Maybe it's just me, but is anyone else bombarded with constant FB brags about Crossfit WOD's? I have met a lot of cross fit people over the last couple years. They are everywhere now! I have had to unfollow several in recent days, due to non-stop and not so subtle bragging and bravado. I wish I could hand them all a Hero Cookie. Does anyone else run into this? I do think the sport is a great way to get injured. On another note, why do all the crossfit men think that copious amounts of facial hair are so cool? It has made me appreciate the triathlon community a lot more.
Triathlon Forum
Login required to started new threads
Login required to post replies
Re: Crossfit [mwanner1]
[ In reply to ]
Re: Crossfit [mwanner1]
[ In reply to ]
I agree, how can my friends see my garmin connect workout updates on their facebook feeds with all crossfit updates going on there.
Re: Crossfit [Kevin in MD]
[ In reply to ]
Kevin in MD wrote:
I agree, how can my friends see my garmin connect workout updates on their facebook feeds with all crossfit updates going on there.
Re: Crossfit [mwanner1]
[ In reply to ]
The first rule of Cross-Fit (Fight Club) is: "You Must Talk about Crossfit".
Re: Crossfit [mwanner1]
[ In reply to ]
mwanner1 wrote:
On another note, why do all the crossfit men think that copious amounts of facial hair are so cool?Say what you want about Crossfit, but leave the facial hair out of this.
----------------------------------
http://ironvision.blogspot.com ; @drSteve1663
Re: Crossfit [mwanner1]
[ In reply to ]
Not going to lie, I watched some of the CrossFit Games on ESPN this weekend.
Re: Crossfit [mwanner1]
[ In reply to ]
Well you know what the worst part about crossfit is...???
Crossfitters
Crossfitters
Re: Crossfit [mwanner1]
[ In reply to ]
say what you want ( I dont't CF but a friend own a "box") but their Championship that is going on right now pays their Elite stars $$$$$$$$$ unlike WTC so they have something right
"Base training is bull shit" - desertdude
"Base training is bull shit" - desertdude
Re: Crossfit [3Aims]
[ In reply to ]
And did you laugh hysterically at the meatheads trying to run 800m? Crossfit= meathead triathlon
Re: Crossfit [drsteve]
[ In reply to ]
mwanner1 wrote:
On another note, why do all the crossfit men think that copious amounts of facial hair are so cool?And now you are bashing their taste in women? Geesh, this never ends
Re: Crossfit [mwanner1]
[ In reply to ]
life and Facebook would be pretty boring if all we hear and see are the hear are the stuff that we are only interested in.
__________________________________________________________________________
My marathon PR is "under three, high twos. I had a two hour and fifty-something."
__________________________________________________________________________
My marathon PR is "under three, high twos. I had a two hour and fifty-something."
Re: Crossfit [thirstygreek]
[ In reply to ]
thirstygreek wrote:
say what you want ( I dont't CF but a friend own a "box") but their Championship that is going on right now pays their Elite stars $$$$$$$$$ unlike WTC so they have something rightFor the record do any of the other events pay (significant) prize money?
Re: Crossfit [thirstygreek]
[ In reply to ]
thirstygreek wrote:
... their Championship ... pays their Elite stars $$$$$$$$$ unlike WTC so they have something rightReebok has deep pockets
"What's your claim?" - Ben Gravy
"Your best work is the work you're excited about" - Rick Rubin
Re: Crossfit [adktriguy46]
[ In reply to ]
adktriguy46 wrote:
And did you laugh hysterically at the meatheads trying to run 800m? Crossfit= meathead triathlonWent to look for footage of this and all I found was a random video from a regional meet. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-DP8IGuOcA
It made me laugh though because of this:
Uploader's description:
"Doing the 800m run at the start of Workout A. I'm running in my Vibram Five Fingers. I definitely need to relax more (especially my arms/traps) and I think I'm reaching too far forward with each step."
Comment on video:
"yes relax those arms and lower them also having a bigger stride is a plus, not a negative, how can gaining more distance with less energy bad?"
Re: Crossfit [zoom]
[ In reply to ]
I agree that life would be boring, if everyone had the same interests. I think my point is how certain groups can be really overbearing with ramming their content and beliefs down our throats. Crossfitters have turned into that group for me. I guess the equivalent would be posting daily run and swim workout videos accompanied by say the occasional 3 to 5 hour GoPro cycling video. Don't forget, daily Garmin data downloads and then national triathlon news stories and daily links to Ironman.com. In addition, a daily brag post or two would make it complete. Get the idea? It gets old quick no matter what your interests are. For whatever reason, the crossfitters are the absolute worst about this kind of thing on my FB.
Re: Crossfit [mwanner1]
[ In reply to ]
Sort of in the same boat. No, I don't care to see your video of your 400 pound back squat PR. And the video of the 410 pound back squat PR two weeks later, ad nauseam.
And about the facial hair, google Rick Froning. All dude Crossfitter aspire to be and look like him.... :)
And about the facial hair, google Rick Froning. All dude Crossfitter aspire to be and look like him.... :)
Re: Crossfit [3Aims]
[ In reply to ]
watched some of it too because there was nothing else on.
The swim was funny. Those pull up things were crazy. The pushing of a 500lb thing over and over looks like a great way to get hurt. Carrying a log whoever far looks just plain stupid as far as sport goes. It's weird and didn't make me want to join a box.
