desert dude wrote:
I like how this bike looks. It's sweet. For a straight up TT hells yeah!
Yet, I'm going to be the naysayer on this thread.
In today's tri world that's a TT bike or a sprint or oly tri bike, not a 70.3 for the masses, maybe the more discriminant STer, but not the avg triathlete and definitely not an IM focused bike. Orbea missed the mark on the LC segment, which is biggest segment of the market, at least the NA market.
It doesn't answer the questions around storage. Where to place bottles or food. Most triathletes are going to end up hanging stuff all over that bike negating many of the benefits they designed it for. You're seeing it's fastest iteration. A tiny aero downtube bottle, no bosses, no integrated aero neutral storage options.
The avg triathlete is going to make that bike the equivalent of a U-haul truck.
Does it look good? It sure does. Do you think it solves hydration& nutrition issues for IM racing?
very good points, but i dont think this bike is much different than something like the P5 Disc if you really think about it.
i think the addition of a top tube provision for a bento box would have been a good idea. unless im just missing it in the photos im not seeing one.
outside that i could easily make this bike work for 70.3. BTA bottle solution, downtube bottle and one behind the seat bottle full of calorie mix and id be good. thats 3 full hours worth of nutrition on the bike, completely bypassing aid stations. if youre an aid station kinda athlete i dont really see why one couldnt live off the land for a full distance.
80/20 Endurance Ambassador