noofus wrote:
Thomas Gerlach wrote:
Challenge will keep Ironman on its toes and that is a good thing for all Ironman participants and Ironman races. I just have a really tough time understanding your hate towards Challenge and the constant need to bash this event at every turn.
As for me, I for one am looking forward to the event. I have done many many IM races but this is my first Challenge event. So far the Challenge organization has been nothing but a pleasure to work with and I'm really looking forward to the event. And don't get me wrong, I will reiterate that I am a huge fan of Ironman as well and I have received far more from them than Challenge thus far.
I have no hatred or ill will towards the WTC, but one of the reasons I signed up for this one was precisely because I knew that the WTC needs competition. Between Rev3 and Challenge, we are starting to see the makings of a healthy market. I wanted to support and encourage that. Whats it going to be like this weekend? Is it going to be the "everybody is a rock star" treatment we get at a WTC race? I dont know. I am willing to find out.
This is going to be a much smaller field than a typical IM. I am fine with that. I tend to do obscure races anyway. I race the half at Bassman and find myself nearly alone out on the course on occasion. I am fine with that too. I am not in it for the "experience", although that can be fun. I just like to race.
No clue why the hate from sinkinswimmer, it seems entirely unwarranted.
At the moment the weather is predicted to be near perfect for Sunday with a likely wetsuit-legal swim and a not too hot day. I am pumped for this and ready to go!
Kind of simple. I think Atlantic City was a bad selection and I think most of what I have seen about the race has been mishandled. But if you think I hate this race, you ought to see my thoughts on Ironman Maryland, which have the same tone. Similarly, I am pretty pumped about a possible Ironman Muskoka and would be thrilled if Challenge put a race some where like Vermont, or Colorado. I fact, if you dig you will find posts from me about Challenge St. Andrews that are pretty positive (at least I think they were). I was very excited that Challenge was coming. I just think Challenge AC and IM Maryland are really bad selections, and hey, guess what, I am exercising my right to say so. But, what have I said that is incorrect? Anything? Is Challenge signficantly cheaper than any other WTC event as suggested by the WTC-haters on this thread? No. Is the Challenge course as interesting as any course in IM circuit? Personal choice, of course, but seriously, does ANYONE think it is? Is their organization really better than WTC? Not from what I have seen. I am just holding them to the standard you all seem to want set for them.
. I really do not care if the sport grows. I do not think it is growing. I think it has reached its peak, but I do know that putting on more and more mediocre races is not likely to grow the sport. I do not think the sport benefits from bad races any more than the car industry benefitted from the Yugo. I asked the RD one simple question a while ago when I was considering this race: How are you going to keep the masses from interfering with the run? I got back the typical (from them) line that "everything will be world class." So, my gripes with the race are (1) Atlantic City, and (2) crowd control. I am pretty sure I have even said, that if everything goes off great, GREAT. I may even do the race next year. But think about this. What if the guys at Challenge read this board and want to prove me wrong, and actually figure out a way to keep the fat slobs trying to get to the beach from interfering with the race. Then, you are welcome.
And once again...good luck to all racing. I honestly do hope it goes well for everyone.