h2ofun wrote:
Power13 wrote:
I'm not bitching about anything....and in general, I agree with WTC's decision re: Muncie. I am simply saying, that from a PR and customer relations standpoint, it is to WTC's benefit to offer a credit of some kind. I don't agree that the athlete should bear the financial burden of WTC's decisions, regardless of waivers, etc. Is WTC obligated to offer a credit? Of course not....but, again, from a PR / customer service POV, they would be foolish not to.
Just show me one race that WTC does not fill up because of their existing policies! So, you might think they have a PR issue, but the results speak louder than any of our opinions.
So easy if you do not like what a business has to sell, just do not buy it. Why does this seem so hard for so many to understand? Do you buy food, or a car, or a house you do not like the terms on?
Oh I forgot, we now have folks bitching that their house is underwater and that is not fair and they want the rest of the country to pay for their contract they signed. Sorry, I just forget how we have become
such an entitlement society. (But do these same folks give up their profits to the country when they are on the plus side?)
.
Aah...we have reached the point of outrageous examples that have no bearing on this discussion.
Well played.
Funny, I don't remember talking about "entitlement societies" or anything of the sort. Wait....hang on....let me check something.....nope, I specifically said that I agree with WTC's decision re: Muncie.
Funny 'dat.
Chicago Cubs - 2016 WORLD SERIES Champions!!!!
"If ever the time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin." - Samuel Adams