The swim was funny. Those pull up things were crazy. The pushing of a 500lb thing over and over looks like a great way to get hurt. Carrying a log whoever far looks just plain stupid as far as sport goes. It's weird and didn't make me want to join a box.
Re: Crossfit [mwanner1]
[ In reply to ]
Re: Crossfit [slow123]
[ In reply to ]
slow123 wrote:
Thank you. That so cracked me up. :D
Re: Crossfit [mwanner1]
[ In reply to ]
On another note, why do all the crossfit men think that copious amounts of facial hair are so cool?
I only watched the womens where there is copious amounts of kinesio tape.
I only watched the womens where there is copious amounts of kinesio tape.
Re: Crossfit [schroeder]
[ In reply to ]
Not a CF fan myself , but in terms of conformity of appearance we are no better. I've just spent a weekend surrounded by a LOT of shaved head guys wearing compression socks and oakleys. As someone who fits that description too I find it very comforting.
Brian
“Eat and Drink, spin the legs and you’re going to effin push (today).†A Howe
Brian
“Eat and Drink, spin the legs and you’re going to effin push (today).†A Howe
Re: Crossfit [TriBri00]
[ In reply to ]
TriBri00 wrote:
Not a CF fan myself , but in terms of conformity of appearance we are no better. I've just spent a weekend surrounded by a LOT of shaved head guys wearing compression socks and oakleys. As someone who fits that description too I find it very comforting.Agreed. I do my 100% best NOT to ever look like a triathlete.
So weird that we can have our own thing we like but anything else is shitty and not effective. Who cares? Do you guys trash the old ladies doing Zumba and Bodypump too? Ever talked to a triathlete all they want to talk about is their "training" and their bricks and OW swims blah blah. Everyone is into different shit, get over it.
"Base training is bull shit" - desertdude
Re: Crossfit [sto]
[ In reply to ]
sto wrote:
Sort of in the same boat. No, I don't care to see your video of your 400 pound back squat PR. And the video of the 410 pound back squat PR two weeks later, ad nauseam. And about the facial hair, google Rick Froning. All dude Crossfitter aspire to be and look like him.... :)
It's not this guy, is it?
Re: Crossfit [mwanner1]
[ In reply to ]
Totally..... thank god triathletes don't brag or do weird stuff ;-)
Re: Crossfit [thirstygreek]
[ In reply to ]
thirstygreek wrote:
TriBri00 wrote:
Not a CF fan myself , but in terms of conformity of appearance we are no better. I've just spent a weekend surrounded by a LOT of shaved head guys wearing compression socks and oakleys. As someone who fits that description too I find it very comforting.Agreed. I do my 100% best NOT to ever look like a triathlete.
So weird that we can have our own thing we like but anything else is shitty and not effective. Who cares? Do you guys trash the old ladies doing Zumba and Bodypump too? Ever talked to a triathlete all they want to talk about is their "training" and their bricks and OW swims blah blah. Everyone is into different shit, get over it.
One thing I don't get is why people show up in their trisuit for the bike check-in the day before the race.
Re: Crossfit [rijndael]
[ In reply to ]
rijndael wrote:
The first rule of Cross-Fit is: "You Must ALWAYS Talk about Crossfit".You forgot a word
"What's your claim?" - Ben Gravy
"Your best work is the work you're excited about" - Rick Rubin
Re: Crossfit [Staz]
[ In reply to ]
Staz wrote:
thirstygreek wrote:
TriBri00 wrote:
Not a CF fan myself , but in terms of conformity of appearance we are no better. I've just spent a weekend surrounded by a LOT of shaved head guys wearing compression socks and oakleys. As someone who fits that description too I find it very comforting.Agreed. I do my 100% best NOT to ever look like a triathlete.
So weird that we can have our own thing we like but anything else is shitty and not effective. Who cares? Do you guys trash the old ladies doing Zumba and Bodypump too? Ever talked to a triathlete all they want to talk about is their "training" and their bricks and OW swims blah blah. Everyone is into different shit, get over it.
One thing I don't get is why people show up in their trisuit for the bike check-in the day before the race.
I saw that at a local sprint and I had no clue what was going on. All I could do was say I'm glad I'm not THAT guy!
Re: Crossfit [skip]
[ In reply to ]
Just read this on ESPN, is Crossfit going to go after them too?
http://espn.go.com/espn/otl/story/_/id/11262964/crossf-explosive-growth-fuels-safety-concerns#correx
http://espn.go.com/espn/otl/story/_/id/11262964/crossf-explosive-growth-fuels-safety-concerns#correx
Re: Crossfit [sto]
[ In reply to ]
sto wrote:
Sort of in the same boat. No, I don't care to see your video of your 400 pound back squat PR. And the video of the 410 pound back squat PR two weeks later, ad nauseam. And about the facial hair, google Rick Froning. All dude Crossfitter aspire to be and look like him.... :)
I would be more than happy to look like him.
______________________________________________
"Sweep the leg...Do you have a problem with that?" - John Kreese
Re: Crossfit [sto]
[ In reply to ]
sto wrote:
Sort of in the same boat. No, I don't care to see your video of your 400 pound back squat PR. And the video of the 410 pound back squat PR two weeks later, ad nauseam.So don't watch them then, the same as they probably don't want to see the video of some tri guy before and after he takes out 4mm of stem spacers and posts repeated check my fit videos..
