I looked at the SRM recalibration process at this link:
http://www.westwoodvelo.com/...;highlight=calibrate
With 165 mm cranks, my slope was calibrated at the factory at 19.2 Hz/N-m
I can't really see anything in this calculation that requires me to go through the entire process. It seems that all I should need to do is scale the slope by the ratio between 165mm and 170mm. Am I missing something in the math?
If I just swap out the crank arms, the only thing that changes in the entire calculation is the llength of the arm. The strain gauge in the SRM should basically be affected by length of the crank arm for a given weight, so if I know my starting slope with 165's a linear scaling should give just as much accuracy as going through the entire process? Then I just entire my newly calculate slope through linear scaling, zero out my SRM and "ride away" .
Anyway, I am not too worried about how accurate my SRM reads vs someone elses SRM or Powertap. It just needs to be consistent with itself, so in reality, I could just leave the slope number untouched (or insert a slope that gives me really high numbers) and have a new unit of power called "ST feel good watts". Then I can can have a 350 ST feel good Watt FTP and I just have to train and race using that consistently...then again, I'd feel really lame when I get on my computrainer :-(
Dev
http://www.westwoodvelo.com/...;highlight=calibrate
With 165 mm cranks, my slope was calibrated at the factory at 19.2 Hz/N-m
I can't really see anything in this calculation that requires me to go through the entire process. It seems that all I should need to do is scale the slope by the ratio between 165mm and 170mm. Am I missing something in the math?
If I just swap out the crank arms, the only thing that changes in the entire calculation is the llength of the arm. The strain gauge in the SRM should basically be affected by length of the crank arm for a given weight, so if I know my starting slope with 165's a linear scaling should give just as much accuracy as going through the entire process? Then I just entire my newly calculate slope through linear scaling, zero out my SRM and "ride away" .
Anyway, I am not too worried about how accurate my SRM reads vs someone elses SRM or Powertap. It just needs to be consistent with itself, so in reality, I could just leave the slope number untouched (or insert a slope that gives me really high numbers) and have a new unit of power called "ST feel good watts". Then I can can have a 350 ST feel good Watt FTP and I just have to train and race using that consistently...then again, I'd feel really lame when I get on my computrainer :-(
Dev
Last edited by:
devashish_paul: Jul 12, 10 15:01