Hey, not trying to be an ass (although I may sound like one).
But part of superior equipment is that it is aero, light, comfortable and fits well.....several of the options you favor only fulfill part of the list (as does the Cannondale).
So to make these blanket statements that only an aero bike that you happen to sell equals value for money is not credible and plain false.
I am sure you did not mean it, but your statements surely read that way. That is what I take issue with.
You can have the slipperiest bike and the rider will still have a horrible riding experience as he can't make it fit, it beats him/her up or it handles like a tricycle...he will actually go slower.
trentnix wrote:
windschatten wrote:
trentnix wrote:
And it is not "all about the engine". Certainly, an exceptional engine can overcome equipment handicaps. But few are blessed with truly exceptional engines, and those who are will still be at a disadvantage competing against similarly gifted athletes on superior equipment.
Hilarious!
I guess if you cater to the champioons clientele only, you may get lucky.
We cater to clientele that asks us to help them get great value for their money. The foremost reason (among many reasons) to buy a triathlon bike is to go faster. That's true whether you can ride 14 mph or 24 mph.
While not everyone is competing to win, many are competing with their friend, neighbor, or some athlete across town. Some compete explicitly with their own past performance. And when they make a bike purchase, they seek to pursue whatever advantages their budget allows. And its our opinion that there are superior options that allow that customer to go faster at similar price points.
You seem to disagree with my conclusion, and that's fine. You may even disagree with my premise. That's fine too.