Re: Crossfit [mwanner1]
[ In reply to ]
next you are going to bitch about all the facial hair on the girls!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Crossfit [3Aims]
[ In reply to ]
3Aims wrote:
Not going to lie, I watched some of the CrossFit Games on ESPN this weekend.What did 7th place earn?
Re: Crossfit [walie]
[ In reply to ]
I think the injury issue is overstated, all sports lead to the potential for injury. A good friend is a PT and he said the number one activity he sees injury from (sport related injury) is runners, followed by high school sports such as soccer, football, basketball, and then triathletes/cyclists. I asked about CF and he said he has seen a few but nothing like the media has hyped it up to be. He said he recently attended a med conference which addressed CF and the potential injuries and the general vibe was that it was not going to be a sport driving people into PT's offices/ serious injury.
I think part of the drive against CF is because the typical gyms are hurting and trying to push a PR campaign to get people out of CF and back into spin class. I asked a GM of a local Lifetime fitness who he views as his primary competition and he said without a doubt CF, he said they draw all backgorunds and its hard to get people to come back to a normal gym.
I think part of the drive against CF is because the typical gyms are hurting and trying to push a PR campaign to get people out of CF and back into spin class. I asked a GM of a local Lifetime fitness who he views as his primary competition and he said without a doubt CF, he said they draw all backgorunds and its hard to get people to come back to a normal gym.
Re: Crossfit [-Mike-]
[ In reply to ]
I just realized something while reading your post.
Aren't crossfitters essentially the weightlifting versions of us?
Aren't crossfitters essentially the weightlifting versions of us?
Re: Crossfit [Staz]
[ In reply to ]
Yep, they are exactly like us, in fact in their definition they state the goal of CF is to be generalists of the "ten fitness domains". They pretty much do everything triathletes do and like triathletes assume they are better than everybody else because they are somewhat skilled in multiple sports.
Re: Crossfit [-Mike-]
[ In reply to ]
-Mike- wrote:
Yep, they are exactly like us, in fact in their definition they state the goal of CF is to be generalists of the "ten fitness domains". They pretty much do everything triathletes do and like triathletes assume they are better than everybody else because they are somewhat skilled in multiple sports.You seem knowledgeable about CF. What's the deal with this event*? Specifically, what's up with having to hold the rope?
http://games.crossfit.com/...eam-6-mile-relay-run
*I like watching the CF games.
My triathlon training blog
Re: Crossfit [-Mike-]
[ In reply to ]
+1 Can't deny the fact that I took up CF in my off season and the strength gains are very noticeable in my training this year.
Can't imagine CF people complaining about all the tri people talking about workouts in their feeds :D
Whole injury thing is hype. Pick a responsible organization/"box" to train at where they don't allow you to sacrifice form for weight and have the personal accountability to know your limits and its just like any other sport. In my n=1 experience I've been busted up more in my tri training and other sports than I have in CF.
Can't imagine CF people complaining about all the tri people talking about workouts in their feeds :D
Whole injury thing is hype. Pick a responsible organization/"box" to train at where they don't allow you to sacrifice form for weight and have the personal accountability to know your limits and its just like any other sport. In my n=1 experience I've been busted up more in my tri training and other sports than I have in CF.
Re: Crossfit [tejanatab]
[ In reply to ]
tejanatab wrote:
-Mike- wrote:
Yep, they are exactly like us, in fact in their definition they state the goal of CF is to be generalists of the "ten fitness domains". They pretty much do everything triathletes do and like triathletes assume they are better than everybody else because they are somewhat skilled in multiple sports.You seem knowledgeable about CF. What's the deal with this event*? Specifically, what's up with having to hold the rope?
http://games.crossfit.com/...eam-6-mile-relay-run
*I like watching the CF games.
I calculate the winners ran 6.5min/mile pace for the run. Not shabby at all considering how much muscle mass they all have.
I recon the rope is just to keep the paired team together. Also gives a chance to add equipment (a rope) into the event.
Re: Crossfit [ATLTri]
[ In reply to ]
That's nice, but I could have someone do pushups situps etc. and still see significant strength gains. It is not a strength and conditioning system for sports. For a soccer player does it make you faster, does it make your cuts quicker, does it make you jump higher. No one really cares that you can lift more wt (snatch, jerk, clean, etc.) don't mean crap if it doesn't make you a better athlete. Just lifting more doesn't necessarily make you a better athlete.
Re: Crossfit [HomerJSimpson]
[ In reply to ]
are you joking?
Re: Crossfit [tejanatab]
[ In reply to ]
The role holding was part of a relay in the team division. There is a masters division (think age group), team competition, and then the individual competition ( "pro"). Most of the dumb stuff happens in the team events/masters where people are really not that fit at all and lots of bad form etc. You also get more steroid use in the masters/team competitions as well which i think diminishes its legitimacy as well.
I like watching CF and do it on occasion as its a good method of weight training in my opinion but i have no illusion that it will make me faster.
I like watching CF and do it on occasion as its a good method of weight training in my opinion but i have no illusion that it will make me faster.
Re: Crossfit [ATLTri]
[ In reply to ]
No and if you think differently you have no concept as to principles of strength and conditioning nor exercise physiology. Mi suggest you go read up on both.
