Thomas Gerlach wrote:
I think you are interpreting it incorrectly. 22% warmer than 99 degrees is 122 degrees. Honestly, I don't know why they put that drag number on there, there isn't enough detail for data geeks to understand anyway, and the average joe doesn't care about grams of drag or watts even, they care about how many seconds it will save in an Ironman.
Saving 25 seconds over an Ironman over the Air Attack is huge and that assumes 250 watts. Age-groupers are not riding 250 watts in an Ironman so you are going to save even more time in an Ironman at 180-200 watts. Regardless you aren't going to find that sort of time very easily or cheaply with anything else and the beauty is that it is testing fast on everyone. I don't think it is an surprise that even the pro athletes are letting helmet contracts lapse knowing that the Rudy Project helmet is costing them 25 seconds. And to be fair we are comparing an aero helmet versus a new aero helmet so gains are smaller but think about people making the comparison of switching aero bike to new super aero bike. You aren't going to get the same value like in the upgrade from this helmet.
As far as the chart goes, yes the 22% in terms of heat is meaningless
But to go further how meaningless this manufacturer data is, if it's 15w then it isn't 25s on a IM. If it's 25s on a IM, it isn't 15w. Their data doesn't make sense. My testing shows less than 15w and more than 25s. As do other aero helmets.
While the aerohead and AA are the helmets we use the most for testing (for other reasons) I do test 2 other aero helmets and while the Aerohead is faster it certainly wasn't leaps and bounds faster. If you have $500 in your pocket, you will probably be able to get more aero with a A2 and $400 left over for other goodies.