently maxed out on existing setup. Will play around with different options now that kona is done



____________________________________

Are you ready to do an Ultraman? | How I calculate Ironman race fueling | Strength Training for Athletes |
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [OldFart] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
OldFart wrote:
ericM40-44 wrote:
Over heating is essentially over biking. Whhat are your other thoughts on slow running cases? Interested.

So in your opinion Rapp overbiked as well?

I don't think it's quite that simple. I think I over-biked *early* in the bike ride, but not because I simply rode "too hard." I rode too hard early after having had a hard swim, in quite warm water, on a day with high humidity, and with a tailwind early, having not properly acclimatized in advance of the race.

Now, at the root of it, I definitely think I could have salvaged my race if I'd backed off on the power and focused on cooling myself in the first 30min of the race. But by that same token, my power output for the first 30min was the exact same power as at IMTX & IMNYC. And it was quite a bit less than in Melbourne.

So did I ride too hard? You bet I did. But it wasn't like I rode 30min @ FTP or something obviously way too hard for ANY Ironman. I rode too hard given the conditions in this particular race and the environment-specific training that I did (or rather, did NOT do) beforehand.

Ultimately, the end result is the same. I only clarify because I think it's useful in terms of what you - and I - can learn from the mistake(s) that I made.

"Non est ad astra mollis e terris via." - Seneca | rappstar.com | FB - Rappstar Racing | IG - @jordanrapp
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Rappstar] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
On the recent threads re: the value of HR, you said that you don't use HR in races, and don't even wear a HR strap.

Given that an increased HR is an early indicator of heatstroke, and your statement that you think you could have salvaged your Kona if you had backed off in the first 30 min of the bike, do you think there is some value to having HR on the bike now?

In other words, you were riding at power levels which you had done in previous IM's, but if you had been able to note that your HR was not at a level comparable to those previous efforts, could / would you have been able to back off before you got in too deep of a hole?

I'm not suggesting that HR be used in lieu of power, but wondering if it can help provide some context to your efforts.

Chicago Cubs - 2016 WORLD SERIES Champions!!!!

"If ever the time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin." - Samuel Adams
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Power13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Humidity + Heat can be very tricky to race in, because you can't really tell it is bad in the water, and you can't tell it is really bad as soon as you get on the bike. Here are a few cues, that I would like to pass on to you guys from my experience both racing in ultra high humidity and heat as well as several training sessions during biz trips in the vicinity of the south China sea during summer (Hong Kong, Taipei, Shenzhen...some of those runs I needed walking breaks every 2 min or so due to the humidity).

When you come out of the water, on a "normal day" in most of the US, Canada or Europe, you normally feel a bit cold running to your bike as water evaporates from your body. Once on the bike, you may feel cool as the water from your wet body evaporates.

When it is hot with a fairly high dew point with high humidity, you might notice the following:

  1. You get out of the water, and running to your bike already feels warm. There is no evaporation/cooling effect. If it already feels like a sauna, this is a cue that the bike watts may need to go downward.
  2. Early in the bike it feels like a bit of a "heat bubble" around you. Nothing is evaporating (well it is, but a bit slower than normal).
  3. Eventually it does evaporatate, and now you don't really feel that warm



By step 3 it "might" be too late as you may be "overcooking" yourself because you think you can sustain "normal" watts, which may be fine for the entire bike but you're getting dehydrated more than you think without the usual cooling benefit and your core temp may be rising, more than you think.


As soon as you get to T2, there is zero air flow. Now if your core temp is high, you may feel a total thermal implosion. Best thing is to NOT SIT DOWN because now you will overheat even worse. Get your running shoes on ASAP, get out of transition ASAP and start creating some air flow by running....but run easy for the first few miles because if not, the riding core temp from T2 will go through the roof with the additional thermal load from high power output fast pace running (which inherently means more heat created in your core).




Anyway, all this from further back in the Kona pack but on a plus side, between IMLP, IMTremblant and IMKona I only had a 5 min spread between all those race times, so even though I was not quite on form for Kona running, I did pay attention to the thermal cues that presented themselves. I did overbike somewhat, but it was intentional, knowing I had a running injury to contend with. I will say that the first few miles out of T2 past the royal Kona I felt like I was in a thermal bubble wrap, and I generally deal with heat well.


When I look at the number of amazing athletes who had sub par run days at Kona: Jacobs, Crowie, Boeckel, Rapp, Ralaert, Docherty, many of whom generally do really really well in the heat, I have to suspect that the humidity was "hidden enemy". These guys were coming back from Hawi very close to the top bikers like Starky, Mackenzie, Kienle and Faris (please someone clean up Faris' position....he should be coming off the bike with Luke and Sebastien!!!!).


Small girls like Rinny and Rachel Joyce had stellar days so everyone is saying it was a record breaking day....but their volume to surface ratio is very favourable for humid days. I am sure Cat Morrison would have also been flying in this too. Bigger girls like Steffen, Cave, HeatherWurtele etc....not so good. At the women's press conference, Steffen was wondering what happened, and I think the answer is "physics happened"....volume to surface ratio. You can't change yours by much other than lose pounds, but you can only take that so far.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Power13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Power13 wrote:
On the recent threads re: the value of HR, you said that you don't use HR in races, and don't even wear a HR strap.

Given that an increased HR is an early indicator of heatstroke, and your statement that you think you could have salvaged your Kona if you had backed off in the first 30 min of the bike, do you think there is some value to having HR on the bike now?

In other words, you were riding at power levels which you had done in previous IM's, but if you had been able to note that your HR was not at a level comparable to those previous efforts, could / would you have been able to back off before you got in too deep of a hole?

I'm not suggesting that HR be used in lieu of power, but wondering if it can help provide some context to your efforts.

Yes and no. I'm thinking about it for next year. At the same time, there were plenty of other indicators. It's another data point. For whatever that is and isn't worth.

"Non est ad astra mollis e terris via." - Seneca | rappstar.com | FB - Rappstar Racing | IG - @jordanrapp
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [robgray] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
if I were you rather than lower I'd go longer to create some space to allow for shoulder shrugging and head turtling. You can kind of tell by the way your hands are wrapped around the lower part of the ski bend.

you can do that a couple of ways, lowering and pushing back the saddle or a longer stem natch.

for reference, we had similar bike times but I'm 6'2" and 180lbs on 211AP 229NP.

robgray wrote:
robgray wrote:

165 lbs
6'0"
236 NP
0.75 IF (usually .77 - .79)
4:55

Glute seized up as i got on bike. Came right after 25 min.
Had a terrible run despite holding back on the bike. 3:29 and I was aiming for 3:00-3:10. Can't figure it out, it didn't feel particularly hot to me plus I was well acclimated. Maybe it was a remnant of the glute issue. But I've noticed a lot of guys who expected to run around 3 hours, joining me in 3:30ish


Updated with a pic. Would like to go lower in front but currently maxed out on existing setup. Will play around with different options now that kona is done


Eric Reid AeroFit | Instagram Portfolio
Aerodynamic Retul Bike Fitting

“You are experiencing the criminal coverup of a foreign backed fascist hostile takeover of a mafia shakedown of an authoritarian religious slow motion coup. Persuade people to vote for Democracy.”
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [ericM40-44] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ericM40-44 wrote:
if I were you rather than lower I'd go longer to create some space to allow for shoulder shrugging and head turtling. You can kind of tell by the way your hands are wrapped around the lower part of the ski bend.

you can do that a couple of ways, lowering and pushing back the saddle or a longer stem natch.

for reference, we had similar bike times but I'm 6'2" and 180lbs on 211AP 229NP.

thanks Eric - I see what you're saying - I'll try shifting the cockpit a bit forward - maybe a longer stem will be required. I can't really take the saddle further back though. Thanks for sharing your power numbers - that is indeed a good reference point - plus we were wearing the same suit...

____________________________________

Are you ready to do an Ultraman? | How I calculate Ironman race fueling | Strength Training for Athletes |
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [ericM40-44] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Did you put on the Octane in T1 or have it rolled down under a swimskin? Just curious...
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [noahman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I had it on with the upper part rolled around my waist. It was a fairly easy process getting it on. I swam fast enough I think that I had a helper in T1... perhaps if I swam slower I'd have had to wrestle the fabric over my shoulders by myself.