Re: Crossfit [HomerJSimpson]
[ In reply to ]
HomerJSimpson wrote:
No one really cares that you can lift more wt (snatch, jerk, clean, etc.) don't mean crap if it doesn't make you a better athlete. Just lifting more doesn't necessarily make you a better athlete.perhaps you should notify the Olympic weightlifters... oh the irony. That's like a weightlifter saying "just running a quicker marathon doesn't make you a better athlete." You're comparing two totally dissimilar sports and claiming only one competitor is an "athlete"
"4 wheels move the body, 2 wheels move the soul"
Last edited by:
warwicke36: Jul 31, 14 7:42
Re: Crossfit [warwicke36]
[ In reply to ]
warwicke36 wrote:
HomerJSimpson wrote:
No one really cares that you can lift more wt (snatch, jerk, clean, etc.) don't mean crap if it doesn't make you a better athlete. Just lifting more doesn't necessarily make you a better athlete.perhaps you should notify the Olympic weightlifters... oh the irony. That's like a weightlifter saying "just running a quicker marathon doesn't make you a better athlete." You're comparing two totally dissimilar sports and claiming only one competitor is an "athlete"
Agreed. Needs of the athlete will always dictate their best training methods. Clean, snatch, jerk...those are all explosive movements meant to train for explosive strength and speed, beneficial for all athletes mentioned. Go to most collegiate weight rooms and you will see the teams performing all of these movements in conjunction with your squats and controlled movements. Strength comes in many forms.
Power to weight ratio is the bottom line, holds true for humans as well as machines. As long as the athlete with agility and speed demands does not compromise their speed, agility and flexibility with the added strength/weight gains then they are improving and going to perform well.
Re: Crossfit [HomerJSimpson]
[ In reply to ]
HomerJSimpson wrote:
No one really cares that you can lift more wt (snatch, jerk, clean, etc.) don't mean crap if it doesn't make you a better athlete. Just lifting more doesn't necessarily make you a better athlete.Depends on the sport obviously, but there is absolutely a correlation between compound movement explosive strength and explosiveness in many components of many different sports. That is not even debatable and it is backed by decades of EBR. If there wasn't, college and professional programs wouldn't be spending millions per year on equipment and s&c coaches. Now, crossfit generally does not teach the most efficient methods to improving this explosiveness; high rep explosive movements is a definite WTF no matter how you dice it.
Re: Crossfit [devrock]
[ In reply to ]
devrock wrote:
slow123 wrote:
Thank you. That so cracked me up. :D
yup! haha
love when the new dude shows up and drops a post on what he/she thinks might be a novel topic. Note to all: Search Function is a good friend
Say, on the topic of Powercranks ?:)...
.
Re: Crossfit [HomerJSimpson]
[ In reply to ]
HomerJSimpson wrote:
No and if you think differently you have no concept as to principles of strength and conditioning nor exercise physiology. Mi suggest you go read up on both.WATCH THE VIDEO.
"4 wheels move the body, 2 wheels move the soul"
Last edited by:
warwicke36: Jul 31, 14 8:25
Re: Crossfit [Staz]
[ In reply to ]
Staz wrote:
One thing I don't get is why people show up in their trisuit for the bike check-in the day before the race.
You mean you DON'T sleep in your trisuit?
Re: Crossfit [stop2think]
[ In reply to ]
The difference is these are incorporated into a proper strength program at most colleges that utilize a proper professional. No program relies on these alone as they are primarily single plane exercise, where most sports rely on multi plane movements
Re: Crossfit [HomerJSimpson]
[ In reply to ]
says the DPT/CSCS/SCS?
Example: You tell me strengthening and establishing flexibility/resilience in the posterior chain (through any method, not just CF) does not translate to running/cycling?
If your training plan doesn't include strength training similar to some CF movements and focus (squats, core, etc.) you're missing out.
Example: You tell me strengthening and establishing flexibility/resilience in the posterior chain (through any method, not just CF) does not translate to running/cycling?
If your training plan doesn't include strength training similar to some CF movements and focus (squats, core, etc.) you're missing out.
Re: Crossfit [HomerJSimpson]
[ In reply to ]
HomerJSimpson wrote:
The difference is these are incorporated into a proper strength program at most colleges that utilize a proper professional. No program relies on these alone as they are primarily single plane exercise, where most sports rely on multi plane movementsThat has nothing whatsoever to do with your original post. Are you really suggesting that in crossfit they only do movements in the sagital plane? If so, it's not even worth having a conversation. There are a lot of things to dislike about crossfit, this is not one of them.
The ignorance and hypocrisy from both crossfitters and endurance athletes when discussing each others sport never ceases to amaze me.
Re: Crossfit [stop2think]
[ In reply to ]
Agreed.
Apparently OWL is the only thing that is in CF training.
Apparently OWL is the only thing that is in CF training.
Re: Crossfit [ATLTri]
[ In reply to ]
Having just read the new Lava "Lindsay Corbin" issue, it describes her physical therapist's plan for her rehab from stress fractures. Shockingly it included 2X per week of heavy lifting right up until Kona race day last year (ala crossfit, but probably without the "for time" component (which IMHO is how people like me got injured in Crossfit, that and trying to life too much weight too soon but I let my desire to keep up with the younger ladies outweigh my physical ability (dumb ego!).
