Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

IMWI vs IML Bike Profile
Quote | Reply
I can look at the profiles but I have a hard time undertsanding how they correlate to difficulty. I did IML this year so I have that as a baseline but want to hear from someone who's done both (IML & IMWI), how they compare for both hills and wind.

Thanks.
Quote Reply
Re: IMWI vs IML Bike Profile [tojunialto] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Wisco is harder, if not for just the fact that the roads are crap. A few more climbs in wisco in my perspective as well.

Visit The Chipotle Calorie Calculator
Quote Reply
Re: IMWI vs IML Bike Profile [tojunialto] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
courses are pretty similar, both have around the same elevation gain and both with the same kind of very short steep hills. wisconsin is slower though IMO as it has a lot more turns and the roads in general are alot worse, quite annoying at some parts.

=====================================
S�rgio Marques
When it hurts is when it feels good ;-)
Sergio-Marques.com
Quote Reply
Re: IMWI vs IML Bike Profile [tojunialto] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Wisconsin is absolutely the harder course. IMLOU bike seemed pretty damned ez to me in comparison. The one thing you won't see on the profile chart is how many f'in cars were on the IMLOU course.
jamie
Quote Reply