Slowman wrote:
yeah, josh and i have been trading emails all along during these recent polls.
Well...now you're just making me feel left out ;-)
Slowman wrote:
my only question revolves around the notion of what is "perfect" asphalt. in my experience, depending on who's laying the asphalt, new asphalt is far from perfect. it's horrible. it's got to be smooshed down for a few months by cars repeatedly driving over it until i and my bike like it.
Not just the "smooshing", but the the asphalt will also tend to "cure", or harden over time (probably an out-gassing effect). Some of the slowness of a brand new surface may be coming from the surface itself being somewhat soft...which is then getting into the types of things needing consideration for off-road uses.
Slowman wrote:
i think the roads you and i tend to race on are more often much smoother than milled pavement ready for the final coat or green finished pavement. still, i take your point and i should've stuck 80psi in there.
Tend to be...but there can also be sections that aren't. I recall doing the CBR "State" TT near your house one year (the full 40K out and back course on the south edge of Edwards AFB, not the SCNCA course). There was an ~1/2mile section in that which was VERY rough...and it was easy to pick out in the power file later due to the dramatic speed reduction vs. the power output. If I knew then what I know now, I probably would've run wide tires (wider than I did at the time) at considerably lower pressures, just for that one section (gone over twice - out and back).
Slowman wrote:
as an aside, i do think josh's new thinking makes me think about softride's thesis 25 years ago, that muscle vibration is big performance limiter. funny how we hold notions in our heads for a generation or more and then we find out we shouldn't have been so dogmatic.
Well...we have to be careful to separate vibration effects on muscle power producing ability vs. vibration effects
dissipating energy in the body tissues. Softride's thesis was more of the former than the latter. Also, if you're relying on a suspension system
between the tire and the rider to reduce vibration energy making it to the rider, then those are going to be energy dissipating effects as well, and not as fast as using the tire for as much "suspension" as possible...especially considering that fast tires are by definition low energy dissipating ones as well...know what I mean? :-)
http://bikeblather.blogspot.com/