Eric Reid AeroFit | Instagram Portfolio
Aerodynamic Retul Bike Fitting

“You are experiencing the criminal coverup of a foreign backed fascist hostile takeover of a mafia shakedown of an authoritarian religious slow motion coup. Persuade people to vote for Democracy.”
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [robgray] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
if you look at at my upper arm angle it's more open than yours... you're at like 90* and more open.

robgray wrote:
ericM40-44 wrote:
if I were you rather than lower I'd go longer to create some space to allow for shoulder shrugging and head turtling. You can kind of tell by the way your hands are wrapped around the lower part of the ski bend.

you can do that a couple of ways, lowering and pushing back the saddle or a longer stem natch.

for reference, we had similar bike times but I'm 6'2" and 180lbs on 211AP 229NP.


thanks Eric - I see what you're saying - I'll try shifting the cockpit a bit forward - maybe a longer stem will be required. I can't really take the saddle further back though. Thanks for sharing your power numbers - that is indeed a good reference point - plus we were wearing the same suit...

Eric Reid AeroFit | Instagram Portfolio
Aerodynamic Retul Bike Fitting

“You are experiencing the criminal coverup of a foreign backed fascist hostile takeover of a mafia shakedown of an authoritarian religious slow motion coup. Persuade people to vote for Democracy.”
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [amgray13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Height: 5'9.5"
Weight: ~163 lbs
NP = 227w
AP = 219w
Ride Time = 4:58
Completely blew up 10 miles on the run unexpectedly. I do not think I rode too hard.. been using the same power target for 5 IM's with success the last 2 times. TSS well below 300 (FTP = 306w)

Not the fastest frame out there, but optimized what I could as far as having a clean cockpit/setup. Comments to improve position welcome:


Ride data: http://www.trainingpeaks.com/...4B33MEUYAO33LAJOEVMQ

---------------------------------
T. Guertin / Spocket
Last edited by: spocket: Oct 22, 13 10:25
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Rappstar] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
That's always been one of my issues with the "HR has no value" chorus. Power alone is not necessarily a good indicator for heat situations, altitude, onset of training fatigue (over a duration of time, not one day), getting sick or just having a bad day. At the least, it seems there are various scenarios where power and HR together provide a more comprehensive picture.
Last edited by: Carl Spackler: Oct 22, 13 10:41
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Carl Spackler] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Carl Spackler wrote:
That's always been one of my issues with the "HR has no value" chorus. Power alone is not necessarily a good indicator for heat situations, altitude, onset of training fatigue (over a duration of time, not one day), getting sick or just having a bad day. At the least, it seems there are various scenarios where power and HR together provide a more comprehensive picture.

You would think but the Power Nazi's seem oblivious to this.

-Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
Team ZOOT
ZOOT, QR, Garmin, HED Wheels, Zealios, FormSwim, Precision Hydration, Rudy Project
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Carl Spackler] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Carl Spackler wrote:
That's always been one of my issues with the "HR has no value" chorus. Power alone is not necessarily a good indicator for heat situations, altitude, onset of training fatigue (over a duration of time, not one day), getting sick or just having a bad day. At the least, it seems there are various scenarios where power and HR together provide a more comprehensive picture.

I have found heart rate to be very useful in adjusting power down to the proper level whenever it is very hot. From there, what feels right fine tunes the effort level so that my power does not drop too far off target (for perfect weather).

-Bryan Journey
Travel Blog | Training Blog | Facebook Page
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [joshjan] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
joshjan wrote:
ok, try this link:
http://connect.garmin.com/activity/391394757

7 watts different than Lake Placid but 51 minutes different on the run! Heat was not my friend Saturday. I totally agree that you race for place here and not time. I had nothing to lose by going for it on the bike but if you are a better fish it seemed like you could get into a pack of guys and save a ton of energy and throw down a great run. Oh well, live and learn.

Josh

First, amazing bike split. Not discounting that, congrats for sure. But your power numbers are off by 70w at least. I'm 178 and I go 25 mph on ~260w and your TSS is like 4x the recommended amount for that ride. Numbers don't jive at all. But you're a beast, so who gives a shit what the watts are. :)
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [amgray13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'm really curious...these numbers are fascinating, so I'll ask...
Do you guys ride standard or compact cranks? I have always been a standard crank guy, but seeing a lot of people going to compact.

So what is it...
compact
or
standard

????
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [tc_tri_texan] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Standard crank. 172.5mm length

Proudly Team BSR
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Bryancd] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Bryancd wrote:
Carl Spackler wrote:
That's always been one of my issues with the "HR has no value" chorus. Power alone is not necessarily a good indicator for heat situations, altitude, onset of training fatigue (over a duration of time, not one day), getting sick or just having a bad day. At the least, it seems there are various scenarios where power and HR together provide a more comprehensive picture.


You would think but the Power Nazi's seem oblivious to this.

No, the power nazis realise that HR response is unreliable for such a purpose and more likely to mislead than reliably inform.

If you need a HR monitor to tell you about "heat situations, altitude, onset of training fatigue (over a duration of time, not one day), getting sick or just having a bad day", then you have bigger problems to address, like learning some common sense.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Mc B] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Here is an interesting tidbit from my ride file. On a 4:55 bike split, I spent 15 minutes of it at zero cadence. I purposefully tucked and coasted on all downhills when I hit 27 mph or so. I specifically remember dropping down into Kawaihai (after tuning off the Queen K) and hitting my race max. speed of 45mph in my tuck position, I passed 3 or 4 dudes that were pedalling!!.15 mins of zeros will decrease your average power quite a bit, so I'd be interested to know how much coasting folks that have higher avergage power on similar bike splits did. If I can figure it out, I'd like to know the average speed I maintained while zero cadence. I'd bet we'll be looking at close to 30mph. Think about that, 15 minutes of my ride at close to 30mph at absolutely no energy cost!

Thread participants: Please look at your ride files and let us know how much coasting you did.

Edit: I just figured out that average speed for my cadences between 0 and 20 revs was 29.5 mph!!!!!!
or looked at a different way, average mph for powers of 0-50 is 29.5 mph also.
Last edited by: Russ Brandt: Oct 22, 13 16:01
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Russ Brandt] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
For your amusement Russ I had 11 minutes of zero watts.

Ben McMurray
Northern Michigan Small Farm Venture ---> http://facebook.com/hillvalleymi [/size]


Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Mc B] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I don't think it's uncommon for everyone to free wheel or soft pedal those sections and with less cross winds, folks were more inclined to do so this year.

-Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
Team ZOOT
ZOOT, QR, Garmin, HED Wheels, Zealios, FormSwim, Precision Hydration, Rudy Project
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Watt Matters] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
How wonderfully parochial...

-Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
Team ZOOT
ZOOT, QR, Garmin, HED Wheels, Zealios, FormSwim, Precision Hydration, Rudy Project
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Mc B] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Mc B wrote:
For your amusement Russ I had 11 minutes of zero watts.

Same here 11 minutes, not sure how to figure out the average speed for those 11 minutes though.

-Brad Williams
Website | Twitter: @BW_Tri |Instagram: @BW_Tri | Strava | Co-Founder & Coach at: KIS Coaching
Partnered with: Zoot Sports | Precision Fuel &Hydration | ISM
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [afbadbrad] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
afbadbrad wrote:
Mc B wrote:
For your amusement Russ I had 11 minutes of zero watts.


Same here 11 minutes, not sure how to figure out the average speed for those 11 minutes though.


Brad, compared to last year is that more, less, or similar?

Here was my cadence from 2012, with the big drop off at the Penalty tent just after the turn in Hawi. I didn't coast as much..



But my HR didn't drop, so I was still putting out effort on the descent fighting the winds...



-Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
Team ZOOT
ZOOT, QR, Garmin, HED Wheels, Zealios, FormSwim, Precision Hydration, Rudy Project
Last edited by: Bryancd: Oct 22, 13 16:57
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Russ Brandt] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I spent 19 minutes between 0-24 watts



____________________________________

Are you ready to do an Ultraman? | How I calculate Ironman race fueling | Strength Training for Athletes |
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Russ Brandt] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
12 min coasting for me...

---------------------------------
T. Guertin / Spocket
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Bryancd] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Bryan, your HR graph is very uninformative. When seen with your rare power graph, you can 'see' the true differences between different folks' ride. If you can apply your power the way you track your hr, I suspect your run gets faster. I know you'll attribute power spikes to getting around packs, in my opinion that is exactly opposite of what one should do. Ben and I dropped off the back of groups when they formed, soft pedaled and let things clear up until reasonable watts could make the pass.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [afbadbrad] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Garmin 's .Tsx file can be viewed in Excel. Find the cadence column and filter by all low cadences, then find speed column and highlight all the speed values, the average will appear at the bottom of the Excel window. Note: in my file speed values were expressed as m/s so I used Google to convert to mph.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Russ Brandt] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Really?! Tell me more... ;) It is a fair approximation of relative effort but here is that power file although I can't vouch for it's veracity, I never calibrated the meter when I had the bike I rode for 3 months.



