cwg_at_opc wrote:
i did read, and i'm not disagreeing with your technical acumen; 4nm dry bolt(s) hold my post fine.
your procedures and specs may be overkill here though.
would you agree that a torque wrench would be advised in this application(dry bolts)?
tigermilk wrote:
Re-read my post and see where 4 N-m just may not give you all you need to know...
Hint, 4 N-m doesn't fully define the procedure. There are a couple of key bits of information missing.
Problem with the dry assumption is how do you know it's dry? Just a small amount of lube makes a ton of difference. And is that 4 N-m above running torque or absolute? If that bolt has been cycled a few times you can expect wear particles to develop in the threads, increasing running torque, dropping nut factor, reducing preload, etc. Also, dry surfaces have unbelievable scatter associated with them (I've seen +/-30-40% in preload in tests I've done on NAS fasteners with various dry/lube conditions and even higher in JPL data).
Torque wrench for this application? I would ask the vendor (assuming the clamp, seat post, and bolt are all OEM and in an as-received state) the proper procedure so I know how the joint should function. But personally I would lube it to reduce the scatter (well lubed threads/heads do wonders for reducing scatter), apply some torque, try to twist the seat, and if it moves apply a little more. Take for a test ride and make sure it doesn't slip. I'd prefer to creep up on it for carbon bits. Now if it were all metal parts? Crank the crap out of it and hope I don't shear the bolt.