Bree Wee also does Crossfit.
I'm just sayin...
Bree Wee also does Crossfit.
I'm just sayin...
Re: Crossfit [sto]
[ In reply to ]
indeed.
agreed in what gets people into trouble in CF is not being accountable to themselves in relation to their abilities and the coaches not checking them.
A good box helps with that.
agreed in what gets people into trouble in CF is not being accountable to themselves in relation to their abilities and the coaches not checking them.
A good box helps with that.
Re: Crossfit [ATLTri]
[ In reply to ]
Senescence- aging over time.
Is a fatal disease.
Exercise is one strategy that has proven to be somewhat sucessful in dealing with the problem of senescence.
Many people seem to mistake the "treatment" for the disease with the disease itself.
Runners- how often do we hear:
"Running destroys your knees?"
No -old age, being over weight, and inactive, destroys your knees.
Running is simply incapable of overcoming all problems.
Random accidents and senelecence are part of life. Weight training did not invent theses problems.
On the other hand, dilettantism is also a symptom of aging. Doing random stuff in a half-ass way is an expression of dilettantism. Much weight training (and especially crossfit) seem more an expression of dilettantism than "exercise."
Triathlon might be the stupidest "challenge" ever.
Yet lap swimming, weight training, cross fit- are simply activities that many people do to convince themselves they are doing "something."
When in fact they are doing nothing.
Even a stupid challenge is better than that.
Is a fatal disease.
Exercise is one strategy that has proven to be somewhat sucessful in dealing with the problem of senescence.
Many people seem to mistake the "treatment" for the disease with the disease itself.
Runners- how often do we hear:
"Running destroys your knees?"
No -old age, being over weight, and inactive, destroys your knees.
Running is simply incapable of overcoming all problems.
Random accidents and senelecence are part of life. Weight training did not invent theses problems.
On the other hand, dilettantism is also a symptom of aging. Doing random stuff in a half-ass way is an expression of dilettantism. Much weight training (and especially crossfit) seem more an expression of dilettantism than "exercise."
Triathlon might be the stupidest "challenge" ever.
Yet lap swimming, weight training, cross fit- are simply activities that many people do to convince themselves they are doing "something."
When in fact they are doing nothing.
Even a stupid challenge is better than that.
Re: Crossfit [stop2think]
[ In reply to ]
Whats to dislike is a program that fundamentally ignores most scientific principles around strength and conditioning but follows the rantings of an ignorant founder who decides whatever he thinks is fact.
Crossfit is a program that primarily uses olympic lifts to form the basis of its programming. Been there, done it, waste of time
Crossfit is a program that primarily uses olympic lifts to form the basis of its programming. Been there, done it, waste of time
Re: Crossfit [HomerJSimpson]
[ In reply to ]
HomerJSimpson wrote:
Whats to dislike is a program that fundamentally ignores most scientific principles around strength and conditioning but follows the rantings of an ignorant founder who decides whatever he thinks is fact. Crossfit is a program that primarily uses olympic lifts to form the basis of its programming. Been there, done it, waste of time
Once again, a post which has absolutely nothing to do with your original statement that we all disagree with. Yes, crossfit does include quite a bit of olympic lifting (which sadly very few others do nowadays), but to say it is the primary means of programming is pure ignorance. This is just like the myth that crossfitters do no endurance training...except for the fact that in the last Crossfit games more than 25% of the events including long bouts of running/swimming/biking/rowing. You sound more bitter and ignorant with each response.
We get it, you don't like lifting heavy things, that does not make your original statement any less asinine. Lifting heavy things in an explosive manner is very beneficial to many components of many sports. Period, end of story.
I am the farthest thing from a crossfit proponent and share your disdain for the odd culture, the absurdity of some of the methodology, and (most certainly) Glassman, but as someone who studied exercise physiology for a very long time (PhD, MS, CSCS, PES, CES) and is a former professional strength coach; statements like your original one really rub me the wrong way.
Re: Crossfit [ATLTri]
[ In reply to ]
Not what I am saying. They do help but they don't necessarily make you a better athlete in said sport. All that I am saying.
Example. Strength Coach to coach. Billy can squat 200lbs more than six months ago.
Coach to strength coach. That's nice but can he run faster.
These things are not mutually connected.
Example. Strength Coach to coach. Billy can squat 200lbs more than six months ago.
Coach to strength coach. That's nice but can he run faster.
These things are not mutually connected.
Re: Crossfit [stop2think]
[ In reply to ]
Sorry. That's nice but I also have a PHD in exercise physiology. Teach at university, CSCS certified l, PES and no Olympic lifts contrary to what you believe are not necessary to make you a better athlete. They make you better at Olympic Lifting. They do not necessarily make you a better athlete. I have worked with many pro football players who were weight room hero's and on the field zero's.
Hmm. Last time I was at the NFL combine there was only one lifting test, bench. No Olympic lifting tests.
Hmm. Last time I was at the NFL combine there was only one lifting test, bench. No Olympic lifting tests.
