buzz wrote:
i don't find the doped tours more entertaining. and i don't want athletes dying in their hotel rooms to entertain me. so i like this better.
+1. Far more entertaining when the athletes are clean as they can't just crush it every day, and I have no interest watching a sport where it's virtually impossible for a clean athlete to win. I'm sure there are still plenty of dopers out there, but I do believe (maybe naively) that enough teams have cleaned up their act and/or that things like the biological passports are at least curbing the extent and therefore benefits from doping, that it's possible for riders to win clean.
I find it interesting that Nibali seems to be getting a lot less doping questions/speculation than Froome and Wiggins did over the last 2 years. Is that because the whole Armstrong saga was still in full flow in 2012/13, but has now died down? Or that people really dislike Sky for some reason (seems odd given Astana's track record and appointment of Vino as general manager)? Or just that I haven't been paying as much attention to the news this year?