veganerd wrote:
j p o wrote:
veganerd wrote:
Quote:
Pre-prepubescence, do kids really act that different based on sex without outside influence?
Yes. Infants show prefrences towards types toys in ways we would consider stereotypical.
OK, (and I'm thinking this through as I type, so...) then it doesn't seem to require being "assigned" anything. Kids don't really go around checking their birth certificate before picking up toys.
Instead of jacking with birth certificates, which are used to help establish identity and kind of need identifying characteristics on them, can we just not fuck with kids who decide to play with different toys or do things differently than is stereotypical? That seems easier.
Usually when we talk about "assigning sex" in an infant, its because they were born with both or unambigous genetalia. In those cases its a huge mistake to decide for them. Parents often get it wrong and so far, there is no way to tell how to get it right.
Yes, i agree that we should not fuck with kids who are not stereotypical.
I agree with what you are saying. But, to nitpick and get into semantics, we do not "assign" sex. Even if we perform a surgical procedure on genitalia, we still do not assign sex. As shown by the definition I posted above, sex is determined by many characteristics, only one of which is genitalia.
We do, however, "assign" gender. As pointed out in the definitions I posted previously, gender is "assigned" based on a variety of sex characteristics, the primary one being genitalia.
We tend to use sex and gender interchangeably, which, unfortunately, is done in the law as well, which is a mistake.
If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers
Emery's Third Coast Triathlon | Tri Wisconsin Triathlon Team | Push Endurance | GLWR