Re: Crossfit [HomerJSimpson]
[ In reply to ]
HomerJSimpson wrote:
Sorry. That's nice but I also have a PHD in exercise physiology. Teach at university, CSCS certified l, PES and no Olympic lifts contrary to what you believe are not necessary to make you a better athlete. They make you better at Olympic Lifting. They do not necessarily make you a better athlete. I have worked with many pro football players who were weight room hero's and on the field zero's. Hmm. Last time I was at the NFL combine there was only one lifting test, bench. No Olympic lifting tests.
Would you like to re-read your original statement instead of continuing to go off on tangents? You could replace olympic lifting with running (in your original post) and come to the exact same conclusion. Does running more automatically make you better at your sport (unless your sport is running)?
And please tell me you did not just insinuate that the sub-maximal load for maximum rep bench press was a more relevant metric for football than an olympic movement. The bench press is there for one single reason: it is safer. From a functional standpoint the movement and the volume are almost completely useless for football. Are you also going to argue that olympic movements do not assist in improving vertical and broad jumping ability (which they do test at the combine)? Excuse me for questioning your credentials as you continue to make ridiculous posts.
Last edited by:
stop2think: Jul 31, 14 13:32
Re: Crossfit [stop2think]
[ In reply to ]
Triathlon- a ridiculous and arbitrary challenge of fitness and endurance that some people pursue as an end in itself and which others pursue as a reason for which to "exercise."
Triathlon training-a systematic program of exercise and skill training with the explicit goal of making one faster at triathlon.
Crossfit training- a ridiculous set of activities without sense or purpose (unless looking good to other meatheads is a purpose).
Crossfit games- a competition designed to give a purpose to the "crossfit" activities.
There was the guy who tied weather balloons to his lawn chair and drifted into LAX airspace. When asked why he said:
"I guy has gotta do something. Can't just sit around watching tv."
True!!
But first we should chose a goal and then figure out how to achieve it.
Not just do random stuff and then try to justify it.
Triathlon training-a systematic program of exercise and skill training with the explicit goal of making one faster at triathlon.
Crossfit training- a ridiculous set of activities without sense or purpose (unless looking good to other meatheads is a purpose).
Crossfit games- a competition designed to give a purpose to the "crossfit" activities.
There was the guy who tied weather balloons to his lawn chair and drifted into LAX airspace. When asked why he said:
"I guy has gotta do something. Can't just sit around watching tv."
True!!
But first we should chose a goal and then figure out how to achieve it.
Not just do random stuff and then try to justify it.
Re: Crossfit [dirtymangos]
[ In reply to ]
dirtymangos wrote:
Triathlon- a ridiculous and arbitrary challenge of fitness and endurance that some people pursue as an end in itself and which others pursue as a reason for which to "exercise." Triathlon training-a systematic program of exercise and skill training with the explicit goal of making one faster at triathlon.
Crossfit training- a ridiculous set of activities without sense or purpose (unless looking good to other meatheads is a purpose).
Crossfit games- a competition designed to give a purpose to the "crossfit" activities.
There was the guy who tied weather balloons to his lawn chair and drifted into LAX airspace. When asked why he said:
"I guy has gotta do something. Can't just sit around watching tv."
True!!
But first we should chose a goal and then figure out how to achieve it.
Not just do random stuff and then try to justify it.
For a while I struggled with why I didn't "get" crossfit, but this is pretty much it. It's like they created a competition to test their workout routine, like the World's Strongest Man, but with better marketing.
Chris Harris
Re: Crossfit [stop2think]
[ In reply to ]
I highly doubt yours as well. Keep going in circles if you like but again Olympic lifting is not a singular way of improving strength and power like you are arguing. I could just as easily put together a plyometric program which would be better for long jump or vertical improvement.
Peace
Peace
Re: Crossfit [HomerJSimpson]
[ In reply to ]
HomerJSimpson wrote:
I highly doubt yours as well. Keep going in circles if you like but again Olympic lifting is not a singular way of improving strength and power like you are arguing. I could just as easily put together a plyometric program which would be better for long jump or vertical improvement. Peace
I'm sure you are familiar with the maxim; I am going to stop arguing with the idiot....and then go tell my football players that we are going to run a 5k today.
Re: Crossfit [dirtymangos]
[ In reply to ]
>Not just do random stuff and then try to justify it.
I don't get your distinction. Triathlon is also just random stuff that we justify by turning into a competition.
Re: Crossfit [trail]
[ In reply to ]
trail wrote:
>Not just do random stuff and then try to justify it. I don't get your distinction. Triathlon is also just random stuff that we justify by turning into a competition.
Triathlon might be random. (I said "ridiculous" and "arbitrary".)
Triathlon training, however, is a systematic process for achieving this "ridiculous" and "arbitrary" goal.
I have a stupid goal. The best way to achieve this goal is x followed by y, followed by z.
Crossfit does not start out with a goal at all. (Unless looking good to other meatheads counts). It starts out with a bunch of pointless activities. Crossfit games and a bunch of psuedo-psuedo science is then used to justify the activities.
This seems backwards.
If life is a journey, it is not the end destination that counts. Who cares that triathlon is pointless?
But without a destination, one is just wandering around aimlessly. One never gets anywhere at all.
Just lingering around the box!!
Dedication to a recognizably pointless goal is probably a hall mark of a certain kind if person.
We want to do things.
Anything!
The stupider, often the better.
(Like triathlon).
It is not enough to act like we are doing things.
It is not enough to look like we might have done something.
It is not enough to "feel" like we have done something.
