Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Prev Next
New Conti Supersonics roller tested (surprise)
Quote | Reply
 
You might recall I tested some Conti SS before. They both had distinct flat spots and rolled very poorly. Well today I got some new ones from starbike.com. Here are the latest results.

Conti Supersonic (#1) 54 watts .00289
Crono CS tubular on Z4 (404) 55 watts .00294
Crono CS tubular on 808 (#1) 55 watts .00294
Corsa Speed on Super 9 disk 47 watts .00251
Conti Supersonic (#2) 53 watts .00284
Crono CS tubular on 808 (#2) 55 watts .00294
Conti TT 59 watts .00316

All clinchers were 23C with an 18-20C Michelin latex tube. PSI was 115 (I felt like I should obey the minimum pressure guidance for the Crono).

All of these numbers are in line with previous tests, except the Supersonics, which did vastly better. In my last test with the old SSs, they were significantly slower than the TT. Now that's reversed.

My latest book: "Out of the Melting Pot, Into the Fire" is on sale on Amazon and at other online and local booksellers
Quote Reply
Re: New Conti Supersonics roller tested (surprise) [jens] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jens wrote:

You might recall I tested some Conti SS before. They both had distinct flat spots and rolled very poorly. Well today I got some new ones from starbike.com. Here are the latest results.

Conti Supersonic (#1) 54 watts .00289
Crono CS tubular on Z4 (404) 55 watts .00294
Crono CS tubular on 808 (#1) 55 watts .00294
Corsa Speed on Super 9 disk 47 watts .00251
Conti Supersonic (#2) 53 watts .00284
Crono CS tubular on 808 (#2) 55 watts .00294
Conti TT 59 watts .00316

All clinchers were 23C with an 18-20C Michelin latex tube. PSI was 115 (I felt like I should obey the minimum pressure guidance for the Crono).

All of these numbers are in line with previous tests, except the Supersonics, which did vastly better. In my last test with the old SSs, they were significantly slower than the TT. Now that's reversed.

Can you explain what the numbers mean (54vs59watts and the .00289 vs .00316)? How are you testing these?
Quote Reply
Re: New Conti Supersonics roller tested (surprise) [jens] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
No surprise about the Corsa Speed...The new "Boss" has arrived.
As far as the SS...I've always found it illogical that the TT could be faster with regard to having the "safety shield".
That being said...I would feel more confident with the TT than the SS...I think.
Thanks Jens...much appreciated
Quote Reply
Re: New Conti Supersonics roller tested (surprise) [Bernoullitrial] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
X2

It's taken me enough nads to pick up some tt's instead of the usual gp4ks....supersonics for tris? The new ones have anymore flat protection?
Jens so now we have 2 data points. Is it safe to say the first lot were just a dud tire and not the norm?
Quote Reply
Re: New Conti Supersonics roller tested (surprise) [Mike Alexander] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Mike Alexander wrote:

Can you explain what the numbers mean (54vs59watts and the .00289 vs .00316)? How are you testing these?


Sorry. I should have spelled that out for people who haven't followed these tests in the past.

The watts numbers are the power that is required to spin the rear wheel on rollers at 25mph.

The .00289 and .00316 are rolling resistance coefficients (sometimes referred to as "Crr"). As really rough rule of thumb, each .0001 difference translates to about a watt of power when you're going 23-28mph. So a pair of tires with a Crr of .000316 will take about 2.7 watts more power to go 25 mph than tires that have a Crr of .00289.

My latest book: "Out of the Melting Pot, Into the Fire" is on sale on Amazon and at other online and local booksellers
Last edited by: jens: Apr 17, 17 20:32
Quote Reply
Re: New Conti Supersonics roller tested (surprise) [coates_hbk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
coates_hbk wrote:
Is it safe to say the first lot were just a dud tire and not the norm?

I think that's real safe to say. The first ones had very obvious flat spots. One was so bad, it actually hurt to ride on rollers with it. The ones I tested today were smooth as could be - not a hint of flatspotting.