Brad couldn't post from work but messages me:
"9mins last year, I was also out on the course 32 minutes longer &#128521; Coming down Hawi took me 12:29 last year on 153W's, this year was 13:04 on 225W's. I can't see those images from work....."

-Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
Team ZOOT
ZOOT, QR, Garmin, HED Wheels, Zealios, FormSwim, Precision Hydration, Rudy Project
Last edited by: Bryancd: Oct 22, 13 19:37
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Bryancd] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I can put out 5-10 more watts for a minute or so with very little detectable rise in HR (especially when tired). Accumulate enough of those events and minutes get tacked on the run. I cringe when you try to make associations with a flat line HR graph when there is no real information there. Most of the valuable conclusions you make from your ride last year is from your power graph, which you only happened to have . Why you don't get a Pm is beyond me. Someone as good as you is missing easy opportunities to get better if you have the data.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Bryancd] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I see at least seven instances where you should be slapped upside the head.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Russ Brandt] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Russ Brandt wrote:
On a 4:55 bike split, I spent 15 minutes of it at zero cadence. I purposefully tucked and coasted on all downhills when I hit 27 mph or so.

3.3 minutes at zero cadence / avg speed for that time period ~29 mph. My opinion? You are coasting too much.

Also relevant, 67 minutes of my ride, similar in speed to yours, was at 27 mph or higher.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Russ Brandt] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Russ Brandt wrote:
I can put out 5-10 more watts for a minute or so with very little detectable rise in HR (especially when tired). Accumulate enough of those events and minutes get tacked on the run. I cringe when you try to make associations with a flat line HR graph when there is no real information there. Most of the valuable conclusions you make from your ride last year is from your power graph, which you only happened to have . Why you don't get a Pm is beyond me. Someone as good as you is missing easy opportunities to get better if you have the data.


Why you think a PM is the only way to succeed is beyond me but you have drunk the Kool-Aid. I appreciate it as another tool, but I know enough to know there are no absolutes. I enjoy training and racing the way I do. HR served me very well last year at IMSG when the going got tough and other people crumbled because I am so in tune with it. I'm not adverse to using one, just haven't felt a huge compelling need. Maybe next year if we pick up Garmin as a sponsor, I can get try their Vector system. And I don't recall attributing power spikes to anything whatsoever and there is always something to be gleaned from all data, including HR, so please don't cringe, it's unattractive. :)

-Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
Team ZOOT
ZOOT, QR, Garmin, HED Wheels, Zealios, FormSwim, Precision Hydration, Rudy Project
Last edited by: Bryancd: Oct 22, 13 19:50
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Russ Brandt] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I was wondering why my VI was higher this year than last year and discovered a few days ago that my increased coasting time was the big difference. Thanks for the idea about pulling the ride data into a spreadsheet and sorting it. In any case, here's the comparative data:

2012: 5:04, 195/205W AP/NP, 12 mins at 0W at average coasting speed of 52km/h
2013: 4:52, 191/205W AP/NP, 17.5 mins at 0W at average coasting speed of 48km/h (only 4 mins coasting below 40km/h)

As it turns out, when I was pedaling, my average W were approximately the same each year (~203-4W) and the only real difference between the 2 years was the coasting time. I know a low VI is always recommended but I'm pretty happy to coast at ~50km/h or greater. Curious now to see what others are doing, or other's thoughts on this. Is it smart to ride a higher VI on this sort of course and day, or would a lower VI have been better?
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Bryancd] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote:
Why you think a PM is the only way to succeed is beyond me but you have drunk the Kool-Aid. I appreciate it as another tool, but I know enough to know there are no absolutes. I enjoy training and racing the way I do. HR served me very well last year at IMSG when the going got tough and other people crumbled because I am so in tune with it. I'm not adverse to using one, just haven't felt a huge compelling need. Maybe next year if we pick up Garmin as a sponsor, I can get try their Vector system. And I don't recall attributing power spikes to anything whatsoever and there is always something to be gleaned from all data, including HR, so please don't cringe, it's unattractive. :)

One drinks the Kool-Aid if they have a power meter and don't know what to do with it. In no way am I implying that it is the absolute only way to improve, but I can say with absolute certainty that any meaningful analysis of a race effort on the bike comes from data and metrics collected with a power meter. Looking at a HR graph alone says you kept your HR stable. You've been successful despite not having a power meter, but you could be better. Especially now that your are more time crunched than ever before. Don't make me dig up the numerous threads where you posted comments of your last year's analysis. Most of which were not based on your HR data alone, which should be a clear sign that you are gleaning data off of the very device you shun. When you get your Garmin pedals you'd better pick your favorite flavor of Kool-Aid!
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote:
3.3 minutes at zero cadence / avg speed for that time period ~29 mph. My opinion? You are coasting too much.

Also relevant, 67 minutes of my ride, similar in speed to yours, was at 27 mph or higher.


Hmm, not sure why you conclude this. I had 66 minutes at 27 mph or higher, and if 15 minutes of it was with zero cadence then I conclude you wasted energy for 12 more minutes than I did (if you only had 3 mins of zero cadence) to achieve the same general bike split. My Opinion? You didn't coast enough! You didn't get anywhere faster for the effort!
Last edited by: Russ Brandt: Oct 22, 13 21:03
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Russ Brandt] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
11mins this year
9mins last year, I was also out on the course 32 minutes longer. Coming down Hawi took me 12:29 last year on 153W's, this year was 13:04 on 225W's.

Kona 12

5:13, 210/221W AP/NP
50W and Under 46.06kmph
Cad 30 and Under 46.3kmph

Kona 13
4:41, 234/245W AP/NP
50W and Under 41.8kmph
Cad 30 and Under 42.8kmph

-Brad Williams
Website | Twitter: @BW_Tri |Instagram: @BW_Tri | Strava | Co-Founder & Coach at: KIS Coaching
Partnered with: Zoot Sports | Precision Fuel &Hydration | ISM
Last edited by: afbadbrad: Oct 22, 13 21:32
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Russ Brandt] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
To be clear, I posted that HR data as a data point demonstrating last year descending from Hawi I had to keep pedaling in response to the theory you posited that you did a lot if free wheeling and thus saved energy. HR is an indicator of work and energy, it is a measure of effort needed to create power. We can't be so pedantic to think it has no value. You posted that comment Mark Allen made about Ironman being a closed energy system. I agree with him, and if you only have so much energy to expend during a race, you best have all indicators if energy costs available to you. But that's all, I don 't mean to derail the topic, and I like peach. :)

-Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
Team ZOOT
ZOOT, QR, Garmin, HED Wheels, Zealios, FormSwim, Precision Hydration, Rudy Project
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Bryancd] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
To be clear, I posted that HR data as a data point demonstrating last year descending from Hawi I had to keep pedaling in response to the theory you posited that you did a lot if free wheeling and thus saved energy. HR is an indicator of work and energy, it is a measure of effort needed to create power. We can't be so pedantic to think it has no value. You posted that comment Mark Allen made about Ironman being a closed energy system. I agree with him, and if you only have so much energy to expend during a race, you best have all indicators if energy costs available to you. But that's all, I don 't mean to derail the topic, and I like peach. :)
Quote:
Just a quick reply and I'll shut up too. From what I remember, very little freewheeling was done down from Hawi. I remember it as a very active and fluid time as it was still crowded with traffic. Draft Marshalls were present and they nabbed a few guys in a group I dropped off the back of. Things didn't clear up until Queen K return, coincidentally when you actually had to work! As you know, your HR is indeed an indicator of effort, but also a bunch of other shit that complicates the measurement. All I know is that my running legs could care less what my HR was on the bike, but they certainly care what my Pm reads. I won't pretend that I don't pay attention to HR, but in combination with multiple Pm metrics you to can paint a Picasso of your effort, and while you have just a confused pencil outline.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Russ Brandt] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
OK, one more comment as it see this thread has run it's course anyway and it's just you and I chatting. Odd, as we are only about 20 miles apart right now and I could just go over to your office and accomplish the same thing. :) I agree for some people HR can be an extremely variable data point. But as anything it can be very individual specific. I don't have any meaningful HR variability as my HR graph shows. I am likely an outlier in that respect, I have also never had to pee during my 6 Ironman races, and because I am so in tune with what my HR does under varied conditions and situations, it works perfectly for me. And I have the added advantage I can use it for bike/run and have a single data point to watch. Makes life easy. I would disagree that a PM would improve my performance, it might but it also might not, it's too presumptive to say it would. I ran 3:26 in Kona in 2007 off a 5:03 bike but I was 39 and was injury free for 18 months heading into it.

