corneliused wrote:
jackmott wrote:
Well more importantly is how the smaller 90 corner accelerations are overall *Easier* with a heavier aero wheel anyway.
About the only time this question even comes up is choosing tubies vs clinchers, (or maybe Flo vs ENVE) that is the only time intertia would be very different at the same degree of aeroness. But even then the weight hurts you 10 times worse than the inertia.
KevP wrote:
It will also be able to show why the smaller 90 deg corner accelerations don't add up to much, or the smaller accelerations over the minor elevation changes, passing etc.
Do I not understand what inertia is, or is this goobly gook? More mass=more weight,=more inertia, assuming a the same speed and g, no?
This is true for objects traveling in a straight line. Objects that are rotating also have an rotational inertia (similar to mass, but in a rotating context) based on their mass and how far that mass is from the axis of rotation.
Think of a figure skater doing a spin. As they move their arms/legs in they spin faster, even though their mass hasn't changed.
ECMGN Therapy Silicon Valley: Depression, Neurocognitive problems, Dementias (Testing and Evaluation), Trauma and PTSD, Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)