Not to be judg
Re: Crossfit [dirtymangos]
[ In reply to ]
dirtymangos wrote:
Triathlon training, however, is a systematic process for achieving this "ridiculous" and "arbitrary" goal.
For everyone? you are 100% positive that this is the case for everyone?
Quote:
Crossfit does not start out with a goal at all.For everyone? you are 100% positive that this is the case for everyone?
I've met people personally who started crossfit with goals and I have met people who started triathlon with no goals.
Re: Crossfit [dirtymangos]
[ In reply to ]
>Crossfit does not start out with a goal at all.
Sure it starts with a goal. The goal is to increase fitness, with the definition of fitness provided by Crossfit, e.g. a broad mix of strength, stamina, etc. Also I think there's an unstated goal to "look good."
Crossfit training is also highly structured and systematic.
>It starts out with a bunch of pointless activities.
Pointless to whom? That's an arbitrary judgment. Running for the sake of running faster is no more "meaningful" than doing pull-ups for the sake of doing more pull-ups.
(I'm not a Crossfitter, so have no real dog in this fight, I just find the vocal criticism to be odd. From my perception it's a little cultish, but also a healthy, time-efficient way to stay physically fit.)
Re: Crossfit [trail]
[ In reply to ]
Trail. It appears you and I agree on a broad array of topics. Including this one. I too have no strong feeling about CF but agree fully on your assesment.
"4 wheels move the body, 2 wheels move the soul"
"4 wheels move the body, 2 wheels move the soul"
Re: Crossfit [mrtopher1980]
[ In reply to ]
mrtopher1980 wrote:
dirtymangos wrote:
Triathlon training, however, is a systematic process for achieving this "ridiculous" and "arbitrary" goal.
For everyone? you are 100% positive that this is the case for everyone?
Quote:
Crossfit does not start out with a goal at all.
For everyone? you are 100% positive that this is the case for everyone?
I've met people personally who started crossfit with goals and I have met people who started triathlon with no goals.
Why is such a significant faction of this board so myopic? I can just see this very same thread on a crossfit board, with the crossfit and triathlon interchanged in Dirtymango's statement, and getting the exact same response. The sports have way more commonalities than they do differences; competitors in conventional sports are laughing at you both for treating exercise as a sport and having no real purpose/goals...and they would be ignorant as well.
Last edited by:
stop2think: Jul 31, 14 15:40
Re: Crossfit [stop2think]
[ In reply to ]
I agree that crossfit and triathlon are very similar in the sense that they're a relatively random set of activities put together to form a new entity with the objective being to be either the "strongest" (using that word to make the analogy simple) or the "fastest" for the two respectively. Basically to oversimplify a little they're just the weightlifting and aerobic equivalents of each other.
Re: Crossfit [trail]
[ In reply to ]
People on here are just pissed that all the hot chicks do crossfit and date CF guys.
Re: Crossfit [stop2think]
[ In reply to ]
stop2think wrote:
mrtopher1980 wrote:
dirtymangos wrote:
Triathlon training, however, is a systematic process for achieving this "ridiculous" and "arbitrary" goal.
For everyone? you are 100% positive that this is the case for everyone?
Quote:
Crossfit does not start out with a goal at all.
For everyone? you are 100% positive that this is the case for everyone?
I've met people personally who started crossfit with goals and I have met people who started triathlon with no goals.
Why is such a significant faction of this board so myopic? I can just see this very same thread on a crossfit board, with the crossfit and triathlon interchanged in Dirtymango's statement, and getting the exact same response. The sports have way more commonalities than they do differences; competitors in conventional sports are laughing at you both for treating exercise as a sport and having no real purpose/goals...and they would be ignorant as well.
My post is the exact opposite of being myopic... Possibly if you yourself were not so shortsighted you could see I was in no way defending either one.
Re: Crossfit [Pantelones]
[ In reply to ]
Pantelones wrote:
tejanatab wrote:
-Mike- wrote:
Yep, they are exactly like us, in fact in their definition they state the goal of CF is to be generalists of the "ten fitness domains". They pretty much do everything triathletes do and like triathletes assume they are better than everybody else because they are somewhat skilled in multiple sports.You seem knowledgeable about CF. What's the deal with this event*? Specifically, what's up with having to hold the rope?
http://games.crossfit.com/...eam-6-mile-relay-run
*I like watching the CF games.
I calculate the winners ran 6.5min/mile pace for the run. Not shabby at all considering how much muscle mass they all have.
I recon the rope is just to keep the paired team together. Also gives a chance to add equipment (a rope) into the event.
Professional CrossFitters do not do CrossFit for training. They cant. CrossFit is not training, it is cross fitness, the exact opposite of training. They train just like any other professional lifter does, like we do, like everyone does: repetition in what you want to improve in.
Also, 6:30 per mile for two miles is nothing special. I can, and have, done that rate for that distance and I am dead average in my age group for run times and I am far from a professional anything.
Re: Crossfit [trail]
[ In reply to ]
trail wrote:
>Crossfit does not start out with a goal at all.
Sure it starts with a goal. The goal is to increase fitness, with the definition of fitness provided by Crossfit, e.g. a broad mix of strength, stamina, etc. Also I think there's an unstated goal to "look good."
Crossfit training is also highly structured and systematic.
>It starts out with a bunch of pointless activities.