I stole this from another thread, credit to Brett "Texafornia" Blankner:
Power is the work. HR is your body's reaction to the work (and fuel, hydration, heat, and rest).

Power is you at the museum. HR is a tour guide telling what the hell you are looking at.

Power without HR is like arguing with somebody over a play in football without actually knowing the rules of the game - You might be right, but you have no idea why.


-Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
Team ZOOT
ZOOT, QR, Garmin, HED Wheels, Zealios, FormSwim, Precision Hydration, Rudy Project
Last edited by: Bryancd: Oct 23, 13 8:40
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Bryancd] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote:
I agree for some people HR can be an extremely variable data point. But as anything it can be very individual specific. I don't have any meaningful HR variability as my HR graph shows. I am likely an outlier in that respect, I have also never had to pee during my 6 Ironman races, and because I am so in tune with what my HR does under varied conditions and situations, it works perfectly for me. And I have the added advantage I can use it for bike/run and have a single data point to watch. Makes life easy. I would disagree that a PM would improve my performance, it might but it also might not, it's too presumptive to say it would. I ran 3:26 in Kona in 2007 off a 5:03 bike but I was 39 and was injury free for 18 months heading into it.

I just can't shut up I guess! I love to peach (sic) too!
1) What happens when HR monitor malfunctions? Woops!
2) You really can't argue about something that you have not tried. You had a PM for a small part of your training cycle and admitted it was too sketchy to track (compared to HR). That indicates to me that you didn't have it for a year or so where you really learn your numbers, efforts and output "feeling". The granular picture you gain over time is where the value lies. Any long time PM user knows what I am talking about here.
3) Even if I concede the point to you that you do a very good job of using HR monitoring yourself in a race (using what you have learned from training situations), you aren't thinking of your long term development. What do you do next year, ride at 146 beats instead of 145? With a PM you can see what your run does when you have different VI's, or you can ride at different NP's, or you can hit various IF's. You can take general guidelines you read on this forum and try them out for yourself. Season after season the puzzle fills in.
4) You've thrown out some run data from way back in 2007. How many times have you run sub 3:30? Someone with your capability and open run times should be running 3:18-3:25 AT YOUR CURRENT AGE! For some reason I think you forget you are a good runner, or may lack confidence in your run and overbike to compensate. Mark Allen's bottom line was not bike hard, it was BALANCE!!!
5) Why are you even participating in a "Kona and Age Group Power" thread? If you indeed believe your methodology is rock solid, you should be starting HR threads and discussing among other Luddites the value and virtues of HR pacing only. Until then, the peanut gallery (ie me!) is going to keep harping on you until we see you express the desire to keep learning and moving forward, not drowning in the methods of yesteryear.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [afbadbrad] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote:
11mins this year
9mins last year, I was also out on the course 32 minutes longer. Coming down Hawi took me 12:29 last year on 153W's, this year was 13:04 on 225W's

Why did it take you less watts to go faster down from Hawi in 2012 (more wind), compared to 2013 (less wind) where it took you longer on more watts? Is this right?
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Russ Brandt] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
1. I have only one time have HR data not come up for the entire race, this past weekend at SOMA! Rode the whole thing by RPE and average speed (figured the course was flat enough to get away with that). It was fascinating and I think I paced it ok, probably a bit too hard. The only other time was the first 10 miles of Kona last year but it came around. If we are going to debate which technique works the most consistently and accurately, it's a dumb HR monitor hands down. Power is finicky.

2. Ah, you misunderstand. I am not arguing AGAINST anything. I am arguing for a variety of protocols all if which provide benefit. I am far more egalitarian, I think it's important to not become too evangelical about stuff in this sport.

3. Good question. Nick and I are always using racing data and TT testing to see how as I age my HR values change. Racing tends to be the best source of that data and we adjust accordingly.

4. I appreciate that but I have seen a gradual domination of my run ability over the last few years independent of running in a Tri, just at the track and in my training. Just wait, my friend. :) I was running a lot faster when I was 41-43, 3:21 at IMAZ in '09, 1:26 at Vineman in 2011 and 1:28 at Vegas.

5. I love talking about this shit! :) The reason I didn't like using the PM for those few months was we had no data to work with and I was ignorant as to how to use it properly, even just calibrating it, I had no idea. And I never warmed up to the variability of the number even on delay. But that's the OCD talking.

-Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
Team ZOOT
ZOOT, QR, Garmin, HED Wheels, Zealios, FormSwim, Precision Hydration, Rudy Project
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Grindcore] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Grindcore wrote:
joshjan wrote:
ok, try this link:
http://connect.garmin.com/activity/391394757

7 watts different than Lake Placid but 51 minutes different on the run! Heat was not my friend Saturday. I totally agree that you race for place here and not time. I had nothing to lose by going for it on the bike but if you are a better fish it seemed like you could get into a pack of guys and save a ton of energy and throw down a great run. Oh well, live and learn.

Josh

First, amazing bike split. Not discounting that, congrats for sure. But your power numbers are off by 70w at least. I'm 178 and I go 25 mph on ~260w and your TSS is like 4x the recommended amount for that ride. Numbers don't jive at all. But you're a beast, so who gives a shit what the watts are. :)

He didn't change his FTP setting in garmin connect. It's still the default of 200w. But yeah he's a beast.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [tucktri] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
That's Lance Armstrong's HIM power, he was pushing 280 max. But, yeah, awesome stuff.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Russ Brandt] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Maybe because I was forced to stop at special needs this year? Or do you really think it was less windy coming down from Hawi this year? Maybe I just thought that was a wind hitting me in my face this year.......

-Brad Williams
Website | Twitter: @BW_Tri |Instagram: @BW_Tri | Strava | Co-Founder & Coach at: KIS Coaching
Partnered with: Zoot Sports | Precision Fuel &Hydration | ISM
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Bryancd] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
1) You proved my point by filling in the details. No HR = Overbike. You have no real experience to think power is finicky. That is what all newbies to power think. Next time you are on a ride with a long time power meter user, quiz them and ask what power they "feel" they are riding at. I'd bet you a seasoned veteran will be within 90%, despite the measurement being "finicky". Can a PM drop out? Yes, but the aforementioned premise is your backup.
2) I only become evangelical about stuff that works. You can keep doing what you are doing with HR yes, but you'll never understand 90% of what everyone else with a PM is talking about until you get, use and understand yours. I am by far not the only one, you know that. Part of me thinks you are clinging on to the "old school" method because you get good results despite and you wear that as sort of a badge of honor. I think you do too, but I remain unimpressed with your runs off the bike. I think you can fly and demolish more dudes if you can run 7:15's and 7:30's. Be honest, there is nothing sexy about limping in "running" in the 8 min territory. Without a strong pace at the end of IM, you can't race anyone. You are just trying to finish.
3) Sounds like you are always looking in the rear view mirror with HR. Does any part of you find it appealing to set a goal to increase your bike power 5% this winter? You'll have to explain to me more how you approach your development during the offseason using HR, as I just don't understand it.
4) Did you mean "deterioration" or "domination"? You said you were running a lot faster back in "09 and '11 so I'm confused. Just so you know, I was too and so was the rest of your AG competition. Fact of Life that we don't need to dwell on. My point still stands that your open times don't match well with your tri times, at least not what I'd expect from a top guy.
5) I know you love this shit, so do I. That is why you need to pull 7-8 g's out of your fist and get on the bandwagon so we'll have something real to talk about. I'd pay more attention to what you say if you actually had and used a PM instead of just presuming things and giving ill-informed advice based on HR pacing and a nascent understanding of the device. The state of the art is moving away from you (even if it is right or wrong, it just is). I know your OCD want to ride at 14x, but once schooled with the PM feedback, it is very easy to tune into 200-215 watts and hold. Hell, you can even have your HR as a backup! There is a bright idea!
Last edited by: Russ Brandt: Oct 23, 13 10:47
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [afbadbrad] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I didn't race in 2012 so I can't make direct comparisons with the winds. Yes, there was wind this year in Hawi, it was steady and not gusty though to me. I had zero "oh shit" moments, where as the previous 3 times I've raced there and another handful of times I've ridden up/down Hawi during vacations or training rides I usually get 2-3 of those moments in that area. Just a few days later after the race this year when I rode up through Hawi and over to Waikoloa I almost shit my shorts a few times dropping down through the gusts against my front 808.

