The PTO is sorta a 2 way street. Athletes have to be good enough to be in position to receive the PTO "contracted athlete" status (I don't believe he's in the position to get initial auto contract with his current ranking), and imo it has to work for both parties. LS is MOP ability at that distance *currently*. So what is the justification from PTO to bring LS into a full time status when he's likely going to be MOP at best? Can you market his personality if you aren't at the front of the events?
At the end of the day- LS is a professional athlete. This is his job/career- so he's got to make decisions that feed himself and his family. If the PTO contract is only essentially travel funds + some spending money, what is the value to LS when he's racing for what $5k prize money for 10th place? So think of PTO more as a ITU 2.0 style of professional racing (there is a reason he never went ITU ever) and the 70.3/IM the other side of the spectrum. Yes 70.3/PTO are more similiar in distancces but I'm talking about depth/ability that allows you more chances at 70.3/IM than PTO.
Brooks Doughtie, M.S.
Exercise Physiology
-USAT Level II
At the end of the day- LS is a professional athlete. This is his job/career- so he's got to make decisions that feed himself and his family. If the PTO contract is only essentially travel funds + some spending money, what is the value to LS when he's racing for what $5k prize money for 10th place? So think of PTO more as a ITU 2.0 style of professional racing (there is a reason he never went ITU ever) and the 70.3/IM the other side of the spectrum. Yes 70.3/PTO are more similiar in distancces but I'm talking about depth/ability that allows you more chances at 70.3/IM than PTO.
Brooks Doughtie, M.S.
Exercise Physiology
-USAT Level II
Last edited by:
B_Doughtie: Jan 12, 24 12:08