The problem: how do you know if you have good ones or bad ones? I got the bad ones in February, so it's not like they're real old. (to their credit, Radial Cycles accepted the return). I think you have to test them on rollers or spin them, to look for flat spots......

My latest book: "Out of the Melting Pot, Into the Fire" is on sale on Amazon and at other online and local booksellers
Quote Reply
Re: New Conti Supersonics roller tested (surprise) [Bernoullitrial] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Bernoullitrial wrote:
No surprise about the Corsa Speed...The new "Boss" has arrived.
As far as the SS...I've always found it illogical that the TT could be faster with regard to having the "safety shield".
That being said...I would feel more confident with the TT than the SS...I think.
Thanks Jens...much appreciated

Now we just need to know how aero it is! Pretty impressive at how much lower in watts and Crr it is over the SS and TT.
Quote Reply
Re: New Conti Supersonics roller tested (surprise) [jens] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I know this isn't totally germane to the discussion, but is the Corsa Speed the tire that is supposedly impossible to get on? Is that the tire that dkennison and slowman just basically walked away from at a wind tunnel? Have you had issues mounting for your tests?

------------------------------------------------------------
Any run that doesn't include pooping in someone's front yard is a win.
Quote Reply
Re: New Conti Supersonics roller tested (surprise) [jens] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jens wrote:
You might recall I tested some Conti SS before. They both had distinct flat spots and rolled very poorly. Well today I got some new ones from starbike.com. Here are the latest results.

Conti Supersonic (#1) 54 watts .00289
Crono CS tubular on Z4 (404) 55 watts .00294
Crono CS tubular on 808 (#1) 55 watts .00294
Corsa Speed on Super 9 disk 47 watts .00251
Conti Supersonic (#2) 53 watts .00284
Crono CS tubular on 808 (#2) 55 watts .00294
Conti TT 59 watts .00316

All clinchers were 23C with an 18-20C Michelin latex tube. PSI was 115 (I felt like I should obey the minimum pressure guidance for the Crono).

All of these numbers are in line with previous tests, except the Supersonics, which did vastly better. In my last test with the old SSs, they were significantly slower than the TT. Now that's reversed.

So the Corsa is tested in a disc but what wheel did you use with the SS? I think a Spoked wheel should be about 5-6 watts slower than the disc. Any chance you could put an SS on the same disc and run that (assuming it was tested on a different wheel)?
Quote Reply
Re: New Conti Supersonics roller tested (surprise) [jens] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jens wrote:

The problem: how do you know if you have good ones or bad ones? I got the bad ones in February, so it's not like they're real old. (to their credit, Radial Cycles accepted the return). I think you have to test them on rollers or spin them, to look for flat spots......

Jens: can you add the manufacture date to your post for the Contis?
http://www.continental-tires.com/bicycle/service/faq/tyre-construction
Quote Reply
Re: New Conti Supersonics roller tested (surprise) [CCF] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
CCF wrote:
I know this isn't totally germane to the discussion, but is the Corsa Speed the tire that is supposedly impossible to get on? Is that the tire that dkennison and slowman just basically walked away from at a wind tunnel? Have you had issues mounting for your tests?


Supposedly. I am not particularly "ept" mechanically, and I manage it. It's particularly hard on the Hed wheels for some reason. If I thought I might need to change one in a race, I might consider a different tire. In my races, a flat means the race is over, so I don't really care.


grumpier.mike wrote:

So the Corsa is tested in a disc but what wheel did you use with the SS? I think a Spoked wheel should be about 5-6 watts slower than the disc. Any chance you could put an SS on the same disc and run that (assuming it was tested on a different wheel)?


I've previously tested the Corsa on the same spoked wheel as the TT and the SS. Crr on the disk is .00016 better -- about a watt and a half. And I don't think that has anything to do with the disk itself. It's more likely a drivetrain or bearing difference. I've done tests spinning a spoked wheel and a disk on the workstand up to 30mph. Despite what most people believe, the power difference is not measurable (less than 1 watt). Of course that changes when you have a 30mph wind blowing at the wheel.

lanierb wrote:

Jens: can you add the manufacture date to your post for the Contis?
http://www.continental-tires.com/bicycle/service/faq/tyre-construction


It looks like 11/16, though it could be 12/16.