I don't think a special needs stop would affect the data that much in terms of wattage, maybe time though. I'm still curious about the differences.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Russ Brandt] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
1. No, I was just not used having to do 56 miles using RPE. I was pretty close considering and I don't doubt any training protocol can achieve the same feel for effort.

2. Perhaps you need to consider how many "truths" of training have come and gone over the past decade. I'm not clinging to outdated modalities, I just like to keep my training and racing relatively simple. It's simply a choice, not statement. You're being a bit obtuse, I don't hate PM it advocate people not use them. I bet you were impressed with my run at IMSG last year, I must have missed seeing you. I think I know how to race an IM, I have never done an IM without KQ, Russ, give me some credit. :)

3. Yes, like I said, I'm waiting to see if I get a new bike sponsor and Garmin. If so, I'll be setting up in the tunnel and giving power a go.

4. My relative placing across all three sports has remained the same over the last few years. I haven't done any open road racing in a while, so I'm not sure what you are referring to.

5. Don't say I give ill-advised advice about HR training, that's actually a little insulting.

-Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
Team ZOOT
ZOOT, QR, Garmin, HED Wheels, Zealios, FormSwim, Precision Hydration, Rudy Project
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Bryancd] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The only comment worth (or not) replying to at this point is your #2. Keep hanging your hat on the distant past, Bryan. I'll dwell on the recent past, as I am only as good as my last race. I won't throw jabs using results, but I will use them to make a point. I give you a lot of credit, you are a great athlete. You could be better, specifically your run.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Grindcore] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I think your sense of power numbers are a bit off. Obviously avg speed is course dependent. I averaged 26 at eagleman on 255w, and 23 at timberman on 275w (76kg). Elevation change, pavement, wind, other athletes all make a huge different in speed. I know a lot of pros who are riding well over 300 watts in halves and are much smaller than me.

Josh's preset ftp on his garmin is obviously wrong, but I'm not surprised it took that much power to go 4:30 at kona. Keep in mind he was out there later in the day than the pros (a full hour) and was riding solo the entire time. The wind picked up a lot as the day went on.

___________________
Twitter | Kancman | Blog
Last edited by: snackchair: Oct 23, 13 11:42
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Russ Brandt] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Hey, you started this argument! I do still want to lick your brain about Faster, looks like we are going to be with Ceepo..and Garmin . :)

-Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
Team ZOOT
ZOOT, QR, Garmin, HED Wheels, Zealios, FormSwim, Precision Hydration, Rudy Project
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Bryancd] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I am not trying to disparage you. You are the Barometer. A rising tide lifts all ships.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Russ Brandt] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I said "lick your brain" hehehe!

-Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
Team ZOOT
ZOOT, QR, Garmin, HED Wheels, Zealios, FormSwim, Precision Hydration, Rudy Project
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Bryancd] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Bryancd wrote:
Power is finicky.

Huh?
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [James Haycraft] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
James Haycraft wrote:
Bryancd wrote:
Power is finicky.


Huh?

I meant the actual device's, they can be a bit finicky.

-Of course it's 'effing hard, it's IRONMAN!
Team ZOOT
ZOOT, QR, Garmin, HED Wheels, Zealios, FormSwim, Precision Hydration, Rudy Project
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [tucktri] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
tucktri wrote:
Grindcore wrote:
joshjan wrote:
ok, try this link:
http://connect.garmin.com/activity/391394757

7 watts different than Lake Placid but 51 minutes different on the run! Heat was not my friend Saturday. I totally agree that you race for place here and not time. I had nothing to lose by going for it on the bike but if you are a better fish it seemed like you could get into a pack of guys and save a ton of energy and throw down a great run. Oh well, live and learn.

Josh


First, amazing bike split. Not discounting that, congrats for sure. But your power numbers are off by 70w at least. I'm 178 and I go 25 mph on ~260w and your TSS is like 4x the recommended amount for that ride. Numbers don't jive at all. But you're a beast, so who gives a shit what the watts are. :)


He didn't change his FTP setting in garmin connect. It's still the default of 200w. But yeah he's a beast.

He lifts weights.

_________________________________________________
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Bryancd] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Bryancd wrote:
I stole this from another thread, credit to Brett "Texafornia" Blankner:
Power is the work. HR is your body's reaction to the work (and fuel, hydration, heat, and rest).

Power is you at the museum. HR is a tour guide telling what the hell you are looking at.

Power without HR is like arguing with somebody over a play in football without actually knowing the rules of the game - You might be right, but you have no idea why.

Nice quotes but a load of nonsense.

Power is not the work.
Power is the rate of doing work.
That might seem like a subtle difference to some but it is a very important distinction, because it has significant ramifications wrt the physics and physiology of cycling performance that HR cannot convey, ever.

HR is the rate one's heart beats. No more and no less.

HR is influenced by many things, some of which are performance factors and some that are not. HR is not some magical all encompassing measure telling you the combined influence of all factors and how though shalt define appropriate race effort level.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [snackchair] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
snackchair wrote:
I think your sense of power numbers are a bit off. Obviously avg speed is course dependent. I averaged 26 at eagleman on 255w, and 23 at timberman on 275w (76kg). Elevation change, pavement, wind, other athletes all make a huge different in speed. I know a lot of pros who are riding well over 300 watts in halves and are much smaller than me.

Josh's preset ftp on his garmin is obviously wrong, but I'm not surprised it took that much power to go 4:30 at kona. Keep in mind he was out there later in the day than the pros (a full hour) and was riding solo the entire time. The wind picked up a lot as the day went on.

Agree with the above. As a comparison, Starky suggested that his 4:04 Ironman Florida ride took 360-365W average

Josh's numbers make a lot of sense comparatively.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Except 2 (at least) other AG riders rode very similar times on a lot less power.

Given that josh said he rode very similar power at both IMLP and Kona the plausible possibilities are:
1> He is a brick
2> His power meter is defective
3> He failed to zero his power meter properly (other some variation of this)

Since he said that he used different PMs at IMLP and Kona - it probably rules out #2, which leaves options #1 and #3.

For comparison - I rode 2 different half ironmans (Racine and Pigman) this year at ~2:15 - so the same speed as Josh rode, and I did both of them on 70 to 80 less watts.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply


I've always pondered the validity of that statement, to me it smells a bit of BS. I'm no expert on calcuating the required wattage difference between 27.5 mph and say 25 or 26 mph, but 360 is a LOT of watts, a lot of the top tri pros only have FTPs only a handful of watts higher than that; and you should be going HELLA fast.

Not only that, but torbjorn rode to a faster split than Starky on watts that don't sound very otherwordly - which leads me to believe that Starky is just talking.
Last edited by: sentania: Oct 24, 13 8:02
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [sentania] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
sentania wrote:
Not only that, but torbjorn rode to a faster split than Starky on watts that don't sound very otherwordly - which leads me to believe that Starky is just talking.

As he's always doing...

"One Line Robert"
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [wsrobert] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I was trying to be diplomatic :)
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [sentania] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
sentania wrote:
Except 2 (at least) other AG riders rode very similar times on a lot less power.

Given that josh said he rode very similar power at both IMLP and Kona the plausible possibilities are:
1> He is a brick
2> His power meter is defective
3> He failed to zero his power meter properly (other some variation of this)

Since he said that he used different PMs at IMLP and Kona - it probably rules out #2, which leaves options #1 and #3.

For comparison - I rode 2 different half ironmans (Racine and Pigman) this year at ~2:15 - so the same speed as Josh rode, and I did both of them on 70 to 80 less watts.

Won't even get into different courses/different days, but Sami Inkinen rolling 280W (to a similar time in Kona) has a PowerTap, so maybe 15 watts right there. Now we're at 295W and 320W for similar times, a small delta that could be wholly explainable by items like position, equipment, skill at slingshotting/legal draft and positioning tactics, power meter drift/calibration issues, etc. The scatterplots above show that generally power is a poor predictor of time, even on the same day in Kona. We have this notion that input = output and -1 is the relationship between watts and speed, which is not so. So to me Josh's numbers are credible. He outsplit Andy Potts at Lake Placid by 7 minutes iirc...would it surprise you if Andy rode 310W and Josh rode 320W on that day? That's probably about right...
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [sentania] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
sentania wrote:


I've always pondered the validity of that statement, to me it smells a bit of BS. I'm no expert on calcuating the required wattage difference between 27.5 mph and say 25 or 26 mph, but 360 is a LOT of watts, a lot of the top tri pros only have FTPs only a handful of watts higher than that; and you should be going HELLA fast.

