STeaveA wrote:
If he goes to the hall of fame I'd say that says more about the lowering criteria to get in there and the heavy emphasis on "culture of personality" now. (Hardest slap shot contest should certainly not be a criteria) as they say in golf: drive for show, putt for dough
There us a reason he only wonthe Paul Norris trophy once. He simply wasn't a well rounded defenseman.
People get real passionate around the Boston, but an objective, knowledgeable hockey fan would not regonize him as an all time great
I hate to derail this thread even further, as I think it's great that we're talking about Chara and that he has takin a liking to triathlons. It's always great to have "famous" people in the sport to help it grow. But I do need to chime in about your comments that the everyday hockey fan would not recognize him as a great.
I don't think you're giving him the credit he deserves. Chara was an absolute force in his prime (which lasted for about 14 of his 24-season career).
He was feared on defense, he could clear the net as good as anyone, and was rarely beaten in the corners. Who wouldn't want a 6'9' beast protecting their end. He could PK, go on the PP, was out there in the last minute down by 1 and he could fight. Not sure how much mroe well rounded you can get.
Offensively, 1680 GP's, 209 goals, 471 apples for a .41 PPG and a career +301 = HOF numbers.
The hall committee looks at longevity, leadership and hardware.
1 Cup
1 Norris
1 Mark Messier leadership award
1 Silver at 2000 Worlds
The man's a first ballot HOF every time.
As for the "legend" comment. I believe that is partial to geography. He is definitely a legend in the NE part of the country and most of Canada.
He did tons of work in the community wherever he played and donated a lot to many charities throughout his career.
I know everyone has their own opinion and I appreciate that, but when it comes to numbers and stats, they don't lie.
Hope to race against him one day.
Cheers