DaveRoche wrote:
"Also, money does not drive doping. The wish to win, or even just improve/look good does.
Just take a look at a HS or college football team and you know they are on roids."
I agree and disagree. My take is that sophisticated, difficult-to-detect doping is almost always driven by cash money. Those HS/college teams would get bagged with the first pee test, let alone the bio passport.
Generally, I think pros dope to make a living, amateurs dope for ego (though there's certainly some mix-up between those generalizations)
Remember that most countries do not have the pro vs AG like here in the USA. If you are good you make money, but you do not have a pro class.
Most people that use doping do not compete. They use it to look better or to be stronger. Just look at steroid use at any HS or university. It is actually really easy to make steroids, you can make it at home.
When it comes to sport the drive to succeed is as strong among older athletes as younger. Just look at old dudes racing bikes.
Doping a a sport problem, not just a pro problem. If you can cheat with no testing at HS, why stop later in life.