Not only that, but torbjorn rode to a faster split than Starky on watts that don't sound very otherwordly - which leads me to believe that Starky is just talking.

That's because Starky had that aero-as-barndoor hydration setup between his bars. If he'd only listened to wsrobert he could have split the same on 340...
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
sentania wrote:


I've always pondered the validity of that statement, to me it smells a bit of BS. I'm no expert on calcuating the required wattage difference between 27.5 mph and say 25 or 26 mph, but 360 is a LOT of watts, a lot of the top tri pros only have FTPs only a handful of watts higher than that; and you should be going HELLA fast.

Not only that, but torbjorn rode to a faster split than Starky on watts that don't sound very otherwordly - which leads me to believe that Starky is just talking.


That's because Starky had that aero-as-barndoor hydration setup between his bars. If he'd only listened to wsrobert he could have split the same on 340...

Are you talking at Kona or at Florida?

Seems I read that the Torhans30 tests faster than no bottle at all and faster than a BTA bottle.



-Andrew
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
sentania wrote:
Except 2 (at least) other AG riders rode very similar times on a lot less power.

Given that josh said he rode very similar power at both IMLP and Kona the plausible possibilities are:
1> He is a brick
2> His power meter is defective
3> He failed to zero his power meter properly (other some variation of this)

Since he said that he used different PMs at IMLP and Kona - it probably rules out #2, which leaves options #1 and #3.

For comparison - I rode 2 different half ironmans (Racine and Pigman) this year at ~2:15 - so the same speed as Josh rode, and I did both of them on 70 to 80 less watts.


Won't even get into different courses/different days, but Sami Inkinen rolling 280W (to a similar time in Kona) has a PowerTap, so maybe 15 watts right there. Now we're at 295W and 320W for similar times, a small delta that could be wholly explainable by items like position, equipment, skill at slingshotting/legal draft and positioning tactics, power meter drift/calibration issues, etc. The scatterplots above show that generally power is a poor predictor of time, even on the same day in Kona. We have this notion that input = output and -1 is the relationship between watts and speed, which is not so. So to me Josh's numbers are credible. He outsplit Andy Potts at Lake Placid by 7 minutes iirc...would it surprise you if Andy rode 310W and Josh rode 320W on that day? That's probably about right...

Input does equal output at the front of the race - for the most part. Or if you're at least riding through everyone and not sitting in the draft packs.

Also...15 watts from powertap to crank based? Nadda. Unless you're rolling with an ungreased/terribly dirty/grimy chain.

"One Line Robert"
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [AMT04] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Sorry, I was kidding. But I mean this one


Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [wsrobert] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Ray says 5-15W. Roughly 15W was the delta for me when testing my PowerTap against my Quarq. I've heard this figure elsewhere, but yes it varies. Notice I said maybe
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [wsrobert] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
My gf was running a pt and srm for a bit before kona, and it was about 3-3.3% different. So at 300 watts... that's almost a 10w difference.

___________________
Twitter | Kancman | Blog
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Not only that, but he's obviously using a heart rate monitor there. That had to have held him back as well...



-Andrew
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
Ray says 5-15W. Roughly 15W was the delta for me when testing my PowerTap against my Quarq. I've heard this figure elsewhere, but yes it varies. Notice I said maybe

The difference between a powertap and a quarq will not be a constant number, but most closely simply a percentage of power at that point in time. 5% diffference is probably reasonable. Things like a dirty drivetrain or bent derailleur hangers will make this difference greater.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [chaparral] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Good take. 4-5% was the difference I observed personally.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [sentania] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I've also ridden that split on a lot less watts, but also way slower on way more watts... so I don't think that's a great metric between courses.

Keep in mind Josh was out there an hour after the pros and almost 30 minutes after the top ager's, and was riding alone. The wind definitely picked up as the day went on, and the front of the ag field had some massive peletons. I was at the turn at mile ~45/75 and my brain exploded at how big some of the groups were. Only saw a few marshalls go by and they seemed to be further back, or stopped on the side of the road drinking coffee for 30 minutes (true story).

Didn't Rapp also say that the difference between the Mcclaren helmet and aero road helmet was 15 watts? Josh was wearing a regular road helmet, so that's gotta be a few more watts.. Add in a slightly upright position, and the fact that he probably wasn't turtling much bc he had to watch out for people going 50% slower than him, and it's not hard to believe it took that much wattage to go that fast.

___________________
Twitter | Kancman | Blog
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [chaparral] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The difference between a powertap and a quarq will not be a constant number, but most closely simply a percentage of power at that point in time. 5% diffference is probably reasonable.

When this has been tested in the lab, drivetrain losses are closer to a fixed wattage for the range you are interested in (like 150-500W). And it is ~8W if your gear is in good condition.

Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [snackchair] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I am not doubting that his power meter said 317 watts or so at Kona and 324 watts at IMLP or that he is not capable of riding that many watts.

I'm simply stating that 317 watts is a *shit* load of watts, and that *many* other people have ridden faster, sometimes significantly so, on a significant number of fewer watts.

That suggests that either his power meter is defective, or that he has a lot of speed to be gained by tweaking small things - one of which, as you mentioned is to use an aero helmet.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [sentania] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
sentania wrote:
I am not doubting that his power meter said 317 watts or so at Kona and 324 watts at IMLP or that he is not capable of riding that many watts.

I'm simply stating that 317 watts is a *shit* load of watts, and that *many* other people have ridden faster, sometimes significantly so, on a significant number of fewer watts.

That suggests that either his power meter is defective, or that he has a lot of speed to be gained by tweaking small things - one of which, as you mentioned is to use an aero helmet.

And get rid of the bell he has on his aerobars to let people know a freight train is coming.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote:
Won't even get into different courses/different days
No need. I fully understand the differences in wattage different courses and different days on the same course can cause - though I will agree with bill - generally speaking power is an exceptionally good predictor of performance.

As I told snackchair, I'm not some hack who simply wishes his FTP was equal to Josh Becks IM power, so therefore thinks it is impossible for someone to ride an Ironman at that power. As I told snackchair, I fully believe that it's possible Josh rode that wattage, and that Andy Potts also rode your proposed wattage.

In reality, I'm a moderately fast and intelligent guy, who wishes his FTP was equal to Josh Becks IM power, and believes Josh Beck could have rode frighteningly fast if he simply paid attention to some of the aero details I have to pay attention to in order to remain competitive.

Bike
Position
helmet
Etc.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kny] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote:
And get rid of the bell he has on his aerobars to let people know a freight train is coming.

No way - that is totally badass.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [snackchair] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
it's not hard to believe it took that much wattage to go that fast.

I ballpark a CdA of ~.325 for him. I'm nearly as big as he is and that is my CdA on the road bike, with nothing aero at all. On the TT bike with old equipment, my CdA is ~.22. Granted I don't do Ironmans, but still... .25 should be possible while still being comfortable.

Hypothetically, if he could ride Kona with a CdA of .25 he would have gone ~4:09 on the same power.

There are a lot of people at Kona who spend little time and attention to getting aero dialed... pros even.

Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [rruff] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
rruff wrote:


Hypothetically, if he could ride Kona with a CdA of .25 he would have gone ~4:09 on the same power.


That alone tells me your estimates must be off, since no one has come close to that.

___________________
Twitter | Kancman | Blog
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [snackchair] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Perhaps because no one with that sort of a setup has ridden 320 watts at Kona?
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [snackchair] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I agree. Josh is a monster, but he's not the best there's ever been, so if numbers are saying he should be then some numbers are off.

Josh rode pro peloton for a few years before opting out of that lifestyle. Josh regularly races Powerman Zofingen where he does well, but one Vansteelant or another blows his doors off on both bike and run. Josh is a monster who could certainly benefit from spending time on the aero and equipment details, but any numbers that indicate he'd set a course record at Kona are off.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [rruff] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
rruff wrote:
The difference between a powertap and a quarq will not be a constant number, but most closely simply a percentage of power at that point in time. 5% diffference is probably reasonable.

When this has been tested in the lab, drivetrain losses are closer to a fixed wattage for the range you are interested in (like 150-500W). And it is ~8W if your gear is in good condition.

Wait people are interesting in power less than 500w?

Interesting, because there would be fixed wattage losses, like the derailleur pulleys (well those would also depend on chain speed). I guess that explains partly about why different lubricants can make a real difference, since they would not affect the component that is a % of power that much, but could make a bigger difference on some of these fixed losses.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [snackchair] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
That alone tells me your estimates must be off, since no one has come close to that.

