Thanks for the response - really appreciate it!
We are working on some other versions for the short course triathletes and TT riders but already the drag of the FoodCell is very low and in-line with most other carriers on the market (we have been doing a lot of work on this some CFD images attached). We have found the biggest issue for athletes is trying to get product (Gels/Bars etc) out of current designs whilst staying aero and being able to hold enough food for the longer course athletes).
If you have to sit-up on your tri/TT bike to get them out or cannot get in enough gels to get the energy you need to get you though your event, all the aero in the world won't help. We hope we have deliverered that happy medium between a really aero design and being functional.
Of course those looking for no addition drag such as a 10mile or 25 mile TT rider would likely have maybe 1 gel or no gels - then we 100% agree don't put on the bike. But Ironman triathletes already hide much of any drag by placing on hydration units such as these great products:
https://tinyurl.com/kv3vspl https://tinyurl.com/lysoqut In the same way most aero road bikes still have a head tube that masks any food carrier. So in reality that will be almost no difference in drag for 99% of users unless they have a head tube that is level with the top tube on the bike. In addition we are talking about a road bike as on a TT or trip bike the arms will be infant of the FoodCell again masking a significant amount of any air flow. The same is true for other carriers.
https://tinyurl.com/n34gkef Im attaching some images taken today to help out with what the FoodCell look like in real life and other similar products on the market.
So aerodynamics can be important but I think we always need to apply them in a real life practical situation. That was the whole issue for me developing this. I love Ironman triathlon but I need x number of gels and want to be able to stay in aero position.
Best of luck with your training and this season.
Regards Mark
FlowCell ltd