JasoninHalifax wrote:
of course it's a tough decision, no-one has said otherwise. But there is clearly a "correct" decision and an "incorrect" one here (the correct one does not contravene the rules of the sport, the incorrect one does).
The correct alternatives are either to take the medication and not race, or to not take the medication and continue racing. (or to not take the medication and not race, but that isn't really one of the desireable options). The incorrect alternative is to take the medication and continue to race, as that is against the rules of the sport, which are the athletes' responsibilities to know.
Exactly. I also have health issues (including hormonal imbalances, osteoporosis, digestive tract issues), and sometimes my physicians have suggested meds that, as it turns out, are prohibited in competition ( the most recent was a corticosteroid suppository). Each time, I've pulled up the Global DRO, and if it's on the list, asked the doctor if there's something else that's NOT prohibited.
It hasn't come down to this yet, but if I absolutely had to go on something that was prohibited, that would be end of competition for me.
I find her refusal to act similarly really offensive, both to the spirit of sport in general and to others like myself who choose to play within the rules.