Estimate of what?

Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kny] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
dunno - the data for Torbjorn's former course record is public, I'm not sure if Lieto's 2011 ride is, but if you poke around SRMs website there are hints that suggest that Normann's 2006 ride was in the ballpark of Josh's ride - wattage wise.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [rruff] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
rruff wrote:
There are a lot of people at Kona who spend little time and attention to getting aero dialed... pros even.

I would say thats less true now than it was just a few years ago. And might be more true of the womens field. But the men at the FOP seem to be listening...

"One Line Robert"
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [rruff] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
rruff wrote:
The difference between a powertap and a quarq will not be a constant number, but most closely simply a percentage of power at that point in time. 5% diffference is probably reasonable.

When this has been tested in the lab, drivetrain losses are closer to a fixed wattage for the range you are interested in (like 150-500W). And it is ~8W if your gear is in good condition.

I have tested 2 different powertaps vs 2 different cranks (SRM, QUARQ), on the road @ ~250 watts (all properly calibrated and zeroed).
In both cases, the crank-based watts were 2-3 watts higher.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Larbot] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Larbot wrote:
rruff wrote:
The difference between a powertap and a quarq will not be a constant number, but most closely simply a percentage of power at that point in time. 5% diffference is probably reasonable.

When this has been tested in the lab, drivetrain losses are closer to a fixed wattage for the range you are interested in (like 150-500W). And it is ~8W if your gear is in good condition.


I have tested 2 different powertaps vs 2 different cranks (SRM, QUARQ), on the road @ ~250 watts (all properly calibrated and zeroed).
In both cases, the crank-based watts were 2-3 watts higher.

Wow, 2-3 watts seems pretty good. I thought it was in the range of 5-8. But this also reminds of why Mirinda Carfrae has a big penalty vs. Caroline Steffen. Mirinda has to put out the exact same watts to overcome her drivetrain, and she has to put out the he exact same watts to turn her 700 wheels at 36 kph. The watts to overcome her drivetrain and the watts to overcome the wheels are a higher percentage of her overall brute power output. Definitely pays to be a bigger rider in Kona where watts per kilo are not that big deal and where brute top line watts matter more. The run is a different story though!
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
devashish_paul wrote:
Larbot wrote:
rruff wrote:
The difference between a powertap and a quarq will not be a constant number, but most closely simply a percentage of power at that point in time. 5% diffference is probably reasonable.

When this has been tested in the lab, drivetrain losses are closer to a fixed wattage for the range you are interested in (like 150-500W). And it is ~8W if your gear is in good condition.


I have tested 2 different powertaps vs 2 different cranks (SRM, QUARQ), on the road @ ~250 watts (all properly calibrated and zeroed).
In both cases, the crank-based watts were 2-3 watts higher.


Wow, 2-3 watts seems pretty good. I thought it was in the range of 5-8. But this also reminds of why Mirinda Carfrae has a big penalty vs. Caroline Steffen. Mirinda has to put out the exact same watts to overcome her drivetrain, and she has to put out the he exact same watts to turn her 700 wheels at 36 kph. The watts to overcome her drivetrain and the watts to overcome the wheels are a higher percentage of her overall brute power output. Definitely pays to be a bigger rider in Kona where watts per kilo are not that big deal and where brute top line watts matter more. The run is a different story though!

Which makes the accomplishments of a mini-imp like Emma Pooley really stand out as superb.

Hugh

Genetics load the gun, lifestyle pulls the trigger.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
kileyay wrote:
Sami Inkinen rolling 280W (to a similar time in Kona) has a PowerTap

Sami typically doesn't include zeros in his numbers. Strava has his ride as 267 AP/274 NP for 4:33, which seems pretty reasonable.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Larbot] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I have tested 2 different powertaps vs 2 different cranks (SRM, QUARQ), on the road @ ~250 watts (all properly calibrated and zeroed).
In both cases, the crank-based watts were 2-3 watts higher.

Not sure what you mean by "calibrated" but you are talking about a 1% drivetrain loss, and I've not seen it nearly that low when accurately measured.

The HPVA site has a couple of lab tests... one by Spicer, and the other by someone famous from back in the day... can't remember his name. Of you could look at the Friction Facts lube test... and add in the pulley losses.

Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [DrPain] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote:
I was wondering why my VI was higher this year than last year and discovered a few days ago that my increased coasting time was the big difference. Thanks for the idea about pulling the ride data into a spreadsheet and sorting it. In any case, here's the comparative data:

2012: 5:04, 195/205W AP/NP, 12 mins at 0W at average coasting speed of 52km/h
2013: 4:52, 191/205W AP/NP, 17.5 mins at 0W at average coasting speed of 48km/h (only 4 mins coasting below 40km/h)

As it turns out, when I was pedaling, my average W were approximately the same each year (~203-4W) and the only real difference between the 2 years was the coasting time. I know a low VI is always recommended but I'm pretty happy to coast at ~50km/h or greater. Curious now to see what others are doing, or other's thoughts on this. Is it smart to ride a higher VI on this sort of course and day, or would a lower VI have been better?

If zero wattages make your VI look higher, and you are absolutely flying along when you are at zero wattage, then my guess is that I'd rely less on VI in that situtation. Or said another way, when you do put out power make sure you are getting an advantage from it, especially the higer powers. Really cool to see you put out the same wattage over years but manipulated your coasting time. This premise may get lost among those that just gloss over your post, but there is absolute gold in the concept in there if you apply that knowledge to all IM bike rides.
FWIW, my VI was 1.07. I'd normally consider that unacceptably high if it was a long training ride. We were lucky that the Kona course and conditions that day left us many opportunities to save energy while still flying! I mentioned before that I was coasting by guys that were pedalling. Even if they were softer pedalling, there were missing opportunites to save energy, cool down and lower HR.
Last edited by: Russ Brandt: Oct 25, 13 15:15
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [rruff] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
rruff wrote:
I have tested 2 different powertaps vs 2 different cranks (SRM, QUARQ), on the road @ ~250 watts (all properly calibrated and zeroed).
In both cases, the crank-based watts were 2-3 watts higher.

Not sure what you mean by "calibrated" but you are talking about a 1% drivetrain loss, and I've not seen it nearly that low when accurately measured.

The HPVA site has a couple of lab tests... one by Spicer, and the other by someone famous from back in the day... can't remember his name. Of you could look at the Friction Facts lube test... and add in the pulley losses.

Cranks were calibrated with a known set of weights in order to recalculate the slope.
The details of this have been discussed on this forum.

You are right, the total drivetrain losses should be higher.
According to friction facts, total losses on a clean Dura Ace setup @ 250W should be around 6W total, so my finding of 2-3W is within the measurement error.

The point is the difference between PT vs SRM/Quarq is MUCH less than the 5-10% often quoted on this forum.
It should actually be closer to 2%.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Larbot] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I don't know what people usually state, but I figure 8W drivetrain loss. Which is 4% at 200W and 2% at 400W.

Friction Facts didn't have a derailleur attached, and so had no pulley losses. In their lube test the chain loss ranged from 5-8 W for a pristine system.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [rruff] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
rruff wrote:
I don't know what people usually state, but I figure 8W drivetrain loss. Which is 4% at 200W and 2% at 400W.

Friction Facts didn't have a derailleur attached, and so had no pulley losses. In their lube test the chain loss ranged from 5-8 W for a pristine system.

They did in fact do a separate pulley test, which for DuraAce measured at 0.15W (for the set).
Results of the different pulleys varied from 0.06-1.3W.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Rappstar] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
[/quote] Yes and no. I'm thinking about it for next year. At the same time, there were plenty of other indicators. It's another data point. For whatever that is and isn't worth.[/quote]

Rappstar,

Which would be your main indicators/data points besides HR regarding the state of your body (clumsy phrase, I know, but I can't think of a better one) at any given moment during a race?

Also, if you think that the state of your body at any moment during the race is important for overall performance, and if you think that monitoring that state in real time if critical for the same reason, which indicators/data points would be superior to HR?

And which indicators/data points would be most useful in comparing their real-time feedback with other indicators/data points?

For example, on the bike, which ones would be more useful than HR in comparing their feedback with power?

From your posts I get the feeling that you are an analytical mind who likes to work with factual, objective information, so I'm curious to know which ones of those main indicators/data points meet those criteria.

Thanks very much for your feedback and thanks for sharing your knowledge and experience in here and with such detail.

