Slowman wrote:
"I find the puritanical attitude of many triathletes to be curious. Doping exists in triathlon, just as it does in cycling and any other professional sport. Is it "cleaner" than others. I have no idea....but the assertions that triathlon is a clean sport is just not aligned with reality." that's really not true. triathlon is a demonstrably cleaner sport. it's an obviously cleaner sport. and i have no problem with these pro athletes actively campaigning for a clean sport and i also have no problem with them expressing, publicly, their displeasure over a ban they felt was too light and i think this public outcry is one symptom of a cleaner sport. i think they could be more effective at expressing their displeasure. but i think they're entirely right to be engaged. in fact, i wish they were more engaged (see post above).
Dan, I don't believe I said any of those things. FWIW, I do believe that triathlon is "cleaner" than cycling.....but I don't know it. And I'm not certain how you can say it is "demonstrably" cleaner....by fewer negative doping tests? I think the history of anti-doping efforts has shown how little that can mean. But let's not pretend that triathlon is "clean."
I also think these athletes are right to be engaged.....but ranting at MW after IMCOZ is not productive. As you have noted as well, they need to engage with WADA, WTC and ITU.
Chicago Cubs - 2016 WORLD SERIES Champions!!!!
"If ever the time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin." - Samuel Adams