In Reply To:
reactions:
i don't think you should assume that raising the saddle 2.5cm is going to give you the same benefit on the low-diver as it did, or may, on the compatto. my reasoning is as follows:
at the higher saddle height on the compatto, that saddle height was part of an overall position that got you to a hip angle producing (what i think is) your best efficiency over a threshold-ish distance. if you simply raise your saddle on the low-diver position, you'll take an already acute 97° and make it -- what? -- 95°? in so doing i think the extra leverage you get by raising the saddle may be overcome or canceled by squeezing your hip.
Well...actually, Dan (and this is what I was trying to explain on the original Jens FIST thread), when he raises his seat to the PROPER HEIGHT with the "diver" position, THAT'S when he'd have an angle of 97 deg. With the low seat, his "true" angle (based on how close his leg came up to his torso) was actually more equivalent to 95 degrees, or so. The reason being is that you use a "proxy" for the angle and ASSUME that the seat height is correct...if it's not, and low, the "true" angle will actually be tighter since for a given torso orientation his leg will be coming closer at the top of the stroke.
So, by raising the seat 2.5cm and also the bars, he then get's into a TRUE 97 deg position, which should see an improvement since that's better than something less, like ~95 deg. or so.
But, if your theory is correct (which, with my own "farting around" on my TT position, looks to be working for me as well ) it won't be as good as the compatto's 100 deg from a power production standpoint...and it looks like Jens' experience today matches that. :-)
http://bikeblather.blogspot.com/