Nuno
Last edited by: nhluz: Oct 26, 13 7:07
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Russ Brandt] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Agreed. My post-race analysis of my file has made me much more comfortable with the high VI on the course on that day. I'm naturally a very low VI guy so I was a bit disconcerted during the race but I'll definitely use the knowledge I've gained to adjust my strategy in response to the course and conditions in my future races, and specifically at Kona if I do the race again. My impression from looking carefully at a few different power files from Kona this year and mine over the past few years is that the unique conditions of that course really provide some significant opportunities to impact your time by making more significant adjustments to where you output your power than in a typical IM course or training ride.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [DrPain] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Definitely agree...VI is directionally helpful in a lot of cases, but in terms of understanding "the bad kind" vs. "the good kind" of variability, especially in a long race, it's worthless and misleading. I've written about this on another thread, but because of how Normalized Power works mathematically, its delta relative to the average is heavily influenced by zeroes, which are often good, more so than big surges, which are very often bad. Fun w/ numbers using my file to demonstrate...VI was 1.03 (236/229) with about 4 min 40 sec <20W. Back solving a bit, if I didn't coast at all, and instead during all those <20W times I surged, my VI would be the same only with 520 watt surges. VI would have been 1.03 (244/237W), and probably I would have not been all that much faster in terms of time since wind resistance at 30 mph is stout, and with all the variability coming from the wrong end of the bell curve (sum of 4 min 40 seconds at 520W). Better metrics needed for sure...

Dr. Skiba has probably something better with xPower, but all I've been able to really tease out is that xPower is lower and different and not necessarily better. The only difference is that he uses a 25 second exponentially weighted moving average rather than a 30 second moving average, and other than saying "the body does things exponentially", even Skiba does not say it's demonstrable better than Normalized Power. He just says it could be, might be, or thinks it might eventually be

http://www.physfarm.com/bikescore.pdf
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [nhluz] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
nhluz wrote:
Yes and no. I'm thinking about it for next year. At the same time, there were plenty of other indicators. It's another data point. For whatever that is and isn't worth.[/quote]

Rappstar,

Which would be your main indicators/data points besides HR regarding the state of your body (clumsy phrase, I know, but I can't think of a better one) at any given moment during a race?

Also, if you think that the state of your body at any moment during the race is important for overall performance, and if you think that monitoring that state in real time if critical for the same reason, which indicators/data points would be superior to HR?

And which indicators/data points would be most useful in comparing their real-time feedback with other indicators/data points?

For example, on the bike, which ones would be more useful than HR in comparing their feedback with power?

From your posts I get the feeling that you are an analytical mind who likes to work with factual, objective information, so I'm curious to know which ones of those main indicators/data points meet those criteria.

Thanks very much for your feedback and thanks for sharing your knowledge and experience in here and with such detail.

Nuno[/quote]
Ideal world? You'd have a ANT+ core temp pill that showed temp. There are some skin temp gauges, and having one of those built into an ANT+ HR strap would be nice as well.

It's definitely only a matter of time before we see both of these in BTLE versions, because they are so valuable for firefighters and military.

There are also HR straps that measure respiration rate (strain gauges in the strap); I don't know how valuable this would be, but if you were wearing a HR strap anyway...

But I think if you could get core temp during the race, that'd be one thing I think would be pretty neat. Because when it's been done, you can see some pretty dramatic implications.

"Non est ad astra mollis e terris via." - Seneca | rappstar.com | FB - Rappstar Racing | IG - @jordanrapp
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Rappstar] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Rappstar,

Appreciate your reply.

So, for now, no indicator for the main metric - core temp.

Still wondering if HR is of any use on race day (I have power too).

No use at all - none as an indirect measure of core temp for example?

I'm not a very experienced athlete. I've done a few MTB stage races, and I'm just starting with Ironman (I've only done two).

So very much on a learning curve, and eager to continue, and my question comes from that.

I still tend to go mostly by feel - ie, by my evaluations of RPE. But I want to know for what exactly might the other indicators be most useful.

Power I think I have a good idea now. Power and RPE I'm starting to understand and trust.

But HR, not so much. I have been surprised a few times on race day when I check it.

Which always makes me suspect that that indicator is trying to tell me something and I'm not listening/using it.

Thanks again for your feedback and insights.

Nuno
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [nhluz] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
nhluz wrote:
Rappstar,

Appreciate your reply.

So, for now, no indicator for the main metric - core temp.

Still wondering if HR is of any use on race day (I have power too).

No use at all - none as an indirect measure of core temp for example?

I'm not a very experienced athlete. I've done a few MTB stage races, and I'm just starting with Ironman (I've only done two).

So very much on a learning curve, and eager to continue, and my question comes from that.

I still tend to go mostly by feel - ie, by my evaluations of RPE. But I want to know for what exactly might the other indicators be most useful.

Power I think I have a good idea now. Power and RPE I'm starting to understand and trust.

But HR, not so much. I have been surprised a few times on race day when I check it.

Which always makes me suspect that that indicator is trying to tell me something and I'm not listening/using it.

Thanks again for your feedback and insights.

Nuno

I've never worn a HRM for an Ironman. I'm thinking I might try one for IMAZ. Just to see if there's anything I might get out of it.

"Non est ad astra mollis e terris via." - Seneca | rappstar.com | FB - Rappstar Racing | IG - @jordanrapp
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [Rappstar] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Thank you once more for the reply.

I'll be looking forward (again) to read you about IMAZ.

I always find what I would call your self-forensics - and the general forensics of the day too - extremely interesting and useful.

Nuno


Rappstar wrote:
nhluz wrote:
Rappstar,

Appreciate your reply.

So, for now, no indicator for the main metric - core temp.

Still wondering if HR is of any use on race day (I have power too).

No use at all - none as an indirect measure of core temp for example?

I'm not a very experienced athlete. I've done a few MTB stage races, and I'm just starting with Ironman (I've only done two).

So very much on a learning curve, and eager to continue, and my question comes from that.

I still tend to go mostly by feel - ie, by my evaluations of RPE. But I want to know for what exactly might the other indicators be most useful.

Power I think I have a good idea now. Power and RPE I'm starting to understand and trust.

But HR, not so much. I have been surprised a few times on race day when I check it.

Which always makes me suspect that that indicator is trying to tell me something and I'm not listening/using it.

Thanks again for your feedback and insights.

Nuno


I've never worn a HRM for an Ironman. I'm thinking I might try one for IMAZ. Just to see if there's anything I might get out of it.
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [sentania] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
sentania wrote:


I've always pondered the validity of that statement, to me it smells a bit of BS. I'm no expert on calcuating the required wattage difference between 27.5 mph and say 25 or 26 mph, but 360 is a LOT of watts, a lot of the top tri pros only have FTPs only a handful of watts higher than that; and you should be going HELLA fast.

Not only that, but torbjorn rode to a faster split than Starky on watts that don't sound very otherwordly - which leads me to believe that Starky is just talking.

Additional thoughts after yesterday's 4:02? I don't disagree with your skepticism, but still feels like 350W or so might be reasonable for that kind of speed...

If other files from Florida are available it might help
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [kileyay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply


No new thoughts, unless he's a freaking brick.

ETA: Though I don't know what the wind was like yesterday, but looking at some of the times for riders I do know (in terms of power output), it was probably relatively calm/normal. But I'm open to being corrected.
Last edited by: sentania: Nov 3, 13 14:26
Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [sentania] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
sentania wrote:
I am not doubting that his power meter said 317 watts or so at Kona and 324 watts at IMLP or that he is not capable of riding that many watts.


I'm simply stating that 317 watts is a *shit* load of watts, and that *many* other people have ridden faster, sometimes significantly so, on a significant number of fewer watts.

That suggests that either his power meter is defective, or that he has a lot of speed to be gained by tweaking small things - one of which, as you mentioned is to use an aero helmet.


I wish there were a quantitative analogue to power for the run as well. Here is Josh pushing Donna Mummert, former Kona and RAAM finisher and current ALS sufferer, in a wheelchair to a 2:59 at the hilly Harrisburg Marathon. While Josh is a veritable beast on the bike as his Lake Placid and Kona times and power numbers attest, I still believe his 1:18:29 run course record at SavageMan, a full 5 minutes faster than anyone else has ever gone there, is the finest achievement ever at SavageMan, the site of some pretty amazing swims, bikes, and runs over the years.

Video, may require you to like Appalachian Running Company to view: https://www.facebook.com/...hp?v=672481119438319


Quote Reply
Re: Kona and Age Group Power [amgray13] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Had this thread saved from 2013! Be cool to see how 'twitchers faired on Saturday...
Quote Reply