I recently traveled with my bicycle in a Scion AeroComfort bag. I've used it over 10 times before with no problems. Upon receiving the bike back from oversized luggage I checked the wheels. My disc had huge dents in, which were not there before. It was in mint condition. Additionally, my helmet was also placed within a travel bag within the bike bag and the visor was cracked in two.
Additionally, I found that my rear derailleur was so far bent in that I couldn't even spin my rear wheel because it would get caught in. I made the claim right there for those and they filled out the form and gave me a case number. I told them I would have the bike examined at a bike shop and potentially add more to the claim. They said ok and that they would contact me soon because their head guy who deals with damage claims was out for a couple days.
I dropped my bike off and found out that it was a total loss (cracked frame, post, seat stay) and it would be around 7,500 to replace everything. The airline also called back and they said because there was no damage to the bag on the outside, they feel no they have no liability to the damage or claim. To me, this makes no sense. Just because something on the outside isn't damaged doesn't mean the inside cannot be damaged. For example anything that gets mailed, the packaging could be fine, but the inside could easily be damaged.
The airline said my next step was to go to the HQ department and I can appeal the airport branch decision. Was hoping for any observation I am missing before, reasonable thinking that has flown from my brain, or something i should know before I go make my appeal/complaint/wine to the HQ.
Thanks
Additionally, I found that my rear derailleur was so far bent in that I couldn't even spin my rear wheel because it would get caught in. I made the claim right there for those and they filled out the form and gave me a case number. I told them I would have the bike examined at a bike shop and potentially add more to the claim. They said ok and that they would contact me soon because their head guy who deals with damage claims was out for a couple days.
I dropped my bike off and found out that it was a total loss (cracked frame, post, seat stay) and it would be around 7,500 to replace everything. The airline also called back and they said because there was no damage to the bag on the outside, they feel no they have no liability to the damage or claim. To me, this makes no sense. Just because something on the outside isn't damaged doesn't mean the inside cannot be damaged. For example anything that gets mailed, the packaging could be fine, but the inside could easily be damaged.
The airline said my next step was to go to the HQ department and I can appeal the airport branch decision. Was hoping for any observation I am missing before, reasonable thinking that has flown from my brain, or something i should know before I go make my appeal/complaint/wine to the HQ.
Thanks