caf0 wrote:
Personally I'd react more positively if the resume said "Ironman competitor" or "Triathlete".
"Ironman Finisher" makes me wonder: Is this someone who is satisfied with simply accomplishing a task, rather than someone driven to do their best while accomplishing a task?
I'd have a series of questions to uncover that answer.
"Marathon runner" or "Runner": positive.
"Marathon finisher": ?
That's just me, though. The resume would neither move up nor down based on that phrase.
Here is another thought.
In High School and University, the guy or girl who played varsity sports and got straight A's was the hero.
The business world does not have these quantifiable metrics as there are in high school and university where excellence is clearly rewarded and to some degree mediocrity is punished. In the business world, to some degree, there is a lot of mediocrity that is accepted as there is often not a direct way to quantifying relative merit, unless you are working in a sales or executive position where the numbers speak.
You might be interviewing with someone in the mediocre camp, who was in that group in high school and university. They probably really don't want that many people on their team who played varsity sports and got A's in French and Calculus and Renaissance History, and also partied pretty hard and pulled it all off.....it makes them feel threatened. That's great....you don't want to work there either. You want to work for the guys who did play varsity and were top of their class. They will see the value of your athletic pursuits, because they know from a young age what excellence is all about. It was driven into their heads in youth. They will get it.