tttiltheend wrote:
sub-3-dad wrote:
I'd say > 10% for all participants.
> 25% for the podium.
That is my wishful conservative estimate which implies that the podium can be clean.
Really depends on the level of competition. At local and regional races, I think you're overly pessimistic. At the top levels of the sport, that's a different matter. I regularly AG podium at races in the New England area and I'm clean and have no reason to believe that most or even all of my competition isn't clean either. Just don't see any amazing changes year to year or performances that seem superhuman, at least regionally in my geezer age group. But I'm no where near fast enough to podium at larger national races, and your estimate is probably reasonable for those events, after all, a well-known convicted doper is near the top of the national rankings in my AG.
Doping isn't cheap either. The doper is a different kind of beast psychologically to the cutter.
The cutter is a fraudster, a serial con artist, someone who runs a podium-based Ponzi scheme. Reading some of blogs from such is almost grotesque.
The doper is more of an obsessive addict, willing to lay health, risks, and rules in pursuit of the highest level of competitive grunt. The doper may also be part of a team initiative, team orders, needs the technical skills, enablers, yes men, and $ to pull it off etc. So I guess that is why it ranks "below" the cutter. You need to be a great athlete, but in a corrupt system. Certainly at the elite level, there is whole org chart around the doper.
Training Tweets:
https://twitter.com/Jagersport_com FM Sports:
http://fluidmotionsports.com