Pointless to whom? That's an arbitrary judgment. Running for the sake of running faster is no more "meaningful" than doing pull-ups for the sake of doing more pull-ups.
(I'm not a Crossfitter, so have no real dog in this fight, I just find the vocal criticism to be odd. From my perception it's a little cultish, but also a healthy, time-efficient way to stay physically fit.)
Being "fit" as defined by crossfit?
That is circular or self referential.
I think a goal must have some external measure.
Running is a component of football, soccer, etc.
But it was also the very first sport. The first means of rapid transportation. It is a "thing" in and of itself.
Pull ups are good training for gymnastics and rock climbing.
But an end in themselves?
If so then, why not look at each of the components of pull ups?
To train for pull ups we will practice grabbing a bar, moving biceps etc.
Are those "sports."
How about thinking about doing pull-ups?
Could that be a valid "sport?"
Thinking is part of doing pull ups, and pull ups are good training for rock climbing, which is useful in mountaineering, which could take you to Everest.
So, thinking about doing a pull up is the same as climbing Everest?
No- there has to be a limit on how derivative an activity can be and still be considered a "thing " in its own right. I
Re: Crossfit [mrtopher1980]
[ In reply to ]
mrtopher1980 wrote:
stop2think wrote:
mrtopher1980 wrote:
dirtymangos wrote:
Triathlon training, however, is a systematic process for achieving this "ridiculous" and "arbitrary" goal.
For everyone? you are 100% positive that this is the case for everyone?
Quote:
Crossfit does not start out with a goal at all.
For everyone? you are 100% positive that this is the case for everyone?
I've met people personally who started crossfit with goals and I have met people who started triathlon with no goals.
Why is such a significant faction of this board so myopic? I can just see this very same thread on a crossfit board, with the crossfit and triathlon interchanged in Dirtymango's statement, and getting the exact same response. The sports have way more commonalities than they do differences; competitors in conventional sports are laughing at you both for treating exercise as a sport and having no real purpose/goals...and they would be ignorant as well.
My post is the exact opposite of being myopic... Possibly if you yourself were not so shortsighted you could see I was in no way defending either one.
You should work on the reading comprehension. I was responding in total agreement with you.
Re: Crossfit [dirtymangos]
[ In reply to ]
dirtymangos wrote:
trail wrote:
>Crossfit does not start out with a goal at all.
Sure it starts with a goal. The goal is to increase fitness, with the definition of fitness provided by Crossfit, e.g. a broad mix of strength, stamina, etc. Also I think there's an unstated goal to "look good."
Crossfit training is also highly structured and systematic.
>It starts out with a bunch of pointless activities.
Pointless to whom? That's an arbitrary judgment. Running for the sake of running faster is no more "meaningful" than doing pull-ups for the sake of doing more pull-ups.
(I'm not a Crossfitter, so have no real dog in this fight, I just find the vocal criticism to be odd. From my perception it's a little cultish, but also a healthy, time-efficient way to stay physically fit.)
Being "fit" as defined by crossfit?
That is circular or self referential.
I think a goal must have some external measure.
Running is a component of football, soccer, etc.
But it was also the very first sport. The first means of rapid transportation. It is a "thing" in and of itself.
Pull ups are good training for gymnastics and rock climbing.
But an end in themselves?
If so then, why not look at each of the components of pull ups?
To train for pull ups we will practice grabbing a bar, moving biceps etc.
Are those "sports."
How about thinking about doing pull-ups?
Could that be a valid "sport?"
Thinking is part of doing pull ups, and pull ups are good training for rock climbing, which is useful in mountaineering, which could take you to Everest.
So, thinking about doing a pull up is the same as climbing Everest?
No- there has to be a limit on how derivative an activity can be and still be considered a "thing " in its own right. I
So. Running in its form in triathlon is almost completely pointless for most conventional sports. Wasn't it Meb who ran a 14sec 100m on some athlete's sports challenge? At any distance relevant to other sports, virtually any NFL lineman would destroy a world class distance runner. Your argument is completely circular; crossfit and triathlon are one and the same in this regard.
Re: Crossfit [stop2think]
[ In reply to ]
stop2think wrote:
You should work on the reading comprehension. I was responding in total agreement with you.
Genuinely apologize, I wasn't picking it up at first but my brain is fried from some crap at work today, former customer of ours decided to play some games with trademarks and been dealing with that. Not an excuse my brain is just set to find negative right now I guess, sorry about that and I'll be leaving the internet for the night before I do it again.
stop2think wrote:
HomerJSimpson wrote:
I highly doubt yours as well. Keep going in circles if you like but again Olympic lifting is not a singular way of improving strength and power like you are arguing. I could just as easily put together a plyometric program which would be better for long jump or vertical improvement. Peace
I'm sure you are familiar with the maxim; I am going to stop arguing with the idiot....and then go tell my football players that we are going to run a 5k today.
Yea you can't argue with ignorance. The funny part about his last comment is, plyometrics is as big a part of crossfit as Olympic lifts. The fact many of the skill athletes now do crossfit type of workouts because of the combination of strength,power and conditioning the different workouts provide shows he is not very current on stuff. There are also hundreds of WODs that you never touch a weight so his absolute ignorance is very telling. But from his revelation schools and teams can get rid of their state of the art gyms and save a butt load of money.