My latest book: "Out of the Melting Pot, Into the Fire" is on sale on Amazon and at other online and local booksellers
Last edited by: jens: Apr 17, 17 22:25
Quote Reply
Re: New Conti Supersonics roller tested (surprise) [jens] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Maybe I missed it but what wheel was the SS and TT tested on?

blog
Quote Reply
Re: New Conti Supersonics roller tested (surprise) [jens] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Guess I need to man up and try to wrestle a Corsa Speed onto my Jet disc before Saturday's TT. I have an older gen Supersonic on there but it's in it's last days
Quote Reply
Re: New Conti Supersonics roller tested (surprise) [stevej] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
stevej wrote:
Maybe I missed it but what wheel was the SS and TT tested on?


First, thanks for the explanation on the measurements! Also.....why not test the TT and SS on the disc as well? Lastly, where would you say the Corsa Speed falls in the flat protection category compared to Conti.....more like the SS or TT?
Last edited by: Mike Alexander: Apr 18, 17 4:07
Quote Reply
Re: New Conti Supersonics roller tested (surprise) [Mike Alexander] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The Corsa is more like the SS, no protection belt.
Quote Reply
Re: New Conti Supersonics roller tested (surprise) [coates_hbk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
coates_hbk wrote:
X2

It's taken me enough nads to pick up some tt's instead of the usual gp4ks....supersonics for tris? The new ones have anymore flat protection?
Jens so now we have 2 data points. Is it safe to say the first lot were just a dud tire and not the norm?

I think it is entirely possible that there were some SNAFU with the original production process of the new tire. Like many things in life, it does not pay to buy the first one off the line. Logic would say the Supersonic should roll faster than the TT.


Save: $50 on Speed Hound Recovery Boots | $20 on Air Relax| $100 on Normatec| 15% on Most Absorbable Magnesium

Blogs: Best CHEAP Zwift / Bike Trainer Desk | Theragun G3 vs $140 Bivi Percussive Massager | Normatec Pulse 2.0 vs Normatec Pulse | Speed Hound vs Normatec | Air Relax vs Normatec | Q1 2018 Blood Test Results | | Why HED JET+ Is The BEST value wheelset
Quote Reply
Re: New Conti Supersonics roller tested (surprise) [jens] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Is (are) there a typo(s) here?
Quote Reply
Re: New Conti Supersonics roller tested (surprise) [Mike Alexander] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Mike Alexander wrote:
stevej wrote:
Maybe I missed it but what wheel was the SS and TT tested on?


First, thanks for the explanation on the measurements! Also.....why not test the TT and SS on the disc as well? Lastly, where would you say the Corsa Speed falls in the flat protection category compared to Conti.....more like the SS or TT?

Mike, IMHO the open-tubular cotton based tubulars are much less durable. I believe the cotton threads are much easier to cut than the Conti casing. However, what has me considering the switch is if they can be tubeless than should significantly up the protection assuming it can seal a small puncture.


Save: $50 on Speed Hound Recovery Boots | $20 on Air Relax| $100 on Normatec| 15% on Most Absorbable Magnesium

Blogs: Best CHEAP Zwift / Bike Trainer Desk | Theragun G3 vs $140 Bivi Percussive Massager | Normatec Pulse 2.0 vs Normatec Pulse | Speed Hound vs Normatec | Air Relax vs Normatec | Q1 2018 Blood Test Results | | Why HED JET+ Is The BEST value wheelset
Quote Reply
Re: New Conti Supersonics roller tested (surprise) [jens] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Thanks for the data Jens. Wow that Corsa Speed is fast. I'm a bit intimidated by the prospect of mounting one but that's just too much "free speed" for a guy like me to walk away from.
Quote Reply
Re: New Conti Supersonics roller tested (surprise) [jens] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Do you still plan to do real world testing (on the road) with different pressures? While this is great data, I have to believe getting the pressure correct is actually more important than choosing between any of these fast tires.
Quote Reply
Re: New Conti Supersonics roller tested (surprise) [Sean H] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Sean H wrote:
Do you still plan to do real world testing (on the road) with different pressures? While this is great data, I have to believe getting the pressure correct is actually more important than choosing between any of these fast tires.


Have you checked out Josh (Silca) data on this? Based on his showing, better to err on the low side than high side but you are talking about less than a <1 for 10 psi window. That is a pretty big target on say a HED JET PSI. Called at 85PSI for me at 155 lbs on skinny race tires.

https://silca.cc/...stance-and-impedance


Save: $50 on Speed Hound Recovery Boots | $20 on Air Relax| $100 on Normatec| 15% on Most Absorbable Magnesium

Blogs: Best CHEAP Zwift / Bike Trainer Desk | Theragun G3 vs $140 Bivi Percussive Massager | Normatec Pulse 2.0 vs Normatec Pulse | Speed Hound vs Normatec | Air Relax vs Normatec | Q1 2018 Blood Test Results | | Why HED JET+ Is The BEST value wheelset
Quote Reply
Re: New Conti Supersonics roller tested (surprise) [Thomas Gerlach] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yes I have read that and have been riding at 85-90psi on hed + rims (162 lbs). But I believe Jens disagrees with this low pressure trend and has said he's going to be doing some testing on it.
Quote Reply
Re: New Conti Supersonics roller tested (surprise) [jens] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
thank you for the testing, you now have me thinking i should run a SS on rear as well as the front!

2024: Bevoman, Galveston, Alcatraz, Marble Falls, Santa Cruz
Quote Reply
Re: New Conti Supersonics roller tested (surprise) [Sean H] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Sean H wrote:
Yes I have read that and have been riding at 85-90psi on hed + rims (162 lbs). But I believe Jens disagrees with this low pressure trend and has said he's going to be doing some testing on it.

It would be interesting to see what Jens comes up with. I do notice that you mention "low pressure trend", and I know Jens is relatively new getting back into the sport from what I understand. When Jens was riding back then it was 13mm ID IIRC is standard. I don't think we are necessarily talking about a "low pressure trend", I think what this is about is adjustment for the wider rims, 21mm in case of the HED JET+. If you talk to the average person (the masses) they don't even know they are supposed to lower tire pressures with the wider rims. As a result you have the masses by and a large being the disseminator of information, often old and trailing advice.

To me the most important thing from Silca piece is that rolling resistance continues to falling, with higher pressures, until it doesn't. In which case there is a big jump. Anyone pumping these HED JET+ to 100 PSI should quickly realize how much they are skipping over the ground, or at least on the roads where I am at. To say 120 psi is the fastest result would be shocking and run contrary to what Silca testing shows but I am all for more information so I hope Jens can do it.


Save: $50 on Speed Hound Recovery Boots | $20 on Air Relax| $100 on Normatec| 15% on Most Absorbable Magnesium

Blogs: Best CHEAP Zwift / Bike Trainer Desk | Theragun G3 vs $140 Bivi Percussive Massager | Normatec Pulse 2.0 vs Normatec Pulse | Speed Hound vs Normatec | Air Relax vs Normatec | Q1 2018 Blood Test Results | | Why HED JET+ Is The BEST value wheelset
Quote Reply
Re: New Conti Supersonics roller tested (surprise) [Sean H] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Sean H wrote:
Yes I have read that and have been riding at 85-90psi on hed + rims (162 lbs). But I believe Jens disagrees with this low pressure trend and has said he's going to be doing some testing on it.


When he does, I would encourage him to come up with a way to test at his typical race speeds. The energy input to the tires from the road surface goes up as a function of the speed. Low speed hill climbs, or protocols that don't reach those speeds, may not "see" the breakpoint pressure effect.

http://bikeblather.blogspot.com/
Last edited by: Tom A.: Apr 18, 17 7:38
Quote Reply

Prev Next