goldentech wrote:
1) Are the track guys really better athletes than the TDF sprinters?
Depends on what you mean by "track guys".
Track
sprint and track
endurance are totally different beasts. Someone like Cavendish is a track
endurance rider, not a track
sprinter. Even if he trained for it exclusively, Cav would get smoked in world class elite track
sprint competition.
goldentech wrote:
1) I thought the most talented track guys jumped to the road (like Kittel) where the money is.
Track
sprint riders who are successful that move over to road racing are pretty rare, e.g. Theo Bos, but not many do it, and Bos hasn't really made it to the higher echelons.
Kittel was never an elite track
sprinter. He started out as a junior road and MTB rider, indeed winning junior road time trial championships.
Most track riders that move over to the road are track
endurance riders, i.e. team pursuit, individual pursuit, points racing, scratch racing and the like. Riders like Wiggins, Cavendish, Phinney, Zabel, O'Grady, McGee etc etc.
No elite track
sprinter does those events, or at least not with any hope of being competitive. They are just not physiologically suited to it.
goldentech wrote:
2) Track cycling has massive barriers to entry that keeps the best athletes out of contention. Guys with Western African heritage (with a few notable exceptions) have filled out the 100m Olympic finals and most of the rosters of the power/speed sports where "real" money (football) is since those sports have modernized. Sprinting (running) requires almost no infrastructure or investment, and is contested by everyone, not just people with access to a purpose-built facility for a niche-of-a-niche sport. Everyone at one time or another gets into a sport where sprint ability is evaluated, if yoou are good, you keep going. Not everyone does a flying 200 on a fixed gear bike.
No one disagrees that riding a bike requires a bike, and that riding on a track requires a track.
Triathlon is pretty limited in its access to those with limited resources too.
In some countries though cycling tracks are very common. There are about 100 of them in Australia for instance. Most cities and towns have one. It doesn't need to be an expensive indoor facility. Most Australian track sprint talent for instance comes from local outdoor tracks.
However once you progress to elite world class, you pretty much need access to high end sports facilities no matter the sport.
goldentech wrote:
3) You're telling me the BMX guys can go toe-to-toe with the likes of Bolt in power/weight measurements? Again, BMX seems like a pretty narrow gene pool to be able to match the world-wide talent net cast for sprinting.
From numbers I've seen, yes they are in the same ballpark. Of course such events are joint angle and force specific, as well as many other traits that vary, so don't expect one to have pointy end success in the other exercise modality.
I saw one reference saying Bolt is estimated to have put out ~2.6kW for ~0.89 seconds shortly after the start of his sprint:
http://iopscience.iop.org/0143-0807/34/5/1227/ BMX elite (and cycling track
sprint elite) can be 2.2 - 2.4kW+ for peak power measured at cranks with at least 1 crank rotation of data (minimum of 1 second), and I would not be surprised if there are occasional measurement that are higher.
If you want to measure shorter duration power than that, well that's a bit trickier, and I've no doubt instantaneous power is much higher, e.g. peak torque is
roughly double the average torque of a full 360 degree pedal stroke. So an
instantaneous power level of well over 3kW would not surprise me.
You might be surprised to realise how close much of the talent pool